disobedientmedia.com
GUCCIFER 2.0 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS, RIGHT?
Ya it means Seth Rich was the leaker and he was killed for it en.wikipedia.org
More likely than not.
F
HIS
>living in history
NAME
WAS
WAS
SETH
F
>Forensicator
literally who?
>blogspot blog
lmao
>en.wikipedia.org
PACK IT UP BOYS
THIS THEORY HAS BEEN DEBUNKED
bump
the motherfucking slide is real boys
RICH
Inside leaks were more likely than outside intrusion.
That or someone on the inside left the door wide open.
HIS
DIED LIKE A BITCH
He was more man than you'll ever be. Back into your hole (you).
makes sense to me
>WAS AN INSIDE JOB! YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS
Guccifer 2.0 always stunk of an inside job. (What hacker would choose that name, anyway?) Those leaks are not the same as the DNC leaks.
WILD RIDE TEIM
It is Bubs...
bump
Die human scum!
Just confirms what we knew all along. They cleaned he's assassination too well unfortunately. Normies will just shrug it off.
But this also means the DNC was not hacked ? So what is all the Russian hack shit ? I still don't believe all the intelligence agencies were lying.
Her servers were already pretty wide open for outside network intrusion.
the intelligence agencies aren't lying, crowdstrike lied and the intelligence agencies are using them as a source, even though they know crowdstrike lied. they're doing this to absolve themselves of any blame once all this shit finally hits the fan
Sure. The point is the data couldn't be downloaded that quickly from the outside.
Follow?
This
>Debunked
>No evidence
OK
Do read this tho:
scribd.com
Everything in the G2. 0 leak was weak sauce. Nothing was incriminating. Seth didn't leak that shit the dnc did. Seth leaked the wiki. Prove me wrong.
Pretty sure the fucker was being ironic, fucker.
Thanks for the link though.
>They cleaned he's assassination too well unfortunately
They cleaned up the crime scene. That doesn't mean SR didn't leave something behind. He was part of a movement, and he knew the risks. Look for a backup plan.
>crowdstrike lied and the intelligence agencies are using them as a source
Nice digits. Did the lie start with crowdstrike, or with the person or persons who hired them?...
You know it's fake when they reference both snopes and politifact when supporting their argument... Christ, can they get any more obvious?
Bump. For discussion.
Bump
>Pretty sure the fucker was being ironic, fucker.
LoL, didn't read past the supposed definition of "debunked" in that pic. Glad I went back tho.
Hmm I wonder what the implications of this are
can i get a quick, meme free run down?
The agencies weren't "lying".. You kind of have to parse their language pretty carefully. I think the CIA and FBI said something like "We trust crowstrike because we use them too. Their analysis looks correct"... it wasn't that they analysed the information themselves. They couldn't, because podesta wanted to hide the evidence.
I'd take Bill Cosby as a bartender and gas station sushi at the same time. Like at a party or something.
What's the cause of the left eye ptosis anyway? EMF resonance?
>en.wikipedia.org
Already been cucked by wikipedia.
>it's not lying if we refuse to talk about the truth
Talking to spooks is like talking to jews.
Doesn't wikipedia still say building 7 collapsed from fires in the basement?
>newsmediawatchdog.com
>disobedientmedia.com
Is this where you get your credible news from?
They're probably more reliable and transparent than CNN, if that's what you're wondering
Check out:
g-2.space
It's a fine british guy cracking the story.
It's almost like they ARE the Jews or something
I never hear of these sites
Are these sources credible?
Obviously with the people that hired them.
FBI asked for the DNC email server and DNC refused. They offered to hand their servers over to an impartial contractor, CS (a HRCC donor). CS investigation concludes two things:
1. DNC servers were targeted by IP localized to Eastern Europe and Russia
2. Software used to breach DNC server had a silhouette of a software previously used by Russian intelligence.
Despite reasonable humans knowing that this means exactly nothing a couple US intelligence agencies concurred with the CS report and thus spawned the Russia narrative.
>2017
>not knowing about Forensicator
Not always, they share the same manipulative linguistics, though.
Well since CNN and NYT and WaPo are CIA + HRC / DNC assets - real, journalism has found new homes .
F
Hey spooks, member when I told you a calendar year ago that this shit was an inside job?
How do you like me now?
...
Nice link! Thank you smart user!
>"Couldn't we just have the robot interface with the computer directly?"
>"Nah, it's more fun this way."
Find out who was still working in the DNC offices after 6:00 PM and you could narrow down who downloaded the data on their USB drive. Simple enuf, eh ?
...
Seth Rich.
BUMP
HOLY SHIT.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
I'M LAUGHING.
SO HARD. AT THIS. IT'S SO FUNNY.
AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
But it's fake.
Bump.
Seek help plz
I'd tell you to read a book but...
How many times does cnn and the rest of the msm need to be caught red handed lying, for you to get it?
Twice more? A hundred times more? A trillion times more?
Probably the last one.
...
Inside job
The projection is real.
...