Allowing the masses the right to self governance was a mistake

Allowing the masses the right to self governance was a mistake

Allowing the masses the right to propagate inherently destructive ideologies was an even greater mistake

>masses
nice code

White men are just as capable of being morons as anyone else

not an argument

Those are businesses, not "sharing".
Why are all communist mentally challenged?

well...they're not wrong

living standards have declined ridiculously and the kikes at the top are making out like bandits

...

Yes, but unlike communism, capitalism gives you the option to share or not. I personally don't like Uber so I don't use them and I have never had to use airbnb yet.

True. We can't even have a vietnamese scorpion BBQing board without redditfags ruining it.

Clearly the answer is MORE deregulation and MORE tax breaks for the rich, while cutting services to the poor.

Swollen amygdalas

And more socialist shit will help with that how...?

Those are volunteer and most of all, the people who give lifts are paid.

Have to vs want to you fucking idiot

"have to" is the operative phrase here.

Should've thought of that BEFORE setting up r/The_Donald

>Allowing the masses the right to self governance was a mistake
"yes"

That would be thanks to government control of the markets and the kikes running the federal reserve.

>Allowing the masses the right to self governance was a mistake

Well, good thing that never happened then.

These are just companies capitalizing on Communist ideals. Anyway, modern society is fucking absurd.

Monetization of your assets is the most primal form of democracy and capitalism. OP is retarded and this is a dumb thread. Uber and the "sharing economy" is a different beast in that it conducts predatory pricing and leverages poor lending standards to build a bad ecosystem who preys on weak legislation and consumer rights. it's no different then Amazon or Walmart, which is great for capital but poor for sustainable wage growth

Also this. Democracy (especially at scale) doesn't work.

Well, you pretty much HAVE to, since half the wage earners in US earn less than 30k

What makes you think I had anything to do with that sperg hole?

Let me guess: you live in a big city?

That's funny, I live in a capitalist country and I've never used those companies once. It's almost like capitalism is based on VOLUNTARY exchange.

You understand we have more regulations now than ever in history right? Corporations love regulations because they put smaller competitors out of business, giving them a defacto monopoly. Pharmaceutical companies, tobacco companies, the medical industry, and banks are prime examples of this. They spend millions in lobbying for a reason. Regulation is good for them.

Now THAT'S a false equivalency

>Allowing the masses the right to self governance was a mistake
Philosophers have been saying this for thousands of years.
Why is everyone starting to realize that democracies are a mistake?

Yes. They have duped Communists into voluntarily giving them their money because "sharing".

maybe socialists should stop being kike controlled anti white useful idiots who want to flood us with every coon sand nigger and spic while forcing to apologize for being white then

if Stalin came back to life they'd call him a problematic racist transphobic islamophophic white make and tell him to go to the bottom of the progressive stack

>modern society is free market capitalism
The meme to surpass all memes

>Allowing the masses the right to self governance was a mistake
>
>Allowing the masses the right to propagate inherently destructive ideologies was an even greater mistake


Can you and a family of 4 live in a one room apartment? This was life in stalinist era ussr. The situation improved but most SJWs and current western liberals would be in hate living in USSR. Current day republican would make it farther.

Benevolent monarchy is the best government for the white man. The Jews took orchestrated democracy in order to subvert European monarchies.

Stalin had shitty theory and even shittier praxis.

Good riddance.

>you HAVE to do something in order to survive
wow imagine that.

Communists live in a fantastical pipe dream of some non-existent utopia. They have no interest in critical examination of economics. It's more of a religion than economic theory.

>it's a historically ignorant ayncrap episode
So do I start insulting your non-existent intelligence before or after I bring up Standard Oil, and that monopolies existed and unduly influenced the government and people were bitching about them long before the regulations even existed?

Saying this in russia or most eastern bloc countries would earn you a free asswhooping compliments of former USSR

No. The free market capitalism society quickly burned down, and now the people in power know what's good for them.

you're right OP. that is why we need a fascist dictator to oven people like you

this, but deport shitskins first

>he still doesnt understand what it means to be forced to go work in Chernobyl because he got "free education"

Give me an example of large companies being able to create defacto monopolies without government support or intervention.

USSR succeeded in SPITE of Stalin, not because of him.

That's no argument for overregulating though.

>Standard Oil
Learn to read, dipshit.

No one is forcing anyone to use these services under capitalism. Capitalism does not mean it's bad to share

>is this nigga serious rite now.

They dont make shills like they used to.

>no regulation quickly ended in revolution
>heavy regulation ended in the regulations being subverted, eventually
It's like you're not supposed to play regulatory whack-a-mole, you're supposed to be running the industries yourself. You being the government/people.

...

>he still doesnt understand that in USSR ideas of free market ideas and services were encouraged to flourish standard of living but the businesses were still owned by the state

It's true.

Stalin was an idiot and wildly incompetent. Thank God he didn't manage to kill every single person around him who had the first fucking clue how to do anything.

Standard Oil Corporation. An incorporated business is legally protected by governments by allowing them to be treated as an individual which prevents individuals from being held liable for their actions other than typically one or two fall guys. You incorporate to protect yourself because the government will protect you for doing so. Next try

You know the dissolution of Standard made Kohn D. Rockefeller the richest man in the world. Not the actual monopoly. You are just like all the suckers who were duped into thinking they won some victory over the rich while make them more wealthy.

>has soviet flag
>shits on person who saved your faggy larpy ass in burgerstan from facism
>claims to be "proletarian" while blowing his parents money on a 4chin pass

Never come here. You will be hated. The average "john wayne republican" is more welcome here

I didn't say I agreed with what the government did.

kikes are selling you a shit sandwich with some honey mustard glaze over it, "tiny houses" for a low low price of $100k, nobody buys a car you have to Uber everywhere, if you have a nicer place by some miracle you rent it out to strangers for extra shekels via air bnb, "hipster minimalism" of just living on baked beans and rice in a shitty $3000 a month apartment in Brooklyn, white people can't even have kids so schlomo is advertising the child free lifestyle on mtv to normalize it, it's literally all a Jewish trick that the good goyim are embracing with a smile on their face, communists are anti white kikes but at least they see through schlomo's tricks instead of worshipping the Jewish casino of wall street and the free market

What the fuck are you blithering about, you cretin?

>saved your faggy larpy ass in burgerstan from facism
Oh look, it's this meme. Nice meme

Exactly. The whole argument for dissolution of Standard was that tbey held controlling shares in a bunch of companies and were not held directly accountable through their incorporated shelters. That's a great point that business stretching is inherently a government regulation as it had no meaning in the free beyond legal implications, such as being treated like an individual without actually being a tangible human being.

My friend, weve been living in tiny houses forever (commieblocks) while I like having unlimited hot water from the city steam plant i dont like the 3 weeks it doesnt work for maintenance in the summer.

Most burgers would be in hell not being able to control the tempurature

Businesses that are only even mildly successful because they shirk and ignore dozens of laws on the books relating to their fields.

"5 People Coins have been taken from your account and given to the state. Thanks Commrade for defending the bolshevik movement and down with capitalism :^)"

When Standard Oil was broken up by the gov it was already falling apart. They couldn't keep it together because of competition from Russia, other oil fields in Texas etc. and the value of Rockefeller shares went up in value after it was broken up. Point is that 'monopolies' (and most monopolies are created as a result of gov interference btw) that aren't created by the gov have always been broken up after a while historically as a result of technological advancement. If the gov weren't involved at all we would have less monopolies.

I'm not saying communism is the solution I'm merely noting that communists are the only ones who seem to have a valid criticism of our current situation and see through the marketing gimmicks.

Nice comeback. Almost like you don't have an intelligent response.
Let me phrase it simply for you. If a corporation wasn't able to sue for copyright infringement, or it wasn't required to go through a litany of government inspectors to get your product approved, wouldn't it be remarkably easy to undersea a large company like standard oil? How could you have a monopoly (or defacto monopoly) if people weren't required to follow certain rules?
Finally, what if when someone sold you something that got you injured or caused damage, you could after the guy who sold the product to you instead of having to go after the company (which has money set aside for this purpose and just considers it a mild annoyance)? Nobody would sell dangerous shit if they didn't have a multimillion dollar legal fund protecting them and the ability to hide behind paperwork.

>Belarus' s numbers still havent reached replacement levels from before the war
>meme
>have 3 relatives that were locked in a barn and shoahed (polish blood not ivrit)
Meme

You need to leave

do they not know what "have to" means?

>when you're so dumb you don't even realize this is inadvertently more of a critique of communism than capitalism.

"You have too much stuff so you're compelled to share that stuff to justify having that stuff."
In this case overconsumption is being tempered by market forces. In the case of communism its tempered with a hatchet by government, the difference being that in communism you're not even allowed to leverage buying too much house by renting out rooms because you're not allowed to buy too much house in the first place.

Got any more self-defeating arguments I can shoot down?

In america, we don't even remotely have a free market. There's literally more regulations now than ever before. The wall street kikes love it because (spoiler alert) regulations benefit big businesses.

Everyone seems to hold the beacon of truth most opinions are shit though

>have to
Those people are doing it out of choice, and profiting for themselves with their own property.

hahahahaha oh my god the lack of brain power of commies never ceases to amuse me.

It's a critique, it just hilariously isn't a critique of capitalism.

FYI people buy houses they can't afford to live in solo and rent out rooms intentionally.

It's called an apartment building. "OMG capitalism BTFO!"

> if everyone would just act exactly like how I want them to act then we wouldn't have any problems

Literally autism: the ideology.

Allowing women and niggers to have any more privileges than farm animals was definitely a mistake.

Allowing white men to govern themselves? Get back to me when they're given the chance.

People used to buy houses all the time and live in them solo all the time, either way living standards are circling the drain but people are being told to celebrate their shitty situation with a smile on their face by calling it "the sharing economy", it's a massive Jewish trick.

I didn't say I'd prefer totalitarian communism

I'd be happy with a federal government centered on the American constitution with a centralized autocracy or lifetime-appointed supreme leader to make fine-tune adjustments as needed.

None of this garbage where the entire guiding philosophy of the government can change depending on who got one more vote than the other guy