It's official: the Declaration of Independence is lib-cuck propaganda. Thomas Jefferson, or should I say, Thomas Lefterson, wrote this snowflake manifesto of politically correct garbage, such as, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal." What a load of SJW crap. This lefty propaganda also says that people should install a big nanny government on the principles that "seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." Oh great, he's trying to turn America into a safe space. If only King George had some Pepe memes he could have stopped this nonsense.
It's official: the Declaration of Independence is lib-cuck propaganda. Thomas Jefferson, or should I say...
Owen Hughes
Jaxon Cooper
Exactly. The English were right. This is like babies first red pill, come on man.
unqualified-reservations.blogspot.ca
Hunter Rogers
congrats on taking the bitterest pill of them all: the anglo pill
Samuel Parker
You joke, but you're actually correct. The USA is a mongrelized, cultureless mess of a "nation" filled with shitskins and internal strife.
Brandon Moore
Congratulations. You've reached the point of true enlightenment. The American system was designed to govern 200,000 Anglos, not 350,000,000 mongrels. The Founding Fathers should be considered immense failures, not successful nation builders. Their doctrine failed entirely.
Adam Lopez
I imagine OP thought he was being really clever and making a point that would trigger Sup Forums when he created this thread. I can only assume they're some left-wing dipshit from a board like Sup Forums or possibly Tumblr or R*eddit itself, with only the vaguest of ideas of what the politics of this board are like.
Jayden Cooper
Newfag caliber b8. Lurk moar
Jordan Howard
You shitskin, bro ?
Carson Cruz
The SJW version would have read, "All men should be equal." "And some men are more equal than others."
You're an idiot OP.
Connor Cooper
I haven't seen a shitskin in 2017 yet.
Samuel Lewis
Ah yes and your unwritten 'constitution' has given you laws which lock you up for saying nasty words online, knife bins, tv detector vans, and 40 year old 'child' rapefugees. But tell me more about how our constitution is flawed
Tyler Walker
ITT: Salty Cucks jealous of US success
William Ramirez
Bitch please I smell a bunch of faggot haters about, example "I hate America & there cuco Constitution with its silly free speech & right to beat arms". I bet it's so much better in Canada or Europe where mudslimes have installed sharia law & have mudslime patrols, I mean who would need to own GUN over there? Here is a picture of freedom bitches.
Bentley Allen
You realize your Constitution is a copy of the British Bill of Rights 1689? We don't have an "unwritten Constitution", we have thousands of written bits of legislation which dictate our Constitution.
en.wikipedia.org
Sound familiar? The Founding Fathers were rip off merchants.
Brandon Ward
>Rip-off
>Vastly more successful than the original
Andrew Phillips
Mate, you're 52% white, with an ex two term negro president, a conquered executive branch, senate, supreme court, and a 2-party system where neither are concerned about the negrofication of your country.
But yes, honestly, 100% my props on gun ownership. You won't use them until the second term of your 5th nigger president but America truly is unique in how you retained the right to bear arms though.
That doesn't make up for the rest of your broken system.
Ayden Bennett
Bait, but I'll bite
All men are CREATED equal, not the guarantee of being equal. It's the PERSUIT of happiness, not the guarantee of happiness.
In a truly Libertarian society there'd be no white genocide because welfare nigs and spics wouldn't be able to afford 5+ kids because of no gibs.
Josiah Ortiz
what most people do not get is that the legal definition of a "man" back then covered only the colonists themselves - men that could own land legally, men that could vote etc. Slaves were under a totally different classification, as they were not seen as the people that formed the backbone of the society, but rather as a tool used by the white colonists.
Nonetheless, if you take the entire Declaration of Independence verbatim, you'd see that the Founding Fathers actually had the best in mind for the Anglo-Saxon colonists ONLY. This guy gets it also tl;dr granting niggers and spics the same rights as the rest of the Anglo-Saxon 'murica was the biggest mistake
Adam Cook
Clearly both societies are flawed m8. As soon as the West started treating shitskins like people and importing them like exotic beasts, shit started going downhill. Look at the absolute state of the USA ever since desegregation and note the trend as the population has become more "diverse". Social tensions have been rising, degeneracy has become more commonplace, violence has been normalized, and so on. Whites are at the brink of becoming a minority there and it's only going to get worse. I don't know what you can do to stop it, but I hope you manage to pull something off, somehow.
And in Europe, we have migrants causing violent crime epidemics never before seen in the modern era, women no longer feel safe to walk the streets at night, terrorist attacks from the Religion of Peace feel like a weekly occurrence, it's all fucking crumbling down because we opened the gates and let the barbarians loose. Meanwhile, white liberal faggots make excuses for it all and then sleep at night feeling good about defending some brown cunt who will be utterly thankless for it.
Shit's fucked, my dude.
Brody Sullivan
>we have thousands of written bits of legislation which dictate our Constitution.
None of which give you something as simple as freedom of speech. Enjoy being jailed for dropping bacon near a mosque.
Jayden Powell
The right to freedom of speech is enshrined in around 10 bits of legislation. The Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701 most famously.
Sort of like the whole part of America where it was meant to be a white only nation, but later legislation ruined that, the same happened in regards to le """freedom of speech""""
Joseph Jenkins
It really isn't they just delude themselves into thinking it was.
youtube.com
Logan Fisher
a thousand loose leaf sheets scattered in different places doesn't equal a constituition. Your rights are not codified or enshrined in idenfifiable documents. That's why your 'bill of rights' is about as useful as tesco value toilet paper. Obviously the us legal system is based on Anglo common law notions, but to think we used your bill of rights for anything genuinely substantive is laughable. Your bill of rights talks about restrciting the crowns authority and rules about your joke of a legislature. Not really relevant to us. Notice how your bill of rights or constitution didn't give you proper freedom of speech. Wonderful document that one
Jace Watson
>Americans are so enamoured of equality, that they would rather be equal in slavery, than unequal in freedom
>Alexis De Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 1830
Charles Ward
>PERSUIT
Grayson Scott
The Bill of Rights was anything other than "useless" since a) it isn't "the" Constitution b) it served its purposes entirely. It returned rights to Protestants which were otherwise taken away by King James before the Glorious Revolution and it governed Britain and its territories, not as the center fold for law, but in hand with English common law.
Oliver Green
I guess no one really thought how quickly niggers breed back then. All that cotton labor really backfired
Jackson Myers
>. Not really relevant to us.
Also, the Bill of Rights 1689 governed North America before and throughout the American Revolution so that states its relevancy to you. It directly precedes the Constitution, and was an obvious influence (along with the Magna Carta, Assize of Arms, etc).
> Your bill of rights talks about restrciting the crowns authority
Why is this a bad thing? Do you not know Britain was the first country in history to experiment with Republicanism since the Fall of Rome? Every theory on political divison of power between monarchs-parliaments come from Britain.
William Mitchell
Wow the writers of your bill of rights were some future looking prescient fuckers, they clearly knew it would have relevance far into the future. You guys still banned from hunting foxes?
Logan Carter
But it literally did lel. The British Empire probably would've have happened without the Bill of Rights 1689. That's 2 centuries of history wiped out of the annals. Can you explain that and how we make up for that?
Cameron Russell
>would've
wouldn't*
In regards to King James, and parliaments (obvious) role in the Empire.
Dylan Gomez
Meh point taken
Carter Gonzalez
>MUH x% white meme
>MUH mulatto president
Remind me how many times you let a woman run your country.
Daniel Flores
>and a 2-party system
You mean basically what you have now with Tories and Labour
>Implying any of the other parties are at all relevant
John Powell
Enjoy being hauled in for mean tweets.
Juan Sanchez
Articles of Confederation directly preceded the Constitution. Learn your history. Their failure was what convinced the US that it needed a strong government after. Thomas Jefferson and the Anti-Federalists insisted on the Bill of Rights being added to the Constitution as the price of their support, and thank God that he did or we'd be up the same creek as you with the "I'm all for free speech, but..." crowd.