>Before arranging a meeting with a Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer he believed would offer him compromising information about Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump Jr. was informed in an email that the material was part of a Russian government effort to aid his father’s candidacy
>Mr. Goldstone’s message indicates that the Russian government was the source of the potentially damaging information.
Other urls found in this thread:
breitbart.com
jonathanturley.org
nbcnews.com
nytimes.com
archive.is
washingtontimes.com
circa.com
twitter.com
It's over for Drumpf.
Curiously, the Times does not provide the email. Nor has it actually seen the email. Its source: “three people with knowledge of the email.”
breitbart.com
you idiots fell for the MSM CIA blog again!!
HAHHAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHHA
>Unless there is more (and this is worthy of investigation), I see nothing close to treason or a crime in this account. That obviously does not fit with the breathless accounts given the story but the criminal code is not a code of political etiquette.
BAHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHHAHA..
NATALIA: I WAS NOT FROM KREMLIN!
nbcnews.com
False narrative destroyed again!
BAHAHHAHHHAHAHHAHHHAHAHA.
inb4 THE"EMAIL" turns out to be fake news!
Nice source on the email, why don't you go ahead and show it to us?
Yeah I'm sure it's completely bogus.
Just like the Comey memos.
Jut like Trump's sharing classified information with the Russian ambassador.
Just like Flynn being a paid agent of Turkey.
Yup, just some more of the ol' fake news. Fucking liberals right?
cucked by son,drumpf cant catch a break
AAHAHAHAHAHAHA
DRUUUUUUUUUUUMMMMMMMMMMPFFFFFFFFFFF
...
Now you're getting it, dipshit. It's all a false narrative.
Meh, the liberals need something to distract themselves with what better way to further demoralize them with false hope and promises that will never come to fruition, they believe everything the tv tells them anyway.
sup bra
Lawyer has denied she is connected to the kremlin.
lawyer said everybody in the meeting was pretty much bored with her and she had nothing of value for them.
end of story.
Jane Sanders, Andrew McCabe, and Loretta Lynch are still going to prison.
The media is definitely slanted towards globalists/leftist-centrism and they are sometimes wrong but they don't make up stories out of nothing like breitbart, they do have reputations to protect.
inb4 you like me some NYT op-ed where they call someone a white supremacist who's actually just a white separatist, or some dumb shit like that.
All of their other leaks have turned out to be completely true so far.
Notice nobody in the WH is denying the story, only trying to talk around it, mitigate it, distract from it by bringing up Clinton, etc.
>Its source: “three people with knowledge of the email.”
ITT: we ponder who these people are.
Rick Wilson? Mench?
You really trust these people.
It doesn't matter whether the meeting was in fact "boring" or not, three of the top people in Trump's campaign met to meet with someone who would ostensibly provide dirt provided by Russian spying operations.
That is the story. Trump Jr's best defense right now is literally that he was "naive", which is the tack his lawyer is taking.
Also the idea that Trump sr wouldn't have known about a meeting involving his three closest guys is risible.
NYT retractions are more reliable than their first print stories. I will give the nyt credit. Even though they hype the intial incorrect story for all they can get out of it and then bury the retractions as deep as they can, published once and never mentioned again, they do still feel obligated to disown their own reporting.
Trump is about to let go of the slingshot. Meeting was about an 'adoption' agency that operated in both Russia and US. The lawyer said it was afaoul of government in Russia and probably US.
Inb4 it was run by some clinton crony with shady trafficking ties.
Everything you wrote there is complete bullshit.
GTFO
17 INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES AGREE!!!!!!
^^^ top of the page for months and months
*actually it was 3 agencies not 17
^^^^ page 35 lower right corner under the affordable psychic ad.
Post the e-mail.
Here's a page with all of the NYT's retractions. Point me to one that's actually big or proves that they are fake news.
Like the time the New York Times told us 17 different intelligence agencies confirmed Russian interference when in fact it was only 4, all headed by Obama appointees? That wasn't a lie?
drumpfkins are in complete denial, even when presented with documentation.
Archive please
archive.is
see
>17 INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES AGREE!!!!!!
17 intelligence agencies did agree but only 4 were directly involved with the investigation. They're both true statements bro.
False, they issued a retraction
I'm just taking Comey's word, brah.
washingtontimes.com
Fake News!
how many more videos do people need to get of people on the inside of these news organizations laughing at you retards for hanging on their every word before you fucking wake up?
The meeting was about human trafficking.
...
Donald Trump has now announced through his attorneys, and again through a White House press briefing, that he had no idea his son Donald Trump Jr. met with a Kremlin representative during the campaign to discuss dirt on Hillary Clinton. But in what essentially amounts to a public confession in hindsight, during a public speech just before his son’s meeting, Donald Trump bragged during a speech that he was just days away from having dirt on Clinton.
Its over for you Drumpf. The time of intersectional golf course ownership has come to end and organic poetry will prove your a racists sexist homophobe anti-muslims who raped your bankruptcy lawyer.
If you actually read what he said and didn't run to your T_D talking points: The retraction was for saying that the 17 agencies worked on gathering the intelligence and verifying its validity. That was wrong.
The 17 agencies are part of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Which put out a consensus report agreeing on the validity of the intelligence that the 4 agencies presented to the body. Such a report is the official stance of all 17 agencies.
>That was wrong.
So they lied?
They lied.
>old news that's already been retracted and BTFO
Sweetie, no. Just.
It was a setup by Fusion GPS. Funded initially by Bush and Romney, handed over to Hillary. This ends up biting a lot of Dems, neoCONs, and deep state pedophiles in the ass BIGLY.
"The entire meeting may have been part of a larger election-year opposition effort aimed at creating the appearance of improper connections between Trump family members and Russia that also included a now-discredited intelligence dossier produced by a former British intelligence agent named Christopher Steele who worked for a U.S. political firm known as Fusion GPS."
"We have learned from both our own investigation and public reports that the participants in the meeting misrepresented who they were and who they worked for. Specifically, we have learned that the person who sought the meeting is associated with Fusion GPS, a firm which according to public reports, was retained by Democratic operatives to develop opposition research on the President and which commissioned the phony Steele dossier."
Fake news confirmed
she wasn't with the Kremlin.
saged
White House is confirming NYT. Trump Jr was baited into this.
It is all about Magnitsky sanctions, Putin was pissed because it affected his personal wealth.
too much putin shilling in this thread
NYT is fake news, as proven by them lying in the 17 agency report. You wont deny it, you just don't want to acknowledge it. NYT and WaPo are CIA propoganda, not real news sources.
>The fact of what that guy said and the report aren't facts because the writer of the report misunderstood how DNI reports work and the paper did its job and corrected it.
Cool.
>tions, Putin w
how is the weather in moscow, comrade? Comrade Putin thanks you for your efforts.
>17 intelligence agencies did agree
>only 4 were directly involved with the investigation
pick one you fucking retard
misunderstood is what we are calling propaganda now? otay buckwheat.
You write like a communist.
>misunderstood
LMAO
Funny how the media keeps "misunderstanding" things involving Trump huh.
I live in Michigan cunt.
to the lefts own logic, if any of the three persons with knowledge of the email were to be Russian, there should be treason charges brought to whoever met with them to get this information.
Hillary said 17 intel agencies during s speech so it must be true
-former anchor Scott Pelley
fake news!
So your entire shtick is that it's obvious how DNI reports work and anyone who misunderstands them is pushing propaganda then? Okay.
So explain this guy:
Again for the mouth-breathers:
The DNI represents all 17 agencies officially and its reports are representative of the official stance of all 17. The report that the DNI put out was based on the intelligence gathered by 4 of the agencies.The reporter claimed that it was gathered and reviewed by all 17, this was the error and it has been corrected.
Did the reporter use said language to stress how many agencies support the intel in a way that was not correct for them to do? Likely. Does that make the facts of their report disappear? No.
>They reported literal fake news
>But it's okay, they just """"misunderstood""""
CIA nigger leave
Why don't your quotes exist in the article you linked?
Trump jr: "got any dirt on Hillary?"
Russia: "yea probably."
CNN/ liberal media: "OMG TRUMP RUSSIA COLLUSION TRUMP ELECTION PUTIN BAD! OOH OOH AAAAH AAAAAAH!!!"
Smug liberal 16 year old faggot who just watched Jon Oliver: "Before arranging a meeting with a Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer he believed would offer him compromising information about Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump Jr. was informed in an email that the material was part of a Russian government blah blah blah blah"
Is this fair to say?
>Scott Pelley
I HATE THAT FAGGOT SO MUCH
The man did a story on a prep school having a problem with whiteness and putting nothing but minorities in fixed it when it's bullshit. They were all there on sports scholarships.
>NYT has three unidentified sources with knowledge of the email form Mr. Goldstone.
You're finished this time Drumpf.
But muh magination!
Efficiency.
>People in this very thread are misrepresenting how DNI reports work without putting out retractions for their bullshit
>But its cool when they do that but the reporter's outlet has to get the facts straight because I like the narrative they are pushing better.
Fuck off back to T_D.
Yup, fucking liberals. Lowest form of subhuman scum. Nice to know you're starting to own up to it.
What % of NYT stories are fake news?
Out of hundreds of Trump-Russia stories, how many have been found to later be false and retracted? 1%? 5%?
Even if 5% of NYT's stories were false, that still means 95% of what they write is true. Why are you giving MORE trust to members of the Trump campaign - ones who have been caught lying over and over and over and over than to the journalists who report their lies?
DJT was caught in three lies just yesterday. Yet you trust him?
ever got something wrong? ever?
you lied.
you are fake. Everything you say is fake and lies. please shut up, we don't want to hear anything from you ever again, you faker and liar.
that sound reasonable? Because it sounds like you...
Neat. Is that illegal?
Nope.
Did anyone that's part of Trump adminstration neglect to mention this meeting on their security forms?
Nope
>Bu but Don Jr.
He's not an adminstration official
Thanks for playing.
>to T_D
Confirmed Shareblue faggot
KILL
YOUR
SELF
Who gives a fuck? Seriously. WHO GIVES A FUCK??? You spent the nickel on the Russia story. It is literally nothing.
You faggots never learn. Nothing will come of this and you will probably end up with looking like dumbasses again. Go outside and talk to regular people they fucking hate you and think democrats have gone fucking nuts. Some might not like Trump but they hate you guys way worse. Think about that next time.
You write like a Dadaist
Stop making sense frogoloid!
>It rustles their jimmies if you know what I quack
F A K E
N E W S
>Sticking to the facts and telling T_D faggots that want to suck Trump's dick to go back where they belong makes you a paid poster.
If only.
>Jut like Trump's sharing classified information with the Russian ambassador.
The president gets to decide what is and is not classified and who is and is not cleared to view it. Even if he did share classified information, there's nothing wrong with him doing so.
>there should be treason charges brought
nope.
Treason has a very specific meaning - you would have to show this was indeed treason.
technically russia is not an enemy, so can't be treason to give them comfort.
learn to law (like educated Liberals do)
>The president gets to decide what is and is not classified
Murication at its best
>and anyone who misunderstands them is pushing propaganda then? Okay.
Funny how you have zero expectation for the reporters to actually ask Clapper about it before publishing thousands of pieces based on it for 3 months
>Out of hundreds of Trump-Russia stories, how many have been found to later be false and retracted?
How many have proven to be true?
0%
Burden of proof is on you shills and interns
Collusion- Disproven
Obstruction of justice- disproven
Russian meddling?
Where is the evidence?
How did they meddle?
What effect did it have?
Who knew what and when?
But please stick with you MUH RUSHA narrative do nothing else it serves my side perfectly
They are backtracking because there was nothing illegal on this meeting. If she explicitly stated that she was a Russian government official prior to the meeting, than this could be harmful to DJTJr. But she would also have to prove that claim as well.
People confuse Russian = Russian official. Its like saying Johnny Cochran was an American official.
Yes in fact I expect reporters to get the facts straight CIA nigger
>My wife only sucks black cocks 5% of the time. That's why I trust her
Hi NYTimes
It's hard to disprove a story when your only evidence is anonymous sources.
I'm not the fucking news dip shit. I don't have to be 100% accurate, they do.
It's true
Muahhaha
Finally she speaks out
Remember if this woman would have leaked stuff FROM the DNC Server, she would be DEAD.
>you have zero expectation
Wrong. I clearly stated what the reporter messed up and cited the retraction on the grounds of what they messed up.
If you want my personal stance on the matter: The reporter in their haste to cite the DNI report as damning damaged their reporting credibility and in doing so has added an inch of daylight that let's mouth-breathers shout "FAKE NEWS!" on the entire report despite the truth it's grounded in.
An example out of Fox News just in the last 24 hours. The Fox News reporter that put out an article on the reports that 50% Comey's memos possibly contained classified information; but the reported added "Top Secret" to that report without evidence.
Fox News put out a retraction of this wrongfully added point on the article promptly. Does that mean that Fox is "FAKE NEWS!!!"? No. Does that mean that the report on the classified nature of Comey's Memo is inherently invalidated and false? No, that is not how it works. But people in this thread and of the Alt-Right and T_D would like you to think that's how it works when it suits them well.
You dumb bastards would believe somebody if they said their dog would speak to you in french if you let it shit into your mouths, just so long as said dog is also claimed by some random journalist to be a secret agent super-spy of 50 Agency X's that have proof of Trump's ties to Russia.
TL;DR I hope a dog shits in your mouth.
Versus The president that would by analogy suck black cocks 95% (of which 20% straight ass to mouth)
NYT is now using Sup Forums to defend their fake news. LOL
That's how it works, you dumb nigger. The president of the united states can arbitrarily classify or declassify any bit of information he pleases for any arbitrary reason he pleases.
He could, if he so chose, have his breakfast menu classified, and have the nuclear launch codes declassified. He's not stupid enough to do the latter, but he has the authority to do it. These classifications aren't devised by a governmental body, they're a power of the president.
They did, that is by definition what the retractive correction was for.
Yeah, JFK did such a good job at it.
They would rather have children shit in their mouths. You are talking to PEDO's after all...
Yes, they are all fake news, you daft cunt
And telling a lie to millions then retracting to a few hundred is still fake news
Fucking Acosta was still running with the 17 agencies meme even after the buried retraction came out. That's how fucking buried it was
Kys faggot
The left feeds the media machine even more shekels on muh russia narrative to keep it running. This is fucking hilarious
The NYt is so above the fray that in their reports now, when they summarize events so far, like they di yesterday in this very article, they wrote "Comey testified that Trump pressured him to end the Flynn investigation" when IN FACT Comey never fucking said that at all. so they SPIN shit to fit the narrative they want. thats even worse than "misunderstanding". thats deliberate spin doctor shit that didnt really happen but COULD be spoun that way if you splice enough words meanings to mean what you want them to mean.
Congress: did trump pressure you?
Comey: i cant say but i felt uncomfortable
NYT: comey says Trump pressured him while under oath.
typical leftist faggotry
We won't know the truth until the investigations have concluded. Until then all we can do is enjoy the show.
Do you trust the Trump campaign more than the NYT?
When DJT claimed he had no contact with any Russians during the election, did you believe him?
When DJT claimed he didn't know what the meeting with the Russian lawyer was even about, or who she even was, did you believe him?
>Your wife sucks black cocks
.
>B-but Gromald Grumph sucks black cocks too