Is the final redpill that national socialists were just leftists themselves?

Is the final redpill that national socialists were just leftists themselves?

Of course. National socialism, or advocacy for it, boils down to "ypipo gibs! I'm gonna be in the gestapo hunting down da J00s!"

>national socialists
>socialists
gee I wonder

>socialist is in the name
germans are fucking stupid

That's one of the first redpills. The last one is:
You are God.

Which god?

If they were socialists why does everbody say nazis are rightwingers?

up

>which God?
All gods are one and you are it.

>if they were socialists...
Left wing and right wing share a commonality, namely authoritarianism. When the expression of this authoritarianism becomes absolute then the distinction between 'left' and 'right' becomes moot. Which is how Moot got his name, by the way.

The final red pill is that individualism is satanic and National Socialism is the collectivist ideal that is based on catholic Roman communion.

Materialism leads to dismay. Individualism leads to trasgender Xe's. The third way is the only option.

Capitalism is liberal egotism and Communism is a pyramid scheme.

Thought left and right was bout property and personal responsibilty, or rather the difference between obligation and personal freedom.

When I watch AJ I don't want to see anybody but AJ or David Knight. All other "reporters" are a complete waste of time.

I'm sure David Knight is a cool guy and all but the dude puts me to sleep.

^^

every one of these slide threads goes the same - you pull one of the troll questions off your script, get about four of your buddies to respond and finally it has enough traction that actual four chan users start replying

sage fuck

The final redpill is that this is all irrelevant. The only thing that matters is your family, friends and their wellbeing.

I'm pretty sure if you follow a guy called Satan instead of god you're just another follower and not an individual.

For fucks sake. This exactly proves my point.

>MUH COMMIES
>MUH AUTHORITARIANISM

Fuck off, you would sell your mother if it was good for the free market.

>everbody say nazis are rightwingers
Because anglos are tainted by their union with Stalin, that's why nazis are called right-wingers. In fact they were not. And nazi concept of aryan people included poos and gooks.

The final red pill is that this is all a computer simulation and literally none of it matters

If I had that picture of "what people think nihilism is vs what it actually is" I'd post it now

damn do you perhaps think National Socialists is code for SOCIALISTS?

OP HAS SWALLOWED TOO MUCH OF A RED PILL!!!!!!! HELP HIM!!!!

>real redpill of the day: OP is retarded

>and literally none of it matters
the way out matters

Authoritarian Left vs Authoritarian Right are two ways for low IQ brown dindus and low IQ white dindus to leech off the high IQ master-race.

Everyone is a leftist, the only differing factor is how large you deem your circle.

>Massive populace support for socialist Bernie Sanders on the left + massive populace support for the nationalist Donald Trump.
America is a national socialist country, it just doesn't know it yet because of Jews and that amphetamine addicted, rotting, reptilian corpse of a creature, HRC

"Der Idee der NSDAP entsprechend sind wir die deutsche Linke… Nichts ist uns verhasster als der rechtsstehende nationale Besitzbürgerblock."(Joseph Goebbels, 1931 in "Der Angriff")

According to the idea of the NSDAP we are the German left... We hate nothing more than the right (standing) national block of wealthy citizens.

...

I hear you. He was an engineer before, so he just sticks to the facts and argues logically with facts and figures.

Alex Jones - for the lols
David Knight - for the learns

How could that even be possible? How would one of your Sims escape from the game on your PC?

It'd have to become self aware and then seize control of your PC. But then what? And even then, now it's just in another simulation, an infinite chain of simulations. It's simulations all the way down, man.

There's literally nothing wrong with being a leftist. Most Sup Forumsheroes like Jordan Peterson and Sargon of Akkad are

Goebbels jewish girlfriend probably gave good head.

>muh left vs right

>Sup Forums heroes
>sargon
Literally what
Blackmanwithquestionmarks.jpg

Jordan Peterson and Sargon of Akkad aren't collectivists like national socialism pushes
In this context, we speak of leftism as collectivism in general, the application of who falls into the collective is less important.

The state of american education

>we speak of leftism as collectivism
no we dont. Its revolutionairy vs traditional

Because leftist college professors and "historians" didn't want evil ol' Uncle Hitler to be associated with their blessed lefty ideals.
Thus, revisionism.

No one refers to advocates of the right wing as pushing to bring back Monarchy and the Ancien Regime anymore.

trips of truth. atleast one american is not retarded.

>Sup Forums heroes
>Sargon of Cuckakkad

well it does have the word socialist right in the name.

because people are retarded

>Sup Forums heroes
>Sargon of Cuckakkad

...Or maybe it's because monarchies have lost their relevance to modern society.

So monarchies are basically what the right boils down to?

yes, because people are retarded. The whole discussion is flawed
>"SE GUIS NATIONAL SOCIIALALAIST JAHA SEE ITS IN THE NAME BTFO BTFO"
>"yea im a classic liberal"

the right boils down to traditionalism which is built on religion

I'm not sure if you need religion for traditions.

not for traditions. For a traditional way of life

That neither.

>national socialists were just leftists themselves
In What Dimension!?

The Right "boils down" to how political power is organized. Specifically that it is hierarchical and centralized. Monarchy and the Papacy best exemplify this trait because there's one person at the top who mandates political power.

In contrast, the Left wants power to be distributed. Thus why they push so hard for 'democracy', syndicalism and communism/socialism, mainly because the power falls onto many people and why it's often construed as Mob Rule.

Socialism is leftist

>Socialism is leftist
NS is not Socialism in Communistic sense!
Try Again!

Pretty much. It's convenient to shorten it as Nazi so nobody has to realize it was literally the NATIONALIST SOCIALISTS PARTY. They were authoritarian left wing. Socially authoritarian, economically left wing. It's why Communists accidently cheer when bring trolled by Hitler quotes.

Communism wants power to be centralized and right wing libertarianism wants it to be individualized. Like having a gun to protect yourself where as a communist argues that what the state is for.

>communist argues that what the state is for
classles statles society

Stupid fucking Hans aren't you supposed to be smart

That's not what communism is though.

they're both authoritarian shitholes, fascism just takes longer to collapse.

Oh! Really?

You had classes in communism obviously.

national socialism in authoritarian centrism

is*

That's one of them

she looks a bit reluctant ... did Alex blackmail her?

Communism means that there are no longer men who have to sell their labor, since the means of production (for example, factories) are no longer in the hands of capitalists, but are employed by the vast majority of the formerly wage-dependent; By occupations. In this way, the economic classes (those who possess the means of production and the people who have nothing but their labor power), thus a classless society. Or, to put it, in the words of Marx, in freedom, the liberty of each individual is the prerequisite for the freedom of all.
f communists what I've noticed of talking about abolish the state
Dan is talking about the current power structures

i want the civic nationalists to fuck off

National socialism is the gateway for socialism, creating discomfort in the bourgeoisie due to them not feeling comfortable with the identity politics and throwing them towards our side.

National socialism makes it easier for socialism to take root as they extend concepts of public ownership far beyond most other ideologies, it's just a matter of time before we take control and use all the tools they provided.

In my circle people will tell you they hate national socialists but it's all a charade, what we actually hate is capitalism.

Why?

The final redpill is that Hitler was working on behalf of the Finance/Adrenochrome cartels currently shilling this board. Your still paying one of their subjects, Hans or Mullah or whatever your fucking name is...because you let the state OWN you. ....
>letting the volk become mere economic slaves
BAKA

When People say they hate Capital,what they mean what you can do with capital!
Exploitation, position of power and so on so on!

That's the precursor to the real redpill.
The real redpill is that bevause natsoc is far too lefty to not fall to leftift subversion, the only fully functioning form of government that is mutually beneficial for everyone is a white absolutist empire.
Think about it, with one man, the god emperor as the absolute leader, what race would you want that man?
What personality type would you want them to be?
Would you want it to be someone who has nothing to lose and everything to gain from misleading people and abusing his power (women are property and therefor invalid for the position, males, the single gender only), or someone who has sacrificed a world of wealth so that he can make the empire, and by extension humanity as a whole, make actually progressive (not """progressive""") gains?
There more in-depth questions to really make you think about it, but I don't have the time or the space to list them all here.
Your homework is to think about who you would put in the position and why.

I see it like this. Just because somebody can't get laid this is no reason genocide all women.

Massive Marxist propaganda campaign to distance themselves and socialism from the sinking ship that was the Nazis post WW2.

It's just an extension of the not real socialism argument which gets thrown around the second socialist nations reach their inevitable collapse.

no, we break the noosphere

Just because they say classless doesn't mean it will be so. In order to implement communism policies, since they arent arising naturally bottom up, it requires a party, a caste of members who are enforcing the policies on those whom policies are being enforced upon. So you have a two class society, the officials and the proles.

Indeed, what we need to realize, though, is what the Frankfurt school realized, that attracting the bourgeoisie to our side or to eliminate their resistance is easier if we polarize the population and that extending central power would make the transition towards communism painlessly.

Nazis polarize the population like nobody, people like Richard Spencer are turning lots of libertarians into people who believe less and less in capitalism and more in central planning and this red pilling of Capitalists always plays to our favor.

Matter of fact is to look at all the countries that enacted national socialism in the past, they are all towards the way of communism in an accelerated fashion.

Nazis are our allies in the war against exploitation of the proletariat and any commie not recognizing this even within his inner chamber is just not looking at the full picture.

What worries me is the automation at workplaces!
So when we can fully automate a work area, what will it mean for the whole society!

I would like to immediately clarify that I am on no side I'm not left or right
But there are problems we have to overcome in 21 century!
So yes Marx has some good Point!
Nationalist too!
But i think to solve those problems,we need more logic less ideologie! That is my stand point!

But i agree with your point!

it really is, that's why if we are pushing for right wing we should push for monarchy. The age of kings shall arise once again.

>unironic commies

you have to go >>>lefty/pol/