Nobody likes capitalism anymore. It's unsustainable

Nobody likes capitalism anymore. It's unsustainable.

archive.is/XJTDh

My DICK is unstable.

>It's unsustainable.
In the sense that we have limited resources it's certainly unsustainable.

But capitalism is certainly a better system of using those resources than "JUST GIV EVERY1 1 MILLION $$$ AN HOUR LOLOL"

Much like the Democratic Party, does it even have a leader? WTF? SAD!

...

Yes it has its downfalls but id rather live today then in Soviet Russia or right now in Venezuela.

...

That's the problem I hate capitalism but unlike most I'm aware of what (((they're))) really going to replace it with.

Low quality thread

It's the worst system we have except for all the others.

Man, how many anti-capitalism threads can there be in one night?

Are You Ready To Accept the Fact That Soviet Russia Was Just Better? - Some Fucking Kike

There is a Marxist who takes my tram, he basically "smashes capitalism" by being a right asshole to everyone around him. To him, being an unpleasant human is about making people think all humans are unpleasant and therefore need Marxism to force pleasantness.

Somehow he knows I'm a prolific libertarian shit poster and known as a decent commenter among some YouTubers.

One of the things he said to me "did you ever think you're the one that's wrong?" this was in direct reference to me telling him to turn down his edgy punk music because seniors behind him were complaining. I responded that it's easy to misplace blame, because it is. He was being a dick and it felt better for him to pretend I was a dick for pointing it out.

This is Marxism, all they know how to do is question and poke holes, they haven't come up with anything good in 20 years and their last innovation was exactly to accept this flaw, as in critical theory/cultural Marxism. They don't know how to argue, they won't realise the majority of educated people are now middle class and so they don't want higher taxes or more welfare.

They literally don't know how to he persuasive with out
>could you consider the REAL problem is...
>what if what's ACTUALLY the issue is...
Etc.

This is contemporary Marxism, you try to create problems by arguing them into existence.

No, fuck you. You are the problem, I'm an innocuous guy just going to work.

>schools stop teaching reality
>young people stop being rational
Really makes you think...

Well most people find Sup Forums through youtube, twitter so the red pilling has increased. Just not nearly enough. Im not even Alt right or really that right wing but um def not whatever the fuck the Democrats are today

This is a joke right?

Kill all communists.

Yes but replacing it with communism and consolidation production is the ultimate aim goy

sure capitalism is shit but no fucking way do I want socialism or communism to take over.

Most of these anti-Capitalists are conflating capitalism with consumerism. Marxism isn't the solution, but rather a system of beliefs and values which can spontaneously incentivize actions that are not primarily sensation oriented. That requires a metaphysical transformation, not primarily an economic one.

how is Venezuela doing?

No system is sustainable, capitalism just happens to be the best one weve made

>turn down music
>YOUR OPINION IS SHIT
>being that thirsty for an argument

he had that one running around his head for a while

I want to do none of the work and reap all of the benefits.

I wonder what race of people have said that before and claim it to be, "HOOMIN NAYCHUR".

Pure genes? HA! How about a pure FIST!

Just providing an anecdote.

All Marxists are the same
>I'm a shitty person, but it's okay because everyone is..
>..except him, but it's okay because he's only not shitty because he's oppressive
>where are the problems? Oh, everywhere else obviously, nothing wrong with me or my friends
Every Marxist ever.

They only ever do this play, they're only capable of this. Their entire lifestyle is motivated by justifying mediocrity.

Gas half the world population, sterilized 90% of the ones left and bring on the fully automated luxury communism.

Yep. And Clinton is still going to win.

> ruin a perfectly fine first world countr through unsustainable inmigration of subhuman mexigoblins in order to get a bigger voting base
> oh look it was capitalisms' fault

lmao ameriniggers falling for the eternal democrat's bait

>most efficent system to distribute scarce resources
>provinding max utility and max autonomy
>critics bitch that compared to a utopian fantasy its awful
>cronies and self righteous do gooders implement a central bank, various regulation, beaurocracy
>makes things worse economically and socialy
>problems blamed on free markets
>more central planning is implemented
>continually repeat cycle
>cultural of rugged individuals is turned into a nation of dependents because of do gooder policy
>boom and bust cylce is considered the norm because of the bakers
>slowly a collectivist and totalarian society is created
>complete chaos achieved soon after

So spill the beans, Nigel.

Sadly no

>Nobody likes capitalism anymore. It's unsustainable.
I agree senpai.

>... we know that GDP growth, on its own, does nothing to reduce poverty or to make people happier or healthier.
>Global GDP has grown 630% since 1980, and in that same time, by some measures, inequality, poverty, and hunger have all risen.

>by some measures

>we know

>by some measures.

>For example, if I look at the numbers coming out of my asshole...

Cosumerism is a cancer.

> there is no G*d
> I have no children
> Yeah lets exploit the planet as much as we can!
> Whatever!

Communists are not human, and do not deserve our sympathy.

Venezuela is burning, but it's capitalism that is failing. Which is why socialism always fails. They don't learn a damn thing for their failures.

Wait the result should be 1 and nothing else because 20 / 5(2*2) you must make this 5(2*2)->5(4)->20 and then you will have 20/20 or 1

All these Socialism/Commie faggot threads tonight
sage
hidden
kys queer

>A demographic sample that is least likely to have benefitted from capitalism.

Golly gee, 51%? Better get out those pitchforks.

t-the common core one is correct right?

20/5*(2*2)
20/5*4
4*4 = 16

The interesting thing about common core is it's internally logically consistent (most people naturally come to do mathematics in this manner anyway), but when you look at it on a page it looks completely retarded.

Nope. Division and Multiplication are of equal priority in order of operations so it goes left to right making it 20/5=4 then 4*4=16. The notion that multiplication has priority because of PEMDAS having M listed first will literally get you laughed out of a math class.
16 is the only answer and saying 1 is correct in anyway is retarded.

This problem is amplified by the fact that most older people don't know how to do basic fractions, percentages, or algebra anyways.

don't forget gaining a workforce that circumvents wage laws/labor regulations,( and you the [[[employer]]] never have to worry about them taking you to litigation or court over violation of labor laws, workman's comp, FLSA, FLMA, work place hazards and injuries, etc.)

>basically gain slaves you gain threaten with slave labor or they go to jail
>wonder why they join gangs and sell drugs

saying you want to fix illegal immigration because you believe that all companies/industries (service industry, looking at you) should have to operate a business model that follows labor laws makes me a racist.

appparently.

This. Great post.

Ye its correct, (1 is not correct) because the sequence doesn't designate the whole denominator to be 5*4 with an extra set of brackets. I actually cannot believe this shit. Is this american education now??

...

Kill all commiefags and their shit-tier failed ideology.

Literally none under any other system is singing it's praises

They have a point as someone who works on Wall Street most investors are useless people just like everyone else.

I would be for neo-feudalism.

Capitalism still seems to be the best system to break shackles if you are an ubermensch.

And suckling on the teat of inefficient government is sustainable?

>Says the 1 post from this ID with the donkey flag
Wew laddies, I hope you like sage.

If you meant 20/(5*2*2) you wouldn't put brackets there, would you?

> inb4: lets discuss what retarded sloppy meant

Indeed, I have seen their style of discourse. If you logically present an idea they immediately jump into ad hominem. At that point, I always smile, because I know I've won. They have no logical aptitude other than be critical of whatever's said. Remember people, you must be skilled in rhetoric to not dance yourself into their death trap. One good way is to reject their premise. One thing they do not have is any reasonable skill to think logically or form a coherent argument.

When jobs are automated we will be begging for socialism so who cares.

Post-scarcity there is no need for socialism or capitalism you absolute dunce.

>Non-Whites don't think like white people

SURPRISE, SURPRISE

Pol is a collective hivemind of failed individuals who come together over something basic as skin color. They are losers, and from this resentment escalates racism and other garbage ideologies. I look forward to war, as an upper class citizen, to purge America of whiney losers, both black and white, whom of which have no respect for the work and cultivation that defines the individual.

You don't multiply the two together. Adding in a multiplication is like adding in an extra dose of chlorine to the lemonade. It's retarded and people will die if you do that shit.

t.failure

Stop with the pasta and go to sleep faggot

We had the best system from 1931 to 1945. The world dog piled it.

capitalism was a good system when you had the government actively preventing any sort of monopolies from forming.

now its just fucked

>between the ages of 18 and 29
lmao, get a job and get out in the real world and your mind will change quickly

>
but monopolies can only form with government collusion.

who said anything about communism

It's still capitalist with a schmekel of socialist policies, goy

capitalism encourages competition but competition encourages monopolies because thats what winning a competition is...

>19-29 year old millennials can't (((find))) work, have useless degrees, and still live with mom

>hate capitalism

Woow, shocking

>"Looks like we only have two systems and this one, (((capitalism))) is shot. Goys, I think it's time we gave (((Communism))) another chance..."

Racially homogeneous, socialist society

Racially diverse, capitalist society

The former is NOT NatSoc; it is a Stalinist society without internationalism.

The latter is NOT crony capitalism; it is a liberal capitalist society with a gold standard, little to no regulation, and a free market system

They'd form without government intervention. Not like you want other companies stealing away consumers and undermining your profits, do you?

If you want to insure your way of life you must maintain profits, that means buying up and driving everyone else out and controlling every aspect of your market. Sure you can be a good little goy and compete in the marketplace with your competitors but that's not as much of a safegard towards profits as forcing out said competition via any means possible.

Also in the sense that we need to import chinks and niggers to keep the system afloat.

>and the aussie comes out of left field with a truth bomb

It's materialism.

I've been saying this for a while. Materialism (of which communism is a part, just as much as capitalism) has opened the door to everything bad we face today, including our own self destruction. Until we purge ourselves of materialism, that is to view society and our goals and place in the universe in an infinite and immaterial manner, we will continue to be a servant race, serving the master which promises us the most table scraps, but still slave to all.

There is no capitalism with fake central planned fiat money economy

Yes, but does this make capitalism sustainable, in the same way a communist would say "but real communism!"? If real capitalism relies on an absence of the successful realizing they can make more profit with less loss in a planned, cooperative system, than in the waylay of a competitive, monopoly-free, free market, is capitalism ultimately a sustainable system?

I think it's the best economic system, and economic matters must be seen to, but I disagree with materialism, that our society will be made great, that our problems will go away, when we generate infinite growth on a finite plane, at any cost. I believe this opened us up to much degeneration and hardship, that we are just now feeling in this millennium, after a only a century under true, mass society, consumerist materialism.