Net Neutrality is bad and should be opposed

You really have to be an SJW cuck to support net neutrality. It is against Free Market principles and destroys jobs hence it should be opposed.

There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with pic related.

Other urls found in this thread:

arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/02/netflix-performance-on-verizon-and-comcast-has-been-dropping-for-months/
dailydot.com/layer8/net-neutrality-violations-history/
globalnews.ca/news/3034412/crtc-to-review-net-neutrality-in-videotron-music-streaming-case/
freepress.net/press-release/99480/att-blocking-iphones-facetime-app-would-harm-consumers-and-break-net-neutrality
netneutrality.koumbit.org/en/node/5
eff.org/deeplinks/2007/10/eff-tests-agree-ap-comcast-forging-packets-to-interfere
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

It's fucking absurd how Trumpcucks and the_Donald wants to get rid of Net Neutrality.

Ending net nutrality will be the best thing for the internet. By making people have to pay extra for social media sites it may end up limiting the access to those sites due to some people simply not wanting to pay to go to facebook or instagram etc. By limiting access to those sites the social media/fake news machine will have less control over peoples lives.

Just look at what cable is already doing with bundling everything. If they are allowed to get control over the internet they will tear it apart real quick and that's exactly what needs to happen. The internet needs to be destroyed and rebuilt in manner that makes in decentralized and has a higher barrier to entry to keep the women and normies out.

Something low bandwith would be great imho. That would essentially kill "media" No more porn, No more stacey and her selfies. No more tyrone showing off his stolen shoe collection.

This is one time where capitalism can actually use it's power to destroy a greater evil.

>thoroughly controlled internet is more like free market than free internet
slide thread, fuck off nigger op

I know that you're trolling but Ancap as an ideology is as retarded as communism.

you're transparent as fuck.

It reminds me of communism's result. "Everything should be equal. Wait, why is my internet so shitty? What do you mean VOIP has equal priority as someone watching netflix or youtube?"

Anclaps are cancer. How much CEO semen to do you slurp every day OP?

...

Sliderfag

Steven Crowder made a pretty good video about net neutrality and why it's bad. People really are stupid.

>Dude, I don't want these corporations to control the internet, I want the government to control the internet!

Liberals aren't all for it and Trump supporters are not all against it, and not all Trump supporters are conservative. I could keep going on and on.

It's called individuality you little faggot, you can't exactly convince anyone here that net neutrality is bad because [insert boogeyman] is against it.

If you want people to not be fooled by the media, they need to know why and they need to see it the way people who aren't poisoned would see it.

>Limiting access
>for their own good

Still control, still telling them what to do, still teaches them nothing. They'll find an outlet.

Why are people still using this image?
These kind of website / ISP deals have been becoming more commonplace for years.

Heh, to think that there are ancaps who don't believe that their whole movement is corporatist cocksuckers.

It reminds me of "communism"

Lenin: OY VEY SHALOM SHALOM WE'RE SOCIALIST NOW, NO MORE UPDATES

>reality
Still capitalism

I don't know anyone against net neutrality and it's hard to find anyone who seriously against it on Sup Forums.

The days of capital letters screaming 'FREE', and promises of "plans", and more restrictions, is fucking over.

When South Koreans get internet by the gigabit and Americans shit themselves over a mere 20mbit..

I like zero rating, which would be against the law under net neutrality, so I don't want it.

The OP pic is just FUD nonsense.

>Net Neutrality destroys jobs

How?

Net Neutrality protects every single content provider on the internet, from small blogs and software companies to Netflix, from being throttled by cable companies

getting rid of net neutrality will shut you up

it'll be the ens of Sup Forums as well

>we're not over-charging our competition
>we're just making things free for our friends

RIP open internet

>Net Neutrality protects every single content provider on the internet, from small blogs and software companies to Netflix, from being throttled by cable companies

Can you give me one example of when this occurred?

arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/02/netflix-performance-on-verizon-and-comcast-has-been-dropping-for-months/

>The story is really in how each provider's megabits per second changed from month to month. Verizon FiOS suffered just a tiny drop from 2.22Mbps to 2.2Mbps from October to November, but then it went down to 2.11Mbps in December and 1.82Mbps in January.

Why does anyone hate this picture? Every time I see it I think it's the best advertisment for it, you CURRENTLY already pay for every package in this image, if net neutrality passes at worst you can rebuy the package and in better cases you save money by not buying shit you don't want

My ISP throttled me last time it was raining! What kind of insane Jewish companies would throttle because of the weather!?!

I'll give you a bunch actually

dailydot.com/layer8/net-neutrality-violations-history/

End on independent Journalism
End of any website that goes against the narrative, such as Sup Forums
End of freespeech on the internet
Turns the internet in to cabal TV

Only a Liberal would want to end Net Neutrality.

So, only for maybe a week over the last 20 years and only to websites that congest and throttle the rest of the internet?

>have a high bandwidth service
>crowd the lines, causing outages
>IT IS MY RIGHT TO DO THIS
California was a mistake

>our advertisers have notified us that they do not wish their products to be associated with Sup Forums.org and henceforth we are removing it from our $350 misc package

I support Trump (flag related though), but since I work in IT I support Net Neutrality because for fucks sake, there are already ads everywhere, ISPs don't pay those people and Internet is way beyond "TV" or similar media, it shouldn't be limited because you can't limit real life in such way.

I love how everyone implies that no net neutrality will result in every ISP immediately engaging in censorship and fully-blocking entire domains until you pay tons of money. Like that will go over real well for the offending business.

But what if our side can use it to ban porn? Would that be possible?

globalnews.ca/news/3034412/crtc-to-review-net-neutrality-in-videotron-music-streaming-case/
Canada has been cracking down on ISPs offering their in house streaming services for free.
In terms of unfair competition this is worse can just slowing down the competition a bit.

>crowd the lines

LOL idiot, you don't understand how bandwidth works, so please let me explain.

I own a website that gets about ~5000 unique users a day. I have a contract with Verizon which allows me to upload 200MB/s. Now, just because I am using my full bandwidth, which i've *already paid for*, does not mean I'm "crowding the lines"(which literally makes no sense, unless you don't know how computer networks work at all)

Same with Netflix, at a much larger scale. Netflix already pays ISPs to upload data to their customers through the ISPs networks. So you can't blame netflix for "crowding the lines" when they literally pay to use those lines at that capacity.

Then what's the purpose in getting rid of it?

Hi Google employee.

Nigger

>its only individuality if trump's policies will take away my funs
fuck off already

Until NBC gets offended by Sup Forums, and refuses to broadcast on Verizon until Verizon blocks Sup Forums on their internet service.

Or better yet, some hacker leaks Expendables 5 on Sup Forums, causing ComcastUniversal to lose money, so Comcast blocks Sup Forums for "breaching the rights of its ISP contract"

My dad worked in telecoms for 30 years, and he's not jewish, and he thinks NN laws are fucking retarded.

Nobody even knows what ney neutrality is

Allowing slavery or other nasty things wouldn't result in these things becoming commonplace, but they still shouldn't be allowed.

I love how Sup Forums of all places is against net neutrality.
The second that shit gets passed this site is getting fucking hammered to the ground, don't you people realize that?

Sup Forums has never been blocked in the last 20 years, why would it be now?

Are you implying that a company won't do anything to generate more/save capital?
The majority of where Americans live only offer 1 or 2 ISPs at most. They don't need to worry about competition because there's a virtual fucking monopoly. They can do whatever they please once this shit is repealed.

Daily reminder that Sup Forums is contamination board.

Well fight against the monopoly, not for some imaginary net neutrality

Degenerate sites needs to be purged to help us MAGA.
This dumbfuck of a place bans people for the slightest shit anyways.

>Sup Forums has never been blocked in the last 20 years, why would it be now?
because the public will think its a good thing, to block fake-news sites from getting any access to the web

The throttling can be very useful in creating a market among the poor.

Then NBC or Verizon lose customers and revenue.
Then ComcastUniversal loses customers and revenue.

Then the people can easily end their plans and go to the public library or somewhere else you can find internet

Given the option to throttle the shit out of Sup Forums or Sup Forums in general, do you not think an ISP will take it? Especially if they're owned by kikes?
Imagine how much the normies would love it.
>"(x ISP) taking steps to throttle racist hate speech sites!" They'd fucking eat it up

Then why haven't they done it ever? Oh right, because if they do every ISP will go and open in that region to compete with their supermonopolist and win every time.

>Netflix is the only streaming service that exist
>bandwidth is infinite, and can support millions of Netflix-like sites
durrr

How are you fighting against monopoly by supporting legislation that GIVES MORE POWER TO THEM?

Sup Forums will shit on the ISP that decides to block Sup Forums and they will quickly reverse their decision

Why are all ANCAP's retarded?

>when Egypt understands free market better than burgers
What a time to live

Yes, net neutrality does give them more power. Thanks for agreeing

Yes, bandwidth is technically considered a nearly-unlimited resource. It is very, very hard to crowd it.

Also, there aren't millions of Netflix-like sites nor will there ever be, so your argument is moot.

>Then the people can easily end their plans and go to the public library or somewhere else you can find internet
Do you honestly believe that the normies will cut ties with their ISP (most likely the only one in their area) and go to a public library, which would also be under the same ISP?

kinda hard to do that when you only got 3 people browsing your site posting horse porn a day

are you sure you know which monopoly is more powerful

>Amazon video
>Google video
>apple video
>etc
Do you really think bandwidth is unlimited? Holy shit come on man. Only so much data can be transferred at once.

I would imagine it's quite the opposite.
With net neutrality being revoked they will gain much more power in the ability of throttling competition and censorsing sites that go against their agenda.
How exactly is stopping this giving them more power?

he is false flagging as one
my guess is he missed out on bitcoin and litecoin

>he doesn't even know the wording of the legislation
ISPs lobby politicians. By giving more power over the internet to politicians, you are thus helping any one rich enough to lobby them. Including the ISPs.
Apply yourself, please.

Feels like fear mongers have been spamming this fanfiction for over a decade now.

>Then NBC or Verizon lose customers and revenue.
>Then ComcastUniversal loses customers and revenue.
whew boy you almost scared Comcast and Verizon there for a second

it's a good thing they hold regional monopolies so there's no one else to switch to
god bless capitalism and the US of A

I don't understand the problem, are you people communists? Why is the invisible hand of the free market good in every other instance except this one?

you seem very opposed to being throttled
I wonder if there are others like you
perhaps enough, to whe where the doomsday scenario bullshit you are prediciting, doesnt actually happen

It's less likely in places that are monopolized but in huge markets like cities all of the normies who don't even know what net neutrality is will be royally pissed that their ISP suddenly radically changed their plan and ruined their service. Those customers WILL switch on the first day. Google's service will thrive and expand across the country and dethrone Comcast/Verizon.

burn
it
down

freepress.net/press-release/99480/att-blocking-iphones-facetime-app-would-harm-consumers-and-break-net-neutrality
netneutrality.koumbit.org/en/node/5
> The most famous example of non-neutrality occurred during the Telus labour dispute. Telus blocked access to a pro-union site by blocking the server on which it was hosted. Researchers at Harvard, Cambridge and the University of Toronto found that Telus’s actions resulted in an additional 766 unrelated sites also being blocked for subscribers.
eff.org/deeplinks/2007/10/eff-tests-agree-ap-comcast-forging-packets-to-interfere
>This morning the Associated Press reported that Comcast is interfering with users' ability to run file sharing applications over its network.

Is that enough?

Those services have nowhere near the usage of netflix, and even then, what's the argument here?

>Only so much data can be transferred at once.
There is no "congestion" when it comes to bandwidth or internet lines. A company or individual pay for a certain amount of traffic speed and they are fully allowed to use it to its maximum. If the ISP can't handle it, then it's their fault.

They blocked them because they cause congestion.

Oh, I'm sure those ISPs wouldn't be afraid of Google Fiber expanding.

>you seem very opposed to being throttled
So does fucking anyone who has access to the internet.

You don't know how internet traffic works, sorry.

good eye. he is a communist, but thinks by donning a different flag and "2 post by this id-ing" he can generate support for communism

The problem comes down to companies like news sources, Netflix, Google, etc. All don't want to bot have net neutrality because it costs them money. The whole point is that ISP's can charge for the amount of bandwidth these surfaces take up. I worked for a rural local ISP for a few years. Once Netflix came around, people were using 10x more bandwidth at least. Every company except 2 had to drop out, and they couldn't charge their existing customers more unless they wanted them to leave. Currently about 75%, it was 85% on our Network) of network traffic is video streaming from sites like Netflix. Why can't they be charged for this? You charge trucks more on tolls because they damage the road more, I don't see this any differently.

>VoIP having equal priority
That's not how 802.1Q tagging works hombre

Voice > Video > Best effort > Background

Because free (not in the sense of monetarily free) and open access to the internet is something that must be protected at all costs.

The reason the google fiber experiment was abandoned IS because ISPs fucked them over in absolutely every single fucking way to prevent them from expanding or doing anything.

If the biggest multinational technology company in the world can't do it, then how do you expect smaller actors to be able to?

You can't run infinite things over the internet without congestion or throttling. If you don't know this, you are tech illiterate.

faggot retard you clearly dont have comcast

>muh free market

no, the internet shall remain free and neutral.

haha you're funny
this is the part where I tell you how the incumbent monopolies literally litigated and bled Fiber to death

LOCAL LOOP UNBUNDLING WHEN
LOOP
UNBUNDLING
WHEN

>companies should be able to dictate what I do on the internet by punishing my wallet

No. No, no, fuck you, no. The goddamn telecom companies are already jerking off onto piles of cash and then setting them on fire, this argument that "not letting corporations get away with murder means their going to take their toys and go home" is so much specious bullshit and I want to slap anyone who legitimately believes it.

Fuck you.

Fuck ATT.

Fuck Comcast.

Fuck Time-Warner.

And fuck you again. If you're not a paid shill I hope you've got some sort of vested interest in telecom profits so you aren't actually completely retarded.

So you charge more for users who use sites like Netflix, alright then.
How do you not see this leading to ISPs "bundling" off the internet in order to make even more money? You get your streaming package, X dollars a month, then your form package, your email and entertainment package, etc etc.

>You can't run infinite things over the internet without congestion or throttling.
They are paying for the bandwidth and internet speed they use. If the ISP can't handle it, then they'll move to another ISP. Why would they be allowed to punish a business for using the connection they're paying for to the fullest?

it was tongue in cheek
but you have dick in ear so cant understand
the market wont ever produce what OP pic shows

It was because fiber is expensive as fuck to deploy, and currently is not cost effective. Nobody uses that much traffic in residential situations.

Copper and wireless are currently the only cost effective way. Fiber, except for backhauls, is really only being deployed as EPON

You say that but how can you be 100% certain?
Buisnesses will naturally do anything that makes them more money. ISPs have virtual monopolies on areas all across the US. Hell, they can even work together in order to make more money and benefit each other in the long run.
This whole "muh free market" shit is so retarded.

>burgers kill net neutrality
>no more burgers on Sup Forums
>leaves take over
suit yourselves

you're a fucking idiot

>1 post by this id

>why would you ever want more than 10 mbps
>no one can even think at that speed
>do not look at europe
>do not look at east asia
>they are lies and communist sjw liberal propaganda cucks
>you're not a communist sjw liberal propaganda cuck are you
>you don't want more than 10 mbps
>with these speeds you can appreciate what you have

Do you idiots even know why Fiber isn't super successful right now? I'll spell it out: The intense throttling and censorship you morons think will happen has not happened. Nobody is going to switch to Fiber while they're still getting their usual internet.

>6 posts by this id

Slide to the left
Slide to the right
One sage this time
One sage this time