CAN SOMEONE TELL ME WHAT DON JR DID?

Did he hack the DNC?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempted_murder
whatdoesitmean.com/index2334.htm
whatdoesitmean
archive.is/L9DQJ
youtu.be/HO2c_2XAXMw
myredditvideos.com/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

No

Yeah. he's really an Awan brother and is currently in Pakistan, where he's fled to, after he, his wife and his other brothers (which are still TOP secret) were fired as IT specialists.

>Met with a Russian woman
>Listened to what she had to say
>Showed her out
the end

So, if he didn't hack the DNC, what did he collude on, especially if he left empty-handed and no agreements were made?

Look into the Awan brothers, Uranium 1, Rand Paul and others being spied on & unmasked, and various other things to see why the infotainers in media need to keep people distracted. As Van Jones, himself, of CNN so succinctly & eloquently put it: the russia shit is a big "nothingburger". It's all a farce. Keeps people tuning in, and good clickbait.

MUH RUSSIA!!! MUH SMOKING GUN!!!

i can't believe it isn't obvious to you drumpftards. it is to literally everyone else.

he demonstrated the INTENTION to COLLUDE with a FOREIGN NATIONAL

Colluded with the Russians to dig up into on Crooked Hilary (not illegal).

If a pedophile gets an arrangment for a meeting with a young boy and the FBI show up instead what crime did the pedophile commit when he didn't get himself a boipucci and got handcuffed instead?

Making treason and collusion with Russians. Trump will have to resign to save what little reputation left in his name. Jr is going to jail, Kushner as well.

Intention by itself is not a crime. They don't charge people with "attemped murder", do they? Of course not. This is all a smokescreen, MSM shills.

He sold our secrets & uranium. The glumps will rot in jail.

He talked to a girl from a particular part of the world.

and?

I collude with my fiance every day and she's a Russian citizen. Pretty sure that's not illegal in the slightest.

He can't keep getting away with it!

None, most of the time, actually. That's why many of those TCAP guys get off without charges or plea to some minor charge.

>They don't charge people with "attemped murder"
Murder is a crime. Digging up dirt on a politician? Not a crime. Hence why attempted digging up dirt on a politician is not a crime.

You gon' get cucked

>They don't charge people with "attemped murder", do they? Of course not.

Yes they do.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempted_murder

He dindu nuffin.
He a good boy.

Bill Clinton signed a law that states that IF the US asks for help pertaining to criminal activity from Russia,the Russian are obligated to help in the criminal matter.Same goes for Russia.If the US calls on Russia to help us with a criminal matter,we're to help them with what we have.
He broke no laws.He only used the law Bill Clinton signed into law in 2000,

no such crime, unless he intended to receive payments/funding from Russia in the form of cash gold or other universally valuable commodity, and sorry information does not count this is established law.

Attempting solicitation of all sorts is crime. Haven't come across evidence that Don JR did that. Is there evidence?

In this country intention to commit a crime is more important than the act itself

Then I'll beat the shit out of her and her mother, friends, and entire culture will tell her that it's her fault. One of the many advantages of having a Russian wife.

Hillary sold our nuclear material to Russia. That's what you meant right?

fresh off to college

He broke the law.

Unless he gets a pardon he is probably going to court and will have to serve time/pay a fine.

he literally dindu nuffin, libfaggots are simply employing rule #1 from their fagtactics book, this is what the whole russia hoax is

He literally did not break the law. Private citizens are allowed to dig up dirt on others, including from foreign nationals.

Don't forget!
>He said he'd loved it if he could get some dirt on Hillary during the 2016 election

Literally Hitler guys

Fredo isn't an investigator, he was obviously seeking information on behalf of his father's campaign, and admitted to it.

Your justification is flimsy as fuck. Although we all already know that trumpfaggots don't really care about things like truth or facts, only with their right wing ideology.

LMFAO the Sup Forumstard lawyers coming out of the woodwork. "Intent isn't a crime" holy shit

The level of denial by the right wing is unbelievable.

I can't wait to see what happens when indictments are handed down.

It WAS a big nothingburger. Now there is truth to it.

They do you imbecile, that's the main way to prevent such crime
>MSM shill
This is common knowledge Alex Jones

>he was obviously seeking information on behalf of his father's campaign, and admitted to it.
Which is a 100% lawful activity.

Go to bed, Richard.
>talking to foreigners is a crime
Better tell that to Hillary.

The media is realizing throwing rocks at a Star Destoryer doesnt work and they dont have any ammo left.

On the way out some Russian truther threw a corn cob at the Presidents son forcing the the son to put up his hand and waste a few moments of his time.

He was offered the info. They lied about it. He got nothing. Now, if there was collusion, I think he would have gotten the dirt they offered and then offered something back. But no.

lol no, read the law. he was working in the campaign and was attempting to solicit information from a foreign national. A clear violation. Now the GOP won't do anything about it, so it's a moot point, but to deny that the crime didn't occur is just you being a good brainwashed sheep.

subtle troll

>falling for obvious bait

Nope. No solicitation. They offered, he offered them zero. They had nothing of value.

No, it's not. You need to understand the law. Even if he got nothing, the act of seeking that information from a foreign national is illegal. The email chain lays it all out in black and white. if he hadn't said the idiotic things he did, like "I'd love to get that", you might have an argument that this was a simple bait and switch by the Ruskie lawyer, but that isn't what the email transcript shows.

You're calling me a "Trumpfaggot" even though I never stated I was one.I was only stating what the law was.I can post the rest of the law.Everything ,DTJr did was within the fucking bylines of said law.

Can't reason with people that can't read a law nor tell what a crime is or isn't.

>read the law.
I did, yesterday. The law only marks monetary exchange or objects of monetary value as illegal.
>he was working in the campaign
No he wasn't. Like literally Don. Jr was never once a member of Trump's campaign. That is a fact.
>and was attempting to solicit information from a foreign national.
Which is not in the least bit illegal and in fact is clearly protected by the First Amendment.

no crime occurred

>i have information on your political opponent

"i love it"
listen to what she has to say
show her out without offering anything

the girl was a gotcha plant anyways, she met with obama associates 8 days before and is a known anti-trumper. nice try shill!

Baaa baaa trump sheep. How fucking pathetic are you that you have to lie on Sup Forums of all places? No one hear believes your horseshit.

>You need to understand the law.
I do. I have the bills from law school to prove it.
>Even if he got nothing, the act of seeking that information from a foreign national is illegal
No it isn't. Not even remotely.

Don Jr is holding the nuclear codes hostage

>How can I make sure everyone knows I'm 12? I'll call him Drumpfs!!

You're lying.

The law clearly indicates that seeking this information from a forign agent is illegal. You can continue to lie but everyone knows what the law says. You're just grasping at straws.

He didn't say "I'd love to get that." He didn't offer them anything. And it's not illegal to get info from a foreign national, only if it is of 'value.' Something some one actually paid money for.

maybe if you're a member of a government or military, not if you are the stupid son of an unelected business magnate who is running for president.

Not an argument. Getting a little butthurt, are you? That's okay, we understand. Hillary still lost.

That isn't what the law says you dumbass. Where are you getting this misinformation from?

By any reading of the law he broke it. The question at this point is will he get a pardon or will the GOP just ignore it like they've ignored the litany of the other illegal shit the Trumps have done.

Nothing which is the point. Who goes to the targets son instead of the target to collude with? Who uses the information that your opponent is colluding with russia to someone who is colluding with Russia to lure them into colluding with russia? Shit just doesn't make sense.

If you're in the campaign it applies.

He's a victim of entrapment.

>The law clearly indicates that seeking this information from a forign agent is illegal
It does nothing in the slightest. Have you yourself read the law or did CNN and reddit tell you this?

>muh false equivalence
Ask me how I know you don't know how to argue.

test

Lying isn't an argument either Molyneux. How can you discuss things with people when everything you claim to know is provably untrue?

For the record Clinton is a piece of shit, I'm just not blind to the reality that Trump is just as bad if not worse.

Get off your political football team, you're hurting yourself and the nation.

And he was not ever a member of the Trump campaign.

>gets told
>WAH REDDIT IS HERE HELP ME

Fucking pathetic.

HA HA HA HA HA

Now you're denying facts again.

yes

there's a law that forbids foreign nationals from conducting political research on one's opponent? lmao sauce?

HE TALKED TO A RUSSIAN! IMPEACH!

whatdoesitmean.com/index2334.htm

Does that mean the Steele Dossier was illegal? Hillary paid a British spy, who paid Kremlin informants in order to create it.

Campaign records are public and this have verified by both the New York Times and Fox News. If you have differing information I'd love to see it.

Archived that satire/fake news site for you.

>whatdoesitmean com/index2334.htm
archive.is/L9DQJ

trump's done

They were gathering material on him for a later date... but because of CNN meme war... they shut their load yesterday to stop the assault on CNN
The run down:
>He trusted a Jew.
>The Jew tried to backstab him.
>The Jew published his
>He though it was an opposition research on Hillary
>It was totally legal... But the left, project its own illegality (such as piss-gate on Buzzfeed and CNN, stolen Trump taxes on Rachel Madcow, constant leaking of top secret info....)
>They want to equivocate the two so they also get away with it.

He attempted to colluded with someone who had information that would hurt Hillary Clinton and represented "Russia's preference for [his] father".

In other words, he at the very least attempted to collude. So the left finally has their ""evidence"". Whether it goes anywhere or not is another question, but the fact that the Trump campaign tried to work with Russia is no longer up for debate. It happened. Period.

In my opinion, OP, it won't really go anywhere, but this will highly negatively impact Trump's legacy. From here on out, 2016 will officially be remembered as the election that was stolen by the Russians. The election that the first female president should have won. It will not be remembered as an election Trump won fairly.
The dems lost the battle, but have managed to secure the way it is remembered.

Literally a private citizen spoke to a private legal alien about laws and politics

It's impeachable obviously

>Did he hack the DNC?
He personally met with Putin who directly ordered him to hack the DNC and give the stolen information, none of which was true, of course, to Wikileaks, which then ordered Don Jr. to personally go around the country, using Santa's sleigh and an invisibility potion, and fake the votes that made Donald Trump Sr. win.

That's basically what the left believes.

solicited valuable materials from a foreign national and revealed that Kushner and Manafort are guilty of perjury.

At this point whether or not Jr will be charged with anything is irrelevant, the most damning part of the chain is that it was sent to Manafort and Kushner who then attended the meeting.

Under rated comment, would give gold too.

>implying you can know what the historic consensus will be already

I don't see the difference between what Don Jr attempted to do and what Hillary actually did.

keep praying faggots

>The law clearly indicates that seeking this information from a forign agent is illegal.
So you're saying Hillary should be in prison because her people sought damaging information on Trump in Ukraine? Nobody denies they did this and it has been known for a long time. Are you saying she should be in jail for this? Or is it possible nobody cares because IT ISN'T FUCKING ILLEGAL, YOU RETARD.

Talking to someone from a country that libfags don't like is not against the fucking law.

>CAN SOMEONE TELL ME WHAT DON JR DID?

he's not faggy enough to be around that much power

Hack it's not just code.

He did something.

>what did he collude on

refusal to put man's penis in his mouth

Yes. Putin is Don jr from teh future. Dems were right. Wuz teh russian haxors.

>he demonstrated the INTENTION to COLLUDE with a FOREIGN NATIONAL


like when the Clintons sold our nuclear secrets to China in 1997?

they denied meetings with members of the russian government, not any russian national. the woman had no ties to the kremlin. the british publicist who sent the email either intentionally or unintentionally misrepresented her identity (my gut says he did it on purpose) but she was not a member of the russian government in any official or even unofficial capacity. they aren't guilty of perjury, the woman had jack shit and wasted their time; you're grasping at straws.

It's not that he actually had an effect by colluding with Russia, it's that he INTENDED to, as proven by his own emails. And intent is all that's required.

Lawnewz.com

The whole issue is was it solicitation and what constitutes something of value. There are lawyers on both sides of the issue.

>>implying you can know what the historic consensus will be already
The writing is on the wall already.
If you go to the 2016 election wikipedia page, it is all written and feamed in the context that Russia stole the election and that is backed up by the FBI and CIA. The page is blocked feom editing.

The fact of the matter is there is too much noise sayi g the same thing over and over again and not enough against it. So yes, history is being written now, and it is not being written in Trump's favor.

>the most damning part of the chain is that it was sent to (((Manafort))) and (((Kushner))) who then attended the meeting.

Truely the best timeline. Steve Bannon will usher in a new era of rampant Moldbuggery

>This is all a smokescreen,

notice that Democrats aren't upset about nominating Wray to head the FBI?

thats a bad sign

you don't want Wray, democrats aren't complaining about him

youtu.be/HO2c_2XAXMw

Here OP

True. That means they own him, or he can be bought/manipulated

There's no way to know what consensus will be. The entire Russian story will eventually fade away and it won't be mentioned again. Her lose will go back to bring blamed on Comey, or racists, or the DNC.