Why didn't the Romans just end Judasim/Christianity (and Islam)...

Why didn't the Romans just end Judasim/Christianity (and Islam)? The world would've been a much better place as a result.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_(emperor)
youtube.com/watch?v=BEzhGJ0nJDg
youtube.com/watch?v=py10Xs63ewA
youtube.com/watch?v=d29GGnHg9OM
youtube.com/watch?v=KDJtBh3LGJg
youtube.com/watch?v=H0mScGJtnB4
youtube.com/watch?v=ZLCTzLzf6to
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elohim
youtube.com/watch?v=gMyj4L_x81A
youtube.com/watch?v=zXDL2hQ76tU
youtube.com/watch?v=ZJIHLwuK3ek
youtube.com/watch?v=QGlwr44hsoE
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/125637346/#125637346
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

With out Protestantism we would be nothing

It became too popular.

When Islam emerged, "Romans" were already Christian.

Christianity had some positive aspects, for example it introduced labor ethics.

They tried, but the emperor died too soon.
F
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_(emperor)

You mean without? Catholic northern Italy, was never poorer than any germanic protestant countries.

It was their biggest mistake. Cleansing Judea would've done an enormous favor to the world, a world without the cancerous abrahamitic faiths.. It eventually bit them in the back.

Adopting Christianity was so idiotic.

Paganism allowed for better assimilation.

Because only the kikes are willing to kill an opposition to a man in order to maintain their monopoly. Everyone else fears for the state of their immortal soul in the afterlife, and would rather live and let live. How bad do you want it? Kikes want it worse, in every way.

What are you trying to say you crazy polack? Your punctuation makes no damn sense.

Fun fact: the last pagan emperor, Julian the Apostate, tried to rebuild the Jewish Temple in order to undermine Christianity.

Julius Caesar was the first Roman politician to legalize Judiasm in the central and impotant roman Provinces, he also invented the modern synagogue, the Jews could not practice their religion so he created "the synagogue" clarifying it in Roman law to be "not a center of worship but a house of learning jewry"He and Augustus regarlly offered sacrifices and alms to the temple of Jerulsame to the Lord, twice a day once for themselves and a second for the Romans. Augustus and Jewlius spent a fortune building Synagogues all over the Roman empire and giving Jews citizenship status

It allowed for better assimilation because it was such a weak and malleable faith that it could incorporate most other pagan gods into its own pantheon. That's also it's biggest fault, it wasn't a "sincere" faith compared to any of the abrahamic faiths, people weren't willing to die to spread the good news about neptune, it was just a religion of convenience, a marketplace faith.
It would have succumbed to any devout faith that it interacted with, christianity just happened to be the first. Had it not been christianity, who knows what religion would have sprang up to assume it's place. The western world might have ended up being zoroastrian, mithraic, or one of the hundreds of little cults that spring up all the time.

Bottom line, if it wasn't christianity, it would have been some other religion, Roman paganism was a dying faith, it was inevitable.

>it wasn't a "sincere" faith compared to any of the abrahamic faiths, people weren't willing to die to spread the good news about neptune, it was just a religion of convenience, a marketplace faith.
They didn't evangelize because it was an ethnic faith, not because it wasn't sincere.

>if anyone is detected stealing their sacred books or their sacred monies
>sacred monies
lol, Jews in a nutshell.
Also note, "stealing sacred books" is part of the Talmudic dictate of not allowing the goys to know what the Jews actually think of them. Because every time the truth is found out, a massacre follows.

They didn't hold it important enough to spread it is the bottom line. The first religion that would come along and seek to convert people would have invariably devoured a whole multicultural empire of little "ethnic faiths"

Religions are subject to evolutionary survival of the fittest, Roman paganism was not fit to survive.

Huh, that explains why Judaism, Sikhism, Zoroastrianism, and Jainism don't exist anymore.

We got jewed as well. Nothing surprising, to be honest, if a bit disappointing.

But then everyone would be going to Hell, OP

*and Hinduism, of course. Completely wiped from the face of the earth by Islam.

>Religions are subject to evolutionary survival of the fittest
Yeah. It looks like the future will be atheism vs. Islam.

>Why didn't the Romans just end Christianity
you cant destroy the eternal truth

Then why is paganism hand in hand with atheism to destroy monotheistic religions now?

Why are they so popular now?

if they wasted their time wiping out every kooky desert cult under the sun they wouldn't have time to do anything else, those religions are only significant to us now because they eventually took over but back then they had no idea what was gonna happen and what it would mean

Well for Europe at least. I'd don't see most of Latin America or Sub-Saharan African switching from Christianity any time soon.

>monotheism

I think paganism is popular now because most of our countries are flooded with immigrants, social cohesion has gone down, people are more depressed, they don't see an answer in Christianity since the invaders are Christians themselves, in America at least. So they look for an ethnic identity and find it in tribal paganism imo. It's kind of ironic considering that's why the Roman empire got converted, everyone felt empty and depressed because of the lack of national identities in a vast empire and immigrants everywhere.

A)Jews were forbidden to make religious images
B)This represents degeneration to paganism of certain Jews that were dealt with by Levites
Of course you, being a retarded fedora, dont check facts, but post idiocy, because you have something to say in this subject, because you watched some dawkins video.

They're pretty pagan as it is.

All Hebrews were polytheists at the time that was drawn, and idolatry had not yet been proscribed.

>All Hebrews were polytheists at the time that was drawn, and idolatry had not yet been proscribed.
nice meme, again, brainiac. This shard is from time where there was war between Canaanite polytheism and Jewish monotheism and dates AFTER Jews came to Canaan

Its true kek
OY VEY DONT LET THE GOYIM KNOW

>citation needed
Isn't that a familiar phrase?

>It allowed for better assimilation because it was such a weak and malleable faith that it could incorporate most other pagan gods into its own pantheon. That's also it's biggest fault, it wasn't a "sincere" faith compared to any of the abrahamic faiths, people weren't willing to die to spread the good news about neptune,

At least they're real gods. All the Bible gave the vermin was the illusion they had struck it rich with a license to kill.

God-damned fools...

youtube.com/watch?v=BEzhGJ0nJDg

There was no reason to spread paganism because everyone was already pagan - Jews were the devil worshipers, followed by the "Christians" and then the Muslims.

Because Romans created Christianity.
Read up some history.

Islam however was a theocratic religion to keep power in the family of Muhamed.

>When the Lord thy God shall cut off the nations from before thee, whither thou goest to possess them, and thou succeedest them, and dwellest in their land;Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou enquire not after their gods, saying, How did these nations serve their gods? even so will I do likewise. Thou shalt not do so unto the Lord thy God: for every abomination to the Lord, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods; for even their sons and their daughters they have burnt in the fire to their gods. What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.

Even though some pagans occasionally engaged in the taboo of human sacrifice - nobody comes close to the human sacrifices done to your false prophet Moses.

Or don't you realize that killing people for Moses' "divine law" is human sacrifice?

Idiot - enjoy hell where you Abrahamics belong...

youtube.com/watch?v=py10Xs63ewA

>
>When the Lord thy God shall cut off the nations from before thee, whither thou goest to possess them, and thou succeedest them, and dwellest in their land;Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou enquire not after their gods, saying, How did these nations serve their gods? even so will I do likewise. Thou shalt not do so unto the Lord thy God: for every abomination to the Lord, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods; for even their sons and their daughters they have burnt in the fire to their gods. What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.

thats the words of Moshe take it or leave it goy. If anyone performs a human sacrifice under Torah it's sacrilege, also only a beast that chews the cud and is cloven footed the jews could offer up as a sacrifice also forbidding man

He was literally playing 4D chess.

secular Jews have been totally harmless, yes

Lmao atheism has no chance against Islam.

The Romans did take some steps to suppress both faiths, but religious syncretism was one of the defining, and uniting, traits of the ancient world. As a result the Romans efforts were not aimed at wiping out either belief system. Instead they just punished the Christians and Jews for rejecting the Roman Gods. Jews adapted to this by paying an extra tax, and Christians adapted to it by further westernizing their religious practices, bringing them in line with aspects of Roman orthodoxy.

its not with out, its without
and he meant to say that Northern Italy is as rich as any protestant country in any point in the past

>why didn't the Romans just magically change the religion of the millions of subjects they had only the most tenuous of control over?

The Romans were Christian because their serfs were Christian, not the other way around. Read a book you dumb faggot.

The pagan ju ju broke; so they had to become Christians to control the masses.

Post-Enlightenment spiritual crisis. Leftists worship the land with hippie new age religions while right-wingers which have lost faith in Christ look even farther back to the spiritual roots of the Volk still worshipping the land.
youtube.com/watch?v=d29GGnHg9OM

don't know. but it would be interesting to see if there are any books about how much power jews wielded in rome if any. i just finished listening to the roman scandal series on youtube and i have a hard time believing the emperors were doing the things that are said they were doing whilst also running a glorious empire and building magnificent buildings. when we see the lies they tell about trump and how obviously false they are we can imagine that they have always done this sort of thing throughout history.

The emperors were total degenerates only after Constantinus we see a transition to strict Christian values.
youtube.com/watch?v=KDJtBh3LGJg

What we in the west regard as human rights are built from christianity.
It's our culture and heritage.
Go into any European village 100 years ago and the first thing you'd see is the church with all the community built around it.
We've transcended belief in the supernatural but our Christian culture and identity is important. This is why the cultural marxists attacked it first.
t. agnostic

I agree, monotheism would've replaced one day or another. I believe the romans decided to choose between one of those many little cults because at least they would have control over it.

yes but the question remains. if they were such degenerates then how did they achieve such greatness?

Well the city of Rome would explain that. There were lots of good people and bad. Crassus is a good example of this confusing character. A man who wanted gold and silver more than ANYTHING, he had maximum jewry. But if you read anything about him, especially the Spartacus revolt in Plutarch or anything about him in the Cataline Conspiracy you can see that he was a principled man.

That's why rome was so great, even in it's all it's craziness and hedonism it was principled.

weev done a great piece on the stormer last month i think. where he detailed that it was actually the barbarians who were very degenerate and the romans had what basically amounts to white sharia, veiled woman the whole nine yards.
so what im saying is that if that stuff about the emperors were true they would never have gotten away with that sort of behavior. but they did get away with it so to me that makes no sense

Strong ethno-centric society, patriarchy and well-disciplined men that regarded their patria as something divine. This is what was the key to the Roman spirit. Later after the conquest of Gaul and North Africa when the Empire became cosmopolitan a lot of those values were lost and many of the people worshipped different gods Eastern cults were very popular Mitra for example. Christianity unified the people and Europe for the first time in a cultural and religious sense.

The Roman historians believed that corruption of Roman values began when they started to deal with Carthage, which was wicked and taught them greed. With Marius and Julius there was a geuine feeling and desire to change that and this was very much acknowledged, and it did change and get better. Augustus and Julius did what they could to keep Romans from interacting with Eastern Cults

i agree with your points. but a society with these:
"Strong ethno-centric society, patriarchy and well-disciplined men that regarded their patria as something divine."
would not allow their leader to publicly chew somones nuts off (caligula)
both of these things in my mind could not have existed simultaneously
.

True. Augustus led the first anti-degeneracy campaign he even exiled Ovid I think it has a lot to do with greek influence.

But Christianity is pro roman. It's literally the Roman answer to Judaism.

are you seriously shilling (((weev))) and that white sharia shit here on these chins in a roman threat?

>Greed is wrong.
And you are surprised, that jews rules the world, when you had left niche for them.

Not really but at the time Christianity was accepted the Romans had already lost their rural völkisch religion.

False.

Christians were persecuted by Rome in the Early Days

basically back to my original point id like a red pilled version of roman history to be put together. just like we have with our modern history where we know who ourguys are and who the agents of the kikes are

Life was simple back then our real problems started when Charlemagne welcomed the jews in Europe.

Yeah Ovid was involved in a destructive sexual relationship too from what I heard, that's where he got is ideas about love in metamorphosis which are pretty jaded. But I wouldn't say that Augustus was the first, Marius was the first really really popular politician (like Trump or Jackson) to cry out for change. Julius road on his coattails (being his nefew) and also called for change, both made positive changes for Roma. And of course Augustus road on Julius's coattails, and Tiberius road on Augustus's. Although after that there's a lot more room to debate was good and bad for Roma. The real accusation that you can make at Julius would be that he was buddy buddy with Marcus Crassus, although everyone had to deal with Crassus sooner or later. Marius you could argue was inept to a certain extent although he was a good leader.

I don't really know what that has to do with me.

and his main persecutor became his foremost symbol and defender
Ironic, isnt it?

The Roman religion was never rural, other parts of Italy, sure, but not Roma.

Not false, there were plenty of nationalistic Christians back then as we do today, nothing's changed
Tertullian Apology ch. 30
"Without ceasing, for all our emperors we offer prayer. We pray for life prolonged; for security to the empire; for protection to the imperial house; for brave armies, a faithful senate, a virtuous people, the world at rest, whatever, as man or Caesar, an emperor would wish."

>world would've been a much better place as a result.
Not really, it would've fallen into darkness.
Christianity was & always will be The Light of the world!

Probably Mithraic.

>thats the words of Moshe take it or leave it goy. If anyone performs a human sacrifice under Torah it's sacrilege, also only a beast that chews the cud and is cloven footed the jews could offer up as a sacrifice also forbidding man

I'll leave it as Moses has been proven over and over to be a false prophet - one way ticket to eternal damnation.

youtube.com/watch?v=H0mScGJtnB4

I am not even stating or arguing whether his predictions are true or not. What I am saying is that his law, not the Talmud did not allow the Jews to offer up human sacrifices, this is about written law not spirituality. In wisdom it says that the death of a righteous man condemns the ones who killed him

>What I am saying is that his law, not the Talmud did not allow the Jews to offer up human sacrifice

That's not true - the law of Moses is human sacrifice. Just because Moses says it's not doesn't mean that the gods don't see it as human sacrifice.

youtube.com/watch?v=ZLCTzLzf6to

You do realise you posted most pro-Judean Emperor of Rome?

Augustus fucking loved jews so much he was sponsoring building Synagogues in Rome so efficiently, that jews were naming their Synagogues "of the Augustesians"
He increased jewish immigration to Rome durring his reign and made specific reforms to suit jewish needs.

If you ever wanted to example some based Emperor who understood jewish problem, then put example like Vespasian, Titus or Hadrian. (Even tho Hadrian was obsessed with boypussy)

>the gods
Deuteronomy explictly states that there is only one God
Unto thee it was shown, that thou mightest know that the LORD he is God; there is none else beside him. Know therefore this day, and consider it in thine heart, that the LORD he is God in heaven above, and upon the earth beneath: there is none else.

in Deuteronmy 32 it says that "gods" of the pagans are literal demons.

The reason why a human sacrifice is rejected by God is because he requires an unblemished victim. So no stain of sin. The only way a human could ever be accepted is if they were literally perfect their whole lives. That person could only be God (Isaiah 53)

although Jesus wasn't a human sacrifice

Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends

It was a sacrifice as people understand above, like in famous stories of heros giving themselves up. This is God paying this own price that HE demanded of mankind.

Vespasian invented the "Roman pee tax" That would hav ebeen fucking genious with Poo land

Because shooting stars are magical.

How do you explain that "Elohim" is plural?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elohim

"Then God said, " Genesis 1:26

Only the pronoun is plural, but the verbs are singular, and it could have been plural if they wanted it to be but it's not, meaning it means it is one god

well It says "and God said" elohim is plural sure but "and said" is singular if you want to be really technical about it, using plural is way of multiplying something about someone like saying "dying many deaths"

>Deuteronomy explictly states that there is only one God
>Unto thee it was shown, that thou mightest know that the LORD he is God; there is none else beside him. Know therefore this day, and consider it in thine heart, that the LORD he is God in heaven above, and upon the earth beneath: there is none else.
>in Deuteronmy 32 it says that "gods" of the pagans are literal demons.

And why would you take the word of one single book with absolutely no supporting evidence for its claims that you should become a mass-murderer? You think the gods owe you something? Since they don't stop you from becoming a murderer for Moses that you must be doing the right thing?

"This statement is the word of God and Deuteronomy is not the word of God."

Idiot.

youtube.com/watch?v=gMyj4L_x81A

>although Jesus wasn't a human sacrifice

Of course he was - that's why you have to eat his body and blood - because when you sacrifice an animal to a god, you eat of your sacrifice. (e.g. you sacrifice the bones and fat of bulls to Zeus and then eat the meat - since Yahweh demands human sacrifices, you have to eat of Jesus' body and blood for your murders for your false god).

they tried, and they failed misrebly
islam was non existent at the time of the western roman empire

Your picture is pretty edgey dude. Also the "mass murdering" meme is fedora tier.

>Jesus is a human sacrifice
Well the bible says
>Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends
And you can make a problem all you want but nobody is demanding you to make that offering to anyone. Only God made laid down his own life and no one elses. No matter what way you put it nobody is getting slain on an altar to some stone idol. Jesus was crucified, do you really think that the Pharisees and Saducees thought Jesus was a human sacrifice? No they killed him not as an offering but a criminal condemned to death. That is why they hung him on a crucifix because it meant that he was cursed. Also Peter said in Acts that those who murdered him were condemned for it by God.

A proper human sacrifice requires a pagan priesthood offering up a man in a ritual, you do it to get favor from God. In this case God is giving himself up to pay the legal penalty for crimes.

>communion
Well pagans would literall literally eat human flesh. Eating bread and wine that is the bdoy of christ is far from that.

There's nothing here to compare to paganism which is literal cannibalism and murder

since jesus is God
its more of a divine sacrifice than a human one

>Your picture is pretty edgey dude. Also the "mass murdering" meme is fedora tier.

No, it's fact tier.

> Only God made laid down his own life and no one elses.

No, the Jews murdered him.

> A proper human sacrifice requires a pagan priesthood offering up a man in a ritual, you do it to get favor from God.

Yeah, like stoning someone to death for Moses' law - to get favor from Yahweh you must murder the innocent - not to mention commit genocide.

Enjoy hell - you all earned it.

youtube.com/watch?v=zXDL2hQ76tU

> Well pagans would literall literally eat human flesh. Eating bread and wine that is the bdoy of christ is far from that.

You're a retard - I'm sure there's been some cannibal pagans on Earth - but few and far between.

>crucify crazy cult man to bring peace and prosperity to judea
>he becomes a dead martyr, thousands flock to him, they take up the symbol of this dead guy on a cross,wtf
>kill random christians en masse, emperor enjoys those shows
>more pop out to replace these dead christians, every single one we kill 10 take their place
>accursed cult engulfes the empire
>lose empire as the people become weak and decadent due to christianity and don't believe in the glory that Mars brings on the battlefields
>not enough honorable recruits, have to resort to barbarians instead
>they stab you in the back, you die, no choice since other barbarians can kill you as well
>large new muslim cult horde pops up in the east, damn we r fukked
a weak religion creates weak people which forced us to recruit pagan barbarians who stab us in the back which leaves us even weaker, ready and ripe to be pillaged by moon cultists from the east

>lose empire as the people become weak and decadent due to christianity
That happened long before Jesus was born. Already Augustus was starting massive anti-degeneracy campaigns against especially the greek cult.

well no there is a difference between divine retribution and a deity demanding human sacrifice. Any one would be pleased that a judge and jury condemned a criminal to death, but being pleased with a man's death, even God being pleased is not the same thing as human sacrifice.

When Bellopheron rode up to Olympus in the myths, Zeus in the story strikes him down for his vanity, and Zeus was pleased by this, and would be pleased if another man did it for him, but it's not a sacrifice. There is a difference.

A human sacrifice is about buying favor. it's like a bribe. It's not about justice, criminals may be offered but it's not a bout justice since the pagans said that 1 pure virgin = 100 criminals, because it's about worth, not justice. look at burning man, they needed lots of evil men to please their gods. It's like selling a soul to satan. similar principle.

Also generally pagans didn't believe in hell, not for them, that came after Plato and eastern philosphers. Yes the Jews did murder Jesus and they intended to murder him, as a criminal, on the grounds of justice, they didn't kill Jesus to buy favor with God. Jesus himself did consider this a way of saving men's souls from Hell. that's a heroic sacrifice. And the onlyone that needs to be made.

>but it wasn common
It was common in Greece, no matter what they tell you the women in greece did ahve a serious Manead problem, and it came from the eastern cults like in Babylon and it made it's way west into Roma. Bachnicanlia had the wives offer up their own husbands has sacrifices, it was very very widespread.

Because religious practice of Christianity was secretive in the times of the Roman Empire.

The Romans didn't put up with human sacrifice, the Greeks were hypocrites but the Romans weren't. Their response to Bachinalia was a mass state sanctioned purge, it was pretty serious, after that the Bachic cults no longer had the free reign taht they used to have, it was heavily monitored by the state.

>A human sacrifice is about buying favor. it's like a bribe. It's not about justice, criminals may be offered but it's not a bout justice since the pagans said that 1 pure virgin = 100 criminals, because it's about worth, not justice. look at burning man, they needed lots of evil men to please their gods. It's like selling a soul to satan. similar principle.

Moses' law has nothing to do with Justice. You retards are worthless to the human species - no matter how much evidence is put in front of you most of the Bible is a lie - you'll still defend it like God isn't going to put you in hell forever for following a mass-murdering false prophet...

I can give you a shit load of evidence I'm God and you'll still believe the proven lie that never had any supporting evidence in the first place that is the Bible.

The devil must completely own your soul for this kind of retardation to be possible.

youtube.com/watch?v=ZJIHLwuK3ek

>Also generally pagans didn't believe in hell, not for them, that came after Plato and eastern philosphers

That's not true, both Greco-Roman and Egyptian paganism believes in torment in the afterlife for wicked people.

Remember guys

human sacrifice is like selling your soul. You give up x lives to x favor, so giving up your own soul gets you favor from the devil, you do it so he likes you and trades you what you wanted in return. It's buisiness. Not Justice.

God is sees sin as a pentalty to pay not a favor to him. God needs no favors you cannot earn his favor you can only receive his grace.

>Better is death than a wretched life,
>everlasting sleep than constant illness.
Justice in the bible comes from two justifications, either you are punished because it should teach you a damn lesson, or it is done because you really are off better punished, hindered from doing more evil. BEcause for most ancients, sin brought on more sin, "curses" not a magical curse but sorta the destruction that comes naturally from it.
I said AFTER Plato, after plato yes absolutely lots and lots of discussions of hell. Before not so much. Hell is prescribed for legendary figures, as is paradise, everyone else goes to the Field of Ashes. The reason why it became truth to pagans is because the Egyptians and other eastern cults brought in mystery religoins. Like the Orphic cult, you get in and then theygive you instructions to get to paradise when you die, but those are "secrets" hence "mystery religion" unfortunately many of these cults demanded of their men to do wicked things to control them, like today in DC, blackmail.

Men like Plato desired to open up this idea of paradise and hell to normie paganism, because they didnt want normies getting into these mystery religions, what they are are cults, and I mean that in the very bad way.

>Justice in the bible comes from two justifications, either you are punished because it should teach you a damn lesson, or it is done because you really are off better punished, hindered from doing more evil.

You don't know good from evil and the Bible is no guide to that. And, once again, it's still a fraud - Exodus never happened - worldwide flood never happened.

You're lying vermin - better hope God isn't real because if he is, I'm sure he hates murdering, lying, terrorist, self-righteous, blasphemers like followers of Moses.

youtube.com/watch?v=QGlwr44hsoE

>Why didn't the Romans just end Judasim/Christianity (and Islam)?

Lol, Christianity really ramped up thanks to the roman empire actually, specially in the "lower class" of citizens

Catholicism for example it's the perfect example of the romanization of christianity

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/125637346/#125637346

Read this. If you're a history buff you'll like these. the Timothy McGrew guy goes into the Classics the most in comparing with the new testament, but all of them are good

>Read this. If you're a history buff you'll like these. the Timothy McGrew guy goes into the Classics the most in comparing with the new testament, but all of them are good

You people are fools. What is the point of worshiping a false God? Particularly if that false god requires you to be a serial killing, thieving, raping liar?

You people are nothing but losers today, just like the Jews were 2000 years ago - and just like you'll always be: liars, frauds, con-artists, criminals.

I'm God - but your head is too far up your ass for you to pay attention to that fact.

youtube.com/watch?v=BEzhGJ0nJDg

I am an atheist, but you are stupid if you think Paganism could have saved anything. The very fact that Pagan Rome led to decedance and weakness meant that the entire cultural milieu was corrupt. Christian Empires took over where Rome left off and conquered the world.

>Christian Empires took over where Rome left off and conquered the world.

You're confused - Rome was huge - when Christians took over it fractured into dozens of countries. False gods have that effect because you can never reach a consensus as to what the false god wants of people because it's not a god.

youtube.com/watch?v=BEzhGJ0nJDg

Well I'm sorry if this got too off topic. If anyone is interested in Jewry in Roma.

Marcus Crassus was famous, he bought a whole "army" of slaves, it was called the "slave brigade." It was a privatized firefighter force, and the only firefighting service in the whole city. It was not state paid. If you did not have bronze or silver membership to Crassus's slave brigade firefighting service, he would send them to burn down your house himself and then offer you to put out the fire, if you traded in your property and agree to rent out to him. He literally owned EVERY acre of Roma. Crassus is the only reason why we have public firefighting.

Historians assume that the Cataline conspiracy was to kill Cicero or at least exile him or something. It was not actually an assassination attempt on Cicero's life. it was a plan of Caesar and Crassus's to make Cicero look totally ridiculous and stupid. Crassus confides to Cicero in the night that his buddies planned to kill him (Cicero). Cicero freaks out and shows up to the senate with body guards and wearing roman armor, hes flabby as fuck and looks stupid. going on about Crassus and Caesar are plotting to assassinate him with Cataline, nothing happens, he still wont shut up about it and Crassus and Caesar get away with the whole thing. Cicero then writes a poetic "epic" like Homer or Virgil to talk about his heroic adventures against Crassus Caesar and Cataline and all these other men, he reads out publicly and its HORRIBLE, its so bad all we have is Romans talking about how awful it was, but Ciceo had all the copies burned and destroyed that could be found. Since then people could only talk about funny and stupid Cicero looked, and his career was ruined. Which was the real intent.

God is real, jesus was real. A power that big like god can't be just deleted.

My grandfather was miraculously healed from a stroke, he couldn't walk, couldn't talk.
Suddenly he talks, suddenly he walks again, from one day to the other. The doctors said he will be forever in a wheelchair like a vegetable. And now he just like that started talking, walking again. This all happaned after i purely devoted my whole being to god, i begged, i prayed in all of my being that i want at least another year with my grandpa. And he listened, one day after my prayer he started talking and walking again, the doctors said he would never even move a part of his body.

God is real, christianity is true, the bible is true. Read it, accept it, because it is the most truest form of knowledge on this planet.


Amen.