What really happened on 9/11?

Can jet fuel melt steel beams?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=FzF1KySHmUA
uniteordiemedia.com/3-questions-youre-never-supposed-to-ask-after-a-terrorist-attack/
youtu.be/YajtKSezBj0
m.youtube.com/watch?v=3-jeQmW5wiA
youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaWyiozg
youtu.be/lEqeELMXsyo
youtu.be/5d5iIoCiI8g
archive.4plebs.org/_/search/subject/knowledge bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/!!9O2tecpDHQ6/]
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Jet fuel does not melt steel beams. And no one has ever claimed that it does.

Bullshit. Tons of news try to prove thatbit can happen. Lots of sad jewtube videos demonstrating it. The most they ever do is make the steel red hot after hours.

Really sad attempt at subterfuge.

Heating steel causes it to lose it's structural strength.

>youtube.com/watch?v=FzF1KySHmUA

What happened to WTC 7 ?

A billion tons of falling debris fell on it.

Correct. It's called structural integrity and malleability.

uniteordiemedia.com/3-questions-youre-never-supposed-to-ask-after-a-terrorist-attack/

youtu.be/YajtKSezBj0

True, but that has nothing to do with the phrase "jet fuel can't melt steel beams". You see, the steel beams WERE melted into pools of molten steel. Firefighters were quoted as saying there were rivers of molten steel streaming out. The heat was so great that it was picked up on satellites for weeks. So it begs the question, what exactly melted the steel, if not the jet fuel?
I'm so sick of people trying to conflate the meaning of that phrase with the actual collapse itself, which is incorrect.

American's choose to trust their leaders explanation of events in the face of logic and reason. Thus a new autocracy was born, and the government could finally begin it's decent from servant of we the people into the godhead of a future third world communist shithole where real communism might finally be tried.

You're right. Someone (you) should do something (act of violence) about it.

WTC 7. That is all.

It doesn't cause steel beams to turn to dust in midair.

wtf is this??

government holograms son

Still no concrete idea, but I'm gonna assume it was a joint US-Saudi-Israeli operation meant to false flag against the Middle East and tighten security stateside.

dustification of steel beams in a matter of seconds....

...

no but it can melt illusions about your govt

>and yet the other WTC buildings closer with more debris falling on them didn't collapse

structure's steel skeleton is dusty from all the debris of the building collapsing, appears to turn into dust when structure below it collapses and it falls straight down. you can actually see the beam halfway down on the third picture.
Di5lp2LW is a fag.

You can see that it fell...it didnt vaporize.

Drop something into a cloud of smoke and it will suck smoke up along the path of the falling object because of changes in pressure.

check mate, athetits

...

yea, evenly in a burning building after an explosion. straight fucking down retard.

...

they blew it up of course

right faggot

and heating steel also makes it so that various steel beams will lose their structural strength in the exact same millisecond.

>stupid demolition companies do not simply heat up the steel beams a bit and still use expensive explosives for their job
kek

LOOKS LIKE A GOD DAMN MISSILE
MISSILES? IN MY AMERICA?!!?
NO

Jet fuel can't melt steal beams but thermite sure can if you have enough and I can say it's thermite because there was traces of thermite in the rubble of the twin towers. Here is the link for a video talking about it m.youtube.com/watch?v=3-jeQmW5wiA

has anyone ever done a simulation or something of what it was like to either be in the cockpit/plane or in the tower that was hit?

>linking to a 95 iq retard showing intense autism

youtube.com/watch?v=vadSaWyiozg

Yes, see gif in OP

Top bait mate

...

>pentagon
>has high security
>240p jpeg camera security
>mfw

>this
I'm really not sure why people can't understand this. The WTC structural were covered in fire retardant material precisely for this reason. Much of which was blown off during the enitial impact.

>Tucker Carlson isnt a controlled op deep state stooge

Our/guy/ right pol?

Bush did 9/11. Cheney helped.

Its possible that the jet fuel combined with the rapid compression of the steel is what caused the beams to "melt"

Not buying it.

PLANE
MUST
HIT
STEEL

youtu.be/lEqeELMXsyo

>What really happened on 9/11?
You guys always talk about the buildings, but why never talk about how it exposed the fragile financial system was dangling by a strand of hair?

youtu.be/5d5iIoCiI8g

really verbs my noun

The twin towers, building 7, and parking lots full of vehicles were hit by a Tesla Death Cannon.

Were are all the debris immediately after they fell?

Why were cars set on fire, but trees across the street were okay?

Watch the twin towers collapse again, youll notice it evaporates into dust.

This is the truth, no muslim bombers were involved. It was a Jewish Death Ray cannon.

Pic Related

Bush did nothing wrong. Hillary did 9/11. Do some research and you'll understand the truth.

> Bunch of Saudis attack America
> America carpet bomb Afghan farmers

I don't know how Building 7 fell.
I don't know if jet fuel was really enough to melt steel beams.

BUT...
Anyone citing the way the buildings fell has no clue what they are talking about. Buildings are designed to collapse in such a way that it would collapse straight down onto itself. Controlled demolitions merely take advantage of this design when blowing shit up, so there's no reason why the towers collapsing WOULDN'T look like a controlled demolition. You see, some engineers figured out very early on that if a building was to become so damaged that it collapsed, it could cause other buildings to collapse by falling to the side or forwards or backwards. Therefore, they were designed to fail in such a way that the buildings would only ever fall straight down onto itself.

Not saying it wasn't an inside job, just posting some facts here. There is nothing suspicious about the buildings falling straight down; in fact, it would be extremely suspicious if they did not fall straight down.

...

It can't but it can weaken them which is exactly what happened. Along with paper thin walls and all sorts of fire hazard materials

Large Drones(That would be mistaken for airplanes) were used, all Planes on TV/Media were not Real.

Shadow Gov/Deep State,Saudi's,Mossad(2 sides), MIC,MSM/Hollywood & Al-Q were involved. It was a Coup,Heist,Distraction & Domino Effect.

[Made a 9/11 thread a while ago: archive.4plebs.org/_/search/subject/knowledge bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/!!9O2tecpDHQ6/]

Demolition of the Towers was a combination of Thermite at the Core Columns, Charges around the Structures at key locations & Mini-Nukes in/at the foundations.

If you know the size of the Pentagon Building, you'd recognize that must have been one fucking big missile.

Was i right?

READ THIS FFS

>2001
>where are the 4k 60fps security cams

>Demolition of the Towers was a combination of Thermite at the Core Columns, Charges around the Structures at key locations & Mini-Nukes in/at the foundations.

Then why fuck around with fake planes at all? "Terrorists used thermite bombs to destroy the WTC" would have been a sugfficiently scary story to justify a War for oil, or whatever you think the secret purpose of the whole thing was, without the extra chances of getting caught in a lie that adding hugger-mugger about planes full of people would have added.

>sugfficiently
Fuck this fucking phone.

What's pathetic is that a basic smart phone has full color, high resolution video but every time an actual crime takes place, security footage is still black and white and/or grainy and blurry.

>but why never talk about how it exposed the fragile financial system was dangling by a strand of hair?
Luckily, some big investors and interests made the right moves to benefit by coincidence.

The problem is that it wasn't just the impact points where the steel was melted or lost integrity...

The entire building lost integrity and fell along with the other steel beams being melted or turned to dust.

Why would the entire building collapse flat at free fall speed and not slowly break away or crumble?

>uniteordiemedia.com/3-questions-youre-never-supposed-to-ask-after-a-terrorist-attack/

Good read. Thanks. Seriously.

>checkd

go here mein nigga

Bush Administration hired Bin Laden to fly planes into the building/

They told the owner so he could keep those floors clear

Instead he took out a massive insurance policy and set timed thermite charges to bring them down.

He made a dentist appointment for that day and everything that happened was pretty much his fault

Bush Admin could not go public and was forced to roll with the narrative. It's why optimistic George died that day. Bush Administration would have been hung for treason if it were discovered

>Bush Admin could not go public and was forced to roll with the narrative. It's why optimistic George died that day.
Don't read up on Project for a New American Century, mebbe take a nap. There's nothing suspicious about the BIN LADEN family hanging with the Bush family and then catching a plane ride after the attack. Bush dindu 9/11, Sauds dindu nuffin.