4.Flexible language up to FCC interpretation could and would most likely be used to further regulations.
5.Governments are the notorious censors of the website they have much more to lose than just potential customers they lose power from those that dissent publicly.
6.Every byte is not equal and it's not possible for them to be. Traffic shaping and QOS will always be used because that's a technical part of networking.
7. Lauded by the left who consider anything they disagree with as hate speech and would love to enable government censorship and would lie to you to do so. (what I believe is currently happening)
I dont know either but NN was introduced in 2015, pretty sure end of days stuff wasnt happening before then
Owen Fisher
That
Spacing
Go
Back
Leo Ortiz
>crying about spacing
Lucas Collins
Stay on topic please
Hunter Wright
Paid shill leaving talking points and trying to use hatred of liberals to make the ISP lots of jewbucks.
Brayden Foster
My internet speeds are great. I don'y want my skype blocked because some jew mobile operator wants to force me into paying extra for their services. Fuck this kike free market meme. Fix your own fucking governments.
Adrian Lee
No I'm a neet. Just my opinion in the way I find easiest to put it
Xavier Carter
Compelling argument.
Liam Carter
Don't make the same mistake that Canada has made with their heavily regulated telecom industry. Yes, technically it's considered a 'utility', but the CRTC has such loose rules that they can censor any content the government disagrees with. We can all see how much the left despises free speech. Why do you think they would do anything other than do thinly veiled censorship?
Try watching for instance nazi wartime songs in france on YouTube region blocks all around Netherlands is actually pretty good on this things blocked are due to copyright things, economic reasons not politica