(((Net Neutrality)))

Honestly I do not see what is wrong with this. The Free Market at work is a beautiful thing to me.

Other urls found in this thread:

google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwid-tq6k4XVAhWH3SYKHUKVAccQFggqMAE&url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality_in_the_United_States&usg=AFQjCNGmVZsFC8fmZJj7rrGSnWPaXDNiPQ
twitter.com/AnonBabble

That is the most retarded thing I think I've ever seen posted here before.

This is not going to happen. It can't. Internet is not a fucking cable package.

Hahahaha ironic considering that we'll all be banned off Sup Forums if this goes through

This image literally triggers me.

>NN repealed
>ISP bans [insert website here]
>Drop ISP For one that doesn't
Wow, so hard.
Also, wtf is going on with the CAPTCHA. forgot to turn on legacy, and now Google keeps telling there are cars when there are no cars.

It's not a free fucking market when over 50% of the country only has one ISP available, and another 30% only has two to choose from.

>Drop ISP For one that doesn't

Where do you live that you have a choice in ISP?

>>Drop ISP For one that doesn't
You can't do that. Your ISP depends on your region. You can't change your ISP.
They need to break the monopolies before removing net neutrality

You are free to choose no internet.

I have two choices for ISP. DSL and cable.
Unless they enforce regulations which stop them from creating monopolies, I'm fucked.
There are a few places in the US which have municipal lines, the one I experienced had """fiber""", and it was utter shit.

>ameripoors being stuck with ONE (1) provider

>tfw you live in a city that banned this isp's from pulling this shit

Twitter warriors would never have that option.

Good thing you used half of your data cap to post that, otherwise I wouldn't feel bad ;_;

Is this shit real? It's not the 90's anymore. There are a lot of people who cut the cable and are depending on an internet connection to view TV.

Pic is my current internet package

If we lived in a world with 20+ ISPs competing for customers, I'd say go for it. Instead, we live in a world where over 80% of Americans have only one or two choices in ISP. The "muh free market" argument against net neutrality is out of touch with reality.

well goy better hurry up and try and get NN to stay because you'll end up using your entire cap to post what I just posted!

I wish they taxed social media sites more than anything. I wish it costs money to post on social media. It's the catalyst for fake news, and western degradation.

Regardless, a monopoly is not an element of a healthy capitalist system.

This place called "the world"

...

if it increases my internet anything past 600kpbs im down for it.
Already pay $120 a month for this garbage

what

I would have no moral stipulations with rounding up every single an-cap and Libertarian and putting a bullet through their thick skulls.

Sparse on the east coast, random bits in the west, or North Dakota.

Also, what is North Dakota doing that the rest of us aren't?

Interesting. I'm part of that map and there's no secondary choice let alone a third or fourth.

>ISP "A" and ISP "B", being the only two ISP's in the region, make an arrangement to ban [insert website here] (or even charge extra for access to it, because jews)
>due to no competing ISP's, users of [insert website here] are forced to go fuck themselves.
I assure you, this won't be nice.

>Drop ISP For one that doesn't

Prior to 2015 there was no legal enforcement of network neutrality and we were just fine all that time.

What's your zip code?

Except that's a violation of existing federal anti-trust law and the FTC will fuck them both in the ass for it.

Right wing sites are going to be the first to go under these packages. Once again libertariansm will make conditions where libertarianism isn't possible.

>Also, what is North Dakota doing that the rest of us aren't?
Fracking

This. I'd think North Dakota would be as fucked as South Dakota...North Dakotanons, what gives?

>tfw americucks get jewed, once again

More likely each ISP creates a standard for what content it will allow and what content it will block, causing ISPs in the same area to block a similar selection of websites without any explicit arrangement.

>being this fucking stupid

what's gonna happen to the fucking TCP/IP protocol

>Internet is not a fucking cable package.
You can thank NN for that.

ask the UK...

How many ISPs do you Eurocucks and Aussies have?
I honestly have no idea.
I thought I heard that show Adam Ruins Everything claim that other countries have plenty to choose from, but that dude is a liberal douche and I don't trust a word he says.

The FCC has been able to fine ISPs over net neutrality violations since before you were born you down syndrome monkey retard

sage this shit

How did you niggers post on 4chins before Net Neutrality was put into effect? Really makes one ponder

If you notice in this thread and others of the same topic, OPs flag seems to always be posting against NN.
Interesting

>everyone agrees with me, no one is stupid, everything is bait
go to hell

In my area I have 9 ISPs to choose from, 5 of them offer fiber internet with speeds up to 10gbps and the other 4 offer cable internet up to 500 mbps

Well, in just searching around for a house, I've noticed we have a many different rural ISPs. Midco also has a huge presence. That's probably why.

at least 7 in my vicinity

sage

Fugggg.
It's crazy how most Americans don't consider that lack of competition caused by the government interference causes so many of our problems.

Net neutrality existed way before the FCC codified it.

I guess my mind just can't grasp this type of concept.
So they would put each website ever made into a category or something?! I'm sure I sound like an idiot, but I honestly don't get it.
Sure, I have certain websites I go to everyday, but I like to check out other places too.

Interneting is hard

What do you guys pay a month?
Please use your currency amount or do the exchange rate for me.

at least 4 or 5 in most areas
2 to 3 in regional areas
think only telstra services the outback areas

>Internet is not a fucking cable package.
this is literally what net neutrality means

60AUD a month for unlimited ADSL2
speed for me is ass tier tho

I currently pay 108$ which has 10gbps speeds, however if you get something like 500 mbps you pay around 46$. Netherlands and the US have almost the same GDP per capita so the prices should be comparable

Reminder that you live in a country that is a fourth the size of my state

Yes I understand that, if you live in a smaller country network infrastructure is way more manageable

160000 citizen town, i live quite central, i know 5 big provider and theres a bunch of other niche providers/just worse providers, but the big ones dont really have differences, and i never heard about all this crap, i pay for 6mb/s download and thats all, no size limit, no blocked crap, only raw internet

Then I get the cheapest package, buy a VPN to a free country, and go wherever I want on the Internet.

Done.

I pay 40 euros for 100Mb/s (my actual speed is +-80) + hundred and something channels and phone.

40 euros is like 50 something dollars. But Minimum wage here is 500 euros, and the average is 850.

VPNs are leftist tools. ISPs have a right to ban them.

I pay $60 a month.

How can America be so awesome in some ways but suck so horribly in others?

...

Shit, ment to use this pic.
$60 a month for this shit.

Think of it from a business standpoint. The ISP makes deals with all major websites to create a "basic internet package" that is very cheap, but only allows access to those select sites. The ISP makes money from the sites who pay to be part of the basic package, and the sites paying to be part of the package make money from essentially a captured user base.

Then you expand this system into more tiers of web access, each tier getting more expensive and providing you with access to a wider variety of sites, probably with an "unrestricted internet" package being the most expensive. A "pay per view" style system where you pay a dollar amount to access certain sites is unlikely, but a system where broad categories of websites are segregated into different packages is.

The "pay more to get more" idea also extends to stuff like streaming, data limits, etc. You want to stream 4k video? More data use? Gotta pay more. Imagine the current concept of paying more to get higher speed internet extended to every aspect of the web.

No country is perfect, and you know that. Luckily we live in the west and we should be thankful for it. There are a lot of people out there who don't have food or a bed to sleep in tonight

Forgot to add that if i wanted a package with just the internet, i would pay half for the same speed

>upto 22gb/month

I get the vibe you might be a tad liberal, so you might disagree with this, but the west is awesome because white people founded it.

Starving people who don't have a bed to sleep in weren't smart enough to start a society that considered such things.

hah maybe if it was a freemarket and not a monopolised one

"February 26, 2015 – FCC passes the Title II Net Neutrality Rules. “In a 3–2 party-line vote, the FCC passes open internet rules applying to both wired and wireless internet connections grounded in Title II authority.”"
google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwid-tq6k4XVAhWH3SYKHUKVAccQFggqMAE&url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality_in_the_United_States&usg=AFQjCNGmVZsFC8fmZJj7rrGSnWPaXDNiPQ

The Internet isn't what it was a decade ago. For most people, it might as well be a cable package.

The telecom companies know this and would happily exploit it.

What are the plebians going to do? Start their own ISP? Lol good luck.

you stupid fucking knee-knocking faggots. we had none of this fucking shit prior to 2016/obama's net neutrality garbage. in fact, prices were way lower because the companies had to pay for the data transfer on their end. now they force the consumer to pay it
you stupid liberal fucks are the dumbest people on this planet.

I guess my mind just can't grasp this type of concept.
So they would put each channel ever made into a category or something? I'm sure I sound like an idiot, but I honestly don't get it.
Sure, I have certain channels I watch everyday,but I like to browse other cable channels too.

Television is hard

>This is not going to happen. It can't. Internet is not a fucking cable package.

Oh that's right. They care. They care about you. So it won't happen.

>The state of your denial/delusion/faith in muh big Corp being goody good good.

They would sell you oxygen if they could control access to it, what makes this different?

>1 ISP in your area
Y'all are getting (((rused))) in to adding more regulation (as if Net Neutrality somehow results in less? you fucking droolers would buy that shit from a bunch of liberal whiners, jfc) to a market a few ISPs are already monopolize because of current regulation blocking competition. I hate you all so much.

>Net Neutrality
>willingly giving control of the internet to the (((FCC)))
What a great idea, there is a 0% chance of this ever biting us in the ass. No siree, no chance at all.

I think socialists care more about an individual than a liberal. On the political compass I'm in the middle but leaning to the right. Most people on Sup Forums can agree with you on that argument because whites are the superior race in any way. But the point I'm trying to make is that internet is a (western) luxury and people should stop chimping out over it

This is literally disgusting and fuck you for supporting it.

It's great. Would just kill those shitty companies. Goodbye facebook!

>ISP blocks website
>I open my VPN and access website anyway
>Meanwhile I shop for another ISP

Why do people think governments need to interfere with things that aren't problems?

let me tell you kiddies how it used to be

I had NetZero internet - cost ZERO dollars
I connected through my phone line - cost $9.50 a month
I had access to every website

No, there was no Netshit, but there were also no sissy girls, grandmas, authorities up your ass on the internet....good times, sorry you missed it

How has free market competition worked out for journalism? Surely it would be impossible for big conglomerates to all conspire together to force narratives and agendas upon the population? After all, there's competition right?

I'm sure ISP's would never ever be infiltrated or lobbied to throttle access to certain politically incorrect websites

Is anyone still surprised that nu-Sup Forums loves riding the corporate cock? Those teh_donald faglords would even defend big pharma in a heartbeat.

Big difference between 450+ cable channels & 10,000+ websites.

Why would i listen to opinions from someone who cant figure out a fucking captcha

Fucking bannonshills are getting too obvious

If you even knew how cable packages works you would know that the cable companies actually buy the rights to broadcast channels from specific channels themselves, if internet worked the same way cable tv does you would find all ISPs paying places like Facebook, and Google to be able to allow access to their customer base to the website, not the other way around.

yet the great boogeyman comcast hadnt throttled anyone for 10 years when that was passed
hmmmmmmmmmm

Then the free market isn't a healthy capitalist system

>No, there was no Netshit, but there were also no sissy girls, grandmas, authorities up your ass on the internet....good times, sorry you missed it
b-b-b--but this is impossible! We need unchecked government bureaucracies to oversee things! Surely we can trust them!

>he thinks the internet only has 10,000 websites
99% of these will be throttled. They can't outbid Youtube or facebook, they're fucked

but the state cares?

>Honestly I do not see what is wrong with this. The Free Market at work is a beautiful thing to me.

Why doesn't ISP just create their own internet. I'm sure plenty of people would use AT&T verse or what ever they would call it.

People are very passionate about their utilities.
If there's a much smarter and better way to do something, we should do it. I think we mostly agree, but I think American's should chimpout over government jewish tricks fucking up ISPs being able to compete.

>Why doesn't ISP just create their own internet. I'm sure plenty of people would use AT&T verse or what ever they would call it.
Compuserve 2.0 incoming!

Burgers don't get freedom. ...

anyone that wants the state to do something is automatically spitroasting themselves

Again if you even knew how cable packages works you would know that the cable companies actually buy the rights to broadcast channels from specific channels themselves, if internet worked the same way cable tv does you would find all ISPs paying places like Facebook, and Google to be able to allow access to their customer base to the website, not the other way around.