Was giving women the right to vote a mistake?

Was giving women the right to vote a mistake?

No. Giving people that doesn't own land the right to vote was a mistake. Gender doesn't matter when the true root to being retarded is being retarded.

No, it was a planned judgement by New Zealand to fuck with the rest of us.

fpbp

Land ownership is a myth in my country.

>Give only land owners right to vote in Australia
>90% of the votes come from Chinese nationals and 9% from Jews

>Was giving women the right to vote a mistake?

No more white women voted Trump then Hillary and more women voted Le Pen than man

giving everyone the right to vote just because they have a certain age, that's a mistake, the gender isn't of any issue.

Allowing them to leave the kitchen was a mistake.

Allowing m*n to create the laws in this fucking country was its first mistake

Not an argument.

because feels over facts
and considering the marriage rate, the only conservative women are married ones

Yes, cunts can't have rights they aren't people.
>more women voted Le Pen than man
She's a horrible "politician" and a cunt. No wonder cunts would vote for it.

Thought they are too inbred to think of that.

was giving the Average North Mexican Woman the freedom to be seen a mistake?

Do women even know what they want?

I'd give that bitch a chance to pull my lever, if you know what I mean.

These conversations always forget one simple thing. Western society has no stigma against women who are sluts and whores. In fact, women are encouraged in many aspects to be those things. Men shill for women and western culture allows women to do whatever degenerate things they want. It's quite evil actually.

Voting is a side issue in all this. As said, a lot of women are conservative actually, but I'm not entirely convinced voting is even a good thing anyway. All I see out of it is a choice between different politicians and parties that will kick the can down the road for more years time and change nothing.

So I don't think giving women the right to vote was a good thing, but I don't think giving anyone the right to vote was good either.

That pic, lmao
>white "people"

One could argue that. The 19th amendment led almost immediately to prohibition and to the formation of brutal gangs who engaged in open warfare in our cities. It also created large illicit fortunes for people who in a free market would never have risen to such levels. If women couldn't vote, the democratic party might actually be sane and represent the interests of the american people at large.

yes

>more women voted for Le Pen than men
If this is true, France has reached cuck levels previously thought impossible

Bingo. People who have no skin in the game shouldn't have a say. Welfare scums shouldn't be allowed to vote themselves more freebies.

A better system would have the votes of anyone 18-21 years of age have their vote worth only half unless they are have been enlisted in any branch of the military in which case they get a full vote.

>Was giving women the right to vote a mistake?
Nope. next!

Yes. Overwhelmingly liberal voters. When you grant women the right to vote, say goodbye to your national heritage, because women aren't loyal to their own people, over time. Say goodbye to non-intrusive government because they prefer lifestyle security to financial and personal freedom. You'll be paying for every welfare scheme and personal life screw-up insurance benefit they can manage to get their hands on.
The amount of politicians and social movement organizers eager to get power off women votes is longer than the line of cocks they want spurted up in them, before they'd like to have you raise their babies. If you will. If not that's okay, because daddy gub will take care of them, and they can be as degenerate a whore as they want to in exchange for nummy baby formula gimme checks.

If you rely on the government to feed and house you, you should have no vote.

Giving women the right to vote was an error.

So... no votes for army personnel, public school staff, or public hospital staff?

obviously

No, otherwise we wouldnt have half the shit we got today, society would be fucking saudi arabia but with bible thumpers instead of muslims. Plus women would still be doing crazy shit to get that right if we didnt give it to them back then

Funny because he won with the women vote.

Damn. Nailed it.

/thread

This 100%

>Was giving women the right to vote a mistake?
Women should be the only ones allowed to vote anyways. Dudes are idiots. Even the smart ones.

Behold the leftist puke.

You're a retard.

Boys should be the only ones allowed to vote anyways. Girls are ditsy. Even the smart ones.

>Giving people that DON'T

Welcome to the shit retard...

That is what our original voting laws where; we are a REPUBLIC, not democracy.

Europe wasn't Saudi Arabia before WWII, it was very civilized and pretty liberal.

well put user.

Yes

kinda, yeah.

Women generally use their emotions more than their sense of reason and should not vote or govern. It is a curse to be ruled over by women

(Is 3:12) "As for my people, their oppressors have stripped them, and women have ruled over them. O my people, they that call thee blessed, the same deceive thee, and destroy the way of thy steps."

Limiting the vote to property owners stopped the government from passing new taxes. People who don't own property will vote to get free sh*t from other people.

I think there should also be an intelligence test to prevent retards from voting. I don't mean just literal retards, but also about half of California.

It was a bigger mistake to let non-property owning men the right to vote. This is what's led to the fucked up situation where half of the population pays zero net taxes (and just collects gibs from the gubment) and now has the power to continue to vote themselves free money.

Single women are problems because (see above)...most married women will vote as their husbands do. If they don't then that's the fault of men.

>Find myself in this thread
>Legitimately think I'm still on r9k until I notice the flags

Yeah, but if we restrict voting back to white men, Trump would have won all 50 states.

Giving anyone the right to vote was a mistake.

The world needs balance. But, when men start doing things to get women(Like being liberal), that's when shit collapses.

...

Literally seeing this girls face everywhere on Sup Forums lately... you just crazy posting it everywhere?

Yes. Socialism would be impossible without the votes of women.

>having a few thousand dollars means you're not retarded
The answer is yes OP.
Also giving it to childless men and non-whites.
>women would still be doing crazy shit to get that right
No more than the dumb shit they do now that they have it. Just now they have the government going along with it.
How often do you hear about women doing crazy shit in Saudi Arabia?

Yes, but democracy was also a mistake.

Speaking about the welfare class. Not those who exchange work for pay from the government.

The truth about you is not an argument?

I wrote all this shit out in a thread that 404'd just as I hit post. Aggravating... Sorry for adding this to your only vaguely-related thread.
>loss of purpose
For Carl Jung, sense of purpose was yet another thing that came from the anima. I haven't really understood the whole thing completely yet, but I think that's yet another thing that Carl Jung would place there.

He interpreted it as an image of the ideal woman that men held inside their minds. And for most of men throughout our biological history, indeed, a woman was the end goal we strived towards.

I think part of the problem is that men get so enchanted with the chase, that they never really think about what kind of person they're going to be after they actually get a partner, so they kind of become static, just "basking in their glow". He willingly gives his life's purpose over to her, even though she can't comprehend it, maybe loses a lot of his drive. (Which for women are a huge benefit-- they want a man who has the energy to act on their behalf in an emergency. This is all subconscious, of course.) I'm sure, after a while, that'd get annoying, and the man will start to feel like something of a dead weight to her.

I think that's too neat and perfect to be 100% correct, and it's definitely not the only contributing factor if there's any truth to it, but it really does seem to describe how a lot of men behave.

>a lot of women are conservative actually
No, women don't form opinions of their own, they just follow what men/groups around them do, and the majority of men are conservative. The problem is when cucked men get into positions of power (heads of universities, politicians, etc) and allow women to lead themselves and form groups when evolutionarily, he should be using his own innate male logic and rationality to pick the best ideology for women/the group to follow.
>pic related, first 2 posts

I want my rib back.

Very well put.

I think people should be at least 30 and own land to vote. unless it is for war, to declare war anyone fighting age can vote on it, and if war is declared everyone who voted yes must enlist.

Yes and we are paying for it right now

not an argument bro

Anon5 was right about feminism destroying things.

yes

Not consciously, no. But then again, nobody does. The forces that control us, that we LET control us, are completely beyond our reckoning. We don't want to face this fact, because it may lead us down a really long rabbit hole we don't really want to go down.

See, when men become weak, women begin to crave strength, even if it comes from outsiders. 50 shades of gray, a porno movie women went to go see in the god damned theater, WITHOUT SHAME. Kinda speaks loud, doesn't it?

We are not yet mature enough as a society to handle the amount of freedom we have--assuming it's even possible for a society to become more mature. As a whole, we are not self-posessed enough, we don't know ourselves well enough, to make decisions that will avoid pain.

The collective unconscious is trying to drag us back into the stone age because was a time that made sense to it. It was a time where mating with strong men meant you'd have strong children, without having to piddle around with education, reading and writing, learning to control reality and think ahead and deny baser impulses. It was a time when you wouldn't even need to check to be sure your man would be able or willing to save you from some predator or other, because if he wasn't he'd be dead.

The unconscious is undeniably real. While Jung was basically going off of intuition, neuroscientists are beginning to confirm a lot of his theories-- or at least things that look an awful lot like them. I'm placing hope that someday some heroic scientist type, one that nobody can ignore, is going to be able to slap some sense into everyone, show them what forces they're really letting control them.

It's a dream, I guess.

It'd be so much easier getting along w/ women if when I heard them bitch about politics I knew they couldn't follow that shit up w/ a vote.
I know a girl from Saudi Arabia, she bitches about Trump. Think about how retarded that is. A girl, living in fuckin Saudi Arabia, by choice, complaining about what Donald Trump says.
Saudi Arabia only stays how they like because they don't allow her to vote.

>t. Frank

solid answer grandpa!!!