Don't tell me you're falling for this garbage too. We all know that this movement is bankrolled by Soros-funded groups, in an attempt to censor the Internet while disguised as the exact opposite.
Now Sup Forums is promoting it... fucking seriously, get your shit together.
4cuck
i hope net neutrality occurs.
See you guys, stay on your sinking cuckship of a website
Perhaps we won't be here forever.
>net neutrality goes away
>internet providers start receiving hate for LETTING racist on the internet
>oh wow, I havn't seen this befor-(youtube/twitter/twitch/facebook/reddit)
>internet providers decide to kill off top racist sites
>they get praised for not allowing that shithole Sup Forums on there service
Tell me again why your in favor for letting company be a gate way to what we can see online? Holy Fuck
Are you dumb? Sup Forums wants to stay in business, for that Hiroshimoot needs Net Neutrality to continue being in effect.
>supported by comcast and soros
looks like a patriot act attempt
>name something positive but is total opposite
makes sense that redditors spam this shit like robots without ever reading it themselves
I am anti net neutrality but I have seen quite a few people who are unironically supporting it. Sad!
how much is (((comcast))) paying you shill
just give up fools
soros always wins in the end
If you don't support the movement then you clearly work for the bad corporations, not the good ones like us.
Without the net neutrality laws that were put in place 2 years ago, the decades old isps will definitely probably censor and destroy everything because reasons.
Remember, support it or get blown up by terr- I mean no Sup Forums.
Hiro probably doesnt know any better. A lot of sites are bandwagoning not knowing what it is.
I saw Tom Fulp (Newgrounds) doing it, too, even though people in his announcement thread were telling him the same thing we're saying here. They just dont seem to know what's going on and think that it's purely a Comcast vs Netflix issue.
>implying Netflix shouldnt pay money for using more bandwidth anyway
It should be obvious that "net neutrality" regulations are called such just to fool you.
These rules wouldnt even solve the issue that brought it up in the first place and would be used just to shut sites like Sup Forums down or deprive them of users, or rather, not allow us to access these sites.
The deception is real. Think of all the people writing congress or other elected officials "dont kill net neutrality pls" not knowing which "net neutrality" is being referred to.
>"net neutrality" rules are put in place
>actual net neutrality is now gone
>your post happens
Google and Facebook are backing the new regulations. That in of itself should be a red flag.
Google and Facebook have always fought for Internet freedom. They didn't back Pipa sopa or any of that trash
Also you should use your own brain, not just check who's backing who.
Do you feel there is something wrong with the internet right now? If yes, then you support change, if not, then you don't support change which makes on the side of Sup Forums.
I hate change.
alright if soros is for it , you know it's bad for us.
Be Net Neutral(tm) goys!
Google and Facebook censors and manipulates the internet at the highest rates.
Because it means giving the GOVERNMENT control over what we can see online.
And they don't give a fuck about competition from other providers they will ban places like Sup Forums if they can. Look at how many shills this place is flooded with you don't think they'd jump at the chance to simply turn this place off?
And we don't need more of them.
Again, I hate change. I want my internet to be free, with all that means, including the facebook and google manipulation. I feel the internet is free right now, I don't feel like it needs to change.
So I support NN, because it keeps things like they are right now. I don't give a shit who is backing what, I'm smart enough to have my own opinion.
What is this about? Give me a quick but enlightening rundown, please.
If reddit shills for it, it's shit. Just like Hernie Panders
Nice.
T-Mobile already lets you listen to Spotify and watch Netflix without data caps.
This wouldn't be possible with net neutrality, which proves that the entire argument is flawed and people actually enjoy it.
In 2015 we decided to regulate ISPs in a different (and more strict) way.
>broadband growth slowed
>monopolies forming & worse than before
>but Netflix doesn't have to pay for using up all the bandwidth, yay?
The FCC was supposedly about to crack down on them for doing that, too.
Why dont you guys just delet netflix?
>Sup Forums is promoting it
It's the shills who are promoting. Have you learned nothing these past years? Even Sup Forums moderation is compromised here. That said, I still sent a letter telling your Congress about why traps aren't gay. Hopefully that'll get one of /ourguys/ there.
Can you give a run down on what each sides means
And then give me the Sup Forums version on which one jews supportt
who gives a shit about net neutrality? Why should the government have the power to tell internet companies what they can and cant do with their own damn internet?
fuck that. the fall of net neutrality is not a bad thing
Murder.
I want a rule where ISPs must not interfere with or data-mine packets passing through their network. I also want a rule where ISPs are not responsible for what is passing through their network. Why should I not support the concept of net neutrality?
>VERIZON: In 2012, the FCC caught Verizon Wireless blocking people from using tethering applications on their phones. Verizon had asked Google to remove 11 free tethering applications from the Android marketplace. These applications allowed users to circumvent Verizon’s $20 tethering fee and turn their smartphones into Wi-Fi hot spots. By blocking those applications, Verizon violated a Net Neutrality pledge it made to the FCC as a condition of the 2008 airwaves auction.
>AT&T: In 2012, AT&T announced that it would disable the FaceTime video-calling app on its customers’ iPhones unless they subscribed to a more expensive text-and-voice plan. AT&T had one goal in mind: separating customers from more of their money by blocking alternatives to AT&T’s own products.
>VERIZON: During oral arguments in Verizon v. FCC in 2013, judges asked whether the phone giant would favor some preferred services, content or sites over others if the court overruled the agency’s existing open internet rules. Verizon counsel Helgi Walker had this to say: “I’m authorized to state from my client today that but for these rules we would be exploring those types of arrangements.” Walker’s admission might have gone unnoticed had she not repeated it on at least five separate occasions during arguments.
In 2015, we put a stop to this bullshit. Creating a law called "Net Neutrality", which is how the internet has worked since its conception, the law explicitly says ISPs will not rape their customers to death like videogame companies are allowed to do to their consumers.
Today, the government is now trying to make the law we made in 2015 to stop abuse from corporations void. Allowing them to anally rape our children to death. And as we all know, if America does it, every other country in the world will follow suit fast.
Also be very aware of who participate in these threads. Because some people are putting a lot of money to make the 2015 law void.
There isn't any new bill out there expect for the roll-back of an existing bill, what the fuck are you talking about, things will continue on the same way if the roll back fails, you act like a new set of laws have been put forth
because the taxpayer paid for a good chunk of the original infrastructure including the internet itself?
Since this is and lauren southern are the only things anyone is making threads about:
I know govt likes to name stuff the opposite of what it actually does. So is net neutrality the plan to throttle traffic of websites who don't pay up, or is net neutrality the plan to prevent ISPs from doing that?
>the good ones like ((((us))))
I'm sure you're just trolling though.
It's called increasing government overreach. You have to fight it now or it will just continue to get worse and worse.
It's the same reason people are vehemently against ANY gun control. Look at pic related but apply it to government control over the Internet.
hello AT&T
don't worry I paid my bill this month
I get to post 25 more times this month!
Have you considered that companies hate ISPs as much as we do? The people are probably thrilled to be able to shit on the ISP companies who are the ones who actually benefit from this, not websites
who cares
>We all know that this movement is bankrolled by Soros-funded groups, in an attempt to censor the Internet while disguised as the exact opposite.
I think it's time to dust of the ol'
>implying
for this one.
Because i'm a cuckservative, and when I see "leftists" attacking BASED corporations I MUST rush to the defense of the corporate machine, lest I be called a commie
Net Neutrality is already in place. What you look at in the internet is the result of net neutrality. Do you like it?
Because the government is about to tear it down, they will remove net neutrality, so they can block certain problematic websites from being accessed. You know, like Sup Forums.
>government overreach
This is about rolling back the original bill that has been a massive pain in internet providers backsides, the one that makes it illegal to process websites different from each other.
The only people who would win are the internet providers if the bill is rolled back, if you think this will create competition that will lead to better service, well fuck sure, but then again, they could pull stunts like blocking porn sites or things deemed racist to better there corporate image
Like EVERYOTHER FUCKING COMPANY RIGHT NOW
>net neutrality stops the government from blocking things
It stops private corporations from blocking things. The government can exempt itself from any of its laws.
if net neutrality disappears, so does Sup Forums
dumb inbred nigger
Ok, so repealing NN will result in ISP throttling, shutdowns, and anal rape-age of our children to death..
Are they voting on this tomorrow or something? Why is it all over Sup Forums in 5 different threads?
Traffic can be masked through a VPN. Imagine a Sup Forums that normies can't access because they can't figure out how to get around Comcast's blanket ban on "racist websites."
>tfw no more normalfag americucks will ever use Sup Forums again
why is this a bad thing again?
Why the Soros focus? You want to take down a pyramid, where do you start? Btw, it is neither the base nor the apex.
The users don't run the site, senpai.
IT ALREADY EXISTS
Are you retarded Op? How the fuck is this to censor the internet? Also why the fuck is everything George soros related to you guys? The man isn't god. He doesn't have enough money to fund every single thing that threatens us.
You're retarded. To be against net neutrality shows you have no clue what the stakes really are. Or you're fine with paying more money to the Jews who run the cable and Internet companies. They're the only ones who profit from this.
Seriously you'd be a fool to believe our prices would go anywhere but up if net neutrality ends.
Time to spice the subject field up for this shit.
>"net neutrality" rules are put in place
>actual net neutrality is now gone
>your post happens
Except we have neutrality now and it's working out just fine. How is working for Verizon?
That would be a dead Sup Forums.
>if you think this will create competition that will lead to better service
But it won't, because it has absolutely nothing to do with the infrastructure regulations that led to the monopoly/duopoly system that 90% of the country deals with.
thisthisthisthis
Why are there so many shills here tonight?
>Because it means giving the GOVERNMENT control over what we can see online.
No it doesn't, provide proof.
The disinfo is fucking WILD tonight.
Like, levels that I haven't seen since pizzagate threads.
>why do we have so many threads
Because Sup Forums is retarded and thinks NN is bad, when it was made to keep the internet like it has always been.
This is what the government is trying to do
>(a) In General.—The rule adopted by the Federal Communications Commission in GN Docket No. 14–28 on February 26, 2015 (relating to broadband Internet access service), shall have no force or effect, and the Commission may not reissue such rule in substantially the same form, or issue a new rule that is substantially the same as such rule, unless the reissued or new rule is specifically authorized by a law enacted after the date of enactment of this Act.
>The rule adopted by the Federal Communications Commission on February 26, 2015 shall have no force or effect, and the Commission may not reissue such rule in substantially the same form
They are trying to remove the law that makes us, consumers, be able to sue ISPs if they try to block you from accessing a website, or deny you internet service for whatever reason.
We have to keep this law in effect, and for that we have to oppose the change in the law. The banner thing is for you to send a letter to the congress telling them to keep the law in effect, because Net Neutrality is important (it is). If it passes, then there is going to be no rules at all for ISPs. In the absence of any rules, violations of the open internet will become more and more common.
Yeah, sorry I got mixed it up a little bit.
>be America
>have literally the worst internet on the entire planet
>living joke compared to countries like Japan, South Korea, etc
>desperately cling to some irrelevant "net neutrality" security blanket while the rest of the world continues to pass you by
ok have fun with that burgs
>We all know that this movement is bankrolled by Soros-funded groups, in an attempt to censor the Internet while disguised as the exact opposite.
Hello Time warner, comcast and verizon. I'm totally willing to trust you, after all you support my favorite (((real))) news stations, like CNN.
Then people don't use there service becaus they can't provide content that's usable
Free market at work fag
We're going to have the shittiest internet AND it will be throttled to any website that isn't approved by our ISPs.
>we can't allow American internet to become like the rest of the world that is vastly superior to it!
That would work if we had a free market. We don't.
That would be true in a perfect system where every ISPs offer services in every towns. This isn't the case. Plenty of areas in the US have only one or two shitty ISP.
>"WASHINGTON — The Federal Communications Commission on Thursday released extensive details of how it would regulate broadband Internet providers as a public utility, producing official wording that almost certainly sets the stage for extended legal fights."
>"But the full text of the new order also raised uncertainties about broad and subjective regulation. One catchall provision, requiring “just and reasonable” conduct, allows the F.C.C. to decide what is acceptable on a case-by-case basis."
Shit works NOW there is no problem but you guys want to solve this non-existent problem by handling control over to the government AS IF THAT HAS EVER WORKED EVER.
And now the door will be opened for more that will instantly win customers who want to jump ship from their shitty comcast, just like our country which has no "net neutrality" but 20+ nationwide ISPs all competing to offer the best fastest service.
Sorry but valve haven't raped me more then my isp
Your argument is invalid
Valve doesn't make games.
The door has been open forever and it hasn't happened. The country is huge and it takes a lot to build the required infrastructure. It's the same in Canada.
I'm one of them and I simply don't use shit that I can do my normal stuff on.
Common fucking since
If it won't work why have it
It works NOW because RIGHT NOW we have net neutrality. The drama is over a bill to repeal it, try and keep up with what is actually happening.
Losing customers is a shitty business model.
>NN fails
>all the burgertards and TD cucks get purged from this website
>Sup Forums finally becomes 'great' again
I don't see the problem here
>Sup Forums is retarded and thinks NN is bad
Honestly, I would understand if a new bill was being backed by comcast or something, but this whole thing is over the FCC rollback, nothing else.
>when it was made to keep the internet like it has always been.
I feel sane again
>worst internet on the entire planet
Maybe in terms of speed and data, but most of the western country are starting to censor their internet, so it's the best of the worst situation possible, at least the constitution will apply to an FCC government regulated internet, meaning free speech has a chance at surviving whatever fucking nonsense comes out of the progress west.
Thanks net mutuality
>Without the net neutrality laws that were put in place 2 years ago
The world would be a better place if stupid people like you were fucking SLAPPED any time you said completely wrong shit
Why is it that stupid people who don't know shit about anything are the ones that talk the most directly about shit they dont know?
Thanks for all the running downs
>The FCC's new proposal — titled "Restoring Internet Freedom"
>Pai has argued that the 2015 rules have slowed the telecom industry's investment in building out broadband access and introducing innovative products, and specifically weighed on smaller Internet providers.
That comes from NPR (i know), but is there any truth to that, iyo?
archive.is
Because no one can compete with the existing services thanks to your anti-freemarket regulations. And keeping "net neutrality" around as nothing more than a bandaid for your shit infrastructure is not a wise use of regulations. Fix your shit instead, like your president wants to do.
That article is from 2015 supposedly when the "net neutrality" law was put into place. Does he Internet seem any different to you? Did it NOT work back in 2015?
>Google and Facebook have always fought for Internet freedom.
Holy fuck, you unironically believe this? This has got to be the most stupid thing I have ever read in my entire life
Cool argument. Why are you shilling for the company that owns CNN?
>I'm smart enough to have my own opinion.
Your posts say otherwise
>Sup Forums and other websites banned from the Jewternet
>we bring BBSing back
My body is ready. BBS was far superior to this shit anyway.
>Americans get banned
>site dies because it lost 50% of its traffic and not even ads can cover the cost anymore
A Pyrrhic victory is still a defeat, user
We don't have Net Neutrality you spastics. That was only the FCC declaring the internet to be a public utility so it could be taxed and given away free by the government to those deemed worthy (minorities who spend their money on smart phones and red vines and malt liquor)
It worked fine in 2015, and it works fine now because the bill was passed and we have neutrality now. Again, this is over a bill to repeal neutrality, which is being funded by Comcast, Verizon, AT&T and Time Warner, who owns CNN.
>same guy
>his posts contain nothing but trash
>he couldn't even concise his thoughts into one post, had to make two
lol
>being this cucked by trump
>still begging for daddy trump's cummies on your tummy
this place is officially garbage, thanks trump
This is like being against the First Amendment because it's the government regulating speech.
holy fuck, net neutrality literally means the ISPs must provide an unbiased connection for ALL websites... it HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH CENSORSHIP
The only censorship that will go on if net neutrality is repealed is that ISPs will """censor""" Netflix and turn the internet into a Cable-like purchase model, like you buy websites like channels.
You're all retarded.
>We don't have Net Neutrality you spastics.
washingtonpost.com
Yes, we do.
IT'S ALL FUNDED BY SOROS!!!!!!!!!!!111!!
Please archive or screenshot
archive.is
>who gives a shit about net neutrality? Why should the government have the power to tell internet companies what they can and cant do with their own damn internet?
>fuck that. the fall of net neutrality is not a bad thing
how many high speed internet choices do you have where you live?
>use google
>click link
>insert coin
Yeah best model ever
It means the government stops business from interfering with the internet. The government has a hands-off approach with the internet aside from that.
Look at all the big social movements going on in your country. Companies firing whites for "diverse staff", companies advertising faggotry, companies offering jobs to refugees over citizens, and so on.
Who's the problem there? The government or the businesses trying and succeeding in shaping public opinion?
This. People who use US servers as hosts in general get fucked over easily anyway. What's the difference if this gets passed or not?
You're correct, it's not censorship it's just to stop monopolies, so anybody who can't pay is blocked and only (((websites))) that can pay are available