Net neutrality

So why do all the businesses, organizations, politicians, political groups and people (Soros) I detest support net neutrality?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempted_purchase_of_Time_Warner_Cable_by_Comcast
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

It's weird, maybe just trying to get some points?

Fuck off Shlomo

If the average joe has to pay extra to access sites like Amazon guess what that does for their bottom line.

Because ISPs will FUCK high traffic websites without it.

They rely on revenue streams for open internet users. People don't realize this. They aren't the good guys here but, the ones also seeking an agenda for profit.

Because "net neutrality" is actually Swamp control. They use trick name to fuck with our minds.

I rather take advice from pornhub then a random user shill from Sup Forums
One of them has a good track record of delivering the goods.

Because it benefits them. If opposing net neutrality helped them they would. None of these companies support it out of the goodness of their hearts.

If you dumbfucks really can't look at net neutrality yourselves and figure out that opposing it is retarded then I hope Trump's FCC does kill this website because a bunch of mongoloids have taken over

This is the most mischaracterized, lied about, disinformation bullshit that nobody on Sup Forums understands.
It's like a magician making you watch his right hand while he produces coin in left

If you only dislike something because people you don't like like it, you must a massive tool.

>I detest
because you're an idiot.
the only good thing about NOT having Net Neutrality is that after they kill Sup Forums we won't hear from dopes like you again.

I like porn, pirating, and reddit, so I support net neutrality!

Web-based corporations benefit from net neutrality

Infrastructure and service providers will lose with net neutrality

Fuck off retard

You mean making a marketing move to switch to HTTPS years too late because of hysteria surrounding net neutrality? They used the justification that it's dangerous "now" that ISPs can spy on you even though they already could, obviously.

I don't give 2 fucks about this. I want to see these companies get fucked.

will all the social media sites like facebook instagram and twitter be blocked? if so im all for it

Why are you posting on Sup Forums if you hate it so much?

you would probably stop breathing if Soros said that it's good for you...

It'll be great if they try to do this

People are going to attack the sites that pay ISP's for priority

That's your confirmation bias in play.
In reality, every company in support of net neutrality runs their business on the internet (as you might expect).

It happens to be a (((coincidence))) that every company you hate happens to have the majority of their business on the internet.

Need to see the package.
There's probably something in there about opening immigration to millions of migrants and refugees to fulfill the worker needs.

Apparently the current NN rules may also somehow prevent ISPs from being investigated for crappy internet speeds... which *may* be a factor in comcast flipping their view...

Sup Forums is shit now if they block this site ill be happy too. let it all burn

That's a good ol fashioned reality check

>be one one of the many ISPs in the US
>don't slow down traffic to sites like a retard even though it's legal now
>everyone switches to your service and you make gorrillions
the free market will solve it.

I don't really like the idea of taking out net neutrality because it would not only be a hassle for these big kikes, but also to me. I would like to see them crash and burn though, and will get to see new fresh stuff to come out.

>pornhub
>not sadpanda
Get out.

ISPs also seem to think "net neutrality" is great. Hmmmmm

It's disinfo you dumb fucks, Sup Forums has led the pro-internet platform for years. The jews are just trying to take it over so the MAGApede redditor posers oppose it because they're literally so new that they actually think net neutrality is a new concept.

anyone claiming that without net neutrality consumers will have to pay more for less doesnt understand the issue

infrastructure needs to be paid for, it either gets paid for by everyone (by taxes), by web companies (charged by the isp), or the ISP customer (in your internet bills)

the ISP wants to be able to charge companies on the internet so they dont have to charge their customers. if the ISP puts up their prices to pay for infrastructure they lose business, if they charge companies for the infrastructure then they dont have to put their own prices up, but instead the web companies have to charge their own customers

Amazon and other fake stores on the internet are communist. They are worse than snowflakes... first, brick and mortar had to deal with big box cheap junk, now we have to deal with totally fake internet stores... it's a fucking war.. you a fucking communist stooge if you buy anything off the internet. Red pill that mother fuckers.

Wayfare is fucking anal warts cancer and charges 2-3x actual retail.

If you see "free shipping" on the internet that is a flag for fake store that drop ships from factory or wholesale.

Amazon started off like wayfare but turned into a criminal shithole... sort of like eBay..

That won't happen, user.
Remember, most ISPs have a monopoly in their particular areas so there is no one to switch to.

>You are a communist if you participate in free trade and buy consumer goods you want to have
>This company trying to maximize profit in a capitalist manner is communist as well!
>If they conduct measures such as "free shipping" to have a leg up on competition it means they are communist!

>paying money for goods in a servace that is completely better than brick and mortar in everywhere
>brick and mortar naturally starting to die because of this better service
>communism
Sure.

Sup Forums is and always will be for Net Neutrality (remember that)

i'd rather side with big jewish corporations than faggots on reddit desu

Sounds like you should be solving that problem instead of this made-up one

the better question is why do any of us outside of the USA give a single shit?

hmm what country is google stationed at?
I wonder?

ISPs already fuck us why are websites exempt from being fucked?

oh wait you are a leaf...
the western equivalent of the manlet

Because net neutrality fucked in the US. Means that servers hosted in the US could theoretically be throttled for users outside of the US as well by the ISPs those servers are connected to if the website hosts don't pay up.

Can you imagine websites/services just denying IP connections from outside of the US simply to same some money? Absolutely absurd but that would happen with smaller websites/services. And the bigger ones would just cough up more money to maintain current connection speed meaning they would have to raise prices on to someone (which will probably be the end-user such as you or more advertisement etc etc)

...

So what? They already give away information at the drop of a hat

There is no fixing that, user.
The free market's natural state is monopolies.
Once they're established, they're there forever.
Its beautiful.

>Because net neutrality fucked in the US. Means that servers hosted in the US could theoretically be throttled for users outside of the US as well by the ISPs those servers are connected to if the website hosts don't pay up.
Thats a huge stretch. Commercial servers are going to continue paying big money for unthrottled speeds.
>says fucking NEW ZEALAND
lmao m8.

Because without net neutrality both the content providers and consumers get fucked. The only ones who benefit are the monopolizing ISP's.

This. They're just protecting their own financial interests, nothing more.

>we're actually for this thing we were against before goyim
>we must stick it to that guy drumpf
I'm getting to feeling it's fucking nothing at all

They are not natural monopolies, but rest on cable franchise agreements made with local governments.

Remove your flag immediately.

Be careful, some people won't catch the sarcasm and think you're serious.

all im saying is that when net neutrality goes out of the window whats to stop a company from intentionally slowing down a site for the sake of revenue. In this state of the internet Net Neutrality is one of the last true defences of free speech and freedom of information of the internet

Well, they'll just pass the fucking on to the consumer.

how many Muslims in new Zealand compared to yours
how fucked are we compared to your country
at least our leader is not a cuck (just stupid)

What about low bandwidth users like me, who just browse the web ? Should I oppose net neutrality on that basis ?

nah it would go from shit to unusable

Wait a minute

>havent payed any attention at all to net neutrality because ultimately powerless to change such things

i know its bad, im sure it will pass, and know that when it does pass (or doesnt) i know comcast will fuck me more. if this shit gets me off Sup Forums and sets me free in the streets that would be a blessing in disguise, thats for sure. at the least no more solving captchas to train AI for google anymore.

Scrapping net neutrality only benefits large ISPs. There will be no benefit to you whatsoever.

>they just want to charge the companies goy
>it won't effect you at all
Yes then not only will small business struggle in real life, but online too. Not to mention online shopping will likely no longer be cheaper than big box stores since the cost will just be passed on to us that way instead. No thanks.

Puts control in the hands of the government, who are already on the lobbyists dime in the first place.
So your options for who holds the reigns are ISPs, or ISPs with (((government))) oversight.

Good luck America, kek.

Isnt net neutrality dead long time ago?

They just make it now official.

ffs its the internet, developed from goverments for research till complete mind control whole country's..

It would lead to longer loading times like in the late 90's/early 2000's. It will also lead to more advertisements on websites and higher prices for services.

The only way you personally might benefit from it is if you own stocks from a big ISP service since their profitability would go up. But for everyone BUT ISPs it will be a big step backwards. Will probably hurt the US economy as well since it would ruin the online economy more than the extra profit the ISPs will get out of it.

>Australian
>saying good luck America, kek
>in relation to the internet
Isn't your internet legendarily shitty?

Yeah thats why your ISPs are so poor and cant deliver good servicen..

>ACLU
>EFF
>several other non-profits
>benefit
Really gets my bits shifting

I'm retarded, so can anyone tell me if I have to flee the country for my past shitposts or not?

Yeah but our internet being a ditch fire is just status quo.

Yours is going down hill either way.

They don't deliver good service because they don't have to.
Things tend to fall apart without competition.

you and all reddit scum will suffer

No you don't have to worry about that.

You WILL have to worry about your torrents only being 5kb/s though. Say goodbye to downloading porn or any niche shit you might like.

Remember the times of you pausing a youtube video and doing something else for 20 minutes while it buffers? That's going to become the norm for 90% of the internet traffic without net neutrality.

Can somebody rational give me a quick rundown on what net neutrality is before I support one side for no reason

Supporting net neutrality is retarded.

It's like if the phone company argued they should be able to accept 100 million dollars from Pizza Hut to not provide any service to other pizza companies in a region. If you want a pizza you'd have to call pizza hut or drive to the other pizza location yourself to order.

>We at Comcast need to make more money, this Net Neutrality is killing out profits.

Meanwhile in reality
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempted_purchase_of_Time_Warner_Cable_by_Comcast
>45.2 billion

>looks at flag
>Realises that they are out of touch with reality

it's funny that people think the internet is neutral
sure you can start your own website, but that doesn't mean you'll get a fair treatment

just google image search for white american couple
or read up on the censorship on sites like facebook, twitter, reddit,...

Except its the exact opposite of that.

not an argument

Net neutrality means that your ISP has to treat all your internet activity in the same way no matter what. Without it, your ISP can decide to impose limits or additional costs on visiting certain websites or using certain services.

For example, they can gouge you or Netflix for extra money if you're a Netflix user.

At&t paid half a billion fighting against NN it you fuck.

Whats an argument?

Now we know why they are struggling, they need to abolish NN because they spent all their money trying to abolish NN.

You would trust Comcast and Verizon over these guys? It's simple, streaming sites have a financial interest in net neutrality. It's not some conspiracy.

This is correct.

And in many places in the US especially, there is only 1 service provider because they don't compete with eachother like they should.

If the gov broke up their monopolies then Net Neutrality wouldn't be such a big deal since you could switch to a smaller provider that didn't manage traffic like that.

Now I understand thanks

but, seriously though look through the last argument I had with a leaf

I don't get what I pay for right now anyways, you faggots.

Obvioisly Google decides what comes up first, but NN is really just about speed.

>be an ISP
>have a 100GB data cap per month
>own a video streaming service
>give free data for streaming with the ISP companies service instead of competition
>have a ISP monopoly in your area
What could go wrong.

Net Neutrality
>Lower costs for websites and internet services (which means less advertisements and lower costs for you the end-user)
>Faster internet speed
>ISPs can't block certain websites (such as netflix because it hurts their cable branch)

No Net-Neutrality
>ISPs become more profitable because they can charge individual websites and services
>Lower internet speed and higher costs for internet services to the end-user
>ISPs will get the legal ability to block and throttle any website that might hurt their personal income such as Netflix/torrents maybe even facebook/twitter if they don't censor complaints against the ISPs

You should only be against net-neutrality if you own ISP stocks or work for an ISP.

They don't want to be the ones paying additional fees so their data or traffic doesn't get throttled. All the memes about "google premium 30$" bullshit is just that, bullshit. The ones who will end up paying far more are these companies. They deal with a lot of data usage and traffic to the point where ISPs would suddenly have the freedom to tell them to give us money or get dialup speed. The end result is the same though potentially, the consumer of these products suffers in some way or another.

So because of that you want to get even less?

>Trump ends Net Neutrality
>ISPs throttle what is not profitable for them
>SJW banshees shriek on twitter about nazi ISPs allow rayciss sites
>ISPs fold like all big business do, bans Sup Forums
>all amerisharts banned from Sup Forums
>amerisharts relegated to consuming Good Goy content
>trumptards on VPN still defend ending Net Neutrality
Mark my word, within two years no amerishart will have access to anything more offensive than you'd find on cable TV.

People who bemoan others' misunderstanding without suggesting better information are fucking worthless

>I don't get what I pay for right now anyways, you faggots.
What do you mean. And legalizing you getting screwed, since you are already getting screwed, is not a good objective in life.

you do a good service keep it up

No, actually the ones who will pay for it is their customers. No business eats the cost. And Premium accounts certainly are not bullshit. They want premium accounts like OPs want dicks because their TV profits are declining because people are canceling their 120 dollar a month cable contracts.

>2010-2014 media: "net neutrality is bad"
>2015 Obongo pushes net neutrality after jew companies that use over 50% of all internet bandwidth and traffic complain about ISPs
>2017 media "net neutrality is good"

Really made me think.