There should be a limit to how much a single person can earn or own

There should be a limit to how much a single person can earn or own.

Other urls found in this thread:

mises.org/library/myth-natural-monopoly
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Why?

There should be a limit to how much a single german can post their opinions on the internet.

Oh, wait.

There is.

'k.
Give us a number.

>There should be a limit to how much a single person can live.

The maximum income should be around 10 to 20 times the minimum wage.

you mean profit?

what happens when your business gets too big

wait don't tell me,
the government

There should be a limit to how much land a person can own. This is the main problem affecting poor people. They have to rent a space on this earth, which means taking a low paid job to make a rich person richer. Every person deserves a rent-free debt-free plot of land where they can build a shelter and begin to self-actualize.

There should be a limit to how much a single person can weigh.

>mineowner
anticapitalism is so quaint and dated
DC is the richest area, the only thing mined there is the rest of the countries taxpayers
>b-b-but we need taxes because there should be a limit to how much a single person can earn or own.

>muh fat capitalist w/ top hat

Fuck off kraut

and the limit should be infinity.

What about couples?

National Socialism had the perfect economy where no one was extra/less país.And you Germans killed your own perfection.

Personal income
Any surplus over gets socialized,
just like the losses of failing banks were socialized

>There should be a limit to how much land a person can own
Yes, very good idea too.

>a
no there shouldn't. thats the beuty of capitalism. work hard earn a lot.

Welcome to the oligarchy.

Checks upon the market are necessary to ensure a wide dispersal of business apparatus, I agree with you. The more widespread property and capital ownership, the better; though even this has its limits, i.e., not everything is for everyone.

If you don't want to pay rent then don't live in a big city you can't afford to live in
If you wanna stop being poor then go live in some small town you can actually buy property in
Fucking poor people
All they wanna do is have their cake and eat it, too

Envy

Sort of. I've always believed companies life Faceberg and Google have gotten too big and influential. Once you reach a certain size, then government oversight is required to keep the company in check.

For example both of those companies are set up in my country to avoid paying higher taxes in the US. They don't pay their fair share and deprive the US treasury money it should be due.

how will you stop economy going to shit after the rich people have redistrubuted all their money to rest of the world resulting in the whole world having the same economic power thus creating a shitstorm that destroys the world as we know it. wew lad you really thought this through

Agreed. No single person should have wealth great enough to corrupt the state. A.K.A. George Soros, rothschilds, rockefellers.

>Personal income
so a corporation / balk can be filty rick and all i have to do is be it's CEO
k thx, not a loophole at all

That's the business money, which they can use to re-invest in the business, or pay their poorly paid employees more. Instead of giving a single CEO 1 billion dollar bonuses.

>Be doctor
>Skills are worth far more than 10x minimum wage
>Lose huge amounts of the money worked for because some socialist cuck thinks he's entitled to something he didn't work for
>People stop going into the medical field because they don't want fuckloads of their money stolen

>Any surplus over gets socialized

And now we've come full circle to causing the very problem you set out to stop, only an order of magnitude worse.

You want to know what happens to rich people who reach your limit? They join the government.

Who would you be compared to to say that you own too much user. Would it be your neighbor or country men or some poor shit sucking nigger in africa living in a mud hut?

>thats the beauty of capitalism. work hard earn a lot.
Use violence (police) to limit access to resources that you "own".
Force everyone to work for you to survive since you "own" the earth's resources.
Get even richer from their labor.
Repeat.

Welcome to the olive garden

Lol, this faggot thinks working hard is how you get really wealthy. Hey dumbass, no matter how hard you work you will never be as rich as a banker, who hardly works at all. The way you get extremely rich is by crime and corruption. What a fucking naieve fuckin idiot, can't seperate the ideals he was taught from the reality he lives in, what a fuckin cuck.

You can afford a plot of land for next to nothing if it's in Skid Row or innawoods somewhere. What if there was some kind of system where you could just buy land according to your need?

>government land lottery day
>"Please not Detroit. Please not Detroit"
>DETROIT

t.nigger

I agree, as long as it's done on a state/local level. BMI is absolute horseshit. It needs to be done by a doctor actually examining someone and giving an actual legitimant healthy weight

>a limit to how much a single person can earn or own.

yeah lets remove incentive past an arbitary limit

A lot of the money wasn't worked for. Just the natural process in which the rich always get richer.

There should ve a limit to how many refugees a country can accept

You would be relying on those rich and powerful people to implement this upon themselves.

No, why?

Economics is not a zero sum game, one person having a lot does not mean someone has less as a result. The entire problem rather is the state, the state is far too easily manipulated by those with money to skew the market so as to earn them more money illegitimately. Remove the state and the playing field is even, the rich can no longer eliminate competition through legislation, unemployment will drop to almost zero, cost of living will hit rock bottom due to unrestricted competition between providers of food, shelter, even luxuries.

Do you have any fucking idea how cheap beer would be without regulations, for example? If corn weren't heavily, heavily subsidized in the USA farmers would grow more efficient crops as well, providing MORE food for the people, not less. Furthermore Monsanto and other scumbag crony corporations wouldn't be able to use the legal system to ruin farmers who don't grow their GMO crops, the food would overall be healthier and the environment would be safer as a result.

Consider also that corporations given legal permission to pollute public and private land, which would not occur without a state to protect them while they violate the properties of countless people around them, fracking would not be permitted around any other private land, it would not be allowed to pollute another man's portion of a water table.

Literally every single abuse corporations make under the current system is permitted only because the state sides with them. Remove the state, remove also the corporate domination of the western world.

why? if i am more skilled than you why i have to earn like you.

There should be a limit on how many useless people can inhabit the earth

There should be a minimum age limit for people that want to talk about laws.

Nope.

>There should be a limit to how much a single person can earn or own.

To what purpose?

That addresses only "earn" -- what about "own?"

To limit power in a democracy:
>Agreed. No single person should have wealth great enough to corrupt the state. A.K.A. George Soros, rothschilds, rockefellers.

Because there are starving Africans and we all know currency is literally the same thing as food.

>Every person deserves a rent-free debt-free plot of land

... and a mule.

Poor people have heard this one before.

There is, it's called your worth. This is determimed by a variety of factors, such as how saturated the position is, your personal qualifications, and the demand number of available positions.

Lmao all these buzzwords and buzznames and you still don't have a clue what you're talking about. Save yourself the embarrassment and never utter those names ever again.

Also consider deforestation, under public protection forests all over the world are fucking obliterated without regard for the environment, the state has no stake in protecting the trees on private land.

Now how many private land owners would let loggers decimate their land's ecosystem? None would give their land up without being offered a very high price, natural beauty is only truly valued as PROPERTY, when it is public, it is rather as if nobody owns it, nobody cares about it because it is not truly "theirs", but if you have a particularly beautiful valley in your personal possession, it is going to take a whole lot more persuasion to let someone destroy it than it does the state, it would at the very least need to be a greater offer than the property value lost as a result of ecosystem devastation.

>the state has no stake in protecting the trees on private land.
*public land

You have a quaint belief that the Government is going to be really benevolent about this and not abuse its power.

I don't think that's realistic.

There should be a limit on how many scoops a person can get

There should be a limit on how much a government can tax and spend.

>Remove the state, remove also the corporate domination of the western world.
The state certainly provides lots of corporate welfare.
But if not for the state, there would be one mega corporation (named Standard Oil) that owned everything. There would be no choice or competition. Sky high prices and rock bottom wages.

Natural monopolies.
Mergers and acquisitions.

My thoughts exactly. I dislike the ability of the rich to seemingly acquire infinite wealth with not so honest means but what are you going to do to fix this without damning the economy to hell?

Everyone can be rich!
Just ask your daddy for a small loan of a gorillian dollans. You born a nigger in the ghetto with no father figure with a cracked out whore mom who drank the whole 9 months you were growing? You get shipped off to a public school that doesn't give a fuck and just passes you so they don't have to deal with teaching you? Just pick yourself up by your bootstraps and start the next Google. It's easy!

Where's my fucking endless free salad?

well played

>he think she this is beautiful
>he think she capitalism isn't just a diffrent version of democracy

Let me tell you why capitalism on a global scale is one of the worst things for us.

>Capitalism gets rid of tradition
Take this example, you go to Italy, you have a choice between an old mom and pop restaurant that's been owned by the same family for generations, they believe in using ingredients that are true to a recipe not to cut corners or find a cheaper alternative.

Your second choice is to eat at Olive Garden, they have one thing on their mind. Making money, they outsource and change ingredients to certain dishes to save money and keep things cost effective.

Global Capitalism has no respect for tradition, values or anything that doesn't involve making more money

Tell you what -- try working really hard fort a year, and come back and report to us how much better you are doing, financially.

True but with say 50 mom and pop shops in one town you get way more options rather than just a target and Walmart

The American Dream is a cruel myth indeed.

“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.”

The question is (((who))) gets to determine that. It's always fucking who whom for the left.

>To limit power in a democracy:
Can you spell out the connection there, I'm not seeing it.

Making everybody poor does not make everybody powerful, in a democracy.

Clearly this is true

mises.org/library/myth-natural-monopoly

>Everyone can be rich! Just take money from rich people and give it to poor people. Then set the minimum wage at $10,000,000 an hour. Everybody works a few hours a year and lives like kings!

Also, amusingly, Captcha wanted me to identify all the flutes. One of the "flutes" was a dildo. I love the Internet.

If you believe deforasting places like Yellowstone, Yosemite etc is okay you need to be shot. The only people who have no respect for such things are niggers i.e. Why fucking rhinos need armed escorts so they don't go extinct, it's why tigers need to be in isolation because subhumans hunt them to extinction

So, ultra Satan, what the fucking Hell do you think is wrong in your scenario? I have a choice, would likely choose the first restaurant, but I get to chose. Why does my getting to chose piss you off so much?

PS: The State Glorious People's Restaurant is going to look a lot more like the Olive Garden.

Good idea, since you are gonna tax me to death I'll throw my aids cure out, just not worth making.

And yet America rules the world. The greatest success of outright socialism was what, the USSR in the 60s? Yes, the American toiled very hard in the past, and often was unjustly treated (as a result of state-sanctioned murder, Ludlow Massacre etc...), but they held strong to their ideals and came to rule the world.

Now "American Poverty" is only being able to afford Doritos and microwave meals and being obese as a result, God forbid! Oh what suffering! The fact of the matter is even the poor American today lives like a king, and this was thanks to their ancestor's toil and patriotism and faith in free enterprise. A true American knows that sacrifice is necessary for the success of the generations of the future, that is what the coal miners toiled for, that is what the longshoremen toiled for, so their kids could live in a world as great as today.

Yet socialists see the world today and want only to destroy it, they make every assault they can against free enterprise, against the prosperity we all enjoy today, against the prosperity our forefathers toiled for, and should push come to shove I'll lay down my life to defend their legacy against socialist scum.

No. I make up to $220,000/Year within my Position, Rank, Seniority and Experience. My Base salary is set at $146,800/Year. I have devoted 18 Years of my life to Public Service and at remaining patience, proficient at what I do along with trying to improve lives within my Community and my State. My Salary and those equal have a top rate at $234,600/Year and if we go over; there is 2% State Income Tax penalty, on top of the 7% that we already pay out. Work harder, earn more. It is that simple. I am currently working between 5,600 and 6,700 Hours/Year.

Both you and the employer determine your value. He offers you too little money? Don't take the job. You demand too much? He won't hire you. Your service is just like any other product.

The selfish mindset of the socialist is expressed purely in that quote.

No regards for concepts such as honour, freedom, or basic dignity, they scrounge and snivel for every penny they can get and can't even comprehend that someone wouldn't do the same because they can't even comprehend these concepts.

Capitalism involves resources given willingly. If everyone stopped buying Trump wares, his empire wouldn't survive through magical capitalism, he would suffer a financial meltdown. But the socialist knows that not everyone shares his ideals, and he just cannot deal with that, so he attempts to set up a system where a single entity has monopoly on the entirety of wealth as a concept, and with wealth being the concept of value, of power given form. They don't want to give power to the people, they want to take all the power the people have away, to communalise it in one base, so that they it can be distributed it as they see fit, because they cannot stand that people with freedom will not allocate their power in ways they see fit. All while bitching and braying that taking away their freedom to allocate their power is good for them.

The only word fit to describe a socialist is scum.

Exactly you want choice. Now imagine no Olive Garden and 50 other mom and pop restaurants that pop up competing with one another for your choice in which you want,, all have unique dishes ingredients etc and they give you wayyyyy more choice than 3 global companies ever could. You want a cheap one? Go eat at a cheap one. You want one that's been around since the 1800s? Then eat there.

Or

You want something else? Sorry only McDonald's and Burger King here at the coliseum

Not even providing an explanation or justification.

Several ways to circumvent this:

- Have money hidden (phiscally or digital form)
- Move to country where this regulation doesn't apply
-> If non existent, found one. A bunch of rich guys surely will finde a way...
- Have a firm you own, own all the stuff you have. "I don't own this car officer, it's a company car."
- Bribe the guy who's controlling your finances or estimating the worth of you stuff
-

It's basically just another form of tax evasion. There is always a way to stay rich ;)

>The greatest success of outright socialism was what, the USSR in the 60s?

The US during WWII.

>Now "American Poverty" is only being able to afford Doritos and microwave meals and being obese as a result, God forbid! Oh what suffering
This is why there will never be a revolution. People are too comfortable. People in the west are so privileged and they don't even realise it. I spoke to a commie once, who said that a revolution in the UK is imminent because "living standards for the poor are unacceptable". He is a NEET.

I dunno, I think all the groups that were brutally killed weren't quite treated equally.
>NB4 "it was just supply failures"

15-18 hours a day?

No, destroy the whole capitalist system.

Usually. I work 12 hours and usually end up having to pull overtime due to a problem, a "go now or no other chance" or some kind of fuck up. I am a Major and in charge of an entire State Task Force. So, I stay busy unless I pull for a few (non-paid) vacation days.

So what happens to mr and mrs fatty once they eat that last twinkle and cross the threshold?

Sorry mate, but you're retarded. Literally a slave to your workplace. I would take a lower wage over these absurd working hours.

no way of enforcing that
all communists must die
keep your totalitarian hands off my property and I will not have to dispatch you

I swear germans are becoming the new leaves

I retire in two years(at 42) and will get my State Pension after that for life. My Pension plan will pay out 86.2% of my overall salary at time of retirement plus I can cash in all of my unspent overtime hours($12.75/hour, currently) and all of my unused vacation/sick days($45.65/day, currently). I will also get to keep my private Health and Life Insurance Policies. My Wife and Children are covered under my Health Insurance for Life and until 26.1 Years Old, respectfully.

I actaully agree with this. 100% against socialism.

The bar should be very high though. Like 500million or 1 billion.
After that you should be allowed to give money, tax free to other people/entities you do not control, family friends charities whatever.

Too much wealth concentrated in too few hands is always a recipe for disaster.
Also think there should be a mandatory retirement age, for all people, with no exemptions. I think 70. No more judges who are 94, thats retarded. People like Soros need to go.

Also think these laws need to be coupled with incredibly strong anti-treason, anti-trust, transperency laws for all public figures, making them subject to harsher penalties for transgressions involving public trust.

Also once you do "public service" you should never be allowed to accept any private money ever again, no gifts, nothing.

Public service should be last phase of your life after that its only retirement.

86.2% of my overall salary at time of retirement per year* Which would be $189,640/Year before any taxes and other take outs. If I could retire this year.