Anti-Net Neutrality Shilling

Just a reminder to all anons that we have been raided by anti-NN shills these past few days. To anyone who needs a quick run down.

>NN has been the default position since the 90s. It is not something being made INTO law but something we are trying to prevent the FCC and telecom companies from removing. Shills will often pray upon peoples lack of knowledge of what NN actually is by pretending its some new EVIL law King Nigger and his jockeys were/are trying to get through.

>NN means that ISPs cannot discriminate against data. Bandwidth is bandwidth, regardless of where it comes from. Without NN, big sites can get throttled and intentionally slowed down so that they can extract more money. But more important than that, information which goes against the (((narrative))), e.g. Sup Forums, can get throttled without any hope of paying the exorbitant fee of getting into the "fast lane" (really just normal speed, but positive reinforcement is another of the jews psychological tricks).

>They especially pray on AnCaps and libertarians by pretending that this lets the government regulate information. There is no regulation of internet data involved, in fact it's the express opposite. It prevents ISPs from doing what the shills pretend the government would be doing.

Don't fall for kike shilling. Without Net Neutrality the jews can legally censor opinions they don't want while simultaneously nickle and diming us for more shekles.

Other urls found in this thread:

metro.co.uk/2017/05/23/manchesters-top-police-say-we-wont-tolerate-hate-after-ariana-grande-terror-attack-6656860/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_L._Roberts
apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293569A1.pdf
fcc.gov/document/fcc-adopts-strong-sustainable-rules-protect-open-internet
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

This is obvious

Have a bump.

You'd be surprised how stupid ancaps are.

if NN wasnt a way for the government to censor political opinions then the left wouldnt be shilling for it

This is another thing shills have been doing.

>But the left likes it so it CANT be good, right?

Remember even a broken clock is right twice a day. If lefties are for something which hurts the jewish plot, well then the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

>EVERYONE THE LEFT LIKES BREATHING OXYGEN! EVERYONE STOP BREATHING THE GAS JEW IMMEDIATELY!

This is what you sound like

>Don't fall for kike shilling. Without Net Neutrality the jews can legally censor opinions they don't want while simultaneously nickle and diming us for more shekles.

Amazing how the jew will even eat their own

Jews only care about their shekels. Much like how niggers only care about themselves.

Shills, Shills everywhere

Bump. It's enraging how easily people have been falling for this shit.

Thank you, NSA.

>the left is doing it therefore it's bad
how fucking retarded are you? neck yourself brainlet

LIERTARIANISM ANE ANCAP IDEOLLGIES WERE MADE BY JEWS
SOME OF IT IS GENUINE SHILLING AND SOME OF IT IS JUST BRAINDEAD RETARDS

>use 38 percent of the infrastructure
>pay as much as a pleb in bandwidth costs
thats what netflix was doing. this is why the future is ancap, because netflic ruined the commons for everyone else

hans herman hoppe is not jewish
that fucker is more aryan than hitler

Maybe there isn't some Jewish conspiracy after all...?

''Let us consider the actual, worldly Jew – not the Sabbath Jew, as Bauer does, but the everyday Jew.

Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew.

What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.

Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our time.

An organization of society which would abolish the preconditions for huckstering, and therefore the possibility of huckstering, would make the Jew impossible. His religious consciousness would be dissipated like a thin haze in the real, vital air of society. On the other hand, if the Jew recognizes that this practical nature of his is futile and works to abolish it, he extricates himself from his previous development and works for human emancipation as such and turns against the supreme practical expression of human self-estrangement.

We recognize in Judaism, therefore, a general anti-social element of the present time, an element which through historical development – to which in this harmful respect the Jews have zealously contributed – has been brought to its present high level, at which it must necessarily begin to disintegrate.

In the final analysis, the emancipation of the Jews is the emancipation of mankind from Judaism.''

Where did you see that it's been default since the 90s? I didn't know we've had that position since then I thought it was more recent.

YOU are the Jew shill OP.

Only retarded reddit tards like you support "Net Neutrality."

We didnt have any regulations on the internet until king nigger came along, and somehow we did fine. Now we need unelected bureaucrats to pass 500 pages of regulations? Fuck off.


Facebook, Google, and many other leftist companies support it. Really jostles the ol' noggin.

FUCK OFF
NET NEUTRALITY IS KILLING ALL ME TORRENT SITES
YOUTUBE AND OTHER FREE HOSTING ARE NEXT
I DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE, JUST END THIS COMMUNISM BULLSHIT

bump

>the jewish plot

You mean the Net Neutrality shilled by (((Zuckerberg)))

PLEASE GOY, LET US MONITOR YOU, I'LL GET YOU MORE PLEB NETFLIX FOR IT! BREAD AND CIRCUSES FOR ALL THE GENTILES!

>t. jew beating around the bush to tell me there was no messiah
functionially identical, these monneyless kikes

>Facebook, Google, and many other leftist companies support it. Really jostles the ol' noggin.

Yep.

I pay for bandwidth. It's not ISPs business what that bandwidth consists off

I was split on the decision from the get go but after the last week of reading what must have been 1000 threads I'm for NN.

While the government doesn't always have my best interest at heart i don't see how anyone can say Comcast will ever do you right.

Shills have arrived. Zuckerberg and Jewgle and the like support it because they don't want to have to pay out their asses to the telecom companies for the same bandwidth use. They already sell your data and censor stuff on their own platform, why the fuck would this effect that one way or the other?

Just because you and your enemy agree with something does not mean its for the same reasons, or that you are suddenly friends.

>translation
>I'm a fucking retard that gives money to companies who treat me like shit. Instead of switching to a better service like a smart consumer, I will instead cry because I need someone to fight the bully for me. Therefore, I never have to use my brain and did I also mention I'm fucking retarded.

Fixed that for you.

>NET NEUTRALITY IS KILLING

nothing.

if you ran a company with that bandwidth
you would need to upload data to your users
that fee you paid for bandwidth? that was assuming you werent going to get all the normies all requesting 4k gilmore girls at the same time
a single normie requesting 4k gilmore girls will never be forced to pay what netflix should be paying.

Yeah, I was just arguing with an ancap about this in another thread. I'm not sure if the shills are impersonating ancaps now, but that shit was fucked. The guy was convinced that net neutrality entails governmental powers that can be used for censorship.

You're either a brainwashed cunt or some psyops cunt either way you're a cunt.

Because Comcast can't break in and shoot you for refusing to be like the rest of the goyim

metro.co.uk/2017/05/23/manchesters-top-police-say-we-wont-tolerate-hate-after-ariana-grande-terror-attack-6656860/

>Instead of switching to a better service like a smart consumer

Why do you faggots always act like switching services is easy? For a lot of people, including myself there is literally one provider and thats it.

>in b4 get up and move from your perfect house because companies choose not to compete

This is so 2nd grade right here.

>Wanting Gov to control you and end freedom on the internet
Mate fk off

Petition for other companies to move their services into your city/town. This isn't fucking rocket science you nigger

There often isn't another service unless, like you, you live in a massive city with lots of niggers and liberals. Most people have one or two ISPs to choose from and they offer essentially the exact same speeds and prices. But basic market research is hard for you kike. Kys

>why the fuck would this effect that one way or the other?

Because who the fuck do you think will be enforcing this you fucking moron? The FCC and NSA, the two agencies RESPONSIBLE FOR ONLINE LAW ENFORCEMENT.

You know, the agencies that do the MPAA's bidding whenever they accuse a 12 year old of using his grandma's computer to pirate batman movies.

Here's a secret: Jewgle and Kikebook have no power over you. The only ones that do are the ones that can break in and shoot you and then claim they're enforcing the law.

Since when does Sup Forums want the government enforcing the internet? Get off this board you statist coward.

Without net neutrality, your ISP can decide to throttle Sup Forums and give preferential speed to reddit.

With net neutrality, all internet traffic is treated the same.

This is a very simplified version but you get the idea.

Anyone who doesn't support net neutrality is a shill or a fucking moron. Ending net neutrality doesn't benefit the average end user in the slightest.

Ending net neutrality would let companies throttle access and basically any website with "hate speech" so corporations have more control over the flow of information. So the internet would become the MSM 2.0 with alternatives being made harder to reach.

It would also let companies Jew you out of your money through various ways like subscription services, and because of corporate monopolies, it would be almost impossible to stop.

Guess who owns most of the ISPs that are pushing for the end of net neutrality.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_L._Roberts
>Brian L. Roberts (born June 28, 1959) is an American businessman. Roberts is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Comcast Corporation, an American company providing cable, entertainment, and communications products and services. Under his leadership, Comcast has grown into a global Fortune 50 company uniquely positioned at the intersection of technology and media with two primary businesses, Comcast Cable and NBCUniversal. [2]
>Roberts was born into a Jewish family[3][4]

Read
Do you idiots really need someone to change your diaper for you as well?

Nice gaslighting thread, shill

yeah, the only reasonable argument so far i saw was "it will be regulated, either by state or cooperations, so better let it do cooperations" but even that is a really sloppy argument as we could just outlaw any regulations and make noone regulate it

that meme image is literally a better plan than I pay now.

Want to know why? Because government-enforced monopolies that protects AT&T from other telecoms moving into my city.

Fuck off.

What's the logic behind that? I genuinely want to know his reasoning

bro, i pay for x Bandwidth. It's not the ISP business if i spend that x watching porn or uploading games. How is this a hard concept for you to understand?

What are you even trying to say? That we should have pity for ISPs? That they are being oppressed?

>as we could just outlaw any regulations and make noone regulate it

Sounds good.

>The left and right are complete opposites and cannot agree on anything.
KYS

Net Neutrality is where the government is the only organization which can regulate the internet's content. Net Neutrality is what China has.

Net non-Neutrality is where companies regulate their own services, and they as private businesses can determine what they want to regulate.

So if you support Neutrality, you support the government taking over the internet to regulate political content (shut down Breitbart, Sup Forums, never allow another Trump-effect to happen).

You want us to become like China?
Fuck off commie

On another note, you allowed it to happen anyway. I'm sure there were other ISPs in your location, but you decided to go with the big man. Now you are surprised they have a monopoly in your location. That's like complaining about early access shit yet still buys PlayerUnknown's BattleGrounds. Or complain about DLC once a game releases yet you still buy the game. You let people fuck you in the ass and then you bitch afterwards. Majority of consumers are stupid, use your brain for once.

Jews at Netflix want to avoid paying more even though they hog up the Internet bandwidth. Bandwidth is expensive. Instead of having sensible pricing models where companies like Netflix can pay for the data they use a bunch of internet tards think their free speech is at risk because of Jewish misinformation campaigns. Yards blame ancaps who see through this shit.

REEEEEEEEEE use the government to stop ISPs from throttling hogs or letting ISPs charge them a fair price.


Well done internet tards. You got (((Netflix'd)))

I have read up on the subject, unlike your lefty ass, and I know that NN is just ISPs and companies like Netflix pitting consumers against one another over their own squabbles. NN does nothing to solve the problem of local monopolies. 9/10 there isn't a choice in providers and only a kike would lie and suggest otherwise. Learn about what you are talking about before you post cuck

>NN has been the default position since the 90s.

Lie

>Shills will often pray upon peoples lack of knowledge of what NN actually is

Like you


>pretending its some new EVIL law King Nigger and his jockeys were/are trying to get through.

It's only been around for 3 years and it actually was passed by Obama

> But more important than that, information which goes against the (((narrative))), e.g. Sup Forums, can get throttled without any hope of paying the exorbitant fee of getting into the "fast lane"

complete fallacy, totally false, NN did not exist for 20 years and this never happened

Stop preying on people's ignorance by putting a good sounding name on corporate welfare for facebook and google.

Bump this

You are retarded. You don't understand how bandwidth works.

Take a free bump

You probably replied to the wrong person, because I'm against NN due to the fact consumers were the ones who did it to themselves. If you did intend on replying to me, then you need to learn who a lefty is you dumb nigger.

That's generally false for rural areas. Usually whomever gets out there first gets a monopoly on the market as they own the lines and laying new lines is expensive as fuck. If you live in a massive liberal city, like you do, you can pick your provider and monopolies generally only form due to stupidity but those of us in the country have to choose between whomever lays lines out to us. You are shilling too hard there shariablue, dial it down

>I take it up the ass so what the big deal if I suck dick at the same time?

Because it's not about you. It's about netflix and whatever other millineal shit startup like shutterfly and snapchat and vine clogging up the internet with pointless bullshit uploaded by clueless normies who think that their facebook live video of them making a fucking retard of themselves at a party will turn them into the next Kardashian.

Fakebook shovels 600TB of data each way daily. Want real 'Net Neutrality'? They should be required to build their own ISP. Same with Netflix.

But please keep paying your netflix subscription so they can fund Sex Junk 2.0

Reminder to always do the opposite of what (((google))) and (((facebook))) tell you.

You replied to me first kike. I pointed out that competition doesn't exist, which is a fact, and you disagreed because the goys can't know so shut it down, right lefty?

> I am utterly unable to argue his point so I'll shitpost instead.

Please, keep sucking the teat of nanny government.

This spic understands.

Are you fucking dumb nigger? Generally false is your perception because you live in the middle of no where. You can use your brain and call up other companies, as a community, and ask for other services in the area. That's how the USA works, not your commie shit. A SB shill calling other people SB shills. Ironic.
Then you're a shill pretending to not be a shill. Your filename on the post just outs you as one you faggot. Kill yourself you nigger.

There's no "enforcement" agency you mongoloid. The regulation is passed through the FCC guidelines but it makes tiered internet speed an illegal business practice, which would mean they would get taken to court if they did it anyways. It's not at the discretion of the FCC or NSA because they're not enforcement agencies. (not that in the NSA case it would matter since they're an intelligence agency and can pretty much act outside the law with permission)

That is completely wrong. The FCC has already and will continue to regulate what can be on the US based internet. That's been going on since forever. I know rights are a hard concept for you aussies. NN means a corporation can't arbitrarily add content filters to favor their business interests.

No actually, I chose not to have internet all together and use my cellphones hotspot for browsing.

If i want to download something big like a game / tv series i just download it at work or a friends house.

But hey, keep on babbling about how retarded I am for signing a useless petition that led to nothing or cancelling the insane rates these jewish corporations wanted for a semi decent speed.

So much stupid.

Dunno who you're on about, but it might be this:
>Broadband users should be able to use any device or application they want, to reach any legal content they wish, using any broadband technology, so long as they don’t cause harm to the network.
apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293569A1.pdf

Keeping in mind how much Obama hated whistleblowers, it's not too big a stretch to worry about what the fed regulators might deem "legal content."

You seem very frustrated with your life user.

In what way is ISP business that people use their bandwidth? ISPs can't provide what they sell? Then ISPs should be upgrading their capabilities.

It's a very simple concept
>pay for bandwidth
>receive it

You gave the jews the money in the first place. Now you bitch about it. Go move to Russia if you need to be baby sat because you can't use your brain.

>2017
>being this retarded
Good goy. NN is gooood, goy. Nevermind the ISP monopoly, what's a few shekels among friends? huh, goy?

>FCC
>Literally government department of censorship
>Not an enforcement agency

Nice try, kike

What is a metaphor

So, it's either Big ISP corporations or the Government controlling the data you see. At least you can boycott corporations.

And when you oversaturate the bandwidth you pay for, it's your fault. Kikebook and netflix don't want to own up to their usage.

What is inability to refute a point

Net neutrality doesn't stop anyone from opening a business. As a matter of fact, it helps us in this instance because people can't just go out tomorrow and start a telecommunications company.

But you already knew that, didn't you shill?

You're literally just wrong. There's no other way to put it.

>"oversaturated bandwidth"

fair point dude, I oversaturated my bandwidth one time and they backtraced my IP and sent the internet police to my door.

You mean, ISP sell more bandwidth that they can afford to provide?

Maybe they should upgrade their capabilities or only sell what they can give

>default position
fcc.gov/document/fcc-adopts-strong-sustainable-rules-protect-open-internet

>NN means that ISPs cannot discriminate against data. Bandwidth is bandwidth, discriminate against data
I discriminate against data all of the fucking time with firewalls, ABP, ghostery and so on.

Just want streaming video faster? Too bad, NN disallows it. Just want faster torrent speeds? Too bad, NN disallows it.

Even in the worst-case scenario of throttling and blocking it is their property to do so as long as it isn't violating contracts. Don't call the cops because the internet isn't nirvana. They could get out of the ISP business and provide 0. Explain how providing more than nothing requires the governments guns when nothing is a-ok.

Yes goyim! Your free speech is at risk! Use the government to prevent ISPs from charging me higher rates. Oy gevalt! Think of the six gorrilion goyim!

>ima throw in the word "goy" while stating the oppinion of this dude i dont agree with. that gives me credibillity"
how exactly would getting rid of NN get rid of the ISP Monopoly? what makes you think it wouldnt stay a monopoly, but it would just result in a package of $20 so you can go to kikebook, twitter, read some NYT and CNN together with the newest propaganda from VICE, but if you want literally everything else but the MSM media sides, or mainstream sides in general it will be $80, and since noone wants to pay $80 it will result in everyone just getting the (((MSM))) as source, and surely thats a good thing, right?

The controversy starded over the addition of "fair contracts", something not part of the NN principle till then.

>>NN means that ISPs cannot discriminate against data. Bandwidth is bandwidth, regardless of where it comes from. Without NN, big sites can get throttled and intentionally slowed down so that they can extract more money.

Even though ISPs hate Net neutrality, the fight between netflix and them was not about deliberate traffic shaping. The big ISPs tried to use their power to not give Netflix cheap contracts.

The current bill is mostly about what they call "open internet", a lose term that was associated with net neutrality around 2015

>Petition for other companies to move their services into your city/town

Except it doesn't work like that in real world.

It's too expensive to lay wires down so ISPs dont even bother. Corporate monopolies over areas make it incredibly hard to provide competition, and they usually end up being bought out anyway. Most people aren't gonna bother paying more, probably getting a worse service, just to avoid monopolies.

Net neutrality is what were already have, where all data is treated equally.

>Go move to Russia if you need to be baby sat because you can't use your brain.

Says the shill with a Nazi flag

Tell me when's the last time the US government censored or throttled a website you wanted to read. They've never done it to the extent ISPs could if net neutrality didn't stop them. This isn't Europe.

You're literally unable to prove your point. There's no other way to put it.

You're right. They should just turn you off.

The internet isn't a product, fuck off reeeee

Like seriously, anti NN shills LITERALLY want you to believe that the equivalent of your water provider stopping your water access because they don't like the food you're cooking with it is a good idea.

It's my fucking bandwidth, I fucking do with it what I fucking want. You don't get a say in it.

You mad user? Do you understand basic economics? A hundred or so sales isn't going to cover the cost of the lines. LARPing behind a Nazi flag while being an ancap just proves how much of a newfag lefty shill you are

Nah, they can sell whatever the fuck they want. If kikebook or netflix goes over what they agreed in their CONTRACT, they should get turned off. Might make goyim like you get your face out of your (((cell phone))) for a while.

Yes goyim! Keep fighting for net neutrality! Don't let those kike shills disuade you! Oy gevalt.

If you stop paying your water bill, you get cut off. If you go over your water use in the contract you sign, you get fined.

That's how it works with water, that's how it works with ISPs. Now go prep your wife for Abdul, kraut.

Yes goyim! Repeal NN so that we can finally censor Sup Forums and any other hate speech site we deem worthy! Yes yes!

>what is hindsight

Oy gevalt don't repeal! Don't worry goyim the government is your friend. They would never censor Sup Forums or worse. Oy gevalt net neutrality for the win goyim!

You...You honestly think NN is what's keeping the Federal Kike Kommission and the (((NSA))) from censoring the internet?

>Netflix/Facebook isn't paying for their usage

I pay an ISP to download contents, they pay an ISP to host their content. This is the current system, why even touch it?
>calling it net neutral in the first place
This is why everyone is arguing. Instead of arguing for less regulation it's either the corporations control the net or the government does. Both corporatists ANd socialists are in the wrong here and their shills are distracting y'all

I'm sorry guys, but I'd rather trust our government to control the internet than corporations. Both want to screw me over, don't you dare imply otherwise, but at the least I know the government won't throttle me constantly. all I have to do is avoid "wrongthink". That sucks, and I hate that I have to do that, but I'll prefer it over the corps who will throttle me even if I have the politically correct opinion.

>You... you honestly think

nobody here talks like this shill. you're too obvious. Try again next thread.

No
It's what's keeping ISPs that are owned by kikes from doing that.
The whole reason NN got passed back in 2015 was to ensure a free and open internet.

Thanks for supporting net neutrality actually. Textbook of what you just said.