The number of men attending higher education is shrinking every year

The number of men attending higher education is shrinking every year.

Swedish college 2017:
62% women
38% men

>In the future Sweden will be ruled completely by women

Other urls found in this thread:

professorconfess.blogspot.com.au/2017/07/the-vanishing-college-male.html
myredditvideos.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

What is the cause of this drop? Is it just demoralization of the men?

>ruled by women
>women let in niggers

correction: in the future Sweden will be ruled completely by niggers

professorconfess.blogspot.com.au/2017/07/the-vanishing-college-male.html

Everything you need to know

college is a scam

I remember, years ago, when it was news that more females than males were in college. It was considered a major victory for feminism, and perhaps it was. Males never made a “comeback” after that, and soon the percentages went from a barely noticeable (but newsworthy!) 50.1% female, to 55% female, to today’s we-should-ask-questions 60% female.

Thing is, the unbalanced gender issue doesn’t really work on a per-classroom basis. Take a gender studies course, and you’ll have perhaps 1 male and the rest female, for example. In math classes, it starts at near parity at the entry level courses, but by the time you get to the third year math courses, only about 10% of the students are female. I don’t consider this a loss or a victory for feminism, it’s just the way it is.

The issue that should be noted is the overall disparity, already extreme, is getting worse. I’ll quote from the Denver Post, but I assure the gentle reader these trends are everywhere in the U.S.:

> Men saying “no thanks” to college
>The proportion of men on college campuses is dropping


Naturally, we need to ask “why?” Our kid are trained from near infancy that college is an absolute necessity, so why is this (terrible) training working on the females, but not on the males? What’s giving males this resistance to the conditioning?
The very natural response is money, and the Post addresses that:

>“If you don’t want to go to college you can go to a trade school and come away with something and not be on the hook for $150,000,” said 28-year-old Adam Stark, who dropped out of college and now is thriving in the music business in Denver.

To succeed in life, you really do need a skill, and, yes, if you want money, you need a skill someone is willing to pay for. Colleges don’t focus on skill-building, because teaching skills requires hiring people with skills, and that costs money—our campuses are flooded with administrators whose purpose is to hire teachers as cheaply as possible. Thus, almost all the coursework involves things that don’t require any skill, or even build up skills.

At the risk of sounding sexist, males are more money-oriented than females, as though they’re trained early on that nobody is going to pay their way through life and so they must figure out how to pay for themselves and hopefully a family. To even suggest such a thing could bring an attack if I said it at my job but…there’s a difference here, we’re supposed to consider why.

Greater fiscal responsibility might well be a factor, but there’s more to it. You can step into a casino any time of day and see males making terrible financial decisions, and college is for most people a terrible financial decision…there’s more here than financial concerns.

You can easily condition a child to associate a brightly colored candy coating with something good to eat. What happens when you put a candy coating on fecal matter? A well-conditioned teenager will still put the “candy” in his mouth, but as soon as he’s exposed to the visceral unpleasantness of it, he’ll spit it out.

>“Others say the campus environment has become testy, even hostile, toward men. “You definitely get the sense you are the problem,” said Maxwell. “One woman once told me that she could use statistics to determine how many of my friends were rapists.”

this is what we get for letting women vote

It’s still something of a secret that our campuses are, quite often, hostile towards males. Between the hate-filled Gender Studies courses spitting enraged females out to mingle amongst the other students, and a kangaroo court system destroying male lives at will, it doesn’t take long for a male to note the candy coating of “college is a great choice” to have an underlying flavor of pure hatred for him.

And, indeed, this is what’s happening:

>Meanwhile, over the past decade about 30 percent of male college students have dropped out during their freshman year,


Why did the article I’m citing blow off the given reason with a “whatever”? It’s very clear males are still coming on campus. It’s just when they get there, they see it’s a very hostile place for them to be, and they leave.

One small anecdote from the article:

>Stark, 28, studied computer science for a year and a half before leaving Metro State University to study on his own.
Now a software engineer for a music company in Denver, Stark also DJs at some of the area’s most notable nightclubs. “What I was getting in the classroom just didn’t jibe with me. I felt I could teach myself on the Internet,” he said.

is it supposed to be easier dating as a student in college now that most college students are female?

Look, the world runs on computers, if you’re looking to make money it’s a great field to get into. But our campuses just aren’t going to teach job-applicable computer skills (too expensive to hire those kind of people), so, yes, learn it on your own. Or go to a legitimate (i.e., non-accredited) school which will return your tuition if you don’t get a job after graduation.

Returning to the topic, another reason for the gender disparity is males are told they are not wanted in yet another way: scholarships. Again, I might be a bit biased in mathematics, but there are seemingly endless “free money if you’re female and want to be a math/science major” opportunities on campus, while I’m very hard pressed to remember any scholarship that was for males-only. Granted, this might not turn away males (though I think it does) but it certainly means we’re slamming more females into higher education than there otherwise would be.

I really wonder what will happen, years from now, when the full extent of the fraud of higher education is revealed (I’ve done all I can, but hold no illusions as to how long it will take). Will the fact the females were disproportionately taken advantage of here matter at all?

>Parent: “I can’t believe my daughter got into Yale, graduated, and got married to raise kids.”

There are other future concerns as well. College enrollments have been heading up except (thankfully) the last couple of years, so this means that now a huge number of our best and brightest females are giving up some of their best child-bearing years, not only to become deeply indebted, not only to receive heavy indoctrination into a hateful ideology, but, at absolute best, to gain skills so they can have a hard core career instead of a family.

Might this be a bad idea for society in general?

No, the women who have recieved the marxist indoctrination hate men.

I grant I’m not the only one to have such concerns, but we really need to re-think this “everyone must go to college whatever the cost” idea. Yes, education is good, but so are knowledge and actual skills, and seeing as the latter are no longer considered a necessary part of the higher education complex, we now must ask if setting up colleges and universities every few miles (as well as online) is something we as a society should pay for.

Once again, we should at the bare minimum stop with the student loan scheme. A societal system which taxes its citizens to force them to pay for the destruction of their own society is invalid, after all.

it was manufactured to be this way. Has nothing to do with men being stupid or lazy. They heavily reward and praise women for going to college, the same for shitskins. Doesn't matter how productive or useful they are, or if they excel at anything - there is an enormous structure built around putting these people on a pedestal at a great cost to everything around it. This is all crashing down now, in an ugly and disgusting fashion. Everyone alive today will be well acquainted with great pain and suffering, just around the corner

Women may be good at memorizing stuff and don't goof off as much, but when it comes to logical thinking they just can't do it. They're too emotional, which is why women under perform in any subject that counts.

Government funding on universities and loan forgiveness is just another way for taxing men to pay for women.

>In the future Sweden will be ruled completely by women

Isn't it already the case ?

Thank you for this dump.

>>In the future Sweden will be ruled completely by women

>assuming most degrees women take arent worthless
>assuming Sweden wont ltierally turn into a Caliphate before that happens

Read his blog. Hes been dropping redpills on college for years. Exposing the student loan scam, showing how professors are forced to pass even the dumbest of students, how universities have been accepting anything with a pulse to get that sweet sweet government money.

This is what happens when government subsidizes things. You get massive inflation of the cost as the buyer no longer cares, you get degeneration of the product as the buyer now receives it for """free"""" and an overall decay of the institution.

>be daughter
>mom and dad still treat you like a child
>be son
>"ok user get the fuck out you're 18, stop being so entitled no one owes you anything"

Women are emotional simpletons that only car about gossip, attention, and fucking feelings. There is a reason Scandinavian countries are getting buttblasted by nonsense these days

I fucked a lot of girls in college but i played the militant communist angle and lifted weights. the men on Sup Forums with their far right politics would repulse most college women who tend to be leftist feminist and sjws. I weighted until after college to adopt right wing views.

Women relative to men are highly neurotic and conformist. That means they are changing societies to be that way as well. That again means strict procedures for everything, alienating men, and learning by memorization and diligent everyday paying attention in class, where men does poorly. A society controlled by women will alienate men more and more, unfortunately men are physically stronger. What we need now is to stop showing sympathy to women who are raped, because in the majority of cases it's their own fault.

Yup.

>Swedish college 2017:
>62% women
>38% men

This could actually become a self-enforcing downward spiral for men. If at one point there will be 80% women and only 20% men in college - 'higher education' might start to be considered a 'woman's thing' by men and boys (in the same way there are not many boys wanting to become a cleaning maid).

Lies. It already is.

>Isn't it already the case ?

It can always become worse

as a university graduate i can say the entire system is completely tailored for women, and very anti white-male in general.

But will they ask the real question of what is the breakdown in genders in courses. To call it a triumph of women or considered a "womans thing" when 90% of college is female but only 10% of them are in the physics classes is a bit ridiculous. Can you imagine an 80% female campus yet math remaining 70% male which it most definitely will? Insane

Men go straight into a job from highschool or drop out entirely. Only retards go to college.
(Except for medical/engineering and only if the degree guarantees employment).

I found out this works the same if you start taking girl hormones too.

Because men realize schools are marxist indoctrination camps.

>Turn up at college.
>CIS SCUM. CHECK YOUR MALE PRIVILEGE AND BEND OVER FOR THE MATRIARCHY. YOU'RE A FEMINIST AREN'T YOU?
>Turn 540 and become a college drop out.

>What is the cause of this drop?

More women going into higher education and not necessarily a drop in men.

>"You can just go to a trade school"

>says guy in the music business

This is the epitome of this stupid meme. People who've never worked a trade in their life think that you can just "go to trade school" and then you're set for life without college debt.

1. The only thing you're going to get by doubling, for example, the amount of welders in the US (~350,000 with an average wage of $17 an hour) is going to be twice as many welders working at minimum wage.

2. Trade schools are not all of the same quality. My best friend of 20 years runs the weld shop for a local company at the port and he's literally crumpled up and thrown away "trade school certificates" for welding in peoples' faces. Because what they did in trade school didn't teach them shit about actually working in a weld shop in the real world.

You get into trades through apprenticeships. And getting that apprenticeship is one part luck two parts having family or friends already on the job.

And for various reasons there will always be an artificial ceiling on trades because it protects wages.

>loan forgiveness is just another way for taxing men to pay for women.

What the fuck are you talking about?

My university have been quoting women into engineering programs for the last decade, and the result is well documented in the exam reports: Women tend to score a whole grade below the average in most undergraduate exams, yet they are still the most headhunted by industry. They do the same in the army: Women recruits are made to become officers because they think that society will change if they forcefully change it from the top down. I don't think they even know what they are proposing. It's like the meme that we need migrants to better our economies. We now have a pop-culture of political ideas and the unintelligent that subscribe to it.

False. Islam will take over and no women will go to school anymore. It's Haram

Hahahahahah, because the males probably understand that college is fucking useless unless you're going big time into an actual valuable skill that is sought after.

Meanwhile women are learning whateverthefuck they think is trendy and cool or what they'd "enjoy", the majority of girls there will more than likely become burger flippers or the equivalent, a hairdresser, waiter, if they are lucky; a nurse that cleans fat landwhales on life support.
I don't care what government you have you're not going to create jobs out of thin air for these fucking idiots and if they somehow do, good fucking luck keeping that afloat.

that's ok, we can petition to allow migrants free college and guaranteed acceptance
college in sweden should be 60% niggers and 40% scared pregnant swedish girls trying not to cry publicly or one of the other swedish girls will knife them for being racist

they chose courses that are cheaper to run
they flood university therefore, to get a "seat" at the "party" game - if you have a piece of paper, you can get a public job
this is how communism comes in

I'm not proud of it, but I'm looking foreward to the inevitable forced migration of white swedish refugees, and their scared, vulnerable women.

OP implying that women could actually run a country KEK

Good. Less competition for me.

This is the real result. Men will go mostly for things people should go to college for. Women will go for courses that do not advance their economic value.

The end result will be debt for the women more so than the men. How that affects dating or marriage or relationships is unknown. Imagine if an educated woman makes less than her uneducated husband or partner. Will she say "dang I am dumb, I'm glad I have him" or will she commit further to an ideology that says her failures are not her own? Will her thoughts be "ugh he doesn't even have a degree and makes more, we need equal pay"