Do you think that Donnie Trump Jr. will be bottom or top bitch in prison...

Do you think that Donnie Trump Jr. will be bottom or top bitch in prison? Or will he get his own cell because he's the President son (assuming his dad lasts that long)?

Other urls found in this thread:

washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/07/13/donald-trump-is-wrong-when-democrats-were-offered-secret-help-by-the-soviets-they-refused/?utm_term=.46b6960e881e
archive.is/grEll
washingtontimes.com/news/2006/oct/27/20061027-084248-4386r/
thedailybeast.com/when-the-left-longed-for-russian-political-interference
realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/07/11/gwu_law_prof_jonathan_turley_on_trump_jr_meeting_a_russia_for_the_love_of_god_this_is_not_treason.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

What crime did he commit?

If he ever goes to prison it all depends how he handles himself.
Situation 1.
>Don walks in and smacks the fuck out of the biggest nigger he sees, because don knows that niggers cant help but find that submissive genetic trait in the face of such white pride
Situation 2
>Don goes to prison and goes gay for the stay

18 U.S.C. § 201

Election defrauding and conspiracy to commit espionage.

...

Mind Rape Media (MRM) is trying to Mind Rape America into a shallow grave

don't even accept an inch of the Russia Freak conspiracy theory

he'll be neither because he wont go to jail :^)

Someone clearly doesn't know what espionage or opposition research means

>What crime did he commit?
Not being a registered Democrat.
Because this is the shit they do all the time.

Donnie dindu nuffin

Donnie good boy

Sage

Lol 2/10. Practice your bullshit more on cuckit sweetie

rich people dont go to prison moron

Can you explain to me how this isn't a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201? Someone is going to go to jail in the Trump family.
so execution it is, then? Just like the Rosenbergs.

His father can just pardon him.

see

>tfw he'd just get pardoned by POTUS Trump
lmao

Liberals used to be funny but now they're turning into pure cringe.

He didn't recognize OPs gender.

Do you know what precedent is? Do you know how law works?

Nobody in the Trump family was a public official or a witness at the time. 18 USC 201 does not apply.

>Liberals
Really should change their name.
>Not liberal at all.
>Fascists
>Radical Communists
>The most hate filled violent party ever known to American politics
>Also bigoted
>Liars
Maybe just call their party "Satan's Spawn"

...which would be Trumps, as they thought that colluding with a foreign government is not a clear violation of Federal law and a felony.
You're wrong. The Dems turnt down Soviet aid to bring down Nixon in the past during elections:
washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/07/13/donald-trump-is-wrong-when-democrats-were-offered-secret-help-by-the-soviets-they-refused/?utm_term=.46b6960e881e

Archive shills archive.is/grEll

He didn't break any law. Even if he did, he'd just plead guilty and Trump would pardon him.

Why is the left not funny?
Their memes are awful and don't make any sense.

Tell us, when is the arrest happening?

>Be Donnie.
>Get convicted of a crime.
>Oh wait my dad is the president!
>Get pardoned.
Wow fucking liberals I swear.

Why does he and his kids look like spics?

Collusion is only a illegal if an actual law was broken. In this case, no laws were broken.

Also, talking to Russians is not a felony.

Care to cite the statute?

>washingtonpost.
Who reads that propaganda filled rag?
Besides you liberal dimwits.
Nixon?
You fuckers owe Nixon an apology after giving us Bil Clinton, Hillary and King Nigger.
Talk about corruption.

Fuck off.

I think you're a bottom now, user. Go fucking dream about DT Jr and wish you could get it

LOL brock finally got you your cheat sheets! (((Nice))) try faggots. Tick fucking tock.

"When The Left Longed For Russian Political Interference To stop Ronald Reagan in 1984, Ted Kennedy reached out to the Soviet Union"
washingtontimes.com/news/2006/oct/27/20061027-084248-4386r/
thedailybeast.com/when-the-left-longed-for-russian-political-interference

GWU Law Prof. Jonathan Turley on Trump Jr. Meeting A Russian: "For The Love Of God... This Is Not Treason... No Crime Was Committed!"
realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/07/11/gwu_law_prof_jonathan_turley_on_trump_jr_meeting_a_russia_for_the_love_of_god_this_is_not_treason.html

>"Whoever . . . being a public official or person SELECTED to be a public official, DIRECTLY or INDIRECTLY, . . . agrees to receive or accept anything of value . . . for any other person or entity, in return for . . . being influenced to commit or aid in committing, or to COLLUDE IN, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of ANY fraud, on the United States . . . shall be fined under this title or not more than three times the monetary equivalent of the thing of value, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than fifteen years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States."

Hammerschmidt, which was applied specifically to 18 USC 371 and defined "defraud" (i.e., commit fraud).:

>To conspire to defraud the United States means primarily to cheat the Government out of property or money, but it also means to interfere with or obstruct one of its lawful governmental functions by deceit, craft or trickery, or at least by means that are dishonest. It is not necessary that the Government shall be subjected to property or pecuniary loss by the fraud, but only that its legitimate official action and purpose shall be defeated by misrepresentation, chicane or the overreaching of those charged with carrying out the governmental intention.

also 42 U.S.C. Section 1985(3): which says:

>If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire... or more persons conspire to prevent by force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President, or as a Member of Congress of the United States; or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy

Umm no, sweetie. Tick fucking tock.

"When The Left Longed For Russian Political Interference To stop Ronald Reagan in 1984, Ted Kennedy reached out to the Soviet Union"
washingtontimes.com/news/2006/oct/27/20061027-084248-4386r/
thedailybeast.com/when-the-left-longed-for-russian-political-interference

GWU Law Prof. Jonathan Turley on Trump Jr. Meeting A Russian: "For The Love Of God... This Is Not Treason... No Crime Was Committed!"
realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/07/11/gwu_law_prof_jonathan_turley_on_trump_jr_meeting_a_russia_for_the_love_of_god_this_is_not_treason.html

Did Don Jr. practice journalism without a license? Because getting dirt on people is basically journalism.

Nobody was preventing people from voting.

None of that applies.

>2 rubles have been deposited In your account.

Fuck off shill.

see They committed conspiracy to commit election defraudment

your second link article is right. It isn't treason. But it is another Federal crime that can get applied here.

Election defraudment? Like the media outlets were doing when they dished dirt on Trump prior to the election? Funny.

colluding with a foreign government in support of your candidate to get information they obtained to discredit your opponent is a crime. Said government was under Federal sanctions, and our recent Congress (run by Republicans themselves) have still upheld those sanctions.

Saged and reported for being an faggot

Please cite the statute which says this.

He's a Trump. He'll have two bottoms, obviously. But for real. Don jr. ain't going to prison.

We are not worthy. Shine on you crazy archiving diamond.

you idiotic niggers tried to set him up with a fucking Democrat flunkie and a fucking American

Don Jr. is the target of your bullshit because you tried and failed to get dirt on daddy

also your posting style hasn't changed since i called you out yesterday

i wasn't shit-posting yesterday, but I'm glad someone else is doing my job for me.

Defraudment only applies if the information is ficticious. If the information is valid then it's just information.

Otherwise that implies that it's okay to elect someone who's a massive criminal as long as you don't get the information about it. Otherwise it's defraudment.

>Defraudment
>implying a liberal can understand what is honest or dishonest.