Trump is not a sign of anglos fighting back

He is the political result of the hispanization of the US, that now has a caudillo as president, something unthinkable until very recently.

Think a little: Where are you more likely to find a president who bullshits all the time, promises to be strong and to fight the elites, promises to build very cost-ineffective pharaonic wonders and spend his way to economic development, someone who is charismatic and atracts a loyal base of followers who keep going to his self-congratulatory speeches even after the elections, and who are willing to fight in the streets for him?

In fair and balanced little Canada? In high-cultured and aristocratic Great Britain? In surprisingly dull Australia? In pastoral New Zealand?

Or in Mexico, Ecuador, Argentina, Spain, Colombia, Venezuela, etc?

He might not have a personal army (so far), but Trump is the closest thing the US has ever had to a caudillo leader, and I'm afraid american politics will get more and more like the politics of shithole hispanic countries as time goes by.

Democrats are already losing their shit to conspiracy theories and coming close to trying to oust Trump with a Coup D'état, and are becoming more socialistic and unhinged by the day, while Republicans are no less tinfoiled and prone to call the system rigged, and are becoming more populist and prone to spend huge bucks instead of trying to fix the debt.

How long till the US has a president Lopez or Carerra, and retarded political problems?

Just one of the bad consequences of the ongoing hispanization of America

>tfw that one guy that said America will become Argentina was right
Fuck

We caused that feel

Eventually yes.

I mean a bunch of Trump voters aren't based either, they just voted for him cause he was "gonna fight the stablishment"

They might as easily go to some bernie-tier cunt who'll be America's Peron

And the demographics are all going this way too. Republicans can't win just with whites forever, and even Trump isn't raising anglo birth-rates or deporting enough illegals, and even if they all got deported, the legal non-anglos are already a majority in some states, and like what? 40% of babies?

How the fuck don't people see this will make america become more and more hispanic, including it's politics?

what did u mean by this?

Who gives a shit, history is full of native populations changing. The U.S. is no different.

The US has nukes. Anglos were smart enough to remove them from South Africa when they allowed it to go full onorable memba. Who is going to disarm POTUS Jesus Lopez?

What country should I escape to next? My family left Argentina because of that whole pension thing in the early 2000s and other reasons relating to the corrupt government and I fear that I don't have enough time to acquire wealth and a strong family for my future generations.

It matters in the long run you white polled faggot. People = country.

would you like a nuclear Argentina or a nuclear Venezuela or a nuclear Mexico in charge of the world's most powerful military?

Would you like to live in any of these countries?

I don't know mate. Europe is going to the shitter and Aus and NZ are chink territory (canada is Gaychinkland), so at least they'll not have retarded policies and go bankrupt, I guess?

Maybe some small country or one where you can live in peace by yourself even if the government is shit

Maybe even the countryside in the US if u manage to become self-sufficient

Yeah dude, culture is what is important, not the people! Free Kekistan, amirite?

The spics are nothing but a bio-engineered social weapon created through centuries of rape
Sorry for not resisting the jungle puss puss

Damn, good post. That is some shit right there.

I disagree with you though, Canada/England are completely fucked. They would be better off with a Trump-tier leader.

Okay, you got pretty slick numbers, but I think you're wrong OP. Trump does indeed embody machismo and has a very dominance assertive personality like many caudillo Hispanic leaders.

But that's where the similarities end. Trump is more akin to JFK, Teddy Roosevelt and Andrew Jackson. All four were very manly men and destroyed their competition rather easily. All four were men who pushed huge cost-ineffective infrastructure and scientific projects, like canals, national parks and NASA. Trump's a throwback to old school American manliness, not a parallel to the dictators down south. Plus, Trump is single handedly withholding a Hispanic majority for at least another twenty years, perhaps completely reversing it by the end of his presidency.

Trump was the American Anglos last stand, not a forebear of some darker future, (pun intended).

Pakistan has nukes and mestizos are smarter than fucking pakis, so I wouldn't worry too much

:'(

I still have hope in the US. At least the increased federalism makes life more bearable in some states, for those who are prepper-tier

They are fucked, but not being hispanified. They're gonna be islamized, which isn't detectable on the political level in the short run, cause they aren't as large a % yet, and don't have a political culture, being full-on savages.

But culturally they're already surrendering, and on the long run everyone will be able to see the changes, like a ottoman-style segregated religious policy of self-rule, instead of the typical secular policy.

not every caudillo was a dictator, and these former guys weren't elected in a situation of america becoming more spic every single year

A country doesn't change so much without being affected, and this includes politics

Pakistan has a stronger enemy right next to them to keep them in line.

The US is one of the safest countries on earth, geopolitically speaking.

Any type of invasion would be very hard, and they don't need to use the nukes, just threaten to use them to fuck with a bunch of non-nuclear countries

I don't understand though.

Trump is a white, civic nationalist candidate. Hispanics don't have much to do with America's political culture.

obviously, Trump was more of a reaction against hispanics.

You're saying that Trump was elected partly due to the reaction to the Hispanic menace, in the same way that Hispanics nominate their leaders in reaction to each other's behavior in South America

Top fucking kek. How does this work exactly?

it's not about the particular policies or who they blame for stuff, but the trend in political culture

Trump is not 100% equal to your typical spic candidate, but the trend is going in this direction, and he was a relevant speeding of this

Some points of typical spic politics: the enemy is internal, u vote for people to defeat your internal enemies more than anything; if you lose it's because the elections were rigged, and you'll try to get rid of the president u dislike any way you can, and pull a bunch of kikery to achieve it; it's as important to be macho as to have good policy; build big and build beautiful, and don't cut benefits and shit (as he didn't and won't touch the most important spending, pensions and welfare), who cares about fiscal responsibility; develop a personality cult (Obama was better at this, Trump is still working on it); get all ur family involved, make one of them ur successor if u can; bravado and boasting; petty stupid fights; everyone is a shill all the time, doesn't matter if things get achieved, u cant let the adversaries win even petty victories; celebrity-status and style as important as substance; blame gringo for the problems, nothing is the people's own fault, blame is on the elite (which curiously doesn't make the people who elected them blame-worthy) and foreign influence

etc

etc

>for at least another twenty years,
Dude this is a meme. Legal hispanics will soon be a majority among babies irrespective of anything Trump does.
Even if there is no more amnesties or immigration and their birthrates go down , they'll still become a majority (even if a small one) or flip a couple states (like dominicans are doing in Florida, and like what happened in Cali and NM)

Very interesting

Except Trump is cutting welfare and lowering taxes

But I see what you're saying here. I actually had my friend from Columbia tell me this a while back, but I thought he was being over-dramatic.

So what exactly is your theory for how this came about? We have had a little bit of this sort of thing before. Presidents like Andrew Jackson and a lot of hypermasculine antics and theatrics, but I agree that this does resemble south american politics a little bit more.

Too little to count. If benefits for seniors aren't touches the debt will not go away.

And cutting taxes is good, but it can lead to debt increases tol, as in the past. Even in LA some politicians cut taxes from time to time (not that common tho, only in a couple placea or after shtf), but if spending isnt0 cut drastically than lafer won't help

Cutting regulations is excellent and very anglo tho, but will the next president be more anglo than Trump or less?

If his non-pol non-ideological base who didn't vote for Romney are not satisfied, might not they vote for some anti-establishment loony populist (probs not progressive) lefty? I mean, Peron wasn't an sjw cuck either

>he was being over-dramatic
A brunch of spics are saying it as their version of "fuck dlumpft", mad because he isn't deporting illegals (which I honestly can't understand)

But what I think is that the increaswd hispanization if the US is moving parts of its politicians to become more Hispanic in nature, and that anglos will become more fed up of keeping their more respectful and serious political culture going while getting fucked by politicians, and with time will have to become more and more like what they fight against to keep competitive.

Its hard to win being all serious and economically and technically correct if people don't want to hear hard truths and take responsibility for their mistakes (including voting for more immigration and welfare and Obama) and fight their problems even if it makes life worsd on the short term, especially if the other sides ignores this and gets to do what thry want, while yours keeps getting fucked over and demonized

Tolerance for corruption and small deviations and poor behavior might increase too

Wrong, the US is going to balkanize before any of that ever comes to fruition.

Like it did in the 1860s?

Different circumstances, mate.
If the US begins to hispanicize at the rate in which you are suggesting, it's inevitable the states will balkanize.

I doubt the US would balkinize.

If we balkinized, we would run the risk of becoming a very weak country. We would lose our world power.

Its already doing, and good luck trying (again)

The most important and strategic and rich states are the ones who'll be the most hispanic.

Mormons have more chance to get a state of their own than the US has of "balkanizing".

And if it does happen, say goodbye to freedom and peace and enjoy being some power's bitch or ally.

This is just a pipedream that never happens, especially because there's zero chance of a hispanic vs anti-hispanic conflict

It'll be 70% vs 30% hispanics together with 40% vs 60% anglos at most, and both sides are changing this way.

Its a change in political culture, not some spic coup taking control of the country.

Once demographics change enough no one will be able to win with the completely unbalanced black and hispanic vote patterns changing, and even voters will accept this after the change is big enough.

Plus intermarriages are going fast (already 7% IIRC) and the most common pairing is hispanic/white anglo

>We would lose our world power.
Going to happen either way with the declining white population

We can only hope seeing as how Argentina is one of the whitest countries in the world.

t. Argie diaspora