Challenge: search "white couple" in jewgle images and try to find with white man and white woman

Challenge: search "white couple" in jewgle images and try to find with white man and white woman.

Challenge: try and critically understand how Google algorithms work and why searching "white couple" primes the system to show you couples with one white and one non-white.

It's not a conspiracy, it's down to how Google ranks its search results.

wtf?

When u search "black couple" it's the opposite. Only black people and no white babies, e.t.c, compared to "white couple"

it doesn't prime anything because google usually prefers to promote results that match the search phrase verbatim to the top of your search results

not in this case!

oh heck 2nd picture is two white faggots with a black baby that they are obviously going to take turns raping

Right wing retards don't understand how Google search algorithm works.

Hint: Pages with the most links from other pages are ranked higher. Pictures of completely white couples are very rarely labelled with "white". Why bother pointing out their race when people can see it?

On the other hand, there are lots of web pages and blogs dedicated to showing pictures of mixed and black couples.

So when you search "white couple", Google finds a picture with the label "WHITE black mixed COUPLE" or "interracial WHITE Asian COUPLE" and shows you those pictures.

stock photos are always labelled with the bleeding obvious, so the results should be littered with stock photos of white couples

>2017
>using google
Enjoy your botnet

Now here comes the critical thinking bit Mr right wind retard.

How often do you see pictures of white couples on blogs or news stories LABELLED as specifically white? When pictures of white couples show up it's usually in blogs or articles that don't have a racial component to the discussion, so your phrase "white couple" isn't going to find anything.

On the other hand, when pictures are used of mixed couples, it's nearly always in blogs and articles where the accompanying text has a racial component, so your search phrase "white couple" is going to find a lot more matches.

That's what I mean by priming the system to show you mixed couples.

>not using Bing

It does this because it assumed that because you specified race, you wanted to see results related to race.

Oy vey! Delet this now! It's pure coincidence, goy!

Your theory doesn't hold, as pointed by others. "Black couple", "asian couple", "jewish couple" all show only the correct results. Google has shown multiple times to "fix" results to further jewish zionist agenda, this just strengthens the proof. And your defense is so weak the other jews must be ashamed of you.

Yeah, and for most white people who aren't Sup Forumsacks, when labelling a picture of a white couple, the race won't occur to them, so it will be labelled "happy couple" or "smiling couple" or "playful couple".

When those same regular non-Sup Forums people label a picture of a mixed couple, they will pick up on the racial component and include those terms, once again increasing the image's ranking on a search for "white couple".

Go ahead, try searching "smiling couple" and "happy couple".

If you only search couple, you will get more white ppl
>Google algorithms work
I'd say this is a very weird "error"

>not using startpage

please read the Sup Forums wiki

Specifying "white" introduces some sort of racial element to the article the image is attached to.

Here's the results for "couple".

You're an idiot.

ok fuck everything I'm out

Startmail is good too. I have four accounts.

Well? Prove it. Do it with "Black couple" and see if you're bullshit is consistent.

Right wing retard still can't think critically.

Hey, I searched for "black tuxedo" on google images and all the results showed WHITE guys! This is a conspiracy against BROTHERS. Fuck racist google!

Oh look, it's the "algorithm" shill, shows up in every thread like this.

...

Same explanation.
Including "people" include all the shitty afrocentrist blogs obsessed with every black person in every European painting ever.

Try searching "European art" or "renaissance art" or "baroque art".

Lol, you should try Googling "European People's History".

I thought it was a Sup Forums raid fucking with the algorithms at first, but nope, apparently it's just (((Google))).

Google American inventors

You dumb nigger. You can just google "white couple" for the exact phrase and get mostly the same result. It's some jew trick, as usual.

>white couple

Even duckduckgo

Funny how when you remove "people" from the search shows the expected results.

It's almost as if you're aware that including "people" makes those shitty afrocentric history blogs appear higher in the search results because of all the instances of "black PEOPLE have been hidden from EUROPEAN HISTORY".

You're the shill.

Challenge accepted.

Oh fuck.
This is shit lol

im so god damn sick of these motherfucking kikes on this motherfucking planet

one day lads, just imagine, it may be decades from now but we'll get to participate in the real and complete genocide of every kike on planet earth. just gotta keep the dream alive

Oh god.
> one is even a gay white couple with a black child

HAHAHAHA oh god.

He's right. If you type in just 'couple' you get mostly white people.

Happy American couple. Lol literally a gorilla and a white woman. Based jewgle

They're also tearing down monuments to white history here in the states

In 10 generations nobody will know what we did.

Google's position on this very question: SHUT UP you are BANNED.

>Europeans in art

>"the secret history about how EUROPEANS have hidden the black people IN their ART"

search just "European art" or "Italian art" or "French art"

So the only racially loaded term is white ? All the other races seem to be unaffected by this bug. How weird...

>Mfw

>> getting destroyed in argument
>> throw insult at opponent
>> ???
>> profit

Typical leftie absorbed in his naive worldview where things like these are coincidences, just the way algorithm works, just how labeling works etc.

To even further destroy the last dignity of your sore liberal ass: search "white couple" on bing images. Somehow big algorithm is consistent, yet google is an exception.

People with critical thinking would think, but this can't be expected from leftie, who, when presented with contrary argument, instead of rethinking his claim, will only strengthen his belief in his theory, while at the same time thinking and behaving as he is smarter and above everyone else.

>HAPPY African AMERICAN couple
>African AMERICAN COUPLE looking HAPPY
etc

not a conspiracy, just the way the algorithm works with the type of material that is published on the web

SHUT IT DOWN! THEY'RE ONTO US, SHMULEY!

Ok. Same shit. Now what do I Google? Art? Your argument is invalid, cuck.

Incorrect see below.

Type: "caucasian couple" and it will work!

Going to have to side with the algorithm shills on this one. A vast majority of the nigger couples that come up are wearing some kind of white clothing, or the background is white, or something. If you search for caucasian couple, you get mostly whites, with the occasional asian.

>To even further destroy the last dignity of your sore liberal ass: search "white couple" on bing images. Somehow big algorithm is consistent, yet google is an exception.

wow, so consistent
Because white is the default race. People complain about white being the default in television, film and art, and this is the consequence: When things are all white, the race isn't usually mentioned, so it wont show up in results.
When the pictures are of non-whites, it's normally from sources that are interested in race and use the relevant terms often in their pages.

It's really not a difficult concept to wrap your head around.

It has jewspiracy in there tho.

in one generation theres going to be global war to remove kebab, we can take the opputunity to remove shekelstein at the same time

You're still doing it. "Europeans art" is not the same as "European art".

Drop the S and see the results you get.

>blacks were the original EUROPEANS
>blacks have been systematically hidden from art by EUROPEANS
etc

Your inability to grasp this is really embarassing

Yeah, maybe Caucasian will work . Maybe because it's not a relatively used term.
Still, this doesn't answer my question. Why is white the only racially loaded search term ? Who / what is pushing this shit up the rank ?

>Why is white the only racially loaded search term ? Who / what is pushing this shit up the rank ?

Now it's all spread out down the page. What's your point?

>the kikes are really going too far this time...day of the furnace is coming.

forgot pic

Thats also a retarded search. Just write european art.

Now try searching "Swedish Couple"

Do you know how to scroll?

Hey I found one!

...

That the most popular pages that include your specific terms the most frequently are the same small set of shitty blogs that are obsessed with a few paintings of black people form European history and convinced that this proves that blacks were the original Europeans.

Most pages dealing with European art are way too specific to come up from your terms.
Maybe a page will specialise in one artist, or region, or time period, and hence the terms "European" and "people" aren't going to be popping up a lot in a page about the 16th century painters of Normandy, and these individual, smaller websites aren't going to be getting a lot of hits and referrals.

But that afrocentric blog about how da evil whitey Europeans have been hiding the noble black people from their art that gets shared 10,000 times on Facebook afrocentric groups? Different story.

Googles British people
Does even need to go to images to WTF

There are a few blackies, but generally just lots of European fucking art. So what if they painted curiosities. They are in the lourve too.

I dont have a problem. Perhaps you should stop letting google track your history. They they would stop streaming PC in to your face.

Op said white man, not german man.

Everything is fine.

So you're telling me that a multi-billion dollar company that makes everything from the world number one most used mobile OS to the most used search engine/email service can't write an algorithm to filter out fake news written by asshurt niggers?

>Swedish Couple
The only conclusion I can get is that the Afro centrist and (((their))) mixed couple agenda are getting more hits than any normal page.
It does explain why Asian are not affected for example, BUT IT'S NOT FUCKING OK !!!

The results are probably just confounded with white+couple or {x}+and+white+couple, search for "white couple" in quotes and you're more likely to find what you're looking for. Very few people are going to host an image of a white man and woman and label it "white couple", but pretty much every mixed-race couple will have some attention drawn to the fact that they're mix race.

Looks like normal is a term to be used instead of white to find what we are looking for. Lol.

...

Ummmmmmmmmmmm.... sources.

...

The algorithm is working as intended.
It is designed to show the results that have the most referrals to them and also include your search terms.
It just so happens that the material the is most often referred to with those terms is fucking retarded bix nood shit. The problem here isn't google, its the dumb bix nood WE WUZ EUROPEANS shit.

Right wing retards can't figure this out so they call it a google conspiracy to show you niggers on their search engine.

This is problematic. Can someone please report this to Google? Thanks!

...

(((working as intended)))
Yeah, their intentions are to erase white dominance both socially and historically.

oh my fucking g-d my blood is boiling

...

>it's real

"GOOGLE

Sources for what? This thread is about how Google indexes content, not the actual websites that it's indexing, faggot.

This is a matter of Google not properly filtering this shit, which is why it's a joke of a search engine that nobody should take seriously. Fuck off.

DID

History is being rewritten whether you like it or not.
People are just making excuses now.
I feel a peak coming.

NOTHING

WRONG

That's still seems fine since we don't know anything about their respective userbase demographics.

...

EVER"

is it possible to get SJWs to complain about this? all of these women are under 200lbs

kek

If people of color were given a fair shot, there would be more of them up there. Give them another 50 years user.

Maybe if it were >healthy couple

>This is a matter of Google not properly filtering this shit, which is why it's a joke of a search engine that nobody should take seriously. Fuck off.

I am more comfortable with an objective algorithm that has sometimes imperfect results as opposed to Google altering their results to suit a political agenda, even if I happen to agree with that agenda.

Who is Google to say that the WE WUZ EUROPEANS results don't deserve to rank as high as they do? By artificially lowering those results they would open themselves up to all kinds of lawsuits.

same shit as before. specifying "white" matches your search to pages where the white and non-white couplings are specified.

omfg

"ok"

You do know Google comes up with different search results depending on your country and your own search history, right?
The fact that you see what you see is probably because you searched for interracial porn too many times.

Just shows that google doesn't exactly censor results/sources, but rather selects posts that are heavily tagged with stuff like "white art" "europeans art" and other rather nonsensical terms.

Only people debating race IN art, lefties and rightwingers, tag it like that.

Normies google for certain periods of art... like this...