Superman IV: The Quest for Peace is a widely despised movie. Is it despised for being a bad movie or for being too red-pilled?
>Superman saves a Soviet Russian cosmonaut and even calls him тoвapищ
>Superman under the weight of the white man's burden to save the world from nuclear war
>Lex Luthor is rescued by his nephew who assists him in his crimes in exchange for work (literal nepotism)
>Luthor has curly hair and is a notorious white collar criminal, and consider himself superior to all others like a chosen one
>Luthor creates a destructive blonde-haired powerful demigod to wrestle for power with the Anglo-American demigod, requiring that one kill the other
>Luthor does this all for ego and shekels
>Obvious Jew Warfield buys out the Daily Planet and turns it into a tabloid to sell newspapers for shekels, offending Anglo-American editor Perry White who is only concerned with reporting the truth
Superman IV combines deep themes about the white man's burden, destructive Jewish influence in media, international politics, and warfare, and the need for the Anglo and the Slav not to be at each other's throats, so they can destroy the Aryan threat beset upon them by the Jew. Ergo, the movie was hated for being red-pilled, not for being terrible.
Why does the Aryan let the Jew manipulate him into attempting genocide?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtu.be
twitter.com
The character (((David Warfield))), who buys the Daily Planet and turns it into a tabloid with outrageous and false headlines. Portrayed by American-born Jew, Sam Wanamaker, whose parents were Jewish immigrants from Ukraine. This face screams "BLAHNALHD GARRUMPLF!"
Having trampled the American flag underfoot, the Aryan blindly does the bidding of his Jewish master and attempts to sicken and kill the Anglo. This is after having committed many random atrocities against many different races for pleasure.
One theme dealt with is female hypergamy and exogamy by Jews like David Warfield. Warfield has already anglicized his last name - his daughter Lacy is clearly a product of a shiksa marriage as she looks very Aryan - blonde, and her facial features are Aryan. She has been bred by a long line of shiksas to gun for the most powerful man around. David Warfield had money, so that's why her mother married him. She is inexplicably drawn to Clark. Lois warns Lacy off her possession, saying Clark is not her type, that he is "loyal," "dependable," and "obedient." Lacy tells Clark that, "The thing about you Clark is that you know that you don't have to flaunt it." Lois can see her prized possession, Superman's love, is being encroached upon. Lacy is oblivious to Clark being Superman, but can tell that he is THE alpha at the Daily Planet and that his "mild manners" are really the expression of his ultimate male dominance - he possesses supreme power and hides it as best he can. Lacy can tell because of her well-attuned, inborn shiksa sense. You can see in this photo how as an alpha female she guns hard for seemingly "beta" Clark.
Lacy attempts to seduce Clark at the gym, where he subtly advertises his sympathies with working-class Russians by dressing up as a gopnik.
Jewish arms dealers with whom Luthor conspires to bring back the risk of nuclear war. Luthor rewards them by betraying them and seizing control of their combined assets with the threat of Nuclear Man. Harry Howler is portrayed by Jewish actor William Hootkins, ardent Zionist. He kvetches quite obviously in several scenes. The three arms dealers who conspire with Luthor form an obvious warmongering Jewish cabal.
American audiences won't see it in the subtitles, but you can hear Superman call the Cosmonaut "comrade" at 2:15.
youtu.be
why is superman wearing that thing on his dick?
Kikestrianity stsrts early on submitting to foreign hebrews as holy and a hebrew as God.
That one is funny because the blonde dude sounds like the old dude when he talks.
>where he subtly advertises his sympathies with working-class Russians by dressing up as a gopnik.
I'm fucking dead
>this is what neo-pagans actually believe.
This
Anglo and Slav alliance is the worst nightmare of euroshits and kikes
I am monotheist but believe the torah is pure rubbish and this Jesus the Jewish messiah to be a populist kike.
Superman is a character literally written and created by a jew. Most capeshit characters were made by jews.
>MUH ARYAN MAYMAY
w2c?
So you're Zoroastrian?
That's a vase in Luthor's penthouse. Luthor is obsessed with anything that superficially makes him appear cultured and continental, in the European sense. He desperately wants to be perceived as an upper-class European, but he's in reality the epitome of nouveau riche American Jews. He dances to harpischord music with a woman dressed as Marie Antoinette at one point. But she's still a whore and he's still a nouveau riche white collar criminal with (((curly hair))).
Indeed brother. The Anglo and the Slav know how to live side by side in peace and friendship in separate countries and separate developments. The Jew knows only how to sew hatred and discord among the nations to cause war, and the Aryan falls for it every single time.
I dont have any zoroastrian traditions so no, I am simply a monotheist with the Aryan tradition.
Jews can't help but brag and accidentally reflect reality in movies or even propaganda they create. Remember the pro-immigration movie Elysium which showed the dystopian Los Angeles that is the inevitable result of Jewish-enabled mass immigration of Mestizos to California, and its contrast with the whitopian space habitat of Elysium? And Barbara Lerner Spectre bragged on video that Jews would be at the center of the destruction of Sweden.
>the jew controls the aryan but not the anglo
lmao is this what anglocists actually believe? Anglos are the jews of Europe. You cunts started a war with Holland because their free trade tax & tarifffree empire cucked your jewish financial systems
>Slavery
>Manifest Destiny
>Potato Famine
>Boer War Concentration Camps
>Holodomor
>Stalin's Five Year Plan
>Shoah
>Generalplan Ost
>Post-WWII Ethnic Cleansing of Germans
>Mao's Cultural Revolution/Great Leap Forward
>West Bank Invasion, Occupation, and Ethnic Cleansing
What has happened to Anglos that has been so bad? The Emu Wars? The loss of Rhodesia? 300,000 Anglos expelled, but not genocided. And only because they consented to it because the rest of the world's Anglos foolishly demanded they do so. Pearl Harbor? One battle costing a few thousand Anglo lives in a war in which we killed 100,000 Honoraryans with one bomb at the end. The Blitz? You should see what Berlin looked like after the war. The fifty POWs from Luft Stalag 3 murdered by the Gestapo? 9/11? One stab in the back by our "eternal" friends, and we accidently killed millions of Middle Easterners afterwards in our misplaced rage.
Tell me, when was it that Anglos were conquered and genocided and put to the sword in a humiliating and brutal loss that put down our power for centuries? When was the last time we were shoahed?
The answer is never. We were never shoahed. The Jews were and live in constant terror of anuddah shoah. We outrank them. The Jew endlessly lusts after our power, our influence, our women, our money, our land. We have been generous to him from a sense of noblesse oblige. Despite his evil machinations, supreme temporal power upon this earth lies in the hands of Anglo man and Anglo man alone, our Russian allies a distant second - the rest of the world much farther behind. The white man's burden is ours and ours alone. And that burden is to rule and to rule for the good of all.