A reminder that Monarchy is the only legitimate ideology and form of government, all else is a corrupt...

A reminder that Monarchy is the only legitimate ideology and form of government, all else is a corrupt, degenerate and anti traditional.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_II_of_Spain
youtube.com/watch?v=SDzrcPp-L4E
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

*blocks your path*

Reminder that Lena is best girl

*gives free helicopter rides*

Romanov restoration when?

Hopefully soon but I would prefer a new dynasty

best good ending tho
and the most horrible bad ending

Why, the Romanov dynasty is one of Europe's most ancient and great houses, their rule of Russia stretches all the way back to 1613.

1 Soviet Mi-24 helicopter could wipe out the whole Chilean airforce.

Stay cucked my friend.

lol monarchy is for faggots

monarchies usually get pretty corrupt and degenerate

True but the remaining Romanovs all suck ass

No, it wouldn't. Communism is dead, face it.

t. Commie/Liberal scum

*Stabs and throws into ditch*

Yes it could, shitty Chilean U-1 Hueys would be raped by the Soviet Mi-24.

Also
>C-communism is dead
>Shills for monarchies
Lol

Sorry about your mental illness.

You want Solomon back?

Gotta agree tbqh
Shoulda made Washington king
God save the King

>anti-traditional

So is a monarchy that does not answer to the church. Bestowing supreme authority not on the Lord, but on mortal man, was the first link of a chain of revolutions.

>Implying monarchy is dead

Doing a lot better than communism.

Even today, there are still more monarchies than communist countries. Kek.

Then why did it fail?
>all else is a corrupt, degenerate and anti traditional
It can be all of these things too.

Then why did you advocate for their overthrow throughout Europe, jewboy? Why did you invent communism?

Goddamn yes! Under Democracy man come to power only if they are popular and not because they are skilled, only rarely we see a good politician appearing.

tradition is the corpse of wisdom

Religion is not the only tradition.

Marxist ideas spread all over Europe and weak minded people feel for them.

Jews are a monotony

>Weak cucked country's still have monarchies

Communist China could rape all of thouse shitholes. Try again you low iq subhuman.

Is it? when the head of that "monarchy" is flooding their homeland with islam invaders...

Name one monarchy that is not cucked?

Japan.

>weak cucked
Is that Rich and Prosperous in commiespeak?

>constitutional monarchy

republics and liberal democracy get corrupt and degenerate, far more than any monarchy.

And what would you do if the Heir of Solomon will be retarded and degenerate?

t. Rothschild

>communist china
Interesting how they've been making their economy more and more capitalist for years, and only now are they a major player on the world stage

Have the Senate enact an emergency-only procedure of removing him from rule

>Yes it could
>no it couldnt
Continues for all eternity, it's like you are five year olds arguing about the rules of your made up game. You fuckers need to go back to preschool!

Yeah a banking cartel are big fans of no property rights and kings arbitrarily being able to nulify debts
That's why the whole world has gotten more monarchical over the last few centuries

Inept Monarchs have been routinely replaced, take Ludwig II of Bavaria for example. Or Carlos II of Spain, whom everyone likes to use as an anti-monarchial example. Only the Kingdom was aptly administered by advisors and regents during his reign, and following his death, a member of the House of Bourbon assumed the throne, and is the House that still rules Spain today.

It's constitutional monarchy. When senate rules or constitution considered to be stronger that monarch will. The Romanov's were known for opposing constitutional monarchy. If you would posted Winsdor's picture it would be more relevant.

True. Monarchist flag when?

Hopefully soon

I think yours is as close as we get. Too bed it gets used by protestant anarchist fags just to virtue signal that they dislike Muslims.

>why should this person be in charge?
>uh.... their parent did it?
>what if they're retarded?
>lol idk its traditional though lol

good idea

Monarchism is, and has always been, the best system of governance

WW1 was a fucking disgrace and guess what people is behind it

(((people)))

Would you prefer a Caliph Ahmed?

Wasn't it Franco who let them be?

He would prefer Sikh Khan or something like that elected because its 2017 and we need more brown stains in the government

He's probably a republicuck

Are you sure about that? The commies aren't in charge of the economics, yet, but they certainly control almost everything else in a lot of countries. Flag related.

>why should this person inherit his parents money
>uh... because their parents left them it?
>what if they are retarded
>lol idk its traditional though lol
saged

He established the legitimate heir to the Kingdom as his successor, yes. Good man.

Didn't the commies kill off the Romanovs?

Hemos pasado!

true. democracy is a lie created by the aristocracy to overthrow monarchs because the king is the only true representative of the people and check on aristocratic excess.

They killed off the immediate royal family, yet heirs survive

replacing a king is much easier then replacing the entire aristocracy

Did you know that Stroganoff dishes are named after Romanovs? Small things like that make me tingly about monarchism and houses

Yeah monarchies are fucking great...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_II_of_Spain

Yes faggot, we all know about Carlos II of Spain. Read my earlier post.

Fuck up u stupid cunt. Monarchy is dead. The days men living under the heel of some family of cunts is over.

>why should this person be in charge?
>uh... because they're funny and charming?
>what if they're retarded?
>lol idk he's got a good personality though lol
compared to someone who has been trained their whole life to be able to rule a country

Is that what democrats doing right now? :)

As for topic. It doesn't matter what form of government you create in Russia - it always ends up with corrupted despoty with feudal elements. Thus I do not strongly support any sides.

Everyone knows that

>For God, King, and country!"

Liechtenstein
Japan

I think he's referring to Serbs

Doesn't even have an army lol

Americans arguing for monarchy is just about the saddest most cucked thing I've ever seen on this board. Sad!

The nature of monarchy is that the monarch isn't absolute: aristocrats and the Church can make sure a bad king does a lot less damage in 20 years than a bad prime minister can do in 10 months.
Besides, monarchies tend to be such that kings have a lot *less* power over the common man than a president or prime minister!

Post Monarchism contribution to architecture

This is how you sound: "Please, please make me a slave"

Deus Vult is as close as we have

oh fuck off, krauts weren't supposed to have an army after WWI and look what happened
Japan is world top3 navy-wise

Typical underfoot brit. A man is captain of his own destiny. We don't take orders from a family of inbreds.

Sounds like a empty platitude a professional "intellectual" would say

...

Yeah, and that's why we want it back

youtube.com/watch?v=SDzrcPp-L4E

A man is his own destiny? That's the most laughable shit I've heard, sounds like it came straight out of Disney

>Communist China could rape the British Monarchy

There are boundless oceans which your skull carries weight, and no life to be find therein.

If we're talking Mao era then New Zealand would have a good shot.

If we're talking modern day, they're more a defensive focused military and while strengthened by land mass, aren't true Communists anyway, and would have the Indian military and MARCOS on their case seconds after the flashpoint, considering they're so enticed by their military expansion that they patrol Indian land without permission.

No you take orders from the turncoat 'based god emperor' instead

>communist china
Hmm...

Israel was instated by the Rothschild's. Their coat of arms is on the flag. Its there country basically

Monarchy
>Why should this person be in charge?
>Because he was raised from birth with the knowledge that he will be personally responsible for running the nation; his entire life has been focused on preparing to be ruler. If the nation prospers, he prospers; if it suffers, he suffers; if he loses power his children are paupers or dead.
Democracy
>Why should this person be in charge?
>They won a popularity contest where they manipulated the rpess with money and lies and won votes by promising to use the nation's treasury to give gifts and power to his supporters. He was almost certainly from an upper-middle-class family and his only experience in leadership was as a mid-level politician. If he screws up completely he stays rich (or gets richer!) and his performance will have no impact on his children except to make them famous and rich

So if a monarch gets deposed, its not really a monarchy is it.


Besides, monarchs rule by divine right, so if a monarch is a inbred retard. well that's God's well so you little subjects should just fucking deal with it and support him. Sorry about your luck

This is coming from a GOT larper. Gtfo before we nuke you're country to glass boy.

The difference is Germany wasn't cycled and had an army anyway. Grorious Nippon on the other hand...

Good answers

Off yourself senpai, democracy is a sham and in heavy decline

It still is a monarchy, the institution is preserved!

go back to your bipartisan attempts to emulate the NHS while you let the press beat you like a rented mule, burgerlad

The person who would choose the fucking GOP elephant as his flag is about as ZOGed as they come

I'm going To call bullshit on that one. Just because the time period in which prime ministers existed rulers have more capabilities due to technology doesn't mean that they had more power than a monarch. The main benefits of monarchy were social not functional.

Ever see the UN analysis of freedom in Europe? It was well covered in the news.
It boiled down to the fact that citizens of monarchies have less surveillance, more personal and more economic freedom that citizens of democracies. The more Monarchical and less Democratic a nation the more free and private its citizens are.
Democracy is a sheep and 3 wolves voting on what to have for dinner.

Trump will eventually not be president. The presidency won't be handed down to his children automatically. If we ever get sick of him, he's gone and we have a constitution that limits all of his powers. I am still a free man, not a subject. You pathetic bits can't see how enslaved you truly are.

I haven't seen it. Do you have a link?

>always ends up with corrupted despoty with feudal elements
this is natural human condition. why fight it.

>So if a monarch gets deposed, its not really a monarchy is it.
What?! That makes no....
OOOOOOHHHHH! It was posted by an American!
Good old American education....

That's because democracy is a soft form of communism. That is how communism would be functioning basically, by popular vote

You always fall prey to the majority

If you want to become a succesful architect, clockmaker, blacksmith or any other craft, you would have waaaaay more freedom within a monarchy than a democracy

>muh tabula rasa

You might as well as argue that race is a social construct.

Hah, you think your elected officials really run shit. We're ruled by unelected (((entities)))