Name 1 Thing Wrong With This Image

I'll Wait

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/wDRFQ384gdY
filteries.com/politics
youtube.com/watch?v=N5kWu1ifBGU
youtube.com/watch?v=xtasXQu70H4
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

>Libertarian Socialist

>Name 1 Thing Wrong With This Image

Its creator. sage

It means overall the market is free but its regulated by the government to be free, and prevent monopolies, and do things that a regular libertarian society wouldn't be able to do, such as pollution, military, science, etc

Can't be socially conservative and libertarian socialist. What you're referring to is authoritarian socialist. Welcome to the red square comrade.

>regulated by the govt to be free

yea ok.

>He still hasn't grown out of the ancap phase

Nah Senpai I doubt it.

Yes, you made it a png you retarded nigger

>Calling me a nigger

Literally replaces the theory of evolution with larping.

>lolbertarian in 2017
sad

take the scrutonpill and become a reluctant capitalist conservative

youtu.be/wDRFQ384gdY

It's called primitivism.
Also, there were communists before Marx. They generally just believed that the community should be the basis of all life and have sovereignty apart from the government.

flagposters are always niggers

It's still not necessarily socially conservative.

You're fucking retarded if you think that lack of government regulation causes the formation of monopolies. You've got it backwards, kiddo. The only monopoly that was created without government interference is the diamond monopoly.

me at the bottom

not even an ancap, but if a market is regulated it is not free lmao. that is just by defenition

It'll be a great day when people realise that freedom means more than 'I do what I want'. Yes, governments can add to your freedom or personal liberty. Just think of a man trained and sent off to explore a new land, that is a wholly different type of freedom than 'Um gonna micrawave sum soylent green.'

The fuck is a libertarian socialist.

Something hinderences to freedom come from corporations not the government.

See

Forcing pre-industrial life isn't socially conservative?

...

Not if you don't go the Evolian route and put in king to go with it.

New higher level: socially and economically Zen.

Shit doesn't matter, all life is good and bad; just watch the show and if it doesn't harm anybody, do it. In order to maximize happiness in the world, everybody should always act in their own best interests.

So basically you want current system in place

Because capitalists would never create monopolies on their own as that would go against their personal interest. Oh, wait...

I know it's hard to accept, but capitalism was invented by monarchists so that the minions could larp as 'free people.'

but more fashy

>libertarian socialism
(((Noam Chomsky's))) newspeak for communism

A Jewish Run Corporatocracy that is extremely socially leftist? Uh no?

Seems about right

And how do we call it? Ctrl-Right?

True enough, I guess some of the primitivists are allied with the anarchists and communists. And some are extremely feminist while opposing trannies.

The government is currently feeding monopolies in the tech, service, and liberal industries.

what is the quiz at the bottom?

>socialist
That's what is wrong

filteries.com/politics

Not all Socialism is the same. Some are socialist in name only to reference basically safety nets and shit.

I am aware of this, and I agree that some parts of the market need control from a higher power, but any reform on a market makes that market not a "free market" by definition, even though it might be a free market in practice

This is great

And you do expect things to go the other way, should we remove jew?
And you do expect things to go the other way, should we... do nothing? Because "free market with benefits" described by OP have a tendency to turn into "govt feeding monopolies". Because someone must make guns and science as well as remove pollution. And he must do it now, not when market will solve everything.

Fair enough. With that said, some of them can indeed go either way. You have the Varg tier types but you also have the social justice types.

this leaf gets it

N A Z B O L
A
Z
B
O
L

this tbqh

Zionism. Haavara. Ettore ovazza. Pink swastika. Fiat money

Call it whatever you want I suppose. I get its not free in the anarchy sense but there's different degrees of freedom.
Yeah obviously we should remove the Jew since they didn't earn their way to the top legitimately and have a monopoly over a majority corporations also pretty sure a system like this has never existed but the good parts of it have and works so basically i'm just combining the good parts of other systems that worked together.

what's the key of grouping them together? you mommy's input during lunchtime?

best itt

It's also not free if you can't freely kill people and sell their organs

You understand the concept of relative freedom, right?

>freely kill people and sell their organs
there's a free market for that already and it's a black market; whatever is prohibited finds its way to satisfy the demand one way or another

>and have a monopoly over a majority corporations
Again. You remove jews and now monopoly belongs to americans / germans / french / you name it. What change will it bring? Are they somehow not greedy or immoral? Will they remove fiat money and interest? You know, those things that they will quickly find to be quite beneficial for them.

Retard Alert

This. Disincluding the New York Stock Exchange around the early 1900s and the Diamond corporation, there hasn't been any monopolies under capitalism in a free market society.
How is this possible? What about people like Carnegie? Carnegie was able to out compete the rest of the country in the US, this is true. However, the government did step in to stop this, but what did they do? They allowed free trade across the globe. Why you may ask? This stops the monopoly of Carnegie. When you allow free trade across the world, you can't outcompete it. It's impossible. There is always going to be somewhere else in the world with cheaper prices because they have the materials much more easily. For example, Vietnam can make shoes 1000 times cheaper than here in the US. Allowing free trade prevents monopolies from ever happening. The government stepped in to actually allow less government.

Not if you have right wing death squads for people who do those crimes :^)
What's this magic monopoly that will spring out of nowhere my dude? Unless you mean the government in which case woopty doo. Also its not about if people are greedy or immoral its about having a system in place that prevents these things. Think The American Constitution but about 1000x more concrete with a seperate market constitution that would be socially forced upon society and if any government official tries to alter it or even considers it it'll be treason punishable by death.

When arguing about what political system is the best, we are talking about legal institutions by definition. Otherwise the entire conversation is pointless. If you do whatever you want anyway, the political system doesn't matter.

Also, fuck you and your autistic ;'s

>if the market is regulated in anyway then its not real capitalism

jesus christ
who is in charge of these horrible memes?

>magic monopoly
You have jewish monopoly under the current regime. It took some time for it to establish. Now you remove jews while keeping the system intact. Fast forward 20-50 years. Meet your new jews.
>its about having a system in place that prevents these things
Your does not
>a seperate market constitution that would be socially forced
Name your means of "socially enforcing" it and i will describe ways for your new jews to gain power
>if any government official tries to alter it
Wait, weren't you talking something about govt ordering guns, science n shiet. How's that not altering system on behalf of govt for you?

(((Diamond corporation))). The perfect example of why lolbertarianism/ancap is not the final solution.
>Hey goy, if you wanna have a family you gawwta buy this fancy diamond ring
>That'll be $6 gorillion please, all sales are final
>3rd world slave labor & artificial scarcity is fine goy, I mean just look at how shiny this rock is!

>but its regulated by the government to be free,

The last thing just describes national socialism.
10/10

patrician choice coming through

there is no such thing as a libertarian socialist for socialism is both authoritarian and a mental disease in need of urgent treatment by culling the mob trying to enforce it

Diamonds are rare, aren't they? Isn't that why they are so expensive?

All the good dynasties except Ethiopia's and Japan's are dead

This only works in very small European states, nothing massive like the U.S.A.

Fuck off.

>Keeping the system intact
There's your problem
>Yours does not
I don't like the current system? Unless you mean the one i'm bringing up in this post in which case you're wrong.
>Name your means of "socially enforcing" it
Same way religions do it by idolizing the system and extremely punishing people who try and destroy it even a little bit.
>Wait, weren't you talking something about govt ordering guns, science n shiet. How's that not altering system on behalf of govt for you?
Prob some sort of language barrier here. Obviously the government doing things is a bit different than trying to alter the constitution, change laws, etc

not to mention diamonds weren't even valuable until they made the artificial monopoly, completely inconsequential

>replace "reactionary monarchist" with "(post)modernist reactionary progressive monarchist"
>choose a leader you like to start a new dynasty
>50 years after keep telling everyone that he literally did nothing wrong

>It means overall the market is free but its regulated by the government to be free, and prevent monopolies, and do things that a regular libertarian society wouldn't be able to do, such as pollution, military, science, etc
Calling that libertarian socialist is fucking retarded. That's just a regulated market.

Free market means everyone can freely access it, not that there are no government regulations on transactions.

the only reasonable

>socially Conservative
>economically libertarian
I believe this is part of National Socialism.

What do you call a system of government where everyone has freedom, and the government only exists to enforce the NAP, and funds itself by providing services to the public in exchange for agreed-upon fees, and the government provides utilities in environments where equal competition is not feasible?

Like, say you build a house, but you need some kind of pathway from your home to an "open market" area of commerce, but it's not possible to have 2 of these paths occupy the same physical space, so it is impossible for competitors to compete on even ground, so the government installs this physical pathway and you agree to pay a nominal fee to access it in order to pay for its upkeep.

>regulated by the government to be free
Don't ever post again you retarded fucking imbecile.

this

>idolizing the system and extremely punishing people who try and destroy it even a little bit
>extremely punishing people who try and destroy it even a little bit
So your society of terror values loyalty now more than any other thing. I guess we even have a privileged group of "enforcers" by this moment. Which brings us to the next point:
>a bit different than trying to alter the constitution, change laws, etc
How will this society dodge a 9/11 or WWII bullet when some economic freedoms (since we have no political ones) have to be given back to elites, who also may have corrupt intentions. You know... Military-Industrial Complex and stuff like that.

>Libertarian (((socialist)))

Ancap WITH ROADS

No, they simply control the supply, it's common knowledge. Even lefty trash like Huffpo and (((Adam Ruins Everything))) are openly "purple-pilled" on this.
>they explain the symptoms, but not the (((causes))).

youtube.com/watch?v=N5kWu1ifBGU

>but its regulated by the government to be free

you do know the world is ancap right?

Ancap has literally been our society since 3000 BC.

...

>FDR and Theodore Roosevelt are the same person
American education everyone

>regulated by the government to be free, and prevent monopolies
>we prevent monopolies
>by giving control of the economy to a massive monopoly

that isn't capitalism. NS is not capitalism.

>pic related
Kikes did this to us, sans government. They must be stopped.

youtube.com/watch?v=xtasXQu70H4

nuffin m8

ctrl-alt-delete

I can think of plenty of reasons they need to be stopped but shiny rocks?

>How will this society dodge a 9/11 or WWII
If it grows out of an already existing worldpower like the USA? Expansionism/Colonialism.

Indeed. Americans are so dogmatic about the market they fail to see what is best for the race.

I have NEVER seen a Nazi or Fascist on this board who has even a remotely competent grasp of economic issues. Even the fucking commies know more than you tards.
Stay ignorant fashcucks, AnCap is the future for both this board and the higher races

>itz just rockz
This is literally a fucking marriage tax that goes directly to the kikes and is held up by 3rd world slave labor.

...

Ancaps are just as retarded as commies tbqh

only retards buy them when they are literally useless for the average person and industrial ones can be fabricated

Absolute nonsense, if that was true then why aren't they out if business?? The majority of women demand a real diamond, and if the average goy is caught buying a fake one it's likely to end in divorce.

how so? NAP and genocide are literally on opposing extremes of the spectrum

>libertarian socialist

explain

Yes they have worth because enough retarded women think that they need one to be adequately loved.

So if you want a retarded woman, sure, diamonds then have a use.