This is the greatest and most important organization of thought in the history of the human species and it is very...

This is the greatest and most important organization of thought in the history of the human species and it is very pol-related.

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/130881717/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

shit-tier philosolarping, user.

You read and understood the book completely?

One day you will understand young one.

what is it?

www.thefoundationpress.com

Contents:
Preface- Understanding the necessity of working with subjectivity.

Introduction- The Question: Should I continue to exist? Basis of philosophical thought in creating an existence that allows humanity to thrive.

Section 1: Welcome to Not Nothing- The duality of human nature- rejection and destruction, or acceptance and building given the
inherent structure of existence which is- "We have free will, we are not all powerful, we are not all knowing, and we experience the
universe with a biological framework and consciousness."

Section 2: Destruction and Building- Cultivating power, facing powerlessness. Path of destruction involves a lack of self-control,
courage, wonder, and/or humor, with the person succumbing to powerlessness through either wrath, depression, madness, hedonism, or
ignorance due to the lack. Path of building involves self-control, courage, wonder, and a sense of humor.

Section 3: Power, Biology and Society- Maintaining a strong society (and individual) through a balancing of the pursuance of our
animalistic nature completely with a complete rejection, and a balancing of the desire to obtain all-power and the desire to relinquish
all power from oneself. A society comprised of men and women pursuing an animalistic/hedonistic sexual nature will crumble. The polar
nature of masculinity in men and femininity in women must be upheld.

Section 4: A World Completely Off the Mark- Application of the philosophy into the areas of Government, Politics, Economics,
Agriculture, Environment, Science, Crime and Punishment, Mental Illness, The Media/Entertainment/TV/Internet/Porn/Advertising, Lack of
Freedom/Technology/Overpopulation/Overcomplication/Globalism, and The Exploration of Outer Space. Focus is in creating a society in
which people feel the most power, connection with one another, and connection with the universe.

"Wrath

Our inherent meaningless existence produces mental and physical suffering. Other people or society as a whole can exacerbate suffering
produced by existing. The source of this mental and physical suffering is powerlessness. An individual that feels powerless may
reject the conditions that produce the powerlessness and retaliate through wrath as an attempt to gain power. The attempt to gain
power through wrath is either the attempt to supersede the powerlessness by trying to obtain all the power one can get (which
indirectly creates destructiveness in the individual and society), or the direct destruction of anything that creates powerlessness.

Wrath is destruction and destruction is power.
Wrath is extreme power and extreme power is destruction."

Complete animalistic sexual behavior in women is characterized by the pursuance of a man or many men for only their high sexual
prowess with disregard for the creation of a strong family due to:
A. The desire for the woman to put off raising a family in this pursuit, which also contributes to a long-term negative
effect in the creation of a family in section C.
B. The unlikelihood that a man with high sexual prowess will settle down and raise a child with the particular woman given the fact
that he has many other options and may be animalistic himself.
C. The elimination of the possibility of raising a strong family with a man who has less sexual prowess than any man the woman has
had sex with before. The reason for this is that a woman will only remain submissive and desire to be with the man who is the top alpha
male in her sexual past. The alpha male creates in the woman feelings and pleasure that is unmatched by others, and is the only man
that can truly command respect from the woman in a relationship. A man who remains in a relationship with a woman in which he has no
possibility for becoming the top alpha male in her sexual history is a beta and therefore weaker and inferior to the actual alpha male
from the perspective of the woman and her feelings. If the woman disregards her sexual hierarchy and starts a family with a beta male,
the partnership is doomed to be weak and they will fail in remaining together and fail to create strong offspring. The woman may have
chosen the beta for his provider status because of her inability to hold down an alpha male. The beta is a provider of both monetary
and emotional support for the woman. The woman is the dominant person in the relationship with the beta male because she holds the
locus of the power in the relationship- her sexual feelings and needs that are not being met."

Holy shit. I really need to read Evola.

Fuck off Sean. We know it's you. Stop shilling your shitty book here.

That isn't Evola, that is Goonan, and there is a lot more where that came from.

But have you read it? What position are you in to say that this isn't the most important thing since the dawn of man?

holy shit this is cringe-tier, fuck off

It's human nature buddy.

Your book is awful

You haven't read it. Or you are a fucking idiot who only understands Ayn Rand tier shit, which is very possible with this being pol. This isn't the intellectual center of jack shit.

give up, Sean. this is complete dogshit

The worst thing that comes with the rejection of animalistic behavior and power-seeking is sexual degeneration. In a strong society
there is a strong polarity between the sexes with men being dominant and masculine, and women being submissive and feminine. But of
course with free will, and a society that allows for complete freedom, anything is acceptable. But why should our polar animalistic
nature be retained? Proponents of unrestricted free will ask why is it desired for men to remain men and women to remain women when
these creations can be dismantled and replaced with something else? Why not continue with our society in which more and more men
become feminine and more women become masculine? Why not take it to its conclusion with a new humanity where all women are the
masculine beings and all men are the feminine, or a new humanity comprised of androgynous things?

Our base polar nature should be retained because it is a base guideline to work off of and use as a mental and social anchor, because
it is practical, and most importantly because it is necessary.

If the sexes are to be scrambled, this causes immense confusion and suffering. I'm not only talking about suffering with regards to
social break down, I am talking about acute mental suffering due to the fact that the person's mind is grating immensely against its
true biological nature. Our minds are fragile things and need all of the help they can get from base anchors to work off of in a
meaningless existence. The biological polar nature of the sexes is a base mental anchor for individuals to work off of in creating a
social structure that forms an individual mental structure.

More importantly, our biological polarity is practical and actualizing. We must harness our biology, not grate against it, distort
it, and weaken it. Let men be men and women be women and let them do what they do best.

Women are not meant to be men and men are not
meant to be women. I do not say this in a religious context, but as a matter of reality and truth. The polar nature of man and woman
WORKS. Why destroy something that functions extremely well in creating happiness and productivity? It is hard for men to cultivate
masculinity and it is hard for women to cultivate femininity. Yet the rewards are great. People today shrink away from anything that
requires effort. Women think men have it much better and want to be men. Men think being a man is too hard and want to be women.

The most important reason for the preservation of masculinity in men and femininity in women is because it is NECESSARY. Social and
societal breakdown will occur otherwise. When you tell men it is okay to pursue masculinity and at the same time that it is okay to
pursue femininity, you are going to get some very confused people. You are also going to see, over time, the discardation of
masculinity in favor of femininity, because it is far easier for a man to relinquish control and power and pursue weakness and
submissiveness. On top of the fact that it is completely destructive for a man to pursue weakness, society needs masculine men to
keep it functioning. The world is a harsh place and we have not reached our current civilization through weakness. Women contributed
to the formation of civilization with their support and counterbalancing of pure masculinity, but it was men who forged civilization
out of nothingness with their masculinity. Civilization must be continuously maintained with masculinity. Humanity must use
masculinity to survive, civilization or not- especially without a civilization. If for some reason it is collectively decided by all
of humanity that the poles should be switched or that there should be no poles, society is done for. The period of transition would
be so counterproductive and destructive that humanity would not recover.

It takes a strong well-constructed and upheld polar nature
of man and woman for society to be on the path of building. As you will see later, the destruction of the polar nature of humanity is
the destruction of the family unit, and the family unit is one of the most important elements in the creation of a strong and
continuing society and enjoyable life.

Before getting to the creation of a strong family, we first have to look deeper into the nature of sexuality.

Sexuality has to do with power, or the individual's exposure and reaction to external and internal power. The individual can either
be sexually dominant or submissive. Humanity's biology is one of sexual dimorphism in which men are the dominant sex and women the
submissive, but with free will anything is possible. Environmental factors play a role in a person's sexual development, but in the
end it is up to the individual to cultivate the right nature.

Homosexual men are averse to masculinity, most likely having had bad experiences with overly masculine men or overly harsh women
that subjected the man to fear and powerlessness. Men who are homosexual were likely to be exposed to extremely masculine men
(father) counterparted with an extremely submissive mother in which the child would turn to. This manifests later when the child is
exposed to masculine boys in which the child feels inferior and turns those feelings into sexual submissive feelings towards the
boys rather than trying to be masculine himself. The child then turns to approval from his girl peers, just the same as when he
turned to his mother who would provide comfort from the domineering overly masculine father.

Men who are homosexual may also have
had a weak and feminine father in which the child learns and mimics, and never understand the importance of cultivating masculinity.
The homosexual man becomes adverse to the harshness of competing for women and the difficulty in cultivating masculinity. The
homosexual derives pleasure from being submissive to more dominant men, the path of least resistance in grappling with his
inferiority and difficulty. Homosexual men relinquish all self-control. This is why they are likely to be hedonistic and pursue
casual sex. The "gayness" of the homosexual is a lack of understanding that a man must be courageous, have self-control, and that
true happiness does not come from being overly gay and happy all the time to protect from the harshness of existence, but comes from
accomplishment, self-actualization, overcoming, truly connecting with others and so on. Homosexuals artificially pretend that
everything is great and project this pathetic gaiety onto others. In the certain kind of flamboyant gay man these things can be seen
the easiest. These projections and the man's feelings of inferiority, especially regarding masculinity, reflect the man's inability
to grapple with the demands of existence and the cultivation of power.

Men who are "bears" are hyper-masculine and because of this expose themselves to masculinity's fragility and ability to be rejected
in favor of deviancy. Hyper-masculinity fosters a snapping of the mind, because it is an extreme state of being that is taxing on the
mind and is not objectively necessary. The hyper-masculine man will reach the state of extreme masculinity, realize that even in that
state of being there is still always weakness, and turn on this weakness in exploring the subjective free will.

Homosexual men tend to be perfectionists, which explains a lot of their nature. A perfectionist man finds faults in his character
easily and exacerbates these faults as objective and absolute truth. For example a homosexual man may have felt that he could not
compete with other men for women because of a sense of inferiority. Being a perfectionist, or absolute-minded person, the man's
inferiority manifests into a rejection of his masculine nature in which he is not worthy. The man delves into what must be absolutely
true- he is inferior to other men and must be submissive to them, and this desire to be submissive grows because it is the path of
least resistance. The man rejects the pursuit of women altogether and relishes in his pathetic state of submissiveness by becoming
friends with women rather than pursue them sexually- something deep down the man truly desires but suppresses.

Women who are lesbians can be two things:

Dykes are adverse to masculine men because they were exposed to powerful men and developed a feeling of jealously for this power,
along with a strong aversion to masculine nature. These women are wrathful. They then try to become men because they feel that they
should and CAN be just like men. They want the power of masculinity and they absolutely do not want to be subjected to any masculine
power. Masculine women most likely had a weak feminine father or no father, or were brought up to be one of the guys.

The "soft" lesbian is adverse to masculine nature but does not want to become a man, and would rather be submissive to another women
then God forbid be submissive to a man and his penis, the symbol of his masculine nature (His tool of sexual power).

The transgender person is a person that takes the pursuance of their deviant submissiveness or dominance to its logical conclusion. A
person may delve into bisexuality, then homosexuality, and there is nothing stopping them from pursuing trans-sexuality. In fact the
mind will follow this destructive path because it is the path of least resistance. People support transgender people because they
believe that because someone CAN become transgender, they SHOULD become transgender. It is destructive to be transgender and it is
destructive to encourage transgender for the sake of the creation and preservation of the self and society, especially regarding the
preservation of masculinity. People are not born transgender; they become it. The genetic makeup and/or parental predisposition and
early parental influence does have a large effect on the individual's probability of becoming transgender, but the notion that a
person is simply born that way is wrong. Included in the genetic makeup, a person could be born with certain characteristics that predispose
the person to pursuing a deviant path. For example a man can be born with low testosterone and feminine features so he is more likely
to pursue homosexuality or become transgender. A woman could be born very large and masculine so would be predisposed to being a dyke
or transgender. It is important to always follow the biological nature of masculinity for man and femininity for women no matter what
the inclinations of the genetic makeup are.

A reason why a person would pursue sexual deviancy may be because they desire the attention and feeling of being different or
special. With the breakdown of social anchors and lack of social curbing, the deviant person recognizes the possibility of being
deviant and pursues this deviancy without any repercussion, gaining all of the sympathy from clueless supporters and attention from
anyone else.

this book fucking sucks m8

You haven't read it you pathetic cuck. Or even worse, you didn't understand it. Stick to reading 200 pol threads a day faggot.

You don't know shit about shit.

Is this from the book in OP's pic related?

Yes, what are your thoughts?

It seems true, but why is it the most important thing to understand for modern society?

The reason I gave up and stopped pursuing women, I felt like I had to be the father towards her and it was a turn off. I thought if i just waited, then the girls would mature past it, they never do though. I don't see modern society recovering from this female dominated structure.

That is just a small snapshot of one small section of the book. The book encompasses everything involving life. Yes, modern women are completely broken, but they don't have to remain this way. Women in the past were not completely worthless little children, so why should the women of the future have to be? Navigate this world carefully, begin changing this world strongly.

Goonan comes to pol every couple weeks to shill this fucking eBook. Nothing to see here. Always uses the same image, same sentences.

"Economics

An economic system that aligns with and harnesses the core nature of human existence and rejects destructiveness is needed for
humanity to be on the path of building.

This system would recognize the need for each individual to obtain power and would harness the individual will to obtain power, but
it would involve rejecting excessiveness in extortion and hoarding. To combat excessive power seeking through hoarding, people in
power must allow for the offloading of power in money and ownership to others that deserve it, along with consumers rejecting
businesses run by excessive power-seekers. Power cannot be offloaded to those who do not deserve the power though. These are people
who will relinquish all responsibility from themselves and will not work hard or work at all.

All of this achieves a balance in the power spectrum, the key to building.

The economic system I have created that strives for complete building is called Conscious Capitalism. It is beyond capitalism, and
it is beyond any economic system ever devised in the history of mankind. It is beyond any system because it supersedes rigid
structure and is based in personal choice, cooperation and nuance. This economic system is individualism and collectivism
intertwined in their strongest forms."

We shape the environment and our environment shapes us. The environment contributes to the aesthetic of physical existence, which
influences our aesthetic perception, and mind. Some aesthetics are better than others. Human beings create the aesthetic of cities,
buildings, land, and existence. The aesthetic must be created with intelligence and planning. Its construction must get rid of
artificiality and distraction. The distraction is a distraction from the fact that we live in a universe in which we do not know
everything and are not in absolute control. Artificiality creates this distraction. The environment should not convey that humanity
has taken over Earth, but is rather a part of Earth.

The ideal creation of an environment and infrastructure is one in which our entire concrete/asphalt jungle we call civilization is
undone. How this environment will play out and function in the whole of society can be found in the sections on economics and
technology. Technology has completely and seemingly irreversibly changed the infrastructure, aesthetic, and existence of the
environment and community. It has completely and seemingly irreversibly annihilated a natural and wonder inspiring environment and
life. The industrialization of our world must be undone. Cities must be recreated to be small, functional, intertwined with nature,
and conducive to community. Our current environment evokes constriction, isolation, a separation from nature, a separation from one
another, excessive industriousness, an acceleration of day-to-day life, confusion, artificiality, and powerlessness. What we
physically create and see as our environment reflects our internal selves as a society.

Here is Goonan shilling his book last month: archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/130881717/

He even admits it's him.
Literally just ramblings of a Sup Forumsack and then subequent shilling.

Mr. Holmes, I would have thought a man of your caliber would see the importance of this piece of work.

Authority has been stripped from the male, and it has been given to the female. The funny thing is, the female is not equipped to be a positive adult role model, in the way a man is.
This is why you see safe spaces in colleges, literally adults that have temper tantrums like a 5 year old. This is just the exagerated instance of a greater issue. Any men that attempt to use their authority to shape their children into respectable young adults find themselves divorced. Giving the pants in a household to the female is the worst thing for a country to do.

Read my book. If you don't have any money there is a free pdf.

I don't have the confidence in humanity to recover, I'll sit as an observer and when it's time to rebuild I'll be there to help. The truth is, humanity just isn't ready to evolve yet. Maybe next time.

>This is the greatest and most important organization of thought in the history of the human species and it is very pol-related.

So he wrote the New Science under the pseudonym Giambattista Vico?

Depression is destructive because it erodes the will to live. All destructive states of being feed upon themselves to create more
destructiveness and depression does the same, driving the individual deeper into despair. Without the will to live the outcome is
obvious; the individual will cease to exist prematurely without experiencing all that life has to offer, and without contributing
to building a collective existence for the future of humanity to experience all that life has to offer. Depression drives humanity
into nothingness and is the antithesis of life. If one chooses life, then one must not accept depression or destruction.

Even if the individual does not kill themself due to their depression, but remains in a lower state of despair, they do just that;
exist in a state of despair. Existing in a state of despair leads to a one-dimensional, incomplete, unproductive, wasteful, empty
life and this encompasses all aspects of one's being. This is a life that is not worth living, which is why depression feeds upon
itself. This state of being resonates into all aspects of the collective conscious and society, dragging humanity down.

Depression is not sadness and sadness is not destructive. Sadness is temporary and is not of an apathetic nature. The extreme
nature of the depressed mind is why it is destructive. Depression is extreme apathy and apathy reduces life to nothingness.

Depressed people do not care about anything, which means they do not care about the consequences of their depression. This cycle
drives the depressed person down into more extreme apathy. This indifference and numbness makes the individual weak and this
feeling of weakness, worthlessness and inferiority creates even more weakness in the individual. Depression creates weakness and
only the weak are depressed. Since the individual creates depression, the individual creates weakness in themself and accepts
weakness as the Right state of being.

Weakness only hinders the self and only hinders society. The individual may accept weakness as the Right state of being because
they feel they are inferior. This inferiority fuels the depression, which may fuel the inferiority. The individual must learn to
understand the origin of the inferiority in order to take the necessary steps to overcome it. The origin of inferiority is
powerlessness and powerlessness will always exist in a human being no matter how much power they obtain. The individual must strive
for power or else they will become completely defeated.

The depressed person feels that it is Right that they are defeated. They feel that being defeated is part of their nature and is
part of the nature of humanity. With this defeatism the depressed person loses their animalistic instinct and with that they cease
to be sexual beings. This destroys their life further as it is necessary to retain an animalistic and sexual drive in order to
retain the will to be strong and masculine or motherly and feminine. This drive also includes the will to be productive for
survival and separate from the animalistic component, a drive to build and create a self and society that does not just survive,
but thrive. It is up to the individual to recognize that if they choose life, they must be strong and they must build, otherwise
their life will crumble. The individual must seek a deeper understanding of existence, and as part of that deeper understanding
they must choose to be courageous rather than wallow in depression.

The individual should never let the unchanging base nature of existence, which is meaninglessness and a biological framework,
affect themselves in a way that would produce depression. Meaninglessness is unchanging, and things that are unchanging must be
danced with and mastered. In the case of meaninglessness mastery is embracing it in pure wonder. Reducing meaninglessness to
suffering is useless and destructive.

Although the individual creates depression, external and societal influences may push depression onto the individual. Society is
something that is possible to change, but is very difficult to change by one person. If society is destructive and inflicts
suffering upon a person, the fact that it is near impossible for one person to change it only exacerbates the suffering. The
individual is seemingly powerless, but the individual has the power to change society through their actions and ability to organize
with other people. The individual must not let depression overcome themself and drag themselves into further powerlessness and suffering.

It is too simplistic to say that a person should simply not be depressed. Depression must be overcome through shear will by the
cultivation of four areas. It takes energy and effort to overcome depression or else the mind will remain in the easily obtained
base state of depression forever. The individual must cultivate understanding and power.

It is necessary for the individual to have self-control, courage, wonder, and humor in order to overcome depression.

Power is another word for influence. The best form of influence is influence through suggestion. Anything else is not pure. Attempting to influence using anything but suggestion will always lead to a negative outcome.

"A person of higher understanding must be firm and stand his
ground, yet be tactical and gracious in getting his point across. A person who is ridiculed or thrown out into the open of their
own ignorance will not be in a position of acceptance and building upon the ideas presented, and the new ideas may greatly upset
their mental order if they are not mentally ready for them."

Hey Sean. Sold any more books since the last thread you made?

1. What do you think of the book?

Alright Big Guy Goonan, decent book, superb packaging with an excellent texture on the cover, but 2 questions:
1. Why do you believe this is the greatest philosophical thought organization "of the human species"? Really now? The book is filled with this sort of non-supported elitism. Is it a confidence thing, are you REALLY trying to get known for one single fucking book? Other authors have crafted an entire library's worth of work, and you wrote one 100-something page book, and expect to have your ass kissed for it. Why?
2. The book would be a LOT more accessible for the semi-intellectual if you had a list of references, citations, or at the absolute least opinionated footnotes, it's difficult for someone who has no prior knowledge of the west's issues to understand and absorb the information in the book. At least quote some studies and whatnot to give it a sense of actual supported research. Section 3 would benefit most from that, as it's an amalgamation of non-supported blanket statements, I.E. page 76 "Liberals dismiss masculinity" "Liberals favor the expansion of government" Yes most do, but WHY? WHAT or WHO causes or pushes that? Also, the language used is absolutely repetitive, I.E. page 70, "...I call for every human being to rise... I call for every truth seeker...", it's hard to get inspired by that when no one knows what the fuck you're on about.
It would be an excellent book if the rhetoric was toned down a bit, and made for a more accessible introductory experience to the individual who lacks prior knowledge. At the very least, including a list of recommended reading would help. There is no read all end all book, you need a wide range of literary knowledge to accurately gauge the state of society, and to even imply that "this is all you need to read" is insulting to anyone who takes the time to digest all, what, 110 pages?
tl;dr great "red peel" intro book that would do much better with a bit of editing and any, literally ANY references or citations

What's your favorite/most influential/ greatest book you've read?

bump for an answer from the last poster

Unironically Ride the Tiger by Julius Evola. Why not give an actual response, man? I gave just about the only not shitposting opinion of your book on this entire site

My book is better than Ride the Tiger.

...which you're dismissing out of wrath and angst because it was the first response in this thread.

This is exactly why your work will go no where kiddo, instead of taking legitimate criticism, and having any kind of discussion with one of the five people who have actually read your book, you go into "OH YEAH WELL WHAT HAVE U READ BUDDY, DON'T CARE I'M BETTER" mode

Have fun shilling on here while mom and dad pay for your publishing fees

Shit, which version of the book did you read? I added 11 more pages, tweaked some sections, and made corrections since I first published it. What is the printing date on the back of the book?

There's no printing date whatsoever, 114 pages, back of the book has a serial number and reads
"CPSIA Information can be obtained at ICGtesting.com
Printed in the U.S.A.
FSOW02n2203070617
35085FS"
Do I have an old copy, or what?

Regardless you don't understand the significance of the core philosophy, which has not changed, because you don't introspect enough, so my stance still remains.

when did you purchase the book?

By the way, I do have a book list on my website.


Beyond Good and Evil by Friedrich Nietzsche
Meditations by Marcus Aurelius
The Way of the Samurai by Yukio Mishima
Industrial Society and Its Future by Ted Kaczynski
On Suicide by Emile Durkheim
The Unsettling of America by Wendell Berry
The Art of the Commonplace by Wendell Berry
Small is Beautiful by E. F. Schumacher
Walden by Henry David Thoreau
The Complete Short Stories of Ernest Hemingway
Jack London
HP Lovecraft
HG Wells
All Quiet on the Western Front by Erich Maria Remarque

Which is? There's no core philosophy, it's just a bunch of unsubstantiated bullshit that's been stated many times before, and far more eloquently by far more humble authors. Quickly explain the core philosophy then. Wait, let me guess your response, "If you don't understand it, there's no point explaining it"

"You don't introspect enough" What does that even mean? More unsupported nonsense

Purchased it at least four months ago, forgot exactly when

wtf is this shit? Not even tempted to read its preface.

Damn Goonan I really wanted to have a decent discussion with you, but my God, your attitude fucking sucks

The book has changed slightly in sections 3+4 since then, but all the core concepts remain. Wrath, depression, madness, hedonism, and ignorance. Courage, self-control, wonder, and humor. These words were not chosen randomly. They represent the cornerstones of all human nature regarding the duality of human nature, which is inherent in every human being, and reflect two paths that people can choose to go down. One is the destructive path, the other is the path of building. You are destructively ignorant.

Goonan pls go

Destructively closed-mindedly narrow-mindedly ignorant. You are on the path of destruction.

This guy is anon5 fag, right? He talks exactly like him

Sounds like the most self-evident and pretentious shit ever written

Hahahah the one who refuses to discuss his one single book is calling others close-minded and ignorant? Holy shit this went from questionable to absolutely pathetic very quickly, throwing my copy in the trash right now

Share a fucking pdf at least Sean.

That is part of the tip of the iceberg articulated poorly in one sentence.

You don't deserve it.

Look dude, it really sucks getting shit on when you're trying a push a book (with huge potential) that you've spent hours on. It has many positive qualities, ideas and analyzations that are instrumental in coming together to state a concrete basis of "how the world really works". But when you tell the few people that have actually read it, that they're full of shit and ignorant just because they don't kiss your ass immediately and may possibly have a few questions or comments first, it makes others who might be interested, not interested.

You didn't even let me get to the positive parts, before you went into full blown defense mode when I as much as suggested it's not "the greatest work ever". You didn't even read my original post, did you?