A world of free movement would be $78 trillion richer

What can you say about this, you backwards bigots?
Don't you see that it's you who stand in the way of true progress?
Why don't you want to be wealthy?

economist.com/news/world-if/21724907-yes-it-would-be-disruptive-potential-gains-are-so-vast-objectors-could-be-bribed

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/iqSYh
youtube.com/watch?v=pu__97bVyOc
thelocal.se/20160531/fewer-than-500-of-163000-asylum-seekers-found-jobs
youtube.com/watch?v=A0C4_88ub_M
youtube.com/watch?v=nIMkppsQ3fg
wikihow.com/Immigrate-Into-the-United-States-Permanently
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>A world of free movement would make jews $78 trillion richer

lmao @ social ""science""
post methods

you can all be rich if you just give up your freedoms and culture

archive.is/iqSYh

Faggot

>a world of free movement would make the 1% $78T richer and the rest of us $100Q poorer

I wonder if this plan will disproportionately increase the wealth of just one specific group of people

How much does that net me personally?

A world of free movement would be every brown person moving to nations with welfare and every shithole being empty.

fpbp

Internalizing all the gains, externalizing all the costs.
Right!

Whose pockets would that 78 trillion be in?

The only people who would get richer are the elites while the rest of us have to deal with higher taxes, crime rates, and over crowding.

>while the jews get richer and the rapefugees get richer leeching off the welfare system, the native people get poorer and poorer footing the bill to "resettle" said rapefugees

Yeah and the average joe wouldn't see a penny from that. Fuck off.

I have cancer cells that are smarter than you.

This sounds like taqiyya,having a fuck load of third world citizens made bradford undesirable to business and unsafe to live.

fpbp

>it's a "leftists pretend to love capitalism when it advances their interests" episode

So if I shoot myself in the head you'll give me $500? Count me in

Nope.

Listen to Jordan Peterson. In modern, industrial to post-industrial economies, having an IQ of 90 or lower is a real tough hurdle to getting a job.

youtube.com/watch?v=pu__97bVyOc

Given that the average IQ of for example Syrians is 83, Sub-Saharan Africans is 70 and below, statistics like this one out of Sweden

> thelocal.se/20160531/fewer-than-500-of-163000-asylum-seekers-found-jobs

shouldn't surprise anyone.

Everybody who still thinks that every people are interchangeable is either ignorant or willfully deceiving. We are not all created equal. And I'm not even 14/88'ing here. This simply a matter of fact.

I don't trust any economist anymore. Never has there been a group who are consistently wrong in their predictions.

/thread

I say that nations and their economic systems exist for the benefit of their people, and that total economic output is not a measure of the benefit of the people.

Daily reminder that one of the talking points used to sell NAFTA in the early 90s was that it would help Mexico develop into a first world country with a vibrant middle class and thus greatly slow illegal immigration. Daily reminder that Mexico remains a poor corrupt shithole that people are trying to flee. The only people in Mexico that benefited from NAFTA were the corrupt business owners and government officials.

/thread. everyone out.

This assumes everyone can move to the US to drive taxis for $30k.

...

Call me a cuck, but I'm trying to egest the redpill. It fucking hurts man, I can't continue living as someone who views such vast swaths of people with nothing but disgust.

I'm trying to retake the bluepill so I can go back to normal. It's difficult but by god I'm trying.

So thanks for this article OP. It's helping me prepare myself for acceptance and embrace of the third world.

Use a picture of an oppressor who actually exists, kike.

That's because of socialists pricing people out of the market, I would hire immigrants instead of an entitled native population if I could set the price

>bankers realize $78 trillion
>rest of us = not so much


Shit someone has to say it: (((The Economist)))

Yeah, this.

And every single penny of it goes to the already rich, while the rest of us get poorer

...

And your wages will be 78% lower.

>Argue Bryan Caplan and Vipul Naik
Why is Sup Forums always right?

>In some European countries, such as Sweden, migrants are more likely to get into trouble than locals, but this is mostly because they are more likely to be young and male.

>gangrape
>childrape
>murder
>grenade attacks
>trouble

Why don't they write who the author is? I'll bet this months salary that it's a coincidence

I wouldn't see a dime of that money but the banks would see all of it.

The thread could have ended right here.

America first.

The only people richer would be the poorest of the world made into laborers (unrealistic in some scenarios) and the Jews lording over them.

Sure. Minimum wage, administrative overhead for hiring people etc. makes it even harder for low IQ people, or simply very young, very old or handicapped people, to find a job.

What job do you want an IQ 75 Nigerian do for you?

What would happen is that 2 billion 3rd worlders would move to the west and the entire system would collapse and it would start a genocide of galactic proportions

>dude the only meaningful thing in life is money lmao
>what, you prefer culture and homogenous neighbors to affording a new phone? loser

that takes into account that engineers in the US would go to work in Africa. Very reasonable, changing the first world to a place you shit in a bucket

>Bow down to your Money-God, goyim
>Who needs culture and ethics when I can just take my shekels from you? Filthy goy

Manual labour

money really isn't everything.

That's a very small sum desu even if it wasn't bullshit

Sticking your head in the sand will feel good right up until you die

...

Nah the rest would get richer too. And by the rest I mean Pajeet and Ching Ping. You'd see the destitute places get less destitute but all the middle class and lower class parts of the developed world would see their living standards plummet.
Basically we'd become a feudal society with only Serfs, and Fuedal lords who own everything.

I think you underestimate the uselessness of these people.

youtube.com/watch?v=A0C4_88ub_M

>world-wide total combined wealth goes up by 78 trillion
>the total wealth of world's top 0,001% goes up by around 200 trillion
>the lives of the rest of top 20% are ruined because the bottom 80% drags them down to their level
No, I don't want that.

In other words:
>money is more important than protecting children from being raped

Came here to say this

And why would anyone encourage white Europeans to breed with them? It couldn't be motivated by a sadistic will to destroy, revenge and racial hatred?

>newspaper owned by globalists publishes ridiculous claims to promote globalism

Who could have guessed?

Also, explain how "free movement" and global sharing of resources would "make people richer" by the end of the century when Africa's population reaches 10 billion? There won't be enough resources to go around; and the massive influx of monkey-IQ third-worlders would turn the West into a giant Detroit anyway.

The main reason the West has a high standard of living is because we extract tons of wealth from the brown foreign plebs, and keep said wealth exclusive to our relatively small population. Otherwise, we'd all get paid Chinese and Indian wages.

Honestly you're right. I have a high paying job, girlfriend, all that but I'm still fucking angry and sad inside. I don't let it show but I feel horrible all the time. I just want to stop feeling this way. Truth is a double edged sword.

>Why don't you want to be wealthy
That's the catch, I'm NOT the one who'll get wealthy out of that deal.

The only thing which saves us from total NWO global state serfdom with microchip implants in our bodies is that the system is so corrupt. Everyone needs physical cash to get bribes from drug deals and politicians needs borders, countries and nations to push their own schemes.

Just another lie to help world communism.

True free movement probably would be fine in the long run because I imagine you'd end up with city/ state/ country wide versions of gentrification and white flight. People tend to stick to their own given a choice

The problem with free movement/ trade/ etc is it's not free. FTAs would be a page long if they were truly about freedom.

Honestly, niggers going to Europe and Whites going to Africa wouldn't be that bad in the long run. We'd probably terraform the desert within decDes and have access to the natural resources.

How much of the pie do I get? Nothing? Well fuck off.

dont youo want to be king of shekels, goy?

It'd make global corporations richer by flooding the labour market and push most of the developed world into poverty

Nailed it.

>what can you say about this?
You can't cut barbed wire with scissors

Last one out get the lights. We're done here.

>when a bad jew spills the beans
OY VEY

i agree that freedom of movement would increase productivity, but only among industrialized nations.

if you include africa they will all just come here, demand welfare and breed like rabbits. so we will have to move to move to africa, rebuild an industrialized society.
at that point, they will have used up all the resources we accumulated in the european industrial period and crisis will start. 3 generations later they will all come to africa, africa willgop to shit and we restart the cycle by re-migrating to europe

Let's pretend for a moment that the 78T would be split evenly among the 7.5B living in the world (it wouldn't, but this is a thought experiment).
78T / 7.5B = 10,400
Would you sell out your homeland and living in a multicultural shithole full of crime and poverty for 10,400$ (for reference, in the US this is about 6 months full time work at minimum wage. A year if you work part time)? If your answer is yes, you probably already live in one.

fpbp

I'm all for free movement and removal of humiliating visa procedures and airport security checks. This it how things were before WWI, but as of now we cannot have nice things.

/thread, delete this thread now.

You gotta give us links man. Don't leave us hanging with only your words.

>NAFTA will totally work guys!

If ALL borders were open, I'd be on board with this

I'd go to America and set up a business or something

Also I think it would really encourage people to get off their arses and make something of their lives. You wouldn't have any excuses then. You could go anywhere on the planet to do something productive and make some money.

I love the idea. Make it happen.

Underrated

EVERYTHING WILL FALL

Meh. A world of free movement would inundate every decent, wealth-generating culture with destructive short-sighted retards. Ancapistan border militia ftw.

No. Fuck off, we're full.

...

So... all 7 billion humans... would instantly receive ~$1.1 million each if we just opened all the borders?

How does that work? We open all the borders and then all retire at once? Live off the interest forever?

>a they will all just come here, demand welfare and breed like rabbits. so we will have to move to move to africa
oh shi-
youtube.com/watch?v=nIMkppsQ3fg

How does a world get richer when there is no other world to compare the economy to? Doesn't the world always stay the same richness? If anything according to the fundamental reality of everpresent entropy, the world should always be getting poorer.

What am I missing (outside of a hook nose) to understand this black magic?

Thats exactly what I said.

Jews would make trillions in additional profits because wages would basically be eliminated. Everyone would become a third-world serf mining lithium for water and a bowl of rice to keep Elysium stocked.

And income inequality would be even greater.

Unlimited cheap labor means poor get poorer and rich get richer.

>Lynn Forester de Rothschild is an American-British businesswoman who is the chief executive officer of E.L. Rothschild, a holding company she owns with her third husband
>The company manages investments in The Economist Group, owner of The Economist magazine

>invest in developing countries and pay the logistics, run the risks of unstable political conditions, long term, low return investment

or
>bribe governments for immigration, let the society mitigate the risks
>fund conflicts to force the immigration crises around the world
Oy vey.

Objectors have been getting bribed to let it happen. White people love their cheap labor, and they love not being at the bottom of the social ladder. They have very little foresight and don't see how everything will go to ship until they're a minority in the civilization they're ancestors helped create, and even then they wI'll be divided and have to fight themselves in any potential civil war.

78 trillion richer for .1% it would depress wages hugely and we would all be living in favelas.

Gentrify Africa!

>Permanent resident status in the US is granted for four main reasons: family ties, employment, status as a refugee, and to promote diversity.
wikihow.com/Immigrate-Into-the-United-States-Permanently
>and to promote diversity

AAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

funny yet tru my man

(((Free Movement))) just not to the store down the block

...

>t. never met a nog before

African nogs are literally mentally retarded by modern standarda

We are going to need a bigger bottle.

If executed properly, yes. Problem is that the current "Free movement" is completely orchestrated on purpose to depreciate the countries and send them to economic and demographic ruin.