Let's talk about the sexual revolution and all that it entails

Any social change in society has an inertia or lag of at least a few decades, until society notices its full effect. This was mentioned casually in J.D. Unwin's 1934 "Sex and Culture". Unwin noticed that a change in sexual relationships had an inertia of roughly 3 generations (~70 years), since this is the time it takes for a society to fully remove any social restraints from the past. The defeminization of women is not a new phenomenon. Even Nietzsche mentioned it in "Beyond Good and Evil", when he wrote:

>They want more, they learn to make claims, the tribute of respect is at last felt to be well-nigh galling; rivalry for rights, indeed actual strife itself, would be preferred: in a word, woman is losing modesty. And let us immediately add that she is also losing taste. She is unlearning to FEAR man: but the woman who "unlearns to fear" sacrifices her most womanly instincts.

This was in 1886. Around 1900, women got the right to vote in many countries. The social inertia (and also the 2 world wars) kept women in line, but 3 generations later they pushed towards the next step and initiated the sexual revolution around 1970.

>What is the effect of the sexual revolution?
The answer is: We don't know yet. The full effect of the sexual revolution will become visible around 2040, as we still have some social restraints (e.g. "slut shaming" or provider mentality by most men), but anyone with open eyes sees the rapid transformation of society.

What I currently see is that society goes through a period of tinderization. Women try to maximize their alpha fucks during their peak sexual market value period and hope to cash out on a beta bucks when their time is about to run out; men adapt their sexual strategies by shifting from traditional provider roles to the emulation of alpha behaviour to pay the women in tingles instead of a secure home. The process of tinderization is still ongoing, and we can expect to see A LOT more of this in the future.

Other urls found in this thread:

dandebat.dk/images/1205p.jpg)
archive.4plebs.org/_/search/subject/knowledge bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/!!9O2tecpDHQ6/]
psychologytoday.com/blog/fulfillment-any-age/201304/the-lingering-psychological-effects-multiple-sex-partners
cdc.gov/std/gonorrhea/arg/default.htm
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>What is the endgame of the sexual revolution?
Following the "3 generations rule", we can expect to observe the full impact of the sexual revolution around 2030-2040.

However, I believe the endgame will be primarily determined by the economic impact of the sexual revolution. The economic impact however, has again an inertia of a few decades. On average, women are a net drain on society, while men are a net asset. In some countries, this is true for the average women at any point of her life, and even in more gender equalist countries where women work throughout their lives such as Denmark, women remain a net drain over their lifetime (dandebat.dk/images/1205p.jpg) (red line: women's fiscal contribution, blue line: men's).

The graphs you see were by men whose main sexual strategy was the strategy of provision. A lot of young men who in previous times would have hated their work but nevertheless kept doing it in order to provide for their family, have adapted their sexual strategies and get pussy by lifting and playing in a band, rather than being net contributors to the state. The young men that drop out today will reduce the average net contribution not only for today, but for the next 40 years.

The dropout of men in academia is not a problem for the young girl studying today. She will get cheered by everyone in the media and the president to show these stupid boys that women can do everything a man can do. But the following absence of high-income men in corporate positions will affect the girl in 10-15 years, when her alpha fucks period is over and she starts looking for a beta provider. The cohort of 35yo women that whines about the lack of eligible men today, will grow even larger as the academic gap keeps growing.

What is even worse is the impact of dysgenic fertility. By pushing high IQ women into universities and 60-hour/week careers, you raise the opportunity cost for high IQ women to produce offspring. On the other hand, the increase in welfare state incentivises low IQ women to breed, financed either directly through child support from a productive male or indirectly through beta men by taxes.
Who reproduces today is completely irrelevant in the next 15-25 years. It is only after that period it begins to matter whether the kid is of low IQ or high IQ origin, as it determines whether the kid will end up inventing new stuff as an engineer or steal and murder. Brazil is serving as a perfect example for this effect - it has the most dysgenic fertility worldwide. Just compare the world cup 1950 in Brazil with the world cup 2014 in Brazil. They seemed to be 2 completely different countries, but there was just 64 years in between.

These effects will cripple the welfare state in an irreversible manner. Even if some politicians in the future will notice the catastrophic consequences of their well-intentioned policies, it will be too late. In any case, what you can look forward to in 2040 is a huge amount of unhappy and jaded 50yo single women with cats and tats on their backs and arms. And a bunch of 25yo angry, low IQ males that are born today and raised by a low IQ single moms with help of your money. Go to Liveleak and take a look at videos from Brazil - it serves as a good indication of what young males without any perspective are capable of.

The endgame of women's suffrage was the sexual revolution. The endgame of the sexual revolution will be the collapse of the Western society.

>inb4 thread dies after 3 replies because this wasn't baity enough

Birth Control also causes Frontal Lobe Damage/Disorder in Women due to how there brains are wired. One of biggest Victories the Power Structures had & also when The West started to fall, was when Birth Control & Women Voting happened.

[Did several threads relating to Women & Social Engineering: archive.4plebs.org/_/search/subject/knowledge bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/!!9O2tecpDHQ6/]

Social Engineering & Eugenics, leading to Population/Demographic Replacement is what is going on.

bump for a good Sup Forums thread. I'll bump a couple of times but people need to read this.

bump

I think most people understand the emancipation of women was a mistake that post here. The thing is convincing women that it was a mistake.

also look at my id, im on pcp mutherfucker

...

Roastie can't give a number she'll never get a commitment from me. If she won't give a number she's a roastie. One simple rule, no roasties. Go find another man you dirty whores.

For anyone who doesnt want to read all of this bullshit OP wrote lemme put it to you bluntly:

You give someone an inch, and they take a mile.

must suck to be a roastie. Society tells you to be a dumb slut, media tells you to be a dumb slut. Men tell you to be a dumb slut so they will like you.

Then all used up by 20 yrs old.

>showing people a coherent argument for a position.

>bullshit

Schlomo you are getting sloppy.

in some cases, used up by their dads before teen males could get to them

>convincing women

Never going to happen on a mass scale.

If there is only one diagram you look at in your entire life as a man, it should be this one.

Explain the black text overlay a bit please. Not following.

I don't think women are as dumb as alot of people think. Sure they are gullible and easy to manipulate but they aren't dumb when it comes to biological impetus.

>more women unhappy, more women getting educated, more women realizing the world is lying to them as they see their sisters and moms struggle.

they could redpill themselves

This graph is for men or both sexes (or genders, same thing)?

Ignore it. I couldn't find the original diagram.

It's honestly depressing to think about, especially with research on DNA microchimerism that is being actively suppressed.

bump

Of course it was, the system Is sustainable only with ~50% unemployment or you end with neglected children, broken families since one parent has to sustain entire family in work supply/ demand in unfavorable condition because double the workforce, or straight no replacement rate.

We'll hopefully collapse by 2024 I definitley don't want to see the full effect at 2040.
Yeah
Cool id

Bumpus

seriously, this is why I still come to Sup Forums after all these years

what about atomation? do you think that will play a rol in all of this?

I bump this to

>would be a red flag
>implying your count isn't a red flag for him
Not that we ever expected females to be honest anyways, this article seems incredibly pointless

I personally believe it will drag things on for a bit longer.

This is why you should amass cash. Once western society becomes Brazil, you'll need to do as the upper class Brazilians do. Put enough walls and guns between you and the unwashed masses, cultivate/enforce traditional values in your house and let nature run its course. Why contain it?

>had my share of bad boys
>not looking to sleep around
What did women mean by this?

>These effects will cripple the welfare state in an irreversible manner.
That depends on how quickly innovations in genetic engineering and nootropics come.
It affects their oxytocin production. which is linked to ethnocentrism and pair bonding.

She's a sl00t

Automation will keep the whole system from going into medieval safe mode... After a couple of generation of supporting opens just because, the people who control. Program and maintain the machines, will just decide its more efficient and environmentally friendly to do a major cull

It's results from two studies overlaid on each other I think

if a white ethnostate emerges from the chaos it will be worth it

the west in its current form needs to die for this happen

she rode the cock carousel for a while but now she's looking for a beta provider to leech beta bucks off of

My sexual market value is dropping so my biological instincts are telling me to to switch from looking for r-selected to k-selected mates

Bump

that info if it went viral could change everything

post it everywhere you can and tell everyone you can

Wonderful thread. Im going thru this myself. My gf dumped me and for what, and for why, i dont know, but she only has a few prime years left. By the time shes thirty she will be a washed up dried up hag with no one to care for her because she wanted to le independent woman for a while longer. I am beginning to really hate women

...

Sir are you interested in knee pads?

desu, that's just biomechanics, bro
At least she feels bad about it
We live in the real world, not a fairy tale

>enjoy your cats
>enjoy your STDs
>enjoy your barren womb
>enjoy being pumped and dumped
>enjoy your failed life and wasted fertility
>enjoy your pills and alcohol to numb the pain

psychologytoday.com/blog/fulfillment-any-age/201304/the-lingering-psychological-effects-multiple-sex-partners

>The Lingering Psychological Effects of Multiple Sex Partners
>When it comes to the long-term effects of multiple sex partners, less is more

I don't blame her for anything, I just thought it was an insightfull contribution to the topic of sleeping around,bad boys and the female mind.

60 in a semester.

I don't think I've jerked off to more than that many porn stars.

Makes perfect sense from an evolutionary standpoint. The female upon seeing her mate be defeated by a stronger alpha male in nature usually changes her mate to be the stronger better alternative that defeated her previous mate.

Didnt even make me mad, just made me realize even more that women are blind animals unable to make competent decisions

For a second there I felt myself becoming a robot.
Roastie genocide desu.

Bump

so, op, are we fucked?

Ever asked a woman what she wants to eat? Don't bother. They want you to pick. It's fucked up.

are fickle women really the downfall of western civilization as we know it?

Not OP but yes we're fucked.

Hot dawg down a hawlway

>arm fat
>crusty fingernail polish

Definitely a pump and dump.

>a mistake
You base this on what?

Seems to me this situation works out fine for plenty of people.

A good and thoughtful thread on pol for once in a while. Bravo, OP!

Oh I wonder why abandoning religion was a bad idea guys..

>The thing is convincing women that it was a mistake

No, we just have to convince all the men.

If 100% of men decided today women shuldn't be allowed to vote, it would get taken away tomorrow.

What the fuck would women honestly do about it? Whine really hard?

She is gonna need a good vibrator for the rest of her life.

As a society? Yes, undoubtedly so.

As individuals? No, if we persist. Many will fall of course but we have more knowledge and insight than the normie masses so most of us should be OK whatever happens.

It's a tough pill to process for everyone. It's only instinctual for her: her mate was beaten by a stronger man, so that stronger man likely could protect his family more, so she's attracted to him. Here's the problem: western civilization has been working against that instinct for centuries through the system of marriage. Even before marriage, women were suppressed and owned across the world. They couldn't freely fulfill that base instinct because of how much it destabilized society.

Now, feminists and leftists will claim there's nothing wrong with that instinct, or that it really doesn't happen at all. I know a feminist that casually remarked how every single son of a single mom she knew was socially fucked up, then immediately backpedaled and defended single moms once she realized what she was saying. The truth burns them. The problem is that, if women are so utterly controlled by these instincts and desires, how can we claim that they're equal to men? It's an uncomfortable thought for many people, and they're afraid of the road it leads down.

Not fuck?

I'm a Chad, no don't do it.

Agreed, makes sense from an evolutionary standpoint.
At least she is fighting the urge to just fuck the Alpha.
cdc.gov/std/gonorrhea/arg/default.htm

betas man. betas will constantly betray us because they have their own (really ineffectual) mating strategies.

Unless we kill the beta libcucks we are screwed

I think that most if not all of these types are written by men with strange emasculation fetishes. I can just tell by the way it is written, it' like a shitty, low IQ fantasy.

perhaps if the OPs points were made part of the public dialog, the ball would start rolling the right direction.

You can project whatever feelings you want onto the post. It is an actual social dilemma, though.

aka shes a whore and done for.

No chad will touche her and no user shall for that trap.

>if a boyfriend or prospective boyfriend insisted on an answer, it would be a red flag for me
>he is obviously pushing for an answer because you being a whore is a red flag for him
>literally using the "you can't fire me because i quit" defense

I'm starting to think that I should just embrace the darkness and give up on hoping I'll find a nice woman that won't destroy me.

>i deserve beta bucks

I disagree completely with this point you're making about dysgenic fertility. You're ignoring that genetically inferior men are no longer guaranteed a mate or have the ability to limit genetically superior men to a single mate. Allowing women to choose, means Chad will be the one procreating and betas will provide in exchange for use of her post-fertility body.

From a genetic point of view, that's a clear benefit.

What's your proof? Anonymous reddit posts made by men with emasculation fetishes?

Obviously there is a desire in women for physically strong males. They don't post about masturbating to them on the internet. They also aren't so cognitively impaired that they can't recognize such impulses.

It isn't projection, it's having seen a few hundred of these types of posts over the years.

Just get an Arabian or Russian or Japanese or south American. Literally no Western..

i'll be quite honest though, i can't tell if this is just bait or an actual issue. my first thought is bait, because Sup Forums, but it's disturbingly plausible.

This actually gives me hope for the future. Cucks should fear alphas. Women being attracted to Chad is 100% normal.

If your gf doesn't immediately answer zero without hesitation, leave her.

I am a proud beta cuckold who has no qualms with women choosing (at an increasingly rapid rate) to breed black. It's liberating that we are finally at a point in society where white males are the subservient class.

>Be a cam whore for easy pussy pass cash

>Bitch because "muh victim card"

Learn how to take responsibility, you fucking whore.

It makes sense but it's disgusting from a societal standpoint that there's guys willing to feed Chad's meat bags.

I posted a one sentence observation. What are you even going on about?
>They also aren't so cognitively impaired that they can't recognize such impulses.
People deny their impulses all the time, verbally or subconsciously. Hell, our entire generation is being brainwashed to have our threat detection neutered.

>manlet
>baby faced
>Skinny fat, slowly staring to work out
>Not very smart
>Have actual problems with loneliness

Am I doomed, is there a way to become a Chad and save myself from the fate of a Beta Provider or An Heroing

>birth rates crash after the sexual revolution
Hmm.

Bullshit

>convincing women
It's called a strong backhand

Reading a bit more on the thread, it makes me wonder about one instictive feeling.

If the trends highlighted by the OP are right there is the possibility that the sexual revolution, and its root causes of feminism, marxism and relative (((inspirators))), might have already succeeded in dealing a terrible damage to western civilization, with all that it entails.

The point thus becomes this. When it will be manifest that we are or have been fucked, it might be too late to recover decently as a society.
But shouldn't we retaliate? Without remorse. I feel like it is what these fuckers deserve. Rather than the ruins, let them have the ashes and the cinder.

Am I wrong with this gut reaction?

I know the name Adorno is a red flag on Sup Forums, but he wrote that the surpression of our natural urges was a necessity for culture and civilisation.
t. recovering marxist

You don't have to take a woman.

You can be the cool single uncle taking your nieces and nephews around.

You can be gay.

Traps aren't gay.

Not really. I believe in tribal times only 20% of men procreated but don't quote me on that. What is dusgusting, is giving a young wife to a 2/10 autistic manlet neckbeard for example. Women are excellent judges of genetic fitness. If you want a prime girl in a sexually free society, you'll have to work for it.

This drive for men to be competitive and become the best they can could be considered a benefit too.

But I don't want that, I want a family. I want to raise a generation of kids who won't be total shit and have something to be proud of.

Notice her profession: "Mum". Single mom on top of it all. And no car.

So glad I basically became a monk.

It's funny that she is 29 and still thinks she holds the cards to "raise [her] eyebrows." It's too late, sweetie.

We all know what happens after sexual revolution.

Birth rates fall

Immigration starts

More conservative and stronger family valued group takes over (islam in west, South Americans in US).

it's not a benefit, it's actually the prelude to a civil war.

if you give no incentive for men to plug into society, they won't. the prelude of this is really just starting and already it's noticeable. if these trends aren't corrected, and relatively soon, society will die a fiery death as it tears itself to pieces.

>Traps aren't gay.
You were right until this part.
Just come out of the closet already.

But you're undoing what you desire. If Chad father's 10/10 children but the 2/10 neckbeard is the provider and raising them he's going to fuck up that 10/10. The problem is woman not STAYing with the Chad or the Chad not performing his societal duties.