Should the British have kept India rather than let them be independent?
Should the British have kept India rather than let them be independent?
Jesus Christ here feet are three times the size of her head. Horrifying
Yes, we should have kept them.
Maybe we could have helped their shitting culture. Not so much as toilets so to speak as they aren't smart enough for it, but perhaps have it so when they shit in public, they have a cup of tea or something to show a modicum of decorum.
They committed the same error as us,which one is not exterminate the native population and replace it with europeans
Wouldn't matter, either way you'd turn Britain into India.
I think that bird has a melanoma on the bottom of her foot.
you didn't "let them"
you do not own something if you can't back it up
Defiantly.
Should have kept China as well.
We should of kept the US
they let them be independent? wasn't Ghandi working for them like MLK was working for the feds?
nope. i think its poop
>leaf education
>We should of kept the US
yeah our entire nation is run by internationals traded on the London exchange but somehow we're free of you cunts
ok
Fucking colonials...
>democrat education
Makes sense
Yes.
Sorry guv'na, but you got BTFO of Designindia. You couldn't have kept shit.
>t. ancap fagget
Couldn't even "keep" all of Ireland. Kek.
You'll keep your mouth shut, cuck
Damn, how did Bong know that would work? I'd better shut up now. Enjoy licking Pajeet's dried up cum out of your old lady's Tyrone stretched baby hole Bongcuck.
the cities of india would look more like hong kong if the british had some power there.