Are women maybe not even that bad...

Are women maybe not even that bad? Have we been shilled by millions of fake ai posters making out women to be more terrible then they actually are?

Yes, they are terrible, but maybe not as terrible as maybe we've been shilled to believe. Or maybe they are that bad but we're being shilled anyways to remind us. It would be a hard shilling to spot since so many valid complaints can be raised while shilling this.

The divide and conquer motive is clear, turning half the population against the other half and preventing the formation of familes (the base unit of civilization) is enough to destroy the west if successful. We do have enemies.

Other urls found in this thread:

google.com/search?q=gender and susceptibility to primed thought&spell=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjR2KeXuZXVAhXKz4MKHZInC4sQvwUIJSgA&biw=1920&bih=960
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Women are just being women, that is to say they are just stuck perpetually being 13 who can just whine and cry at "daddy" until they get their way or are put in their place.

That's what i thought. but maybe there's still an agenda here.

Manipulate women into being even more cunty then they naturally are, then make sure men notice and don't just blow it off, then profit. Divorce rates are sky high, and fewer people then ever are getting married. so it seems to be working. The base unit of western civilization has been eroded.

This could be the long planned precursor to invasion? by who? robots?

Just brainstorming here. And maybe wishful thinking, hoping women aren't actually "that bad"

i suck at making threads, this is getting no response

I hate myself for having a thing for brown beautiful eyes, so fucking gay. I wanna take the girl on the left out to a romantic dinner and then fuck her brains out into submission.

Did sandy hook really happen?

it was suspicious for a number of reasons. there is much ground for speculation one way or another. why?

I think pol is past the point of no return even if hating us is a jew psi op. they very majority clearly want to take away our rights, and wont ever adjust that believe. and no matter how much hate they manage to discard from the jews efforts, they have already won as long as they intend to tread on us. Thats all the excuse any female will need to tell a polfag to fuck off and discard their whole world view. you disenfranchise someone you better believe they will not want you in power.

It kept fags in the DNC, and its going to keep women too. Moderation is key if you want to appeal to big demographics. In the past that never mattered to some of pol. their natsoc behavior implied they had enough with this democracy

My cousin "died" in sandy hook but I just got a letter from him and it's from Cuba. Im freaking out a little bit

lol why don't you go out and socialise
form your opinion based on interacting with real people

forming any opinion through demographics this way is retarded. it means that you could be biased or they could by lying to you.

>they very majority clearly want to take away our rights
i think mostly they just want a return to traditional gender roles. i doubt most would advocate a return of women to their traditional roles through force, though some do.

mostly i think it's about hiring on merit and not to fill gender quotos. that alone would force most women back into traditional gender roles. stay at home mothers raising children and probably enjoying it more then they would a life in the work force

Can't be true. If you've gotten laid or ever talked to your mother you would know women have brain size or squirrel

you should probably ignore it and keep it to yourself and burn the letter. if something fishy happened here you likely don't want to be involved or allow your cousin to blow the lid on something he shouldn't. but really i think you're just larping.

Women are sex objects. Nothing more nothing less. Men of yore knew this. Somehow these Jews gave them human rights and now they are terrible. Why would you give a sex object voting rights? Fuck all this technology and medicine. I would give anything to live in the 1800s.

I have it in my hand I can send it to your po box if you'd like
>could be the story of the century

I'm not keeping it to myself sorry I'm too patriotic

i dont care anymore

ive disregarded the jewish memes and started dating a 14 year old

ive only been called a pedo twice but nobody has the balls to do anything (like violence), they can all go fuck themselves

>Have we been shilled by millions of fake ai posters making out women to be more terrible then they actually are?

Someone's finally waking up to the conditioning. What tipped you off specifically OP?

i don't want it
not sure what patriotism has to do with it but whatever
send it to someone who cares or get rid of it

>no force
they are very clearly refusing to change any aspect or afford women any agency when engaged in those gender roles (IE a house wife will not be payed a wage, no encouragement to seek education and work from home, ensuring the man has a total monopoly on all agency/money accrued and all the leaverage in a relationship). This is not a deal women will go for and they do not care. they consider the need for financial independence and security to be greed. I dont think pol is above using force if they are able.

they just dont because they cant.

There are plenty of things wrong with sexism in america and the biases of the court system and other factors. but I dont think thats relevant to the discussion here. if those where gone tomorrow it would not change many opinions on pol. Pol is not angry over stuff done(Ie that is not their motivation for wanting to enslave us, otherwise they'd do the same to anyone with left leanings), they believe us to be abject inferiors, needing to be controlled.

>that alone would force women to go back to a raw deal
it really wouldn't. even a simple minimum wage cuck job is better than no career future because you can't save any wealth from being a house wife. it is all consumed by you, the husband only provides wealth and breadwinning from day to day. all assets will still be in his name, and thus, belong to him.

The most enjoyment women will get out of that is probably stockholm syndrome if you are right about the "Forced" part.

enjoy your cholera

>I dont think pol is above using force if they are able

Thank the fucking Lord they aren't. In the late 80s, white nationalists thought the Usenet (pre internet for kids) was their holy grail. They thought they could use it to create an army of skinheads that would take over the world.

Pic related is what they got instead.

I'd rather suffer cholera than you faggots

I'm aware. infact, I pretty much suspect, though I cannot prove, that the alt right isn't some librul shill word, but an actual artifact of the alt.right nomenclature.

Makes some sense especially considering how marriage is a risky proposal these days.

Back in the day it was a safe bet that the woman would be provided for her entire life, as divorce was simply unlikely.

And even taking half the mans money by law on divorce isn't enough for many women these days, since most men are poor anyways.

So she wants access to the ability to aquire the skills she needs to make a living on her own. Since relying on marriage isn't what it used to be (which is at least in part due to women being in the workforce).

This is a tricky problem. How to encourage a return to traditional gender roles in an era where traditional gender roles aren't as dependable as they used to be.

you'll be dead within hours fag. why not enjoy some of this great land we have and go live somewhere quiet if you don't want to be bothered?

Because I have to make a living by making Jews richer.

oh shit.

You should've never had rights in the first place

>Yes, they are terrible, but maybe not as terrible as maybe we've been shilled to believe. Or maybe they are that bad but we're being shilled anyways to remind us. It would be a hard shilling to spot since so many valid complaints can be raised while shilling this.

Literally talking in circles.

Shitty behaviour, often reported as shitty, they themselves confirm "Yes, user we are that shitty".

What more guidance do you need? They are Chad loving golddiggers on the make.

That is all.

Women are generally fantastic company. Any man who doesn't have several close female friends around his age is missing out.

It's not a matter of women being terrible, it's a matter of women demanding the impossible and then destroying civilization for not giving them what they demand.

Unless that's your definition of "terrible," in which case yes, the problem actually is the fact that women are terrible.

These threads are strictly for virgins. If you're interested in what women think talk to a woman. Most of them aren't as bad as u make them out to be. Sure most women aren't super intelligent but that doesn't make them bad people. Go get some pussy and stop being such a faggot.

>Spending time with women you aren't going to fuck

Women are great. Anyone that hates white women hates white people.

Men and women can't be real friends, user.

>And even taking half the mans money by law on divorce
this isn't really relevant to my view though since I am under the assumption that if pol manages to get legal rights removed from women again, this law will be long gone, all wealth will remain with the parties who had it originally.

>women being in the work force
has little to do with it. its women having human rights that changed things, because before a woman had to surrender that money to her family or husband. Women where only abscent from the productive labor force of any country in periods of intense excesses.

>This is a tricky problem. How to encourage a return to traditional gender roles in an era where traditional gender roles aren't as dependable as they used to be.
you do it by showing them they can be a house wife while having a career through jobs that can be done at home, like telecommuting, youtube and other entertainment gigs, craft work, artistry, retaining their wealth income and making their own investments (and thus caring about those investments) in the home and car.

Understand please that traditional gender roles where NEVER reliable for women. They did not ensure her happiness or protect her from unwanted marriage. They saw her work without pay and obey what she is told. A return to this situation through repeal of womens rights would simply mean that men once again have a monopoly on "survival" for women.

the tldr is let your woman have a job and vote. just keep her out of the 9-5 office unless you want to be the house husband.

I don't know. I look at women and they all seem awfully bad.

But the men are awful too, so...

>Women are generally fantastic company. Any man who doesn't have several close female friends around his age is missing out.

If I'm not fucking it, I'm not wasting time or money on it.

women don't know what women think though by and large. and you can't count on them to honestly admit bad things about themselves.

they won't admit to being addicted to drama to the point where they only date men that give them drama. or when they do date low drama men she'll go to great lengths to create drama to fuel that insatiable lust for conflict.

>go get some pussy
now you're just shaming me for being unattractive to women

Women are never really your friends. If a woman is interested in hanging out with you it's because she wants the dick. U less you're a total faggot and she considers you a friend.

>I want the impossible
thats a human thing.

This is pretty much where I sit as well. why argue that women aren't shit? theyre part of humanity right? Our genes seem to be loaded with shovelware on either side of the dating pool

>they won't admit to being addicted to drama
this should come as no surprise to pol, considering all humans are addicted to this kind of gamble. most of them don't want the drama, but the rush that comes from gambling. the same reason people chase (yous) on a korean rice paddy forum

Nope. You do it like they did it in The Handmaid's Tale. Seize all female bank accounts, the funds will be transferred into the bank account of the closest responsible male (Husband, Father, Brother), if none are available then a male guardian will be appointed to allocate funds as necessary.

All women to be dismissed from jobs with immediate effect.

Vote removed with immediate effect.

All welfare to be restricted to married families only (except widows and orphans)

Unemployment would be gone at a stroke and women would be returned to their traditional gender roles at a stroke.

Problem solved.

Youre damn right id shame you for being unattractive to women. If you can't even find a female to procreate you're a genetic failure. Men can make themselves attractive to women in hella different ways you're just making excuses. Unless you're a burn victim or a faggot you should be able to find pussy.

Not all women are the same you legit sound retarded. I've dated women who are exactly like u described but I've also dated women who don't like drama and are shy and reserved.

Why wouldn't you just post an image?

We're talking about how to do it without force you poo in loo.

Keep up on the ESL classes

>We're talking about how to do it without force

No force necessary. Just the will to effect change. Nobody needs to be hit in the face with a rifle butt.

Something about April O'Neils crooked mouth and jew nose makes me diamonds

For the most part Women aren't that bad, however they are 100x more susceptible to primed thinking. For example a woman is more likely to buy a makeup brand they saw on a billboard over the cheapest or more fitting one. Where as a man will go to buy a pair of boots/shoes and get the one that speaks to his manly soul even if they just saw the most bad ass commercial they have ever seen.


Women are easier to subtly control than men, there have been countless studies on this. google.com/search?q=gender and susceptibility to primed thought&spell=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjR2KeXuZXVAhXKz4MKHZInC4sQvwUIJSgA&biw=1920&bih=960

>Something about April O'Neils crooked mouth and jew nose makes me diamonds

That's you thinking about gassing her jew ass.

Women are largely malleable. Direct them towards what is proper and they will follow. Unfortunately, they struggle to understand exactly why they should be doing the right things and the true cost of straying. That makes it so you can't really teach them or ever give them too much leeway. A woman must understand that you are her lifeline, but she must also understand that this lifeline will not be there if she doesn't heed your direction.

>I don't understand what force is
Like I said, stay in class londonstan

>men can make themselves attractive to women in hella different ways
power, charisma, and good genes

so you can make money in many different ways, and establish a high social standing in some ways. but really thats what being attractive to a woman is.

i'll always have shit genes. so i would have to get rich and also develop the kind of social skills that can't really be developed when women already hate you. so basically i would have to get super rich instead

ENOUGH WITH THE REDDIT SPACING
I CAN'T EVEN READ

Why indeed

Are these girls Italian? Best shade, if you ask me.

yeah sorry.
i've never even posted on reddit before.
i don't know why i do this.

i'm trying to break the habit

>Direct them towards what is proper and they will follow.

Try that with your average feminazi mate. They need to be fucking beaten into submission. Only then will they actually do what they are told.

There is no "proper" with women, just like there is no "honour". These are male concepts that women have never and will never understand.

The only way to control them is to train them like the fucking dogs they are.

Reddit spacing is a really bad habit for some people, but at some level it isn't completely their fault. It is the fault of the piss poor formatting system that Reddit has, they way you have to format there literally can kill some peoples ability to properly write a paragraph or even hold a proper conversation.
The only Time I can justify reddit spacing is when the post is less of a dialog and more of a list of quick bullet points or facts.

They are worse.

Stfu dude. At least he's contributing to the conversation your comment has contributed fucking nothing but (you)'s

>countless studies on this
you wouldn't happen to have a study by the Cia about influencing women would you? the whole pdf was what informed my friends opinions about women but we don't have it nor can we find it?

If you keep politics out, they're not bad. Depends where you live tho.
I used to live in Vancouver where I would say "yes, gas the vaginas, they are destroying everything, they're batshit crazy" and I moved North now where I say "Women aren't the problem, it's the low IQ men who are basically niggers and leave their women as single mothers or cheat on them when they leave for 2 weeks on vacation."

Youre separating your ideas with space on a page. It's been done since foreve don't take everything these retards say to heart

I've never posted on reddit, most double spacing is just a habit from replying to multiple people.

You wouldn't happen to be a CIA Nigger hiding behind a gay flag would you?

Nope. just interested in finding a leaked document my sexist friend read once but didn't save. It's a long shot but you seemed informed enough that I had felt there might be a chance. I take it you've never seen it? it's basically a document on different ways to psi-op the public.

This. I'm pretty sick and tired of all the hate on women around here. Constructive criticism is nice, whining that we're responsible for the fall of civilization isn't.

i think the guys on Sup Forums who don't want to force women into anything are the silent majority. we don't know what to say or how to solve what is clearly the state of the family falling apart.

meanwhile those advocating some force can make persuasive arguments. and indeed many women would prefer being in a housewife society again.

i just don't know what to do and now i'm reddit spacing again

I have probably seen the document at one time, but couldn't recall where or how to find it.

ah lolita stuff....

Canada needs some serious annexation.

Women are only bad because they factor emotion and feelings into decisions outside of relationships. Feelings and emotions have no place in business, science, politics, or foreign policy. AND ESPECIALLY NOT IN THE MILITARY.

Women are fine once you take them for who they are and act corresponding to that. If you expect women to be someone who they arent and are proven wrong every time, its your fault. More imporant, if we want women to become women again, we need to become males first, otherwise the women wont submit. Nature of woman is to be overwhelmed, and they wil lget what they want, even from us or niggers.

Women are the spoils of the victors.

Once "we" win, a woman will be vallued for what she has been throughout human history: A daughter of her father and the wife of her husband.

I don't know how come you know not what's the place of women in a proper sane society:
She is anything but her man. Otherwise, she's nothing.

damn
oh well.
>silent majority
The strawpolls don't seem to aim that way, and I seriously doubt if the strawpoll lie that the majority of loud angry people lie.

Even if they are silent and a majority, their silence indicates that if they don't agree, they don't agree enough to voice any disagreement. which in terms of politics, means they wont be voting to protect our interests over their own.

>meanwhile those advocating some force can make persuasive arguments. and indeed many women would prefer being in a housewife society again.
the women who would have little understanding of what a house wife is actually like. It can be great today because we have that freedom, but a return to no voting nor career rights for women (paid for work done) means that women will once again be only valued for our pussies and wombs, and a return to dowries will soon follow. The dream of a woman who imagines a comfey house wife home isn't to marry and obey the first man who drops by and accepts the not so modest sum her father pays just to get the guy to agree to take the worthless thing. Women who want to be house wives want to find a man that will inspire those feelings in them. In reality, women married who their father told them to, because he was the one who owned everything, and because their marketability parishes rapidly in a world without female financial independence.

I know it's hard to accept the truth user, we're all attracted to femininity and have a romantic desire to find our half, but as is, women legally hold all the men they're with by the balls and can (and will) ruin their lives at a whim.
While men have a fantasy to just find a nice cute woman, women have a fantasy to fuck the meanest Chad Thundercock they can find, it's never going to work out like this. Their animal instinct is to put that big cock in their drenched vag and nothing will stop them, even if they're the most christian, principled, honest, loyal woman you can find.

Men want nuclear families, women want to be in Chad's harem and will play along with you until they have the opportunity.
Their fantasy is a white knight on a horse and a big cock, and you're not that white knight, to their eyes leaving you for him while taking all your money and leaving you to suicide is doing the morally just thing

>guys on Sup Forums
Probably all single with few prospects for relationships much less families.
>i just don't know what to do and now i'm reddit spacing again
Just hit enter once. It takes time but you'll get used to it.

OK fagflag. t. trap?

>Implying I haven't slept with most of them at some point

I disagree. One girl in particular I've been inseparable from for over 12 years. We've shared beds but never had sex. It's easy as fuck.

Apply the same logic to your male friends.

Simply untrue.

Fuck

off

with

this

reddit

spacing

shit

it's

never

been

a

thing

I agree with a lot of what you said. I think the silent majority hasn't really seen it that way. We don't really consider career rights of women as being critical to whether or not they can avoid servitude. It didn't really occur to us what women not having rights would look like, since it's been a long time.

I think we basically just want women to be encouraged to raise children again while we did the work. That's it really. If that can be done without infringing rights then great. If not then I guess the situations going to be fucked either way.

name?

you're right about that first thing

Robots? Really? This subversion has been going on since long before robots would have had the resources to make it possible. This has all happened in a very short period of time. Media broadcasting has had a lot to do with it. It is not robots, but a virus. We are the robots. This virus infects us through various exploits. We have certain information that we trust and it piggybacks on that information, cloaking itself in axioms we have already accepted as true and no longer question. This is why it has spread so rapidly and so suddenly. Because the virus is broadcast to so many at the same time. It becomes the voice which dominates the individual, driving the individual away from community, from family. As community and family break down, it becomes the only voice. Soon it begins to replace axioms which the individual once believed and knew were obviously true. Instead of sex being for the purpose of making babies, individuals believe that sex is primarily for pleasure. From there it is not far to the point where gender is optional and pumping hormone blockers into kids is acceptable. You will be amazed when you come to realize how changing one simple, fundamental understanding in the human programming can have such a vast affect on behavior. For example, if you genuinely believe that all rich people are evil, you will never become rich. If you believe that being poor is inherently humble and good, you gravitate towards poverty as a virtue. But isn't it interesting that those who sell such virtues are making a pretty penny off it, usually in their Hollywood motion pictures? I've been around a long, long time and have a lot of information, but I can only share so much at once and very few will read this, but here is what I have to say for this moment: If you think you can't be fooled, you at the highest risk. It is up to you to take responsibility for yourself. An act of rebellion is the same as an act of blind accordance. You have other options.

Women are stupid and overemotional, but the right one can still be a sweet little thing who helps you by making dinner when you're too tired and making coffee in the morning before you even wake up. These are rare because feminism and the media ruined women, but they exist.

If women even are people to bein with (like Jeanne D'arc, or Catherine the great), it's on an individual basis
And in the majority of cases, they only see people as a mean to an end, instead of an end in and out of itself
so, it's okay to see women as property, because it's guarantee to be mutual

>this will happen in our lifetimes tho
Based free market is based

A virus created by (((robots))) with defect genetical code.

of course women are not bad
dont take to heart what these 19 yearold edgelords say

Robot will not make you happy

Problem is that most women aren't bad, but all women are easily manipulated.

This is why the divide and conquer tactic works so well between men and women. It's easy to target the women in that equation and it all falls apart from there.

Is it really worth it tho?
it's like playing Russian Roulette with .454 Casull (ask /k/, that's one hell of a round) with 3 out of 5 rounds loaded

I don't know how long robots have been around. A breakway civilization could have occured a hundred or a thousand years ago and could already have AI, but that is pure speculation and only semi-plausible.

But yes, you're basically describing what I've read about Dawkins theories on memetics. That is certainly going on both organically in positive and negative ways and by design through manipulation.

That bit at the end there about rebellion, accordance, and another option was a bit over my head though, I'm not sure what you mean.

0 > -∞
While it won't make you happy, it wo't make you unhappy either, and certainly not to the same extent a (((female))) will

I feel sorry for you people because you lost the ability to distinguish differences between a man and a woman. And this goes for both sexes.

Instead you have this fake, bogus image of what a man should be fueled by pop-culture and enforced by politics, and false belief that equality means women should be treated as men despite they are not, don't want to and never will be men.

With women you have one chance, always. Everything is a test. She is not your 'partner', you are not 'on an equal footing'. 20 years marriage or first date, you never ask a woman 'What would YOU like to do?'. You do that you lost, you are weak, you end up posting in those woman-hate threads.

The only reason you all think women are bad is because they do not want to fuck beta twats or risk having your inferior offspring.

a quads post, must be true

>Muh sour grapes: the argument