>is the Supreme Head of the Church of England
>literally the Pope of the Anglican Church
>gives assent to fag rights
>gives assent to fag "marriage"
>does nothing while Mohammadans flood her country
>does nothing while her people are killed
Does this evil woman have no fear of God?
She knows better than you, sweetie. Also, they're called People of Color (PoC), not "Mohammedans".
t. Queen of England
Can any Britbong tell me if the power of the monarchy decreased during Queen Elizabeth's rule, or had it already been neutered in previous centuries? As I understand it, the disintegration of the British Empire was moreso the doing of prime ministers than of her.
I had a teacher who had dual US-UK citizenship who spoke highly of Queen Elizabeth. She was talking about how the royal family survived Nazis bombing her palace during WWII... yeah, only to see the country overrun with Muslims over the course of 70 years. Great.
Before. We had a big cheeky civil war over this issue that resulted in the current situation we have now.
Don't even know where to begin. If this is your level of knowledge you really should consider picking up nitting and just do that all day.
While she technically has the power to block laws, she could never feasibly use it unless it was against the UK equivalent of the enabling act
...
Who could stop her if she tried? Nobody legally.
I could respect her if she simply refused to go along with things because she believed it was her divine obligation to rule according to the law of God (like Nicholas II in Russia).
But she is really just a joke. Why even have a monarchy or a Supreme Head if she isn't going to do anything?
How is the migration issue any worse than the enabling act?
He looks more like the Windsors as he ages desu
Hi faggot flag
She'll be dead in like 2 years. She doesn't give a shit.
Seems like you lost that civil war?
Anglos go to hell automatically. She knows she can't escape her fate.
>2 years
lol
martin luther and his shills paved the way for jewish reintegration into europe and the eventual ownership of england by the rothschilds. this is known.
The Catholic Church knew exactly what to do with the Jews; see: the Spanish Inquisition. But Jews are a persistent parasite and eventually outmarketed Catholicism
>Martin Luther
The guys that wrote "On the Jews and their lies"?
Most disastrous reign the British Isles have ever seen. Even outdoes Dermot McMurrough or Vortigern, the useless old bitch.
She is a figure head for the most part. Technically she has the power to make certain decisions but she almost never uses it. For the most part the parliaments have the real power. It would be a cake walk for the parliament to cut off what little power she has left in government. The only reason they never bothered is because she is not worth the effort. Side note she has the power to veto laws here in Canada via her representative, the governor general. Again she never uses it.
The Anglican church is actually pretty split when it comes to queer rights. Some bishops and ministers are pro gay marriage, while others are against gay marriage. It really is up to the regional and local religious officials to determine if gay marriages are sanctioned. Again she generally leaves these matters up to regional religious leaders.
The reasons the royals are kept around is for act as ceremonial figureheads and to bring in tourists. She is well aware of her real role.
We have been saying that for over a decade and she is still kicking around.
>JEW
>PROTESTANT
gtfo here
Nothing more British than the house of Saxe Coburg Gotha!
>americans who think the queen of england has any real power and isnt just a figurehead
Do Brits get offended when people criticize their monarch?
She's a Satanist.
She may be cucked by the Parliament when it comes to secular law, but she literally has infinite power in terms of religious law.
If she wanted, she could defrock all bishops who allow gay marriage, and there is literally nothing that any of them could do about it.
>1776
oh wow
>is the Supreme Head of the Church of England
In name. In function, it's the Archbishop of Canterbury who does all those thing.
Magna Carta meant that power was stripped from the king, and given to the Lords. Then the Civil War and Restoration stripped more power and gave it to Parliament. Then the Glorious Revolution stripped even more power and gave it to Parliament. Then the George III's deal for the Crown Estate meant that the monarchy could do little to nothing without Parliament's request.
>Who could stop her if she tried? Nobody legally.
Due to the CE contract, Parliament. Plus, the media would call for another Cromwell, and the way would be paved to have a (((USA))) style government.
Yes. It's offending British culture, and people as a whole.
I mean I don't really care when foreigners criticize our presidents but I surmise the queen is like a George Washington founding father type figure
the same
before the schism he caused, the Pope took care of the West and the Jews were routinely BTFO Europe when they started pulling shit. The Eastern Orthodox worked with the tsar families in Prussia all the way up until the Bolsheviks (Jews) slaughtered them into submission
Martin Luther was a D&C tactic that splintered the Vatican's hegemony and allowed for secular usury to become the international currency of Europe
>is the Supreme Head of the Church of England
Wrong. She's merely the Supreme Governor of her Church of England.
Jesus is its Supreme Head.
>literally the Pope of the Anglican Church
Not really. The Archbishop of Canterbury better fits that description.
>gives assent to fag rights
Rights should not depend on sexuality.
And denying assent to anything is a drastic step that could result in her losing the power to deny anything assent. So she's not going to use it on relatively trivial issues like this.
>does nothing while Mohammadans flood her country
Firstly they're not flooding the country.
Secondly, immigration is a matter for the government, not the head of state.
Thirdly, Jesus wants us to show compassion to everyone regardless of religion.
>does nothing while her people are killed
Murder is a matter for the police, not the head of state.
So by your measure, what IS a matter for the HoS?
I don't want to agree, but kinda yea.
Always remember the Windors have no rightful and legitimate claim to their throne over the house of Stewart.
By the way, how strong is the anti-American sentiment down under
True Englishmen have no need either for degenerate Stewarts or dull-witted Hanoverians in England.
"All monarchs I hate, and the thrones they sit on
From the hector of France to the cully of Britain."
But that's false, Jacobite. Stuarts lost their legitimacy by converting and losing the throne.
Not as strong as our other various "anti-" sentiments, but still up there. You wouldn't be attacked in the street or anything.
>Avatara of satan
During the eleven years of Cromwell's rule, he made this nation the most powerful country in Europe.
I heard them bogans up in Toowomba attack Americans upon hearing their accents
It was about the Monarch's overreaching powers. Essentially when you get a shit Monarch who does dumb shit then Parliament can't stop him from doing it.
The current system is to make sure both don't do anything stupid.
But that's false? Britannia didn't rule the waves under that incompetent arch-heretic. All that happened was that he picked on some white peasants.
T-Bar is pretty nice, but haven't heard of that happening. Been there with Americans enough times to check.
Milton, the greatest of England's poets, praised him as "the favoured object of divine regard."
"After the loss of all Ireland, with the exception of one city, you in one battle immediately discomfited the forces of the rebels; and were busily employed in settling the country, when you were suddenly recalled to the war in Scotland. Hence you proceeded with unwearied diligence against the Scots, who were on the point of making an irruption into England with the king in their train: and in about the space of one year you entirely subdued, and added to the English dominion, that kingdom which all our monarchs, during a period of eight hundred years, had in vain struggled to subject. In one battle you almost annihilated the remainder of their forces, who, in a fit of desperation, had made a sudden incursion into England, then almost destitute of garrisons, and got as far as Worcester;: where you came up with them by forced marches, and captured almost the whole of their nobility."
>Milton, the greatest of England's poets, praised him
Oh, well then we should disregard history and logic then and embrace treason and heresy.
Sorry about the battle of Brisbane. General McArthur ordered to hang some American soldier serial killer who killed 3 Australian women. McArthur believed Americans and Australians should band up in times of war instead of focusing on squabbles.
The Paradise Lost is the one of the most beautiful works of religion written in the history of the world.
She is a rep. figurehead though. Her words have meaning to the average man. If she came out and took a stand, even if she got taken down it would mean a lot.
The true reason is probably that she leads a very sheltered life, doesn't know much about the internet, and never sees what's actually going on.
You know... like a monarch
>Sorry about the battle of Brisbane
All good. My grandfather said it was some of the most fun he had during the war (he liked Tobruk more, though).
Quoted as saying, "Got to kick the shit through a bunch of septics. We all had a great time."
Townsville was far worse, where the niggers got to chimping out.
That's what's she wants you to think. Who is your head of state? The prim minister or the queen
Yes, and? Doesn't make him right about Cromwell.
>The true reason is probably that she leads a very sheltered life
The people guiding Her before and after the coronation did their best to shape Her this way, sadly. And being a scared young girl at the time, She didn't know any better, and it's not like Her father helped much in that regard.
Damn he called us septics that's some laser guided bantz
...
>In name. In function, it's the Archbishop of Canterbury who does all those thing.
Sure, just like the Pope delegates his authority to the Curia, cardinals, and bishops. But the Pope can issue an encyclical that says anything he wants.
>an active "married" lesbian can be a bishop in good standing in the Church of England
>Jesus is its head
Apparently not.