Why NatSoc/Fascism is wrong and the REAL decline of Britain

Let us make it clear. The largest support base for the Alt Right and modern White Nationalist movements are concentrated in the White Working class areas. Am I the only one who recognises the ridiculous nature of this? Arguably the greatest civilisation in human existence, and the literal products of dysgenics are trying to latch themselves on to it? White working class people, with their ostensible low IQ HAVE NOT contributed to Western civilisation. AT ALL.

The average IQ of Britain has decreased significantly since the Victorian era. Source: sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289613000470

No, this is not due to immigration, or inbred Pakis in Britain. This is largely due to the higher birth rates within the white working class community, as their offsprings have been able to survive with the advancement of modern medicine. The drastic regress in our culture should vindicate this. Britain went from a nation, with the likes of Dickens representing it and influencing the minds of its people, to Love Island, X Factor and other atrocities reality TV shows.

This is who NatSoc, Fascism and other shitty collectivist ideologies attract. Also a reason as to why I can't stand ugly low class Whites such as Tommy Robinson and his hideous followers. Unfortunately Britons with good genes tend to be Leftists, or at the best case scenario, homosexuals larping as Conservatives, ie Douglas Murray and Milo Yiannapolous.

If you disagree, I'm just going to assume you yourself derive from a shitty working class background. My solution: make life as arduous as possible for the lowest class Whites forcing them to have little to no children at all. And encouraging the upper class to breed lots of kids.

NatSoc or Fascism do not tackle this problem. They're collectivists, that's why.

Other urls found in this thread:

katana17.wordpress.com/2015/06/11/how-jewry-turned-england-into-a-plutocratic-state-part-1/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

So the solution to this supposed collectivism is bringing about collective communism right?
Go back to Facebook.

katana17.wordpress.com/2015/06/11/how-jewry-turned-england-into-a-plutocratic-state-part-1/

Muh Jews

Here is a what a true Briton looks like. Not the inbred looking manlet Tommy Robinson.

>White working class people, with their ostensible low IQ HAVE NOT contributed to Western civilisation. AT ALL.
They grow the food you eat and chop down the trees that your house is made out of.

>Britons with good genes tend to be Leftists, or at the best case scenario, homosexuals larping as Conservatives, ie Douglas Murray and Milo Yiannapolous.
A completely baseless claim. Also define "good".

>If you disagree, I'm just going to assume you yourself derive from a shitty working class background.
I am, and that's why I disagree. I know what it's like to be both poor and upper middle class, and unlike spoiled brats like you it has given me character and perspective.

>make life as arduous as possible for the lowest class Whites forcing them to have little to no children at all. And encouraging the upper class to breed lots of kids
Then the lower class just hates you more and supports the people you hate, and the because there are so many upper class people, a few will inevitably take it all for themselves and you're back to square one after just a few generations.

You sound like a spoonfed commie living off the teat of mommy and daddy. You will be hung with the rest of the Jews. The workers are the backbone of the nation, and they will kill you if you piss them off.

> They grow the food you eat and chop down the trees that your house is made out of.

Wew. So do niggers and Spics for you lot. There will always be a lower class, but they need to stop breeding like rats.

> A completely baseless claim. Also define "good".

Not baseless at all. JK Rowling isn't from Croydon or Luton is she?

> I am, and that's why I disagree. I know what it's like to be both poor and upper middle class, and unlike spoiled brats like you it has given me character and perspective.

Don't get me wrong. I'm sure there are exceptions of intelligent people born into the working class. Only talking averages here. You're utterly delusional if you are OK with the working class having more children than the upper class. The West really needs to start treating them like shit, mimicking Gulf arab treatment of their near slave servants from South Asia, Africa and Indonesia. No wonder crime is very low over there.

> Then the lower class just hates you more and supports the people you hate, and the because there are so many upper class people, a few will inevitably take it all for themselves and you're back to square one after just a few generations.

It doesn't matter whether they hate me or not. They're as worthless as Muslims or Niggers.

> You sound like a spoonfed commie living off the teat of mommy and daddy. You will be hung with the rest of the Jews. The workers are the backbone of the nation, and they will kill you if you piss them off.

Fucking hell you seriously believe commies have this rhetoric? I believe in the free market. That's how I want to make life harder for the working class. No taxes, no social services to help them. Let them die off over time. They're redundant. This is eugenics.

>You're utterly delusional if you are OK with the working class having more children than the upper class.
The upper class always has to be smaller than the lower and middle classes combined. This is just basic economics, otherwise they are no longer upper class. You could argue that these people have better genes, but clearly you have no idea of what Epigenetics are.

>That's how I want to make life harder for the working class. No taxes, no social services to help them. Let them die off over time.
>you seriously believe commies have this rhetoric?
This is exactly how communism play out. Also there is no such thing as a totally free market. It's either regulated loosely (capitalism), moderately (socialism), tightly (communism), or not at all (anarchy). Take your pick.

But who was anarcho capitalism and minarchism?

Anarcho-XYZ does not work. Ok, let's take anarch0-captialism for an example. It's based around contracts between individuals. Do you think this wouldn't be abused to hell and back. Let's say they use some fine print and verbal manipulation to trick you into signing a contract and you unknowingly break it. What happens then? They kill you? You kill them? There's no way to fight that peacefully with a third party, i.e. a court. It's a fucking mess that would lead to the human race going extinct if these tards ever got nuclear weapons. I'd rather settle disputes with a neutral third party because people do not self-regulate. This is why government has to exist and rules have to be enforced.

You claim to be elitist but you're intellectually inferior and self-defeating.

>anarch0
anarcho

My finger slipped.

>Yes goy, collectivism is evil! Remain a detached individual while every other group joins forces against YOU as a shared enemy!

Nice try, kike shill.

>Muh Tommy Robinson

He's a kike shill much like you. Good job with the friendly fire.

>Unfortunately Britons with good genes tend to be Leftists

Sure thing.

>and Milo Yiannapolous.

You mean the half greek, half-JEW queer?

>thinks that right-wing = national socialism

I could if I wanted construct a classical liberal society wherein feminism is unheard of, and negro-slave owning is perfectly legal, etc. Remember, Voltaire, the father of liberalism, made several arguments for the enslavement of negros.

>If you disagree, I'm just going to assume
the absolute fucking state of modern discourse

>make life as arduous as possible for the lowest class Whites forcing them to have little to no children at all. And encouraging the upper class to breed lots of kids.

And when pissed off upper class will hang you fags, who fart higher than their arse, by your balls, you will blame kikes for it.

Good bait.

>You sound like a spoonfed commie living off the teat of mommy and daddy.

>Murrishits actually believe this.

No, he sounds exactly like it's expected from lolbertarian "free market" kike.

I somewhat agree in regards to your sentance about how national socalism and Fascism are obsolete because they are ways of thinking that are simply open to anyone based soley upon the notion of nation and race, however I take more of an Evolian view that a person has to conduct themselves physically, mentally and spiritually to such an abbility to be considered worthy.

However in no regards do I believe that a persons wealth or class background should always be used towards judging a persons quality, for im sure you would aggree with me that there are rotting apples hanging from all varites of tree both common and rare?

>This is exactly how communism play out.

Wrong. This is exactly how Tzarism and especially the February government played out (white side of civil war later).

Even modern monarchists poorly veil their desire to have "good old times and rule over the cattle".

You bring up a valid point that people on the far-right tend to falsely assume the white working class is just like them.

However, the problem isn't that the dregs are lower class. It's that they have lower intelligence, which has never been the case until now. Back in the day when there was no social mobility, good genes were fairly evenly shared across different socio-economic groups. But by now, most western countries have an intelligent rich elite everyone else with some intermediates.

The rich and genetically superior are liberal because they live in society where they are coddled from reality. The only way you can change this is by bringing their quality of life down back to reasonable levels of exposure to races, poverty, etc...

The best way of achieving this would to have successful people opt out of modern life, and return to a more traditional way of living. I don't see how that's possible without some form of fascism, national socialism, or theocracy.

History lesson.

The UK prior to WW1 was bankrupt.
The new state Germany's rising productivity was a direct threat to the empire.
UK has a dual role culture, that of the merchant and that of the soldier. EG You either buy what we produce or we'll kill you.
The British working class is kind of a myth, and the ones that exist are a minority and always have been a minority. The UK truly are a nation of shopkeepers. As such they are in direct opposition to both NatSoc and the Bolshies.
The Brits wanted WW1 to destroy Germany's productivity and control its resources and profits via the Treaty of Versailles.
Nat Soc was a direct response to this.
Jews financed the allied powers.
Jews collected post WW1 and crashed the world economy.
The same method of collapsing economies to own them os being administered to every Nation on the planet now.
The working class had zero to do with this, it was the elites, its always been the elites.