Sup Forums doesn't understand socialism

>the people should own and operate the means of production
Explain why this is bad in 140 characters or less.

Other urls found in this thread:

m.wfp.org/content/global-report-food-crisis-2017
skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/number.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

History.

tfw they can do this under capitalism

This could make a good argument for slavery....

Are we really about to reply to some faggot posting Muslim foot fetish fuel? Really?

Is this how shit this board is now that we have to take the bait EVERY TIME?

An industrialised economy requires a centralisation of capital to such a degree that it's impossible for the workers to own the means of production. The only way to accomplish this is a return to artisanal production like Marx seemed to (consciously or not) long for.

>because they didn't buy them, somone else took the risk and invested in it

They can do this in capitalism. The difference is under socialism you're not allowed to own something. You want a yard and you work hard to turn that into a field where food grows and you want to use that hard work to support your family? No, it belongs to the state. The food will support whoever the state deems most in need. You are not allowed to own anything.

And how do they enforce this? Massive police state, every time. Socialism is a mechanism for you to hand over everything willingly.

>Millions dead

Because they already do.

I just saw this on latestagecapitalism:

>Please remember that this subreddit is a SAFE SPACE for leftist discussion. Any Liberalism, capitalist apologia, or attempts to debate socialism will be met with an immediate ban

I have respect for ideas that I don't disagree with and debate as well. People who live in echo chambers are disgusting subhuman trash though. They are the lowest of the low, the weakest pieces of special snowflake trash that just enjoy hedonistic mental masturbation

Those who want socialism/communism can't operate shit.

There are dozens of varieties of Socialism and private ownership of property is allowed in most of them, don't confuse socialism and communism.

Millions die in capitalist states too, it's just that we blame the individuals and not the state.

plebs can't do shit, see: Venezuela and every nigger country.

Meritocratic hierarchy is necessary to keep the tards focused.

It would require a violent purge of the upper & middle classes. Violence is wrong, you should seek your political goals peacefully.

The general population is fucking stupid

any questions?

Ironic because Sup Forums is essentially an echo chamber, mods regularly delete leftist threads or they otherwise get shouted down completely.

>mods regularly delete leftist threads

Proofs?

It operates under the notion that man is fundamentally equal. Which is untrue.

because its a doctrine of theft, the workers steal the means of production from the capitalists, this results in people going oh shit i shouldnt invest there ill lose my money and the economy stagnates without investment from the upper classes.

>dying is the same as being killed!

The people should not own and operate the means of production, because "the people" or the working class, are not mentally fit to manage and operate the means of production. Marxists assume that all people are created equal, it's simply not true. Some people have 80 IQ, and are not able to survive without stealing, and some people innovate physics, or turn a local business into a franchise without any mistakes.

Not everyone can be a leader.

>Millions dead from collapsed economy and starvation from government seizing lands

There leaf, ya fuckin happy now

>A place with no login required is an echo chamber
okay friend

>mods regularly delete lefty threads
Post proof, the opposite is true.

>should

you can't plan desire

"means of production" is a meaningless meme phrase generated by an incompetent "intellectual" moron

"the people" are on the whole at least incompetent, and on average malicious

capitalism acknowledges human behavior

non-capitalist systems run by state sanctioned genocide of its own people dwarfing any capitalist death toll

pick any

>Ironic because Sup Forums is essentially an echo chamber, mods regularly delete leftist threads or they otherwise get shouted down completely.

Completely wrong there are socialism generals here

I don't have any collection of screenshots or anything, I should. Just watch any threads that aren't part of the Sup Forums id, they often get deleted.

There are more capitalist countries with starving populations and collapsed economies literally right now than socialist states have ever existed.

They already do. And that is why niggers make jenkem

Sure, but there's almost no real discussion in those threads. It's all anti-communist memes and helicopter chat

>There are more capitalist countries with starving populations and collapsed economies literally right now than socialist states have ever existed.
name them
>ignoring china
>ignoring the ussr

Can't claim any European nations because the EU is communism by un-elected bureaucracy

FPBP

Communists don't understand that SOCIETY WILL ALWAYS HAVE SOME FORM OF AN ELITE.

Communist societies destroy an old elite, replace them with a new managerial elite (college profs, authors, etc.), and redistribute most of the income of the deposed elite. But communist nations always remain very socially stratified; Stalin and Mao lived like emperors, while Raul Castro and Nicolas Maduro are fabulously wealthy today.

Communism is the most "feels-based" emotional ideology there is, and modern communists don't actually care about bettering society or have true empathy for the powerless; they only care about tearing down everything because they're deeply disturbed individuals.

More than 140 characters, but fuck you, and I have a feeling I'm going to get to smash commie skull in with a hammer before I die.

lad the mods here aren't pro alt-right
if threads are deleted its because they have garbage in them or break the rules

The majority of the people here are right wing, conservative etc, but there's plenty of different viewpoints for all the issues. This place isn't an echo chamber. Its mostly ruined by people spamming stupid shit to try and be funny but its nothing like the garbage you get on reddit where any posts that don't suck the dick of the ideology they like get banned.

That's just sad as fuck man

m.wfp.org/content/global-report-food-crisis-2017

Because by seizing the means of production you further stifle growth, entrepreneurship and motivation, not to mention you get rid of the idea of harvesting the rewards from the seeds that you sew thus artfically creating a boundary for everyone unable to reach for the finer things in life, that is unless your a (((high ranking party member))) or (((Commisar))) who of course is "entitlled" to drive something other than a rustly old Lada which the proletariat masses had to wait 10 years for.

>Explain why this is bad
okay, so-
>[conditionals]
Oh.
No.

Communism will fail and fail again

you do realize there are more people now than ever right?

its about ratio to the whole, and the ratio of starving people is still less than communism's

not to mention the only way they are fed is with technology and procedures capitalism developed

Every thread on this board is full of garbage, but it's a touch suspicious when garbage threads with dissenting opinions disappear while garbage threads that are pro-pol ID tend to stay.

I don't think it's a massive conspiracy or anything. I do think the conversation here is certainly better than reddit or I wouldn't post here. Yes anonymity does allow anyone to post, but I don't think that prevents and echo chamber scenario, right wing groups make the majority of posters here and have a tendency to shout down opposition instead of discuss. That's still an echo chamber.

ABSOLUTELY HARAM DELET THIS NOW

This, OP is a faggot trying to crowd source Twitter material

But they do. I operate my machines, i own the company these machines are being operated in.

Of course there's more people than ever, but my point is merely that famines are not uncommon under capitalism we just don't count those as the responsibility of capitalism, which is a strange double standard.

If someone dies in the US because they can't afford healthcare, would we count that as a death under capitalism? We count the deaths due to lack of medical care under socialist states.

its hard to dismiss deaths under socialism, when its one human putting a bullet into another for declared ideological reasons

the famines in USSR and china where caused by the communists killing off their own competent farmers, because there is no such thing as competence in communism, its an anathema to the ideology

its easy to dismiss a death in capitalism that no one intended and no one declared ideology for

and you have still ignored the face the socialist deaths still dwarf the capitalist deaths per capita

The US has killed an estimated 40million in foreign wars since Korea, is that not putting a bullet in another human for declared ideological reasons?

It's hard to discuss the per capita issue because we would have to sit down and decide which deaths to count on each side. What timeframe is allowable, which countries are actually socialist and which are actually capitalist. Do we count mixed economies etc etc

People can't and shouldn't trust each other enough to make the initial sacrifice (constructing the means) for the promise of future wealth.

stop posting ugly shitskin feet it makes me want to throw up

>40million
that doesn't even scratch the ussr death toll let alone the china death toll, and sure ass hell doesn't even register per capita now

> 1 post by this ID
saged slide thread

>his fetishes aren't exactly the opposite of what he lets on
lol what a faggot

Estimates range from 8M to 61M for the USSR, but many modern scholars agree on a number around 20M.

>Explain why this is bad in 140 characters or less.
All attempts have failed.

>we
WE

I have no fetishes you disgusting degenerate. Repent and confess.

>But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
>Matthew 5:28

Look me in the eye and tell me you're a saint

>If anyone thinks he is religious and does not bridle his tongue but deceives his heart, this person's religion is worthless. James 1:26

Don't be a hypocrite my friend. I don't think calling others disgusting degenerates is very Christian.

Mean of production are only part of the equation. You also need to control the means of monetary policy.

Because left to their own devices, people fuck everything up.

>"means of production" is a meaningless meme phrase generated by an incompetent "intellectual" moron
>"the people" are on the whole at least incompetent, and on average malicious
Would you be happy with the term State Capitalism?

>Explain why this is bad in 140 characters or less.
The people are fucking stupid.

The tragedy of the commons?

We're all sinners, but we better ourselves to be more like our Lord Jesus Christ. By indulging in your sins you are doing the exact opposite.

Both 'disgusting' and 'degenerate' are biblical terms, there is nothing wrong with using them.

>Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.
>Timothy 5:20

Neither disgusting nor degenerate are biblical terms, the Bible was written in Hebrew. We could contradict eachother all day with biblical quotes though, because the Bible is not internally consistent.

We no longer live in an economy of farms and factories. We live in an economy of skilled workers. Workers can;t seize the means of production when they ARE the means of production.

>Is this how shit this board is now that we have to take the bait EVERY TIME?

Um you act like this board hasn't been like this the whole time. Always foot / cuck / interracial / bubble ass etc

You're making it worse by responding to it.

>because the Bible is not internally consistent.

The Bible is perfectly internally consistent, barring some minor details that were lost in transmission but have no theological significance.

>Old Testament = New Testament

skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/number.html

It really isn't.

Not like Greek is English either. Not sure what your point is.

Socialsm
>As the Bodganovs point out; the Left is not a set of ideas;
>it's a set of optimized tactics for agitation.
>And the only way to win a fight against an optimized set of battle tactics is to adopt them youself.

Socialism litteraly is a civilizational form of cancer.

It's never the "people", that's just a scam. It always ends up being the Jews or elites.

There's no way a mudslime's feet would look that clean/soft. That has to be shopped.