Ancap af ask me anything

I'm probably the most ancap bitch you know. Ask me anything.

What's high school like

How's the free market going to solve race-mixing

In anarcho-capitalism, what prevents the anarchy part from disappearing through darwinistic competition into authoritarian corporatism as more powerful companies and corporations compete for power until a single oligarchy monopolizes the whole state?

Why haven't you killed yourself yet?

By legalising Whites Only stores.

how much did your parents pay for your iphone?

Weapons are more highly available.

Nothing. It'd basically be neo-feudalisn with corporations instead of nobility. Sounds fun desu.

I didnt go to public high school. Some government learning facility. It sucked.

We already vaguely live in such a world.

Darwinistic competition

havent had the time

Darwinistic competition hasn't prevented monopolies from developing in the real world, let alone this theoretical one.

Bought it myself. I think you're confusing that meme with communist wannabe fags. Ancap is capitalism and anarchy.

You buying guns and stopping it, if you stop being such a whiny bitch and put your money where your mouth is.

Oh? You've tried an ancap situation where weapons aren't restricted? Because I'm competitions like that more often than not both parties wipe themselves out. Taking care of the issue for everyone else.

Also yes.

True competition is not able to happen in the real world because of all this government restrictions.

Anarcho capitalism should simply be the economic model. The country should be run with strong traditional values, in our case with a monarchy. All usuary illegal. No fiat fractional reserve banking. A parliament of representatives from local constituencies also seems like a good idea, all answering to the crown. In a developed society like ours if we stop fucking our demographics we can even have some small degree of social security, healthcare, roads, basic infrastructure etc.

The point is that private property rights are absolute. Do that and a culture will immediately reassert itself.
>But muh violent bigots being violent and discriminatory
Turns out culture and traditional values are incredibly important, well who'd have fucking thunk it.

So you just attack the strongest members of society to create artificial equality and economic fairness?

>both parties
In an Ancap situation there would probably be extremely complicated multiple sided alliances who'd be in conflict so much most of the country would be murdering each other. People involved would grow while the others are weakened, and then those who grew would be attacked by the survivors in a constant cycle of spite for growth and success.

i mean if you're an ancom in an ancap world, is there really anything better to do?
also that's the basic description of every ancap ball meme

Do you not expect this to happen in any anarchistic situation? People are naturally dicks. The cycle would continue on until people start understanding that if you don't be a dick you can make friends. Enter the NAP.

This post was physically painful. You're basically trying to turn ancap into an-socialism

No, just traditional monarchy. I'm not suggesting loads of socialism, just for monoethnic countries like ours were over here, and could easily become again.
I never said it would work in the US. For you, I agree you'd have to go full ancap. I was speaking very much for my country and its specific history and culture.

Did you take a short bus there?

No I lived there except for in the summer. Along with all 86 other students and staff in the whole facility.

Y'all anarcho-monarchists are weird

Why are ancap flags the worst larptards on this board, after BLM and EU?

Why would people actually respect the NAP if people are naturally dicks? Every civilization has been plagued by war and conflict, either directly or indirectly(economically or physically).

An Ancap civilization would be marked by pure chaos and constant conflict so much to the point there wouldn't be any kind of actual government. Law would be enforced by the biggest stick/deepest pockets, and everyone would fight until every part of the state gets swallowed by a single group who either gets destroyed or bows to them to survive. It would be like a modern equivalent of 4th century Mongolia and that isn't something to look up to.

these are some of my beliefs what word describes me (politically)

>land should not be able to be bought, however you should be able to forcibly keep other people off the land you're currently on
>you spent billions of years evolving to live in one country living in another is stupid and shouldn't be tolerated
>you should have complete freedom, do whatever you want, it should be up to the negatively impacted to seek justice (even via a third party if they like)
>people should live a minimal lifestyle in the woods, like we did for millions of years

Think of it as fascism lite. Left vs right politics is an illusion. Assuming no globalism then the true left vs right is fascism vs ancap. Monarchy can take the strong elements of both and use them.

Who builds a bridge?

Don't even know what that means

Jesus you commies are fucked... assuming everyone is inherently evil. Though assuming everyone is inherently good isn't dumb too. Just assume everyone it's naturally neutral and you'll understand it more.

Jesus. Just as I think you've said the dumbest thing you keep talking

I build my own damn bridges how I want when I want in the way I want it. Not the government. You have zero business asking about my private bridge building.

exactly this

Are you a jew?

Helicopters > Roads

Fuck off commies. At least my ideology is able to exist unlikely yours.

No

Who will pay for the roads?

There's two anons here that need rides. I'd gladly pay their way.

Do you think reading Kant is essential to understanding Mises? I'm jointly reading Human Action and Introduction to Logic and want your input.
T.fellow ancap

Who the fuck needs roads

Anyone else triggered by all this street signs in captcha?

Why build roads when commercial hovercrafts and helicopters are readily available?

would like a reply to this lads, trying to find out where I stand politically

Unironically either anarcho primitivist or a mutualist/syndcalist type.

Ofcourse not. What are you implying goy.. my fellow white man?!

>can only give a meme answer

>muh gun unrestricted totally enforce the NAP

only a retard would not see the absurdity of this argument

you're like a tribalist/primitivist anarchist. problem is theres too many people to do this shit. If you wanna live this way support either the nazis or communists who will kill 80% of the population and destroy civilization.

>can only ask a meme question.

>my ideology is able to exist
on a related manga imaboard on the internet

nice one lads

Domt read Kant. Human action is a lot better without thinking about Kants theories. Promise.

You don't.

>ancap bitch
sounds legit

oh also forgot, any begineer friendly recommended reading on primitivistism or anarchy or both?

I beg the other anons in this thread to not take this shill at face value. I am an actual ancap, albit only in the beggining stages of consuming the literature (mises, rothbard, halzitt ect). He is foolish and most likely a leftypol psyop. The fact of the matter is he expresses his ideas with neither the natural rights oriented approach of Rothbard in regards to society, or the praxelogical aprioric axioms of Mises in regards to economics. I myself am nowhere near qualified to speak on such matters, but the Mises institute has an excellent reprository of information, and would reccomend going there for genuine questions.

>Anarcho capitalism
>with a monarchy
>All usuary illegal
>No fiat fractional reserve banking
>A parliament answering to the crown
>small degree of social security, healthcare, roads, basic infrastructure etc.

>The point is that private property rights are absolute.
>Hooray, Anarcho capitalism!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA BLYAAT

Anarcho-Primitism. You want to establish an ancom society to start that. This is ancap. Ancap is best way to anarcho-cyberism

But the a priori of Mises is heavily grounded in Kants categorical imperatives. If I seek to truly understand praxeology how can I not understand the apriori?

The goyim don't know yet. Don't shut it down.

Only a retard would "enforce" the NAP. Do you even know what the NAP is? It's a law of sociodynamics. Not a literal legal law. Kys.

With anarchy in general I reccomend starting with the first individualist anarchist that started in the UK. You cant go wrong with Lysander Spooner for an American perspective. Unfortunatly the only primitivist I know about is Ted Kazinsky.

Do you not?

I heard there were cavemen paintings in some cave in Britain.

alright I'll check them out thanks

We already figured he was primativeist

Nothing. Ever play Armored Core?

priori is similar but not the same. You don't have to know what one is to understand the other.

One of the biggest aspects to praxeology is the fact all deductions must be aprioric. He spent in excess of 50 pages driving home that point. Are you sure you've read Human Action??

i should have say guaranteed or allow, burger is not my first langage.However kys is not an argument.

>It's a law of sociodynamic

prove me that the perception of what a "aggression" is is not purely subjective, therefore individual and thus
inapplicable in a large scale.

>Monarchism with anarcho-etatistic tendency

Bump for more anarcho-capitalism autism.
Weird ideology entertain me so much.

>pic unrelated

>What is Bosnia
>What is a civil war
>What are gangs of 400 ppl in a city that take over everything until an army intervenes.

Sorry, you sound retarded. (Not sorry thou.)

>The cycle would continue on until people start understanding that if you don't be a dick you can make friends. Enter the NAP.
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

What it Liechtenstein?

a meme country

How do you carry heavy machinery and construction materials? NO ROADS IS RETARDED AS FUCK, YOU SHORT SIGHTED DINGUS

a parliamentary monarchy

Child slaves

>child slave carrying heavy material on foot

sound like a very effective method

Ok, kys if you're not a bad larper and you really beleive this shit.

Why do you hate roads user?

roads are so authoritarian , it's like they tell you where to go