There are people on this board, right now, who are not libertarian

>There are people on this board, right now, who are not libertarian.

Explain yourselves.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=2nBPN-MKefA
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Enough with your shitty spam, lolbertarian. In truth, you have no arguments. Libertarianism is historically the most impractical, unrealistic and useless political ideology in the world.

>muh degeneracy

Police yourselves, like I do.

Libertarianism gets creamed in conflict by more centralized cultures
That's the name of the game at the end of the day

>Libertarianism is historically the most impractical, unrealistic and useless political ideology in the world.
what the fuck does this even mean?

>most impractical, unrealistic, and useless ideology
>He doesn't know about the political climate of the United States circa 1790

>explain yourselves
I have a somewhat realistic worldview, OP

...

Because that shit would've been fine before the Brown Flood and if a significant portion of whites hadn't gotten bored and decided to try and give away everything they have to people who resent them.

We now have a race/culture problem that a libertarian movement fails to address. Currently, it's equivalent to replacing batteries in your smoke detectors after half your house is in flames.

It's a fine ideology, it's just not the ideology we need right now.

I don't know, seems like it did pretty well during the American Revolution.

but... I am one..

Except it doesn't. The state still exists which organizes and maintain a citizen army in defense of the state. A citizen militia can also be formed to defend against foreign invaders.

>circa 1790
When there was a handful of European expats
I bet communism would have worked too, dummy

Only because England had other wars to fight

>I like the idea of libertarianism, but it's time for me to violate the NAP, so let's put it aside for now

And if citizens don't want to fight? If they want to be tolerant instead? You gonna make them Mr liberty face?

Libertarianism has nothing to do with the War itself
Libertarianism or not if they dont want to fight they are not going to be good soldiers and it's pointless

I like roads.

If I thought people were inherently good and inherently chased the ideal self like some philosophers thought, I'd consider myself libertarian. But it seems more like people would rather race to the bottom than anything else

I thought NAP was ancap only? Still makes me chuckle when I remember ancaps believe their system would work.

if you've ever used a highway you've probably used a private road before

It's not as binary as simply working or not, americlap. Communism in then and there would have worked (like it """worked""" in Russia) but it wouldn't have been close to working as well as libertarianism and free market principles do.

(((Libertarianism)))

Rothbard, Rand, Von Mises, its a bunch of kikes at the forefront of the ideology. Come home white man.

it could work. anywhere. if America went ancap overnight there would be a two day war in the ghettos as they all try to find food and then once the gun owners put them in their place everything would be fine.

most importantly segregation would be brought back

I'm pretty sure there will be few people who do not want to fight if it was proven that a foreign army was steaming towards their shores on boats by the millions.
People have a stake in their land and community, and they will most likely defend it, unless they are some ultra-cuck who has no spine. I'm not worried.

>Rothbard
self loathing Jew
>Rand
not an ancap
>Mises
praised Fascism for saving Europe

it's like you ain't even tryin boy

Define "work"

Reminder that you guys are running after modern ideas in their most radical form, but at least you will leave me alone and let me have guns, so you are cool.

I don't fucking care. If a jew is going to set me free I'll gladly take him over an autist with a fidget spinner flag

>trusting jews

setting yourself up for failure.

better than your communist utopia

I trust both of them over any communist

Libertarianism can only work in an ethnically and ideologically pure nation, which can only be achieved by abandoning libertarian ideals.

rly make think

fucking kikes...

Are libertarians on pol who don't realize this half retarded, Jewish or something else?

Baffling

Threadly reminder that all yellow-flag posters are literally insane.

--->

...

Rothbard was the only AnCap you mentioned. He is without a doubt more anti-ZOG, anti-globalization than any fascist and is called an "Alibi" token Jew used to avoid accusations of anti-semitism by kikes in high places. Rothbard is an honorary white who exposes Zionism and statism.

I only envision an organic politics with a truer conduit of goyim will.

Cause some of us are 16

>When you believe a all powerful government is the answer to wipe out inferior races. But communists are stupid for believing the government will help all their troubles

Kek Kek Kek Kek

fuck you, socialist scum

Find a link between Libertarian philosophy and Zionism. It can't be done. All accusations of libertarians Judaism have one thing in common. Accusation without evidence.

Society needs strong governance to function.

> flag
Are you just larping? The confederacy was more decentralized than the liberal union.

There's plenty of literature that come the opposite conclusion

They used to ban you underage fags. This shit died when the web traffic sky rocketed

>Hey look, a pack of rabid dogs are outside my house or some other hypothetical and clear rational danger. Better not deal with that. Don't wanna taint 'muh NAP hurr hurr.
>I'm broud to git' bit on principal.

This is modern libertarianism. A bunch of pompous cucks jerking off to 'muh principle while the world poos on them, and makes plans to poo on them with bigger poos.
Get blacked and accept your permapoo status already. Only whites generally think freedom is good, in the end.

>"all of my opinions are based on le jew meme XD"
It's one thing to acknowledge Jewish subversion where it really is, but its another thing to stick your head up your ass and shout "JUDEN! JUDEN!" wherever Jews are to be seen, as though they are definitely involved in the international Jewish conspiracy. How about you try thinking critically for once? Try reading Mises or Rothbard and you'll see clearly whether libertarianism is as terrible as you claim

...

Minarchy > Libertarianism

That's what happens when you don't physically remove communists from your libertarian party. A mistake not made by Hoppean AnCapism.

>Libertarianism = anarchy
No.
Also, that's only true if you have two conditions in your society:
1) Multicultrualism
2) Low IQ population

If you have the opposite of these items, a society can function without the need of a pervasive, authoritarian government. You only need a protectorate government, run by responsible, duly elected officials.

Libertarianism and communism are both ideologies invented by anarchist Jews who were scared of the government holding them to account.

Nice claim. Do you have a citation that the French philosophers who pioneered classical economics were of Jewish ancestry? Oh that's right. They were not Jewish. Citation or fuck off.

It isn't the final goal of the Jews to spread degeneracy everywhere. Their ends are authoritarian, but fascists are too stupid to realize this

Because you're still blind to the fact that private companies control us and disregard everyone except the people giving them cash.

It's not too late, however.

>Because you're still blind to the fact that private companies control us and disregard everyone except the people giving them cash.
None of us are blind to this; we just understand the situation differently than you do. The government is a means used by corporations to grow and obtain power. Our predicament with corporations today wouldn't be nearly as bad if the government never got in bed with them

Libertarianism does equal anarchism. You guys are just liberals who don't want to carry the lefty connotation of modern "liberals" who are really just socialists.

I like to have roads. Being libertarian comes into direct conflict with this idea

fuck off and bite coke, I was here before boxxy

I used to be a libertarian until I grew up and realize people are incapable of contributing to society without an authoritarian government leading them

Shit, implying a communist government would have either the means or will to save any of those people in the image

...

how can i merge liberalism with communism?

I'm not a naive idealist who thinks he understands politics from Stefan Molyneux, Hoppe, and Austrian school garbage.

True, that's why you never take an ideology for the full 100%. You just take the best bits, like capitalism and the NAP.

Switzerland and Liechtenstein are shitholes, I guess ...

Back when we were a quarter of our land area and had a few million people, most of whom were farmers or small manufacturers?

Get blacked yourself mate, if a pack of rabid dogs are outside my house, I will shoot them as soon as they enter my property, even in the UK I own a rifle.

Actually that's a lie, I would do that if I lived in the greatest nation on Earth (USA) but here in the UK where individual rights aren't a thing I'd get butt fucked. I still abide by rule of law but I am idealistically libertarian, I appreciate that these idealistic extremes aren't practical, like communism.

No one is a true libertarian, because there are no libertarian societies.

Anyway, you can lie under a log all you want, I expect a 5 foot by 5 foot log free zone around me at all times but unfortunately I'm knee deep in shit

Crony capitalism and corporatism are a result of our fraudulent financial system and debt-based monetary system. These monopolistic powers the banks have over our fiat currency, the dollar, is antithetical to a free market system in which other assets other than paper money, such as precious metals and other commodities, can be used to pay debts and taxes to the state. Most of the American founders were vehemently opposed to centralized banking, fractional reserve lending practices, and the monopolized markets that it has engendered.

You are blaming all Bourgeoisie land owners for our economic ills, while we are blaming our parasitical financial and monetary institutions, like the FED, for such problems.

youtube.com/watch?v=2nBPN-MKefA