What would happen if all forms of welfare was cut in America?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.4plebs.org/_/search/subject/knowledge bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/!!9O2tecpDHQ6/]
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

Growth. It would be magnificent. The underclass would be lifted up out of the chains of dependency into which they have been placed, and they would find places where they could serve themselves in service to others. No more would socialism steal from the workers the gains that capitalism could enable! No more would the billionaire class hold the threat of instability over the public as they stole ever more of the public's wealth! Break free of "welfare", people! You have nothing to lose but your chains!

riots at first atleast

The country would fall apart.

And then what?

Nothing to me

Not really. Those who relied on welfare would be forced to find work/get training or they would die. Or they would be forced to go out into the wilderness and hunt for food or return to their home countries (talking about illegal hispanics and arabs).

Some would loot and steal and would by shot/arrested by citizens or police.

America was built without welfare so it can do just fine without it going forward.

They won't just "find work" as there are nowhere near enough jobs for everyone. And many of the jobs that do exist are simply low-wage service industry garbage. Not to mention many companies are themselves dependent on welfare spending. Their profits would tank if huge sections of the population suddenly have no money to spend. Large scale violence riots in every single one of your cities would tear the nation apart. Boomer entitlements alone are going to bankrupt you.

It must be done. Welfare dependency is doomed for failure. Might as well tear the band-aid off now. Righteous and self-sufficient Americans will crush the rats in self-defense.

But it would be too harsh/ fast ! It's like dropping cocain addiction, should be done gradually.

Black Americans would look exactly like black Africans.

20 million beaners would go back to mexico.

There would be less money spent on guns, drugs, and sex.

The spics would go back
The niggers would nig out

>or they would die
Dude, that is the recipe for Mad max.
Means you would need a strong police presence to keep the ''unwanteds'' away ...

Like all addictions there are first withdrawal symptoms

Social upheaval that brings down the Federal Deep State and the state governments enslaved to Washington since Lincoln waged war to make it so.

Best Happening Ever

Planet of the apes. I'm lucky because I live out in the country, that'll repel the nogs but i'd still have to deal with the methed out tweakers, which is arguably scarier

Good analogy. It even extends to how much better, healthier and productive you'd be once the withdrawal symptoms are over.

funerals. then a lot of muh fuggies looking for jobs that don't exist. then a lot of people doing what they needs to do, some of them not able to get it done. they die. the thing is, it has to eventually happen because the welfare state is temporary. even now it is generating trillion dollar deficits and the statists clamor for more goods and services from the mouth of the state. eventually the piper will need to be paid.

people would be a lot happier

Welfare is vital to crime rates. Think of welfare as a sum of money to keep the hoards from uniting and liquidating wealth. Like the sums paid to the Vikings (vikangz today).

Many are simply incapable of not being a leech

Maybe after a civil war, that paradise wouldn't come immediately there would be intense backlash and rioting, until the commies and other marxist were thrown from helicopters or recreationally McNuked.

That would crash the economy. The number of jobs and businesses that rely on welfare spending is just too massive.

> Month one: riots of the poor and sick
> Month two: mass culling of the poor by the middle class

Lots of posts and still no downsides.

A lot of white people would die of starvation.

Does that include payments for veterans? That would be low

the parasites would fall off the body, so the body can heal and be healthy again. the parasites would die. justice.

Economic collapse, rebellion, eventually one of fascism or communism.
No post war party or institution would survive.

>I cant just ask my wife to stop cucking me, it has to be gradual. I'll start her off with only having anal and eventually she will want to stop

More race riots and eventual race war

Because welfare is an unsustainable abomination and theft when taken from honest tax-payers.

Improved stability & country growth due to less Single Mothers.

[KB's: archive.4plebs.org/_/search/subject/knowledge bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/!!9O2tecpDHQ6/]

US Black Populations would also be better off.

do it faggot!!!! donĀ“t be asking stupid questions

Do what? You sound like a nigger.

...

stick the wefare up your smelly ass

>America was built without welfare so it can do just fine without it going forward.
And a pretty noticeable amount of the population was actually going hungry.

At first, massive chimp outs.

Afterwards probably economic growth

Life is tough.. Who would have thought?

t. sociopath

1488

50 million people would go hungry 11 days from now.

I don't know how many would be evicted within the next 90 days.

Great Depression Mk II, I guess.

the schizophrenics will have to band together to survive, in the process accidentally forming a new religion and ushering in 10000 years of peace in america.

>Welfare dependency is doomed for failure
>He doesn't know global UBI will be implemented within the century.

Welfare is about to be the law of the land boyo

Welfare goes against every liberal ideology and let me explain. Libs love to talk evolution and Darwinism. Evolution doesn't happen without environmental stress to cause a change and adaptation. If the environment is too comfortable, species stay the same and actually become weaker. We need to convince liberals that welfare is dangerous to them because of Darwin and the theory of evolution. If we cut welfare, we are doing them a favor by introducing stress and thus allowing them to adapt, evolve, and become a STRONGER more SUPERIOR being.

i agree, we need to give everyone free money, fairly distributed, but to do that we'll have to take away the money from the people who have it. this sounds like the start of somethikng wonderful user-kun, i think ill call my new and visionary idea, gomunism

Progressives don't like to admit that they are social darwinists, because it interferes with their narrative that welfare is good, which was a populist issue they adopted to win votes after the Temperance disaster.