both countries get closer and closer every year, with Israel soon to surpass Russia as India's main weapon's dealer.
This is because Hindutva and Zionism are very similar ideologies and have the exact same enemies: muslims and deranged suicidal leftists
>The first point of congruence between Hindutva and Zionism is that, as nationalism goes, both are weak. It is not their fervour that is in doubt but the fact that neither held the land which they claimed on behalf of their nationhood.
Zionists didn't have their own country for 1800 years, and hindus were under foreign occupation (and even worse, muslim occupation) for 900 years, so they were nationalists without territory for centuries.
Poo-Jewish alliance
Zachary Reyes
Other urls found in this thread:
swarajyamag.com
m.youtube.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
thewire.in
archive.is
twitter.com
Jackson Reyes
joo in loo
Oliver Scott
pooish alliance
Evan King
>The second core commonality between Hindutva and Zionism is how the exposure to secular, civic nationalism shaped their ideologies along similar lines. The decay of Hindu society and the dilution of Jewish identity preyed on early Hindutva and Zionist leaders’ minds. Both feared that living under foreign rule and gradual assimilation over the centuries had weakened the sense of identity in their communities. [...] Indian nationalists argued in the Western lexicon of liberty, self-determination, equality, and good governance.
>The Jewish people were the first victims of the myth of civic nationalism—the notion of a national community based on shared values rather than the contrasting immutable properties of race and blood that ethnic nationalism privileged.It is an interesting observation that while immigration to Israel was central to Jewish identity and the land features centrally in their liturgies, there was not much of a rush to return to the Holy Land [...] Zionist ideology and immigration to Israel began to increase only in the aftermath of the first set of pogroms after the French Revolution.
Why?
> the new French laws allowed Jews to come out of their ghettos [...] and be considered full French citizens as long as they swore an oath to defend the secular French state; These “modernising” Jews also gave up attending yeshiva and, in the process of deracination, lost familiarity with their culture. [...]
This led to a rise of modernising jews who gave up their traditions and religious practices to assimilate into western undifferentiated universalism. But some jews woke up to this challenge:
Matthew Johnson
>Zionism, then, a post-Jewish emancipation phenomenon, was a response to the challenges of European liberalism and civic nationalism much more than a response merely to anti-Semitism
...
>Hindu nationalists came to the same conclusions about liberalism and the whole general caboodle of post-Enlightenment European values.
>Being modern meant for the Indian what the Enlightenment and emancipation meant to the Jew: the disappearance of the communal essence of their culture through atomisation and alienation—for this, as Max Nordau described, was the nature of the modern world based as it is on deracinated individualism.
And hindutva was born, just like zionism.
swarajyamag.com
^read all, it really makes you think in a new way about the poos and the jews
Luke Rivera
Curry niggers are pathetic
Matthew Wood
ALLIANCE TERMINATED
Billy is no longer their greatest ally. Pajeet is their greatest ally now.
Angel Rogers
Jews began in Pakistan or India, east of Persia. You heard it here first.
Dylan Gonzalez
>Rather than search for and expand a gap between the Jewish community and religion as many Jewish intellectuals of the time tried to do, Graetz maintained that “Judaism is not a religion for the individual, but for the community...and the fulfillment of commandments do not refer to the individual”, but rather are intended for the entire people.
>Yet as Moses Hess, one of the founders of Labour Zionism, had disappointedly noted, the Jews suffered from Mangel an Nationalsinn—an absolute lack of national consciousness. One way to rebuild kinship was through a national language.
> A state based on a purely political imagination, such as that of Theodor Herzl, may perhaps be a State of Jews—Judenstaat, but it could not be a Jewish state—Jüdischer Staat, for the sociocultural infrastructure is a necessary condition for political life. Ahad Ha’am believed that a political ideal which does not rest on the national culture is apt to seduce the people from a loyalty to spiritual greatness and turn them onto a quest for material power and political dominion, thus making the Jewish state an ordinary one. Moshe Lilienblum’s corollary to Ginsberg was the observation that in contemporary Europe, just as in historical Judea, redemption and liberation came from the popular masses, not from the assimilated elites.
Isn't this an example to us all?
>The Zionist emphasis on a cultural revival in service of a political goal echoes closely to the thoughts of Hindu nationalists. Although Hindutva is most closely associated with Vinayak Damodar Savarkar for it was he who coined the term in his 1923 essay, Essentials of Hindutva, its definition could well encompass thinkers who came before then just as many prominent figures of Zionism lived and died before 1890 when the term was coined by Nathan Birnbaum.
Oliver Campbell
>joint india israel weapons project
>engineered soldiers
>Bionic Sikh
Jaxon Long
CONTINUING THE SIMILARITIES
>The third similarity between Hindutva and Zionism is their openness and pluralism. Hardly the words that most would use to describe ethnic nationalism, they are nevertheless accurate depictions of Hindutva and Zionist ideology at least until the early years after independence. As Hess conceived nationalism, it followed Italian nationalist Giuseppe Mazzini’s thoughts in that it combined national particularity with a universal vision. Mazzini held that only by being a member of a nation, one can also be a member of the human race, and the only way of belonging to humanity is by belonging to a specific nation.
>Later Zionists very much followed this pluralistic view—for them, the new state was to be informed by Jewish values just as France was informed by Catholicism and Britain by Protestantism but other communities would be welcome participants in the state if they could adapt to the majoritarian Jewish ethos.
>Ze’ev Jabotinsky, considered to be the devil child of Zionism, also supported a pluralistic state. Although Jabotinsky’s innovation in the Zionist cause was the demand to immediately set up an armed Jewish militia, preferably with British help, he was ideologically more of an aggregator. His own views emphasised the military and the political over the cultural but his goal was a capitalist and pluralist Jewish state of Israel. This should be no surprise, given the strong influence of Italian nationalists, particularly Mazzini, on Jabotinsky during his youth.
Zachary Powell
CONCLUSION
>These three characteristics—dispossession of land, experience with civic nationalism, and pluralism—mark Hindutva and Zionism as unique among nationalist movements. On pluralism, many nationalist groups are also imbued with a touch of xenophobia and unwilling to tolerate outsiders as equal citizens if not members of the nation. On the experience with civic nationalism, few nations outside East and Southeast Asia have a similar experience. This is largely due to the immense proselytism efforts that went hand in hand with the age of imperialism and spread Christianity to large parts of the world. The Christian roots of liberal secularism remove any grounds for contention between state and community if the society is Christian. Countries where this is not so, mostly along the northern rim of the eastern Indian Ocean, would share the Hindutva and Zionist experiences with the civic nationalism of a secular, modern liberal state.
>On the matter of not having control of the land for which nationalism is espoused, this phenomenon is sometimes known as Fourth World nationalism. The term refers to the nationalism of nations that are not recognised by the United Nations, such as Kurds, Assyrians, Yezidis, Pashtun, Rohingya, Balochi, and others. While the situation has certainly changed for the Jewish people since 1948, the situation prior to that is still rather uncommon. It is difficult to imagine, for example, a Russian or Spanish nationalism that originated outside Russia or Spain. For Hindutvawadis, they now endure their own “emancipation” as the Jews of Europe did two centuries ago.
Dominic Morris
tl;dr India and Israel are just like each other and meant to be greatest allies, and they indeed are
>India is the largest buyer of Israeli military equipment and Israel is the second-largest defence supplier to India after Russia.[3] From 1999 to 2009, the military business between the two nations was worth around $9 billion.[4] Military and strategic ties between the two nations extend to intelligence sharing on terrorist groups and joint military training.[5][6]
POO AND JOO, TOGETHER WILL DEFEAT THE KEBAB
Nathan Peterson
poo in joo
Jonathan Kelly
Hindutva is a threat.
Jaxon Kelly
that's a lot of people, and IIRC RSS is some hindu group´in india
Redpill me on what you meant by this comment
this looks like people organizing a paramilitary insurgency desu
Levi Lopez
t. Syed Ahmed Abbasi
Leo Brown
Reminder that India litteraly is a sleeping giant.
They have had little flexibility with their caste system, and been humiliated by successive invading forces for millenias.
India will be a superpower by 2020.
If they act right, they will be on the right tracks to become the greatest ally.
Andrew Williams
India will be super power by 2020 if they manage to stop Israel's geo-political streetshitting.
Carter Lopez
won't chyna and russia fuck them up tho?
Evan Bell
en.m.wikipedia.org
They are a nationalist paramilitary volunteer organization. They are hindu Taliban, but more organized and with much more active political influence. Modi is RSS man, BJP the ruling party is an RSS political wing basically. They have been banned in the past yet they are so organized it's amazing and scary.
Nathan Brooks
Israel? or American "philanthropists" and the CIA ie deep state?
thewire.in
Josiah Gray
doesn't look like the ban worked when they can organize something so big and flashy
Ian Scott
They are not banned today.
Jonathan Kelly
if they got unbanned it worked even less
Will they annex Nepal and start WW3?
Noah Harris
it is to genocide indian mudslimes
Robert Davis
Why will they invade Nepal? They probably consider them to be brother country. They have different goals read the wiki page.
Kayden Ward
annex, Anschluss 2.0
come on pol this wasn't that hard
Justin Kelly
Read the citation.
Jaxson Howard
I saw that, but I was referencing them being literally hitler and starting ww3 with an anschluss
Jace Edwards
...
Colton Jones
>Why will they invade Nepal?
For that sweet sweet Yeti meat.
Aaron Parker
what is that thing on their back?
Jaxon Stewart
A Brazilian.
Gabriel Bennett
thanks leaf
Ryan Howard
np