An analysis by Adam Carter has uncovered verifiable evidence that "Russian tracks" were placed into the already discredited release from Guccifer2.0. Analysis can be found here: archive.fo/xoyTu
>UPDATES (July 16th) >Forensicator Updates >The Forensicator's analysis has opened eyes, got people asking questions and several people have been replicating/validating (and trying to challenge) the findings. >This, in turn, has given people more confidence on this topic...
Vegas odds-makers are taking bets that this will finally shut the Dems up. The odds are currently at 1,776:1 against.
This needs to be memed into the public consciousness. The DNC--Hillary's team--has created an international incident by attempting to frame the Russians for the Guccifer2.0 release. There's nothing I like more than throwing gasoline onto a bonfire...
Juan Evans
Bump and READ this
Far more credible analysis of DNC hacks than what Crowdstrike provided to the FBI (after DNC turned down repeated requests to allow law enforcement agencies to inspect).
Also shoots holes in the 4 agency (originally "muh 17") "disclaimer" report that was issued in January and is more or less the whole basis for what the media talks about everyday.
Cozy bear my ass you larping CIA nigger fags
Justin Garcia
agreed, share and spread on all tech blogs, tech twitter, plebbit, EVERYWHERE
Ryan Cruz
I'm doing a full read-through now. I'll try to synthesize info. Reminder I can't bump for several more minutes...
Kayden Parker
bump
Jordan Cooper
Da, comrades! It is totally trueski! I swear it upon Mother Russi-er, I mean, upon Mother Rush Limbaugh! Yeah. Mother Rush Limbaugh. That is definitely a real thing.
Levi Lopez
...
Tyler Lopez
...
Elijah Long
...
Brandon Gomez
BASED DOTCOM!
Josiah Moore
*YAWN* Is anyone else getting sleepy?
Landon Garcia
>trying this hard to come up with yet another Russian agent willing to say "it totally wasn't le ruskies, comrades... I mean goys... I mean guys"
It's getting pretty sad. All the sanctions past, present and future on Russia are entirely justified. No one worth his salt in the intelligence community has any doubt that it was a Russian intelligence services operation.
Jace Carter
I don't understand any of this but have a bump
Grayson James
bump
Luke Jenkins
...
Juan Jackson
CIA nigger spotted
Liam Stewart
m8 I am so done with Kim Doctor's attention whoring bullshit
Luis Morales
Just start at the beginning and learn the actual, piece by piece chronology of what happened last summer. Basically Guccifer2.0 WAS the DNC doing preemptive damage control by leaking anti Trump docs and very little else because they knew the REAL DNC wikileaks dump was coming
TLDR Guccifer2.0 was DNC larp to cover their massive fuckup of losing all their e-mails to Wikileaks
Mason Stewart
>doctor
Autocorrect reeeeee
Jackson Bailey
>Guccifer >again
>trying to prove a negative
Lucas Green
Has literally nothing to do with Kim Dotcom He just tweeted out the research
Grayson Lopez
Did we get a fresh shipment of shills?
We churn through you guys fast these days.
How much is the pay now? It used to be $2 per post around the election.
Carter Rodriguez
This, combined with Linkin Parkgate will put Killary and Podesta in jail. Spread the word and GET TO WORK.
Jason Bell
...
Zachary Foster
...
James Watson
a-are they okay?
Cameron Bell
They went to heaven user
Adrian Sanchez
teal deer
Jaxon Morales
user on KDC
Camden Miller
>normies thought the deep state was just a meme
Jordan Reed
this is a really sad attempt at damage control
Christian Foster
explain what you mean. How is setting themselves up to take a fall for causing an international incident regarded as damage control in any reasonable environment?
Brody Scott
>Kim sitcom This guy said he had something huge a few months ago with hannity, turns out it was literally nothing. Kim is a liar and a fraud. You guys are reaching schizophrenic levels of delusion and I'm sick of it on Sup Forums.
GET THE FUCK OUT WITH YOUR M BULLSHIT. YOU HAVE NO FUCKING EVIDENCE FOR ANY OF YOUR CLAIMS! GO TO ALREADY
Adrian Gonzalez
Blessed be the Lord Jesus Christ, amen
Gabriel Torres
if i remember correctly, wasn't Guccifer2.0 actually a handful of people collaborating together, all working for the DNC, and not just one single person?
Parker Harris
You could leave Sup Forums and go back to /r/eddit
Lincoln Long
Bumpin this thread
Isaac Moore
Yeah it was some really poorly conceived plan that they took to weird lengths (accepting a slot "speaking" at some tech conference....like wtf). None of them were russian however. Anyone who reads this research will see that quite clearly
Ayden Ross
the linked journal documents the case & evidence. It's the exact opposite of "there is no evidence." You can even reproduce the results yourself, as many have. For you slow learners he even re-hashes old evidence, like the first incident reviewer, a security expert Matt Tait, made a rookie error in his initial assessment. That error and his refusal to retract his claim allowed the cultists to propagate their nonsense for over a year now (they don't know it's nonsense, they're brainwashed, but the brainwashers knew it was bullshit.) The security community has known for a year that Guccifer2.0 assessment that was being quoted was bullshit.
Luke Williams
fresh off the presses. feedback?
Jordan Howard
Go, go, gadget bumpomatic!
Thomas Jenkins
...bottom text needs to read: ...created an international* incident will fix after comment period
Jason Campbell
KIM DOT "I HAVE LITERALLY NOTHING BUT MY DESPERATE NEED FOR ATTENTION IN THE MEDIA"
Luis Reed
MOTHERFUCKING BUMP YOU FAGGOTS BETTER KEEP THIS SHIT UP!!
Xavier Rivera
Good work they kept trying to shut this down
Benjamin Edwards
final draft. i don't do twitter or other socials, so one of you other faggots have to spread it.
Josiah Lopez
What this nigger says
Josiah Flores
> copied some files locally on a date (july 5) that he couldn't have still been on dnc systems anyway (otherwise that fact alone would blow the official story, making the local-copy nonsense and the transfer-speed nonsense entirely superfluous) > therefore, dnc did it confuses style rsids with normal rsids > inefficient workflow > therefore, dnc did it
Asher Bennett
Useful idiot
David Martin
Does anyone know who authored the CrowdStrike paper? I'd like to quote the researcher and put the quote on a photo of the guy who fucked up.
>When you consider all of these various facts in aggregate and understand that Guccifer2.0 never demonstrated any genuine hacking skills, realize his actions only ever served to undermine leaks, ultimately caused no harm to the reputation of anyone except himself and needlessly and inexplicably gave the mainstream press fodder on which they could write headlines branding leaks as "fake", "discredited", "tainted by Russia", etc., had some non-hacking means of acquiring the DCCC documents and has had his claims of breaching the DNC network debunked by ThreatConnect. - It becomes clear that Guccifer2.0 did more to serve the interests of the DNC than really act maliciously against it.
My hope would be the CrowdStrike guy gets stopped at conferences and seminars and congratulated on his great research. >that wasn't actually me, that was Adam Carter. >I was the one who fucked it all up to begin with.
Mason Wilson
>Good work they kept trying to shut this down No they weren't. It will be debunked with gusto the moment the nonsense dares to enter the wider technical community.
Parker Gonzalez
this is solid work. it's being hidden from you cultists. give it a read. archive.fo/AjOmd
Nathan Harris
...
Henry Watson
Bump
Colton Jackson
his head looks like a chicken nugger.
Owen Phillips
There are a lot of computer morons here with no security/forensic experience who don't understand the vast difference in quality between the analyses of CrowdStrike/SecureWorks/ThreatConnect/etc. and this non sequitur garbage.
I've seen only one analysis posted here of first-rate quality and conceded a possible bad apple among Dem ranks, though that's unrelated to the Russian-hacking angle as such.
Gavin Brooks
Kim Mother Fucking Dot Com
Shit thread.
Landon Walker
>Kim Dotcom this is utter garbage
Hudson Morales
Let me stress this point:
>copied some files locally on a date (july 5) that he couldn't have still been on dnc systems anyway (otherwise that fact alone would blow the official story, making the local-copy nonsense and the transfer-speed nonsense entirely superfluous) > therefore, dnc did it
Brody Smith
this
"the research" wow, one dubious report from some nobody, Kim Dotcom is worse than t_d
this
Hudson Powell
you wouldn't be here if that were true, shill.
Hudson Robinson
To be fair, this isn't Kim Dotcom's work. He's just linking to it. But it's not a convincing analysis--not even close--and I've been open-minded, giving credit where it's due.
I actually work in infosec. You can me a shill because of my flag, but I'm only telling you the first thing you're going to hear when you deign to get this attention from the wider tech community.
Christian Wood
>that file wow, you outed yourself you corporate shill
Easton Adams
To be fair, this isn't Kim Dotcom's work. He's just linking to it. But it's not a convincing analysis--not even close--and I've been open-minded, giving credit where it's due.
I actually work in infosec. You can call me a shill because of my flag, but I'm only telling you the first thing you're going to hear in the unlikely event you get this attention from the infosec community.
Jason Reed
kys
Gabriel Rivera
thats a new one
upboating this
Oliver Bennett
CIA NIGGER
Brody Fisher
>no evidence presented, nothing cited nice work, faggot. you'll never amount to anything, let alone someone with even a base level understanding of infosec. But, I'm willing to give you a chance. Care to attach your reputation to your bold proclamation? or is that beyond your comfort level?
Robert Evans
Remember when this guy claimed he had Hillary's emails and started a countdown timer and got everyone all excited. Then when the clock struck zero he tweeting "I don't have them but I know where they are, they're on the NSA supercomputer along with everyone else's emails!"
Joseph Jackson
Not really new stuff, but decent. Assange was plugging the g2-space site for quite a while. The shill controversy over this is adorable.
Ian Sanders
I just told you about the evidence, you dummy. If Guccifer 2.0 had been transferring files from the DNC on July 5, that alone would blow the Dem story out of the water and all this transfer-speed/local-copy bullshit would be entirely unnecessary. That's because Guccifer 2.0 was supposed to out of DNC systems by mid-June.
The reason this mtime garbage is never going to be taken seriously is that, by the same argument, the files on my home LAN weren't downloaded from the Internet (they were).
INB4 STATE YOUR NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OR YOU'RE A SHILL.
Eli Price
that was a reasonable quasi-bluff, imo. and he's also correct.
Aiden Powell
It's not Kim Dotcom's work, though. Let's be clear on that. It's a sincere attempt at analysis, but it's flawed.
Jacob Hughes
Yeah but if I believe the larp hard enough and rewrite all of history, i can call kim a liar.
Justin Hernandez
>files from the DNC on July 5 yes but you made that date up. and backed it with no evidence. but submit it to Carter and I'm sure he'll adjust the record.
Noah Sanchez
You progressive faggots have lost all sense of humor. You guys are not funny anymore.
Anybody with an IQ of 90 can clearly see MSM pushing an agenda here. What truth there was to the "Russian narrative" has been totally bastardized by you progressives.
Jason Rivera
It's the baseline mtime date in the Forensicator NGP VAN analysis, you ignoramus. Do you even read these analyses posted, or do you just like the sound of them?
As for the other analysis, it's a gross non sequitur leaping from an inefficient workflow to "DNC did it!"
Brayden James
fuck Kim Dot Com. the guy has no credibility. >hyped up that he would release the Clinton emails, deadline passed and nothing came of it >hyped that he had information on Seth Rich murder, even got Sean Hannity to hype this, nothing came from it. guy is a fucking hack
Zachary Reyes
>fuck Kim Dot Com. the guy has no credibility. It's not his work, though. It's actually a sincere analysis but misguided -- or at least overly generous in its conclusions.
Eli Allen
Release date isn't the creation date. archive.fo/K7oxw >New meta-analysis has emerged from a document published today by an independent researcher known as The Forensicator, which suggests that files eventually published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona were likely initially downloaded by a person with physical access to a computer possibly connected to the internal DNC network. The individual most likely used a USB drive to copy the information. The groundbreaking new analysis irrevocably destroys the Russian hacking narrative, and calls the actions of Crowdstrike and the DNC into question. What are you on?
Bentley Myers
Do you even know that the local-copy/transfer-speed analysis is based on a July 5 mtime? Jeezus fucking Christ.
David Anderson
i could use some side income. do they still recruit over craigslist?
Michael Harris
all I am saying is his reputation is shit and I wouldn't source him on here or anywhere
Levi Roberts
This. Stop acting like downies plebbit. Fucking retards.
Joseph Sullivan
No, because as I pointed out, you're fucking terrible as your claimed profession. Lay out your case, faggot. What exactly are you claiming that breaks from the massively peer-reviewed analysis?
see
Henry Cruz
There's a chance his posting it will motivate actual infosec guys to finally look at the analysis and put all this nonsense out of its misery, but I'd understand if they just ignore him at this point as a self-promoting LARPer.
Evan Moore
Do you write for Colbert, Meyers, or Maddow?
Jaxson Ramirez
"Peer-reviewed analysis" LOL You don't even understand the basic facts of the case. Tell me what you know about timestamps on Windows and Unix-like systems. Tell me about the format of the mtime in a RAR 4 header and in which structure extended mtime information can be found. I'll wait.
Jeremiah Perry
I got you. Any # in particular?
Jaxson Johnson
If you could explain all of this for people who do not understand, then maybe you would get a better response. I have heard people as equally arrogant as you be completely full of shit when it is all explained. Bravado and a competency in computers does not mean you are right. If this is a bunch of BS, even folks like me who are totally against your bullshit agenda want to know the truth.
Alexander Murphy
You really suck at this. He's asking you simple questions and you're trying to pop quiz him instead of answering.
It reeks of incompetence.
Liam Williams
>unironic dem posting. first off why?
Second off what work has CS done exactly? Besides run interference for the DNC by acting as an intermediary to make sure the FBI never got a hold of the dnc's server.
The only report ive read from crowdstrike that confirmed anything was that "Russian" software was used by whoever breached the DNC's email server and you and I both know that means complete fuckall.
Carson Miller
>wider technical community silicon valley or some shit? the wider tech community is right here, and if you really need confirmation, check out Sup Forums
if you aren't capable of doing it yourself, you probably shouldn't come here anymore.
Mason Mitchell
He doesn't actually know anything.
Keep cornering him and he'll disappear. These are the WhereIsAssange people. I smell them a mile away.
Joseph Diaz
Man that subreddit went to shit fast. Anybody even talking about the blockchain investigation was banned and ridiculed beyond belief. They had some really creepy mods as well. There was this one female mod who was the perfect example of a harpy.
Jeremiah Rogers
sheesh, im not even sure.. stat()?
Wyatt Baker
I answered, you flaming retard, but he doesn't understand my answer, so I'm finding out why that is.
The local-copy/transfer-speed analysis is based on a July 5 mtime. For it to be at all damning, it has to suppose that the official narrative has such files being transferred directly from the DNC to a separate system on July 5. The official narrative has never claimed this -- if it DID claim the files were transferred on that date directly from the DNC, that would contradict earlier statements and would alone blow their official story without any need for further forensic analysis.
So what's really going on is nothing more than "local copies made, therefore done at the DNC!" as if nobody ever moves files around that they have in their possession.
Gavin Johnson
give me q u i c k r u n d o w n on guccifer
Wyatt Price
WRONG!!! We already know that any carpenter who uses a russian produced hammer could be a russian spy. And by could me i mean almost certainly. Thats just common sense.