I dont understand how central banks and national banks work. What's the point in having them...

I dont understand how central banks and national banks work. What's the point in having them? How come the Rothchilds own all of them?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=mII9NZ8MMVM
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibbutz
youtube.com/watch?v=7XtEfnyylFk&app=desktop
youtu.be/iFDe5kUUyT0
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_for_International_Settlements
humansarefree.com/2013/11/complete-list-of-banks-ownedcontrolled.html?m=0
realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2013/07/15/does-rothschild-own-all-central-banks/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Jews

the rothschilds own the central banks?

That's what I've heard but I'm not entirely sure.

>Government wants to spend $100 billion
>Only has $50 billion
>borrows money from central bank (private entity) with interest
>can't pay it back fully and need to borrow again to meet the spending next year
>borrow again
>repeat

It's made to enslave a nation by debt. Beauty is, we can never pay it back because interest creates money that doesn't exist. Simply said, eventually we owe the bank $1000 billion but there is only like $500 billion in cash circulating, so it will never happen.

provide a shred of evidence that the Rothschild's own the Reserve Bank of Australia

>jews

fpbp

The solution is to go back to the gold standard and ban usury.
>Government wants to spend $100 billion
>Only has $50 billion
>Can't spend $100 billion
>The end

See:
I'm not sure, but someone said it the other day talking about how the family has a net worth of 500 trillion US

why? jew

I have it right here in video whore of satan. Fucking baby eaters

youtube.com/watch?v=mII9NZ8MMVM

Haha, yes, very good indeed,

HOWEVER.

How? Our country will get sacked . That's why there was a War of 1812. That's why there was WW2 and the world was against Germany.

>the rothschilds own the central banks?
hahahhahahahaha...no.

They do. They are not listed on Forbes because they are considered (((royalty))).

>How?
Team up with Russia and spitroast the Jew.

This.

The Bogdanoffs collect 80% tax from the Rothschilds.

what? i dont buy that show some shit supporting this argument.

>((Rothschild's))

LOOKS LIKE SOMEBODY NEEDS A QUICK RUNDOWN

Actual economics major here:

The core reason that people wanted central banks is because it would stabilize the monetary system by eliminating bank runs.

In the old days, every bank would produce 'bank notes', so paper money worth a certain amount redeemable at a bank for actual money (ie gold and sometimes, depending on the particular time, silver). This existing system was basically mimicked by the central bank, except the central bank was the only bank authorized to issue bank notes.

The problem with not having a central bank is that a bank can just...issue banknotes. This is what led to the Panic of 1837 in the US, in which the major banks chartered by individual states or large landholders went bust because they had issued more in banknotes than they actually had in 'specie' (aka gold and silver). Andrew Jackson responded by wiping out the state banks and central bank entirely, which effectively stopped the practice of issuing banknotes.

In short, what Jackson did was prevent out of control inflation by forcing banks to only low-risk loans based on money they could reasonably expect to see.

The current US Federal Reserve is a licensed corporation with the President of the United States able to appoint several members of the Board of Directors. Technically it is a conglomerate entity of 13 regional banks, each of them conglomerates of all the small, regular local banks. This corporation has the sole and exclusive right to issue banknotes, allowing Congress (not the market) to control monetary inflation.

Whether this is good or bad is questionable. I personally believe it is bad because it enables the creation of asset bubbles via losses from risky loans being absorbed by the central bank rather than staying localized in a community, allowing for domino effects.

I like Russia, but the situation isn't as simple.

Even though Putin has an excellent public relations team, we have to remember that our nation's interest do not align with Russia. They would pound us so hard if they were stronger and had the advantage. They don't really want us to succeed, and you can't blame them for it either.

Politics is full of hypocrisy yo

yeah i dont know shit about the bogs. Never bothered to look into it

Gold standard YES. But borrowing should be allowed. Fractional reserve lending however is fraudulent. There needs to be incentive to save.

>(((royalty)))

you mean a jew

/biz/ here: This is a load of horseshit and let me tell you why.

The government doesn't 'borrow' money like an individual does from a bank. In fact the government doesn't borrow money at all in the same sense, technically it borrows money from individuals who buy government bonds. In short, like a corporation the Federal Government doesn't actually go to a bank and borrow money, what they do is they issue bonds, which are bought by individuals.

Now the repayments on these bonds are ensured by the Treasury of the US, not the Federal Reserve. This is why quantitative easing was such a big deal: the Federal Reserve was buying government bonds, so that the high interest rates were being paid to the government itself.

Now, the Federal Reserve does cause a bunch of issues, and it DOES act as a parasitic entity, but to say that we borrow money from it is direct misinformation spread around by retards like Alex Jones.

They started as a way to standardize the national banknote among banks.

They they started buying corporate bonds in exchange for printed standardized notes.

Then the governments went into world war and needed money and they forced the national banks to buy government bonds.

>inb4 da joos

it was WASPs who started the big banks

central banks are how certain people foist communism/socialism onto the rest of us while getting even low-information "conservatives" to sing their praises.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibbutz

youtube.com/watch?v=7XtEfnyylFk&app=desktop

This is all you need.

This guy gets it. It was a way to gain monopoly power over monetary interest that was created by issuing banknotes.

>le maymay LMAO
>>>/reddit/

That's the official reason why the rothchilds are not on Forbe' s list.

Government's borrow money from a family that pulls the money from the air, and charges interest for it. What's not to get. It's the biggest scam in history. They also control the interest rate, and pull numbers out of their ass to justify changing it based on subjecture instead of real world market values. This causes immense poverty and class warfare with ease.

You forgot the part where they charge interest on all money created and that when Lincoln had interest free greenbacks he was murdered.

Good goy repeating what he was told in cattle goyim school.

>Government's borrow money from a family that pulls the money from the air, and charges interest for it
Thank you. Good god.

Easy to understand
>Kike gives Goy politician a little bit of money
>Goy politician give all the nation's money and power to regulate its use to the kike.

See how that works?

Was being paid to the government itself.

WRONG!

QE was big because the Fed was performing open market operations on the bond sales. THE INTEREST PAID ON THE BONDS FIRST GOES TO THE MEMEBER/OWNER BANKS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM WITH A GUARANTEED TAX FREE 6% ROI.

The left over money WAS THEN TURNED OVER TO THE GOVERNMENT AFTER THE BANKS GOT THEIR RISK FREE RETURN.

This is a better explanation of the fiat system.

Hidden Secrets of Money
youtu.be/iFDe5kUUyT0

Reminder that the fed, though not perfect, has served its purpose of stabilizing the economy well. 19th century america the economy was much less stable when there was no central bank.

Also the federal reserve's profits go to the treasury department.

They charge interest on all money created which they create from nothing and operate on fractional reserve lending so there's a lot more to it that's wrong. Try again.

Who bows to the Bogs.. The de Rothchilds!! ! Jigsaw fell into place

See
THE FED OPENLY ADMITS TO CAUSING THE HOUSING CRISIS AS WELL AS THE GREAT DEPRESSION.

I only get to this. It's basically the bank of central banks. An international organization owned by private shareholders. No idea WHO holds the shares

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_for_International_Settlements

Fractional reserve banking has lead to a lot of the prosperity we see in the west. Turn back the clock if you want to see the economy stagnate because it scares you lol.

>/biz/
Get out.

Considering that they claimed responsibility for the great depression and how the value of the dollar has fallen as apposed to when it was a constant value before 1913. Hell, the 2008 bubble? If you think the economy has been stable then you'd be right ao long as your realize that it's a stable decline into the ground....

The rotschilds own nothing
>Central Bank of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea
Owned by government of north korea
>Central Bank of Brazil
Owned by the Ministry of Finance, government of Brazil
>People's Bank of China
Owned by the government of China
>Monetary Authority of Brunei Darussalam
Owned by His Royal Highness Prince Haji Al-Muhtadee Billah
>Central Bank of Syria
Owned by the government of Syria

Really made me think

This is the most visible top of the pyramid. When the dollar is reevaluated in the SDR, the dollar could lose half it's value overnight after (((they))) set up their short positions.

See

You're truly ignorant.

The fed is not without its problems, but there's too much scaremongering from people who know next to nothing about economics.

Such an unremarkable building considering it's power.

The federal reserve has a few functions that matter

1. bank and creditor regulation, pretty self-explanatory
2. loan money to commercial banks at a rate they set, the rate will be higher if they want to constrict the money supply, lower if they want more money (that's what they've done the last couple decades)
3. act as a clearinghouse and lender of last resort
4. buy federal securities as a way of financing government debt

Before the federal reserve economic growth was double digits. The a central bank turns a country into a tax farm.

>stabilizing

>That's why there was a War of 1812. That's why there was WW2 and the world was against Germany.

And Iraq, and Libya....

I'll check it out, ty. I like money masters because it covers how the wars have all been planned and manipulated.

You forgot the primary purpose:

To steal the purchasing power through counterfeiting.

Everything is owned by reptilians. We are all being projected onto this planet. Our true souls are being held captive on Mars. TRUE SCIENCE FACTS

Oh indeed. Wars are financed by the same people on both sides for fun and profit.

The point is to enslave you through debt for countless generations

>Actual economics major here:
>here's the propaganda i learned in school, which is paid for by the fed

nice completely irrelevant spam

See

Countries that actually don't have central banks:
Andorra
Monaco
Nauru
Kiribati
Tuvalu
Palau
Marshall Islands
Federated States of Micronesia

It is more stable though. Fewer bank runs, recessions etc. Than when America didn't have a central bank. This is a verifiable fact.
Try and get a loan to start a business when 100% of the deposits have to remain in the bank. Most of it will be useless in there for most of the time, so it makes sense to spread it around.

Like how gyms sell more memberships than people who can actually fit inside the building.

Her asshole likely tastes like cinnamon.

Central banks owned by Rothchilds

humansarefree.com/2013/11/complete-list-of-banks-ownedcontrolled.html?m=0

Verifiable fact

Except for the biggest and costliest crashes WERE CAUSED BY CENTRAL BANKING

>tfw they're quadroons
I can't believe anything anymore ffs

>Fractional reserve banking has lead to a lot of the prosperity we see in the west.

^LOLOLOL^

our economy, and thus the whole global economy is a fragile house of cards because of fractional reserve banking.

almost all evil and injustice in the modern world is a direct result of banks being allowed to lend out 100x what they actually have.

it leads to usury, reckless investments, and economic bubbles. fractional reserve banking is unsustainable and will inevitably cause tremendous turmoil.

Fractional reserve lending is fraud. Plain and simple.

>list of a bunch of banks
>no proof at all that they're owned by rothchilds
because they aren't, it's one of the dumbest conspiracy theories of all

Private central banks are have secret owners. A government owned central bank is not owned by the Rothschilds I will give you that.

>almost all evil and injustice in the modern world is a direct result of banks being allowed to lend out 100x what they actually have.
[citation needed]
And the 100x figure you just pulled out of your ass. Usually the central bank sets the reserve requirement.
It's not fraud if you actually understand it. Keep your money under the mattress or invest it in stocks if you're so worried.

Legalized fraud is still fraud. Bank credit is exchanged as real money. This is fraud.

Good luck investing in the stock market at all time highs with 17 p/e ratios and shit dividends. The market is way over valued because everyone is trying to escape the dollar. The only way to preserve purchasing power is to be in an asset not controlled by the federal reserve: gold and silver.

Central banks control the money flow and watch out for inflation. Its not really rocket science

Paper currency is a liability to the owner as it's purchasing power is continuously decreasing.

>What's the point in having them?
making you a slave without you noticing, pic related

There is a lot more than meets the eye. Above all is the notion that somehow the Fed is above the market and fully understands it and even controls it. It does not , the free market is above it all , any participant has to adapt to it , not the other way around (proved in 1929,1987,2001,2008) . Now there are specific practices that does not hold on what they call "conventional" conditions. Above all the tools used recently , like QE and 0% rate , effectively the big banks have access to an unlimited amount of funds at 0 , yes zero, cost and loan this funds with a premium and we are not even talking about how big banks poured all this founds to the stock market , earning income on market valuation instead of making loans to businesses. At one point in 2011 and 2012 there was even discussion of more unconventional mechanisms like letting money flow directly to businesses instead of using an intermediary , why would a business needed to pay % interest on funds that were free for the banks? Well that tool was shut down by bank owners. If anyone really wants to understand this cartel , just see the curriculum of the regional fed banks presidents , all of them previously work on a private bank. So the Fed has a chairman and if I remember correctly 5 or so members with vote on the federal monetary commite , these members are chosen from these regional banks. Lehman Brothers was not rescued because its CEO has had personal problems with NY Fed chairman at the time. So people and interests are above the general well being, as usual.

If central control of the food supply results in shortages/oversupply, why will central control of the money supply work?

When has centralized control worked better than a free market?

Pedro gets it.

Because food aint money u nigger.

Long term it still makes sense, especially if you know a thing or two about investing. But if the shit actually hits the fan, your gold won't be worth much either. This is a libertarian fantasy.

They are both physicists, and they work together on research. Pretty interesting characters d e s u

Central control of anything has always resulted in inefficient distribution of goods - oversupply in some areas shortages in others. Why would money be any different?

>But if the shit actually hits the fan, your gold won't be worth much either. This is a libertarian fantasy.


you are the stupidest person in this thread.

gold has retained value all throughout the history of civilization

The US is filled with fat people, your fast foods like Mcdonalds Or Burger king throw millions of tons of food into the trash every year bro, that's just capitalist oversupply too, which destroys our planet.

After they established the Fed, they abolished it and got state banks instead. This didn't work because there was no central ledger for the money issued by different banks so different states didn't want to accept other states' dollars. Therefore the reinstated the Fed having settled the issue that the non-Fed system doesn't work. However, since the internet exists now, there would be no problem with a central, relational ledger for non-central banks to use to determine the value of each others' notes.

>gold has retained value all throughout the history of civilization
False. Gold has no intrinsic value.

...

>how do bonds work??
Fucking retards.

>False.
no, i am not, lol.

>Gold has no intrinsic value.
it has more than paper currency, u dumb faggot

it has unique properties that make it useful for medical, scientific, and engineering uses.

while gold may lose some value during the chaotic period after a serious economic collapse, it will always retain SOME value and will always climb back up in value as economic stability returns.


anytime a civilization has collapsed the INEVITABLE civilization that comes along next still always valued gold.

sure, food, ammo, water, etc have more value during a collapse, but gold can retain value before, during, and afterward. paper money usually loses all value in a collapse and is completely worthless by the time its replacement currency appears.

no one in this thread is saying PUT ALL YOUR MONEY IN GOLD! but almost all well rounded portfolios put a percentage in it for a reason dipshit.

shut up frog, you are the biggest retard in this thread

I've been trying to look into this. Here's something I thought was interesting.

...

they're able to make loans during economic collapse, basically.

without them, all the banks fail and everyone loses all their savings, and there are no banks to make loans.

This is from here realcurrencies.wordpress.com/2013/07/15/does-rothschild-own-all-central-banks/ not sure how much can trust this source though but it's a interesting read.

>being this upset
>calls me a faggot while sporting a sodomite flag
Listen, sodomite, I won't say you don't have a point at all, but you're massively oversimplifying things.

the fed has money and gives it to the govt in exchange for t-bills, debt based instruments that require the money back+interest. sure sounds a lot like borrowing money but with different financial terminology to make it appear different

> (You)
>>being this upset
>>calls me a faggot while sporting a sodomite flag
>Listen, sodomite, I won't say you don't have a point at all, but you're massively oversimplifying things.

no, you are the one simplifying and bullshitting with statements like 'gold has no intrinsic value'

and fyi your french flag is universally recognized as 1000 times more gay and degenerate than a gay pride flag