He's right you know

Guns kill people. There are NO gun deaths in the UK, and that should say it all. How can you even defend the right to own LITERAL killing machines? How many children have to die before you realise that guns are evil.
Common responses get BTFO again and again.
>b-b-but sh..shall not be infringed!
sorry, if you can't buy absolutely any gun, then it has been infringed
>b..b..muh second ammen-
a smelly piece of paper written by smelly old farts in wigs 200 years ago are the rules you live by now? haha white boi, you truly are a beta

John oliver is right again. How does it feel to be btfo by him? Refute him and I'll consider some pro-gun arguments
PROTIP you simply can't.

>no gun deaths
>no sword deaths
>no knife deaths
>no fork deaths
>no spoon deaths
>no spork deaths
>no bat deaths
>no stick deaths
>no bike rim deaths
What do people die of there? Boredom and cavities?

I know how brazillians die in the favela you monkey

>Refute him and I'll consider some pro-gun arguments
My wife flew last month and did not have to take her shoes off...
So he is in fact refuted.

sage it up in dis bitchhhhh

Actually snaggle tooth current year man, as we take off shoes at the airport many schools now required metal detectors. You analogy is bad and SAT prep teachers think you're an idiot.

>omg a gun control thread. quickly everyone, s-sage otherwise ill have to use reasoning and logic to defend my gun use. s..sage you s...shill!!

Mainly cancer, heart disease and soul crushing depression.

>private companies
>the government

That shoe business at the airport does grind my gears.

And I always get the pat down. No nudie scanner for me. If you're going to be an authoritarian shit bag, I'm going to make you touch my balls.

>soul crushing depression
At least we have something in common

Yeah taking shoes off at the airport is stupid

UK firearm homicide rates all increased to greater levels than the year before the ban (1996) for a full decade.

Fuck yourself.

Gun deaths is just one type of murder, there are plenty of beaner and nigger countries that have strict-as-fuck gun laws, but have a higher murder-per-capita than the US - for example, the socialist paradise of Venezuela.

The amount of deaths by "assault rifles", the guns that retarded libcucks want to ban most; is eclipsed by the amount of deaths caused by bare fist-fights and blunt objects. The majority of US gun deaths are caused by Tyrones shooting each-other with pistols in big Democrat-controlled cities.

The right to own a gun works both ways, it makes it easier for some nig to kill you from a difference, but it also gives women, old people, and the disabled the ability to defend themselves from a pack of dindus if they place their shots right. In Yurop; women and the elderly just get insta-rekt when a muzzie gang attacks them. "Right to life" should logically include the right to defend your own life; and the police can't instantly teleport to your location to save you.

Even if you tried to ban guns, the US has so many stockpiled and hidden, along with the ability of home-based shops to produce them; it would just create a massive black market. It would also be similar to Venezuela/Brazil/Mexico in that the gangs still have weapons, and get to control law-abiding people with an iron fist.

tl;dr: anti-gun = cucked

Whether he's right or wrong is a matter of values and subjectivity. The reality on the ground is that we care more about our side of the discussion than the other side does theirs. We're better organized, we raise far more funds, we act as a group when legislation needs public comment, we consistently vote, and we've made it abundantly clear that we're unwilling to comply with laws which we find unacceptable.

How you might feel about our position is irrelevant. The only thing of relevance is that 40 years ago we saw the proliferation of handgun bans; today we're seeing the proliferation of open carry.

I've got a shall issue concealed carry permit with no restrictions on what I can carry, preemption of local regulations, and no registration of weapons. In Chicago. Thats my argument.

Brazilian gun regulation is pretty strickt. Wonder how bandits still gets guns, though...

Wait I don't get it
So in America you have to take your shoes at the airport?

Off*

Also, sage. Faggot.

careful there, saging might use up all the bandwidth and your neighbours can't pay for more when they're flayed by the cartel

...

...

Do I have a constitutional right to bring a shoebomb on a plane? No. I have a second amendment that let's me own guns though. Simple as that.

31 school shootings since the 90s. there are more PE teachers who molested kids since then. why dont we get rid of PE

Why haven't you guys banned trucks?!
Trucks kill people!
Why not concerts too?!

What does that unfunny Mr.Bean looking fuck know?

Get out of my country!

>NO gun deaths in the U.K.
This is bait

There were only 14 last year.

>Guns kill people. There are NO gun deaths in the UK, and that should say it all. How can you even defend the right to own LITERAL killing machines? How many children have to die before you realise that guns are evil.
Our firearm rights aren't subject to firearm deaths.

Our firearm rights aren't subject to other people abusing their firearm rights.

Why do britbongs hate guns so much?

What would happen to American gun crime statistics if you ruled out:

>suicides
>death by illegally obtained gun

Not that our firearm rights are subject to firearm deaths, mind you.

Islam has caused numerous deaths, why isn't it banned in England and the US?

Before you say "moderate Muslim" bullshit, I'd like to add that that there are responsible gun owners who have never murdered another person.

>guns were made specifically to kill other living things!

And Islam states you have to kill anyone of another religion.

Which is it? Things that cause death need to be forbidden, or things happen beyond the control of our society?

With that in mind, remember that forbidding something does not keep anyone from getting it, it just motivates them to get it without getting caught.

Any person that actually obeys the law won't go shooting people and committing crimes.

Minorites, blacks, and Muslims on the other hand...

I have travelled to the USA 4 times since 9/11 happened and never once was asked to remove my shoes. What the fuck is this cunt talking about?

When you start talking about what people 'should' be allowed to have, you've already made the case for the Second Amendment.

As if that weren't enough, London is overrun with Islamist vermin... they're gonna wish they had guns...

>There are no gun deaths in the UK
Notice how you said UK and not France, because that would make your opponents argument of "Take guns away and you take them only from good people" correct.
KYS cuck

>Regulating shoes
Is this the democrats new argument against guns? Guns and shoes aren't the same lol, what the fuck are they even doing?

Should we ignore the fact that John is a democratic shill who doesn't care that radical Islam is destroying his own country? He made 2 million dollars last year for like 10 hours of teleprompter reading. I bet he has walls and a gate around his house.

Why don't you ban acid and vans?

Thanks for the hackneyed false equivalence argument....we have never heard that false logic before......

What part of "Shall not be infringed" do you not understand??

No one ever had a right to murder a place load of people.....

Weaponry is power....power to resist criminals, tyrants, and evil alike.....

The government cannot remove a right that they never had dispensation to give......

Sanctioning people who utilize weaponry to protect themselves when it does nothing to remove the weaponry from criminals is foolish....

Go enjoy your cultural enrichment and leave better men than you to accomplish great things........

I am quite sure that most guns are banned in schools. So what is the problem exactly?

NUH UH
I KILL PEOPLE
WITH GUNS