Paganism has already won

Why can't Christfags admit that Christianity is dead? I could literally force my local Catholic church to hold a gay marriage at RCMP gunpoint. Rome has conquered Christ once again.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_same-sex_unions#Classical_Europe.2C_Middle_East.2C_and_China

>At least two of the Roman Emperors were in same-sex unions; and in fact, thirteen out of the first fourteen Roman Emperors held to be bisexual or exclusively homosexual.[18] The first Roman emperor to have married a man was Nero, who is reported to have married two other men on different occasions. First with one of his freedman, Pythagoras, to whom Nero took the role of the bride, and later as a groom Nero married a young boy to replace his young teenage concubine whom he had killed [19] named Sporus in a very public ceremony... with all the solemnities of matrimony, and lived with him as his spouse. A friend gave the "bride" away "as required by law." The marriage was celebrated separately in both Greece and Rome in extravagant public ceremonies.[20] The Child Emperor Elagabalus referred to his chariot driver, a blond slave from Caria named Hierocles, as his husband.[21] He also married an athlete named Zoticus in a lavish public ceremony in Rome amidst the rejoicings of the citizens.[22]

Europeans were having gay marriage before Christ was even born, yet cuckolds on pol insist that gay marriage is an "attack on Western values." I think we all know where you Cuckistani cuckservatarded neocohenservatives get your (((values))) from.

Homosexuality is explicit European identity. Be openly gay and unapologetic for it, because you are the true heirs of Western culture, not the Jewish pretenders with mutilated, tiny cocks clutching their false Jewish god.

There is nothing wrong with being Jewish, you dumb LARPer.

Sodomites think they've won

you won't be laughing when you're thrown into the lake of fire, fag

>Homosexuality is explicit European identity
That'll last long

>Paganism is literally gay
Thank you for clarifying

...

>Being gay is okay
Leaf

Wow what a surprise

Looks like Richard Spencer found an IPhone

Ill kill you faggot.

Please spare me, i didnt choose to be born here.

Germania drowned faggots and degenerates in bogs, germania conquered rome.

no they weren't you fucking faggot. pagans threw faggots into bogs

kill yourself you false flagging faggot

...

A lot of the stuff Roman sources actually say about Nero is actually propaganda by the state, seriously i'm not joking. Nero was the one who took the fall on the burning of Rome and was heavily conspired against. Everything you read about him is basically slander from his rivals who defeated him. Hence why all the homosexual stories, they make him look bad. So that is actually a strong case for Pagans actually hating homosexuality.

atheists and pagans cannot be truly redpilled

free yourselves from ALL RELIGION and group think

What the hell does the RCMP have to do with the USA?

Nero was far more complicated than just "lol watching Rome burn while fiddling XD". For one, Christians DESPISED him. Revelations can be summed up as
>oy vey, and then the evil antisemitic BASTID Nero comes back but Jesus PWNS him and all the Jews who accepted Jesus get to go to heaven while all the gentiles and all the non-Jesus loving Jews burn for eternity!
keep in mind that John of Patmos, the author of Revelations, was a member of the school of thought that only Jews had the capacity to be Christians. Hell, after Nero kicked the bucket there were a number of Nero Impersonators claiming to be Nero come back from the dead who were pretty much swept off their feet and shoved into politics by the Roman people because they just loved Nero that much.

Secondly, the Roman view of homosexuality is far more nuanced than just "lol gays suck/rock". The idea of being a homosexual is new. Up until relatively recently you were simply a man or a woman and you may or may not engage in sodomy. There were not "extra" genders. The Romans had intricate rules about when hating fags was justified and when it was okay to engage in sodomy (Namely, a man can never fuck a free man but slaves are just fine). Sulla, the last dictator of Rome before Caesar came around, retired after leading his city to a stately villa in the countryside with his wife and his lover Metrobius who was a male, and an actor. Plutarch's remarks about this are interesting; it's not that Sulla fucking Metrobius is abnormal or bad, it's that Sulla has bad taste for choosing to stick with the aging ACTOR (gasp!) after he'd stopped being a youthful adonis. Indeed, after his retirement Sulla fucks many people, men and women, but his lasting affection for Metrobius is distasteful. What's notable is that Sulla has a wife who he had five kids with. The fact that they had FIVE kids shows she's clearly not a beard.

> Metrobius
Greek. The thing about Roman sodomy was that it only happened among those who were consciously Hellenizing. Sulla fucking a Greek actor was Hellenizing. Caesar getting fucked by Nicomedes was Hellenizing. Catullus was a Hellenized poet. Romans only fuck women: they learned pederasty from the Greeks. That's why pedicare derives from the Greek pais, not the Latin puer.

If anything, Nero (and Caligula's) homosexuality is just a historical incidence of the fact that homosexuality amongst men and frequency of contact with women are inversely related. Simply put:
>If men can't fuck women they start fucking each other.

During Rome's change from Republic to Empire women experienced a vast change in their role in society. In Republican Rome women were supposed to keep covered and be unseen, tending to the hearth and home. Their roles became more open and egalitarian, as philosophers, businesswomen, low ranking politicians, and women's place in religion became far more celebrated and open. And in the space of one hundred and fifty years or so Rome goes from
>Sulla had bad taste in men
to
>Nero fucked boys, what a degenerate!
And even further, in 200AD~ with Elagabalus, whose homosexuality (and bizarre transsexuality) make him so despicable. Roman propagandists wouldn't smear (or highlight the behavior of) Elagabalus, Nero, and Caligula via homosexuality if it wasn't reprehensible after all. So, what gives? Simple, men were able to get laid more leading to less homosexuals ergo the view of sodomy changed.

For further evidence, look at Pakistan and Afghanistan with their proud traditions of "tea boys", Athenian pederasty, the transition of China into the Song Dynasty (Women gain social status) decreasing the mention of homosexuals, and finally the Middle-East's cycles of women gaining status (less homosexuals) to women losing status (Tea boys resurface).

spread this text in the name of GOD