Soviet Russia was not a real communism

>Soviet Russia was not a real communism

What is your response to that statement?

What about China, Vietnam, North Korea, Venezuela, east Germany?

They didn't achieve full communism, it was more comparable to state capitalism, like modern day PRC.

That is correct

>USA is not real Capitalism

>Nazi Germany wasn't real Nationalism

Correct

Do elaborate

>state capitalism
kys

>What is your response to that statement?

Assuming I'm talking to a communist piece of shit here, so I shoot them to death and hang their remains high in the town square.

Of course they didn't achieve "real communism," because real communism is the equivalent of a skittles shitting unicorn. It's a mythical beast that will never be observed. Communism is contrary to the millions of years of evolution where we like to gather resources to attract mates.

bUt MuH bErNeE sEnDuRs

Real communism isn't achievable, the moment the leftwing retards get their way they have to impose authoritarian state because others would not want to take part in their bullshit ploy to feed them while they ride along.
That or if they'd actually somehow managed to abolish the government then they'd get invaded by neighboring state - either through migration or military.

Ok mate, do a bit of reading and come back with what you find.

The closer you get to kommunism the poorer your country become. Real kommunism is slightly further than death.

USSR were labeled communists because the Communist Party was the ruling party, but it was a socialist state.

>this isnt even my final form!!!

There will never be real communism because it is a retarded utopian fantasy

This.

if only...

ok

Not this.

>Asks to explain why it's correct
>Doesn't explain why it's correct
>"EDJIMACATE YERSELF"

:^)

my response is to sage this commie shit

it's true but that doesn't make communism less shitty

Marxists delude themselves by pretending that communism isn't the methods of Marxists, or the hoped-for result of Marxism, but it's a combination of both, Marx's methods producing Marx's results.
This has never happened, and never will happen, so it allows them to say that factions who perfectly followed Marx's proscriptions still weren't communists, not because they failed to implement Marx's 10 points, but because they failed to make Marx's 10 points produce a stateless, classless society

It was. Read 'What to do?' by Lenin

they TRIED to have communism and failed miserably, because its impossible to have a communist state. this has happened with every other communist state and will continue to happen because communism is futile and unattainable unless every single person in the country agrees to gold themselves back and share everything collectively. its dumb hippie shit

Did you mean "What is to be done"?

And yeah, you should definitely read it. Also "State and Revolution" and "Imperialism - The Highest Stage of Capitalism".

>educate yourself in my unconventional opinion based on falsehoods
ok

they were aiming for it, but encountered the same problems that all who try to achieve the impossibility that ""true"" communism is. yet decided to still try to pave a road to the unobtainable, a road made from broken bodies and blood. EVERYONE that aims for ""true"" communism or ""true"" socialism will walk down the same path, and if the profuse suffering, mountains of corpses and the insanity of its operations are not good enough arguments against even considering "trying" again then that person can not possibly understand what the true consequences of those systems were.

The Soviet Union was what happens when a revolutionary faction wins pledging that they will enact 'real communism'. If they really did that, it would entail abolishing the government and revolutionary wave. If they did that, their commune-nation would just get steamrolled by the very factions they just fought to take it from. They have no choice but to keep the revolutionary army together and run a totalitarian government based around stifling the dissent of anyone who realizes that this isn't real communism, it's just a modern monarchy with the Party instead of the royal family.

My response is that you either don't know anything about the USSR or you don't know anything about communism.

>>Soviet Russia was not a real communism
>What is your response to that statement?

Into the Stalin Bus with you, liberal scum!

(But no, Lenin was good, Stalin bad.)

...

sage

Russian poster

>The closer you get to kommunism the poorer your country become. Real kommunism is slightly further than death.


Whoa, hold up my mannnnnnnnn. So what you're saying, is that it just hasn't been truly tried yet? I really wonder how long dumb fuck americans will be asking that question while russians continue arriving here trying to get away from it. That would be like you telling us a real hamburger hasn't been attempted yet.