JULY 27TH HAPPENING HAS ARRIVED

JULY 27TH HAPPENING HAS ARRIVED

DONALD WILL NOW BE UNABLE TO FIRE THE TEAM INVESTIGATING HIM

GET FUCKED DRUMPFTARDS

ENJOY PRISON DONALD


usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/07/27/sen-lindsey-graham-introduce-bill-protect-special-counsels-such-robert-mueller/517098001/

archive.is/fuckpol

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=tyeJ55o3El0
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenure_of_Office_Act_(1867)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers_v._United_States
twitter.com/Thomas1774Paine/status/890732144569577472?s=09
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>introduces bill
>executive branch can veto bills
Read a book.
Sage

hey brainlet do you not know the President can veto any bill ? We fucking learned this shit in grade school. Stop making Americans look like retards and educate yourself.
youtube.com/watch?v=tyeJ55o3El0

That cock sucker is sweating bullets. It signals how fucking scared they are and Mueller is the only thing keeping them from being rope'd.

>vetoes bill
woooooooooooooow

great, this will apply to the new special counsel investigating hillary and obama!

a joke to the world

>introduces
That means fuck all until it passes, and even then

why are Deep State so scared it's like they're hiding a mountain of child rape or something

why does South Carolina keep voting this virgin weirdo in?

Did they implant John McCain with a device that can cause his brain physical pain so they can control him even more that's what I want to know

>INVESTIGATING HIM

I have a surprise for you

Deep State has the technology now we should expect CyborgTraitors to start cropping up

OP never saw Schoolhouse Rock

McCain really ought to retire. His district deserves representation that isn't brain-damaged.

I guess the impending special counsel looking into Clinton/Comey/Lynch will be extra safe, won't it.

oh no i left the name on

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenure_of_Office_Act_(1867)

Immediately thought of this

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers_v._United_States

Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926), was a United States Supreme Court decision ruling that the President has the exclusive power to remove executive branch officials, and does not need the approval of the Senate or any other legislative body.

In 1920, Frank S. Myers, a First-Class Postmaster in Portland, Oregon, was removed from office by President Woodrow Wilson. An 1876 federal law provided that "Postmasters of the first, second, and third classes shall be appointed and may be removed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate." Myers argued that his dismissal violated this law, and he was entitled to back pay for the unfilled portion of his four-year term.

Chief Justice William Howard Taft, writing for the Court, noted that the Constitution does mention the appointment of officials, but is silent on their dismissal. An examination of the notes of the Constitutional Convention, however, showed that this silence was intentional: the Convention did discuss the dismissal of executive-branch staff, and believed it was implicit in the Constitution that the President did hold the exclusive power to remove his staff, whose existence was an extension of the President's own authority.

The Court therefore found that the statute was unconstitutional, for it violated the separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches. In reaching this decision, it also expressly found the Tenure of Office Act, which had imposed a similar requirement on other Presidential appointees and played a key role in the impeachment of President Andrew Johnson, to have been invalid; it had been repealed by Congress some years before this decision.

>DONALD WILL NOW BE UNABLE TO FIRE THE TEAM INVESTIGATING HIM
OP does not understand that Trump has to sign the bill for it to become law.

The Bill is unconstitutional in the first place see

Also senators represent the state at large, not districts. You'll probably learn that in civics this fall.

When will Lindsey come out of the closet?

slide thread
sage

>he vetos it
>shitstorm

'Congress can override a veto by passing the act by a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate. (Usually an act is passed with a simple majority.) This check prevents the President from blocking an act when significant support for it exists.'

you dipshits make the rest of us look even stupider than we are

Read the Constitution. Congress can override vetoes.

>shitstorm over trump vetoing a clearly unconstitutional bill

Even the swamp cannot get 2/3rds on anything.

This

Lindsey Graham should be investigated for child porn

But not if what the bill proposes is actually unconstitutional, as this bill is.

OP is confirmed retard

Should be common sense thing. Really stupid that the president can fire the person investigating you.

Even then, Trump can take it to the Supreme Court, and precedent is in Trump's favor.

You should see this Is it wrong? Maybe, but it is apart of the president's job. The presidency is a position almost comparable to a CEO in a corporate ladder, so really the president is in his own accord as whether or not to fire someone of a executive position.

Mueller BTFO?

twitter.com/Thomas1774Paine/status/890732144569577472?s=09

More like.

>he vetoes it
>corporate media pretend it's a shit storm when it actually isn't