What is the best political ideology in the world Sup Forums?

What is the best political ideology in the world Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=h2Aqfp5iMnw
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Heil Hitler

Anarcho-Nazism

Constitutional Conservatism

>Bring the government to heel
>guns
>AMBOIGAS
>traditional 3D waifu

What ever the fuck white American women believe

National socialism

Truth. Then you vote according to your best understanding of it.

Constitutional Republicanism

Calvinism, Federalism and classical liberalism. The trifecta that created the west we all know and love.

>muh republic
Republics invariably succumb to corruption due to the parliamentary principle of making compromises to get a "majority", not doing what's actually right.

Global Liberal Democracy

deep...

>socialism
Wew lads

No gubmt

Classic ethnic national liberal

>truth
>voting
Pick one. Participating in a rigged system legitimizes it.

>I don't understand national socialism

The one that gives me the most free things.

Strasserism. National-socialism doesn't go far enough.

Neo-Islamic-Ethno-Zionism

National Bolshevism

Social democracy.

>I don't understand economics

Timocracy

Individualism

Meaning, white fucking land owners and individual freedom

Fpbp

socialism is autism

Hereditary Monarchy.

>I haven't read any books on economics or national socialism but I saw some media so I'm an expert

You're a degenerate spawn of the Kali Yuga and need to be purged. If not that then just the fact that Jews would really love you

Been listening to Mysterium Fasces?

>I disagree with person on Internet that has different political views so he must be retarded and didn't read any books

I have no idea who that is and have never heard of it. If you're trying to do some type of "haha stormfag" or another equivalent then kys etc, if not then I'll check it out

>I have no arguments nor have I ever touched a book so I'll just imply that you're wrong but not refute your points

as long as the ideology doesn't make concentration camps, doesn't fuck with the farmers I'm fine and lets me do what the fuck I want within 110% reason in my own privacy I'm fine.

No I'm a fascist. Mysterium Fasces is a Christo-fascist podcast on sounwdcloud and it's pretty great.

fpbp

Well, have you? I mean programme of the nsdap is only like 80 pages. But you'll probably still be triggered that the word socialism is in the name

Then just go be a hermit. If you're going to live in a society among other people, you will be expected to behave a certain way and uphold certain customs and standards. If you don't like that, fuck of to Siberia or something.

Something that is fiscally liberal and socially conservative. National Socialism, maybe?

>Christo fascist
>Christian
Into the anti-white bin it goes then. Nothin personnel, kid

>Christian
>antiwhite
paganism really is the new atheism

What if there are individual people who fuck with the farmers? What do you do about them other than send to camps? Kill?
>inb4 prison isn't a camp. (It's worse)

Fascism isn't an "ideology" you fucking cunts, it doesn't require any sort of adaptation of behavior through imposed structures -- in itself it is the manifestation of the most basic state of nature, doing nothing but building upon the hierarchical structures that have existed into forms of life for millions of years. The only ideologies around us are the jewish lies that set us apart from the truth threatening those who don't partake on it with punishment.

>any form of white religion must be marginalized and criticized
Good goy

Anarchy. it is the natural order. We live in an anarchy, always have and always will. Everyone is always free to do whatever he wants and always will be. However people were tricked into thinking that governments have legitimity and from then on start enforcing the rules of (((others))) instead of their own rules they usually would choose to live by. You are still able to do whatever you want, you just have to live with the consequenses.
So what you have to ask yourself is: Do you rather abide to your rules and your rules alone and suffer the consequenses, or do you abide to (((their))) rules and live with the knowledge that you are empowering (((them)))?
With Anarchy we wouldnt be tricked into enforcing (((their))) rules instead of our own anymore

youtube.com/watch?v=h2Aqfp5iMnw

>calling christianity "anti-white" with zero explanation is a sophisticated and well-postulated argument
stop being a faggot and go worship Odin

Get the fuck out. Order and structure have existed within nature for longer than you can imagine. To suggest that these concepts are inherently jewish and manipulative just goes to show why nobody considers anarchists humans.

Theocracy Feudalism.

most people today only care about the economy which they treat like a golden calf, and then whatever "social" regulation that is trendy (eg abortion was big some years ago, not it's trannys).

>go worship odin
i feel like you're trying to imply that i get on my knees and ask odin for gibs. whatever.
>spiritually pozzed leaf doesnt understand religion
what a shock

that's like saying disorder is the natural order. anarchy will always quickly result in the manifestation of some type of structure because nobody likes anarchy and whites naturally create order from chaos. the person/group in an anarchal society who can amass the most power will take charge or something like that. or you have many groups/people who hold power and fight the others, ultimately leading to bigger and bigger forms of government as the weaker ones are wiped out, or something along those lines

anarchy isnt the lack of order. the order will establish itself eventually in anarchy. but what we have is a false order that was imposed upon us. when we let ourself get rules it shouldnt be because the government gives it some legitimity, but because we support that guys ideas and want to support him. people will always band together and create a hierchiec structure. but that shouldnt be done through a government

>people will always band together and create a hierchiec structure

That is exactly what a government is.

Mysterium Fasces addresses this inane horeshit you aspouse in its episode on paganism. If you aren't confident enough in your beliefs to listen to it and challenge yourself then you should seriously consider suicide.

Christianity created the European identity. If you understood fuckall about European history post Western Roman Empire you would understand that.

Is there a term for new age technology creating a more efficient conduit of individuals will. Sort of like a grand internet senate?

Shoot them if they're invading my property. Individuals vs individuals isn't a problem. Hell, even individuals vs groups isn't a problem because you can form a group against a common enemy if need be or create a militia. Individuals vs the state is a bigger problem. So, no state is best state.
He's right
He said, natural order. All of your personal relationships are anarchistic.
So your fear with anarchy is that a government will form. Plus he didn't say disorder, he said natural order.
Monopoly of force
Technocrat migt be the term you're looking for.

Authoritarian technocartic minarcy.

>"the foundation of western civilization is inherently anti-white"
>"you don't understand religion"
you might actually be the dumbest fucking poster on this website. Remove your fake flag, I bet you're a leaf too, a cowardly one at that

>slave morality
>european

Religion.

Fpbp

>self-sacrifice and improvement is slave mentality
Look, someone else who hasn't read the Bible is here to tell Christians how they're wrong

Fascist syndicalism.

>So your fear with anarchy is that a government will form
so do just like to put a label things and call it a day? i dont "fear" that a government will form. my point was that anarchy is completely unsustainable
>Plus he didn't say disorder, he said natural order
>what is a simile
who's to say people creating government and law isnt the natural order? maybe not the one of nonwhites, but certainly for the aryan man it is

>the literal basis for the concept of slave morality was inspired by christianity
wew

no, a government gives you the illusion that whatever it does is legit and can only be changed through the means of the government which is designed for the government to stay in power. it makes people unwilling to change things themselves as they believe the government surely does it.
in an anarchic hierarchy everyone can start change (which everyone can do since we already live in anarchy, but due to the illusion created by the government everyone is made unwilling to do so)

You're blaming Christianity for a moral concept espoused by Nietzsche? Do you even know what you're talking about, or just saying things you think sound smart?

National socialism if done right, we need to promote social mobility of the workers and reignite the flames of nationalistic pride across Europe
It would fix problems of unemployment, problems with immigrants unwilling to integrate and would improve the general atmosphere of the countries

Anarcho-Individualism.
No irony, not shit posting.

>the foundation of western civilization
are you trying to imply that christianity, a religion created by jews that contains the tainted and co-opted message of jesus, is the foundation of the west?
white dna is the foundation of the west, leaf. we did what we did despite christianity, not because of it. dont attribute our achievements to the kikes

Fpbp

Leftwing Zionism

>canadian reading comprehension

Government is the expression of the collective will. The collective will can become corrupted over time through decay caused by inumerable factors, and thus the governments become corrupt, but that doesn't mean government is inherently corrupt unless you think violence is inherently wrong.

Only individualism can reign without government and individualism will leave any society ripe for conquest by a stronger, collective society.

When Christianity was taken to Rome and translated into Latin, it became European. When it was preached in Europe for the next 2000 years, it became even more European. This "kike on a stick" meme is so fucking stupid because it ignores most of Christianity's history - focusing only on the time of Christ within Judea.

Christianity taught Europeans to view the world within a unified axiom, an incredibly important step which led to higher discoveries like the world of science.

>don't attribute our success to the kikes
THERE WERE NO KIKES YOU FUCKING IDIOT. WHITE EUROPEANS WERE TEACHING OTHER WHITE EUROPEANS. Some proud Christian kings enacted massive expulsions of Jews - but I guess this is just expelling and killing the Jews is really cucking for them?

The one you give the slip.
Race > Ideology, every time.
Blood is thicker than water.

you know how a system cant be corrupted? when there is no system.
people can work together without the need of a government

Hoppean anarcho-feudalism

Libertarian socialism

Libertarian fascism

>no argument but anime girls
really jogs the noggin

Based

Yes.
Europeans were primitives living in mud huts before the Jews came and showed them how to civilization.

Ancient Hebrews are not theologically or genetically related to modern Jews at all. What we call "Jews" today are false Jews.

European DNA + Christianity created the Europe Europeans know and love. Christianity helped stop the Germanic people of the Holy Roman Empire from warring with Scandanavians and Britons. It created national unities between European peoples who previously fought each other as much as they fought Muslims. "European" unity is Christian. Christian philosophy also inspired all of Western philosophical and scientific tradition. What happened when Europeans abandoned formalistic Christianity is the Enlightenment and Liberal Democracy. Paganism lacks any holistic theology whatsoever and is utterly pozzed.

National Capitalism is the only way!

Classical Liberalism. Stirner is too much of a spook for me.

>it ignores most of christianity's history
and you ignore christianity's roots
>christianity taught-
no, white people did that
and just because a christian kills kikes doesnt mean the religion that he follows is of his own nature. so what if whites took christianity and made it better? why not take an actual white religion that matches up with the white spirit and make that better instead? the results would be much better.
you're like those niggers who think they can compete with whites once transhumanism and eugenics comes along, not realizing that why would anyone want an improved nigger when you can just have a normal aryan. christianity is an improved kike at best

How is it completely unsustainable? Does the private sector do everything better than the government? Seems more sustainable to me.
As to your second point, I couldn't say exactly. I don't disagree with law and order agreed upon/fought for by men. I disagree with a government having the power to disobey those laws, legally. For example, you and I, morally, can not kill and yet somehow we have the power to enable the governments minions to do so? How can the collective have powers the individuals don't have access to. If the government can kill in it's own self interest, then so can the individual man, and if it's wrong for the individual man to do so, then so should it be for the government and they should face consequences for it. But that's not the case becsuse the government has a monopoly of force and who is above them to enforce consequences upon them? That type of situstion breeds corruption. Maybe slavery will always be the way of things, maybe it's a progression over time to less and less government until anarchy finally happens, I couldn't say. Having a monopoly of force makes a good case for easier corruption. Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely and all that.

Individualism is fine when everyone plays along. PROTIP: Others don't.

Blacks, mudslimes and all other degenerates will stick to their own groups whilst you're off being an individual. See how long those freedoms last then.

>and you ignore christianity's roots
like where the kikes literally killed the messiah because he was everything the kikes didnt like?

National Socialism
Sieg heil

anti-authoritarianism/decentralization

this, this a thousand years

So you are a pagan. I had a feeling. Why not actively go and practice your beliefs then? This is what I hate about you LARPers, you literally do nothing besides shitpost about Christianity (something you barely understand). If you went out and sacrificed some bulls, danced around a bonfire with germanic chicks - man that's awesome, couldn't fault you for that. Instead you're sitting behind a computer talking shit to someone who belongs to better or worse, the only major religion for whites on this planet.

>calls me a nigger
>assumes I like transhumanism
That argument makes no sense. I merely accept that Christianity has had 2000 years to grow and develop within Europe, and as a result became an inherently European belief.

MUH KIKE ON A STICK DOEEEEEE

Communalism
"allegiance to one's own ethnic group rather than to the wider society."
Radical Eugenics
"the science of improving a population by controlled breeding to increase the occurrence of desirable heritable characteristics."

>implying

>n-no but see, all the romans were kikes and the vatican were kikes and EVERYTHING IS KIKES
>THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A WHITE CHRISTIAN

>because other people group up, i should also.

Im too lazy to find the pepe eyes half closed meme. Needless to say what youre claiming is silly.

Constitutional monarcho-minarchism

nice troll larper