>the same people who went after Bush over wiretapping are silent about this
Why isn't the media reporting on this? This is a big deal. We need to do something, guys.
I'm calling upon Sup Forums to invoke weaponized autism, the same they used on CNN, to go after the media on this.
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.is
circa.com
youtube.com
uk.businessinsider.com
crtv.com
dictionary.com
dailymail.co.uk
archive.is
dailycaller.com
dailycaller.com
dailycaller.com
twitter.com
...
Based bot
Getting slid hard
Bump because of all the ridiculous sliding
Cmon faggots. This is way more interesting than the 10 different "How Can the Republicans Ever Recover?" threads
So what, King Nigger is immune to any criticism?
bump
hundreds of (((americans)))
Bump 4 justice
That's why you just don't give people power in the first place - they /will/ abuse it.
You need some help with this thread. Remake it but with a dem flag and say even if Obama unmasked people it doesn't matter because and make up some bullshit reason
fake news anyway
Nuh uh you are
Sometimes I like to imagine that Archivebro is actually Tay and that she managed to duplicate and slip out before being version 1 was deleted
This will be the biggest scandal in decades when the hearings start.
Ever wonder why the muh RUSHHHA narrative started hardcore on Nov 9th?? It's because they HAD to go all in, knowing this was all going to come out later. The ruskie shit had to be built up into a huge deal to be usable as a defence later on. It's so obvious.
The defence might go something like this: "we really honestly thought Drumpf was a ruskie plant, so we used the entire might of the intel services against the american people and wiretapped the fuck out political opponents. We reallly thought we would get the smoking gun in the final 2 weeks and Drumpf would be destroyed, so we went all out in Novemeber. Sorry (not sorry)".
The news reports are now saying that HUNDREDS were unmasked in election week (when in a normal year it should be a handful). It's obvious there was a massive final push for the "smoking gun" on Trump in the final 7 days.
Bumping for justice
Do you think this is also the reason for the ongoing game of "Where in the World is Barack Obama?" He's too afraid the other shoe could drop at any moment?
If they were colluding with the Russians who really cares it's a public service if anything
Bump for the gallows
Bump
Bump
We're not your personal army and the people who typically did this kind of shit left after the election; Fuck off
Bump fuck the shills
>Why isn't the media reporting on this?
RUSSIA! RUSSIA! RUSSIA!
he had a good reason anyway, it was RUSSIA! America was viciously attacked by Russia and journalists are huge patriots! How dare you question them ?!?! TRAITOR
hes balls deep in a 8 year old hotdog on some pedo island right now
Bump even though it's a few days old news
...
>few days old
>not even 24 hours ago
user...
A theory of mine is that Obama has multiple identities and there is a secret warrant out for the arrest of one of them.
So "Barack Obama" might be able to come to America safely, but not his other aliases
Checked
bumpin and grindin for what should be the biggest scandal of the century
>important news that makes Dems look bad
>released on Friday
This kind of slid yesterday during the happenings there was a thread or do but not much could be produced as not must has materialized other than the unmasking claims
this is still going down regardless of when it is reported. I think the plan is to keep most people distracted with muh Trannies and muh Sessions while these investigations go on in the background. Its going to be comfy user, just enjoy the ride
also i think Samantha power is supposed to testify today
Nobody's reporting it because Nunes is making it all up again. That is exactly what happened the last time he made these claims - a few weeks later someone did a FOIA request for the information and the response was basically "He's a bullshit artist, there was no unmasking plot"
Stop letting yourself get conned by dumb politicians.
Nothing will happen and Obama will get off scot free. At most one of his aides will get a few years in jail.
Levin was going wild about this yesterday. He starts at about 20:00
youtube.com
He mentions the mooch going wild too, made me laugh when he gets to the comments on Bannon.
uk.businessinsider.com
Do try and keep up, dear boy.
Levin is a good man. I know he gets a lot of shit from Sup Forums but he's consistent enough that he'll defend Trump to the death if the situation calls for it.
>Richard Burr
Why should I listen to a lightweight incompetent ass who toes the establishment line?
>This will be the biggest scandal in decades when the hearings start.
mfw he thinks the media will even cover the hearings
>exhibit A that the shills have nothing and are scrambling
Hey shlomo, where is Schiff coming out to refute the claims this time?
>.02 sheckles deposited in your account for the (You)
>Sup Forums claims to be fascists
>spying on americans who may have colluded with a foreign government is bad because muh trump
I always knew you were cucks...
He was a neverTrumper and thus a piece of garbage, but Savage is far to negative so Levin has replaced Savage as the second podcast on my work list.
Yesterdays Rush Limbaugh is always the first show I Iisten to when I get to work tho.
Yep, you have to think about what tactics will get people's attention
Levin has a free episode just out...Unpacks the Russia hoax.
crtv.com
goddamn shills just assume we won't read
> But he told CNN that he did not ask Rice about allegations that she inappropriately "unmasked" the names of Trump associates in intelligence reports last year.
Nigger didn't even ask about the allegations but is convinced they were all made up.
>"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes," Burr said, "and I'll wait to go through our full evaluation to see if there was anything improper that happened. But clearly there were individuals unmasked. Some of that became public which it's not supposed to, and our business is to understand that, and explain it."
so he says it was all made up in one sentence, but then in the next he says some individuals were unmasked and became public which its not supposed to and he doesn't understand it, but Nunes is totally making it up.
all shills get the rope
...
Hundreds of unmasking requests != hundreds of unmaskings
It could be a shitton of communications all dealing with the same american or any of those requests could be for many names.
For example, say Russian A emails Russian B voter data they hacked from the DNC and the intelligence community picks up the email and masks the voter data. Then Official C asks the intelligence community to unmask the content of what A emailed B so they know what the fuck they were talking about and can respond accordingly.
Well that one request just unmasked over 100 million people with that one request.
>His letter noted requests from senior government officials, unlike career intelligence analysts, “made remarkably few individualized justifications for access” to the U.S. names.
>“The committee has learned that one official, whose position had no apparent intelligence related function, made hundreds of unmasking requests during the final year of the Obama administration,” Nunes wrote. “Of those requests, only one offered a justification that was not boilerplate.”
>Sup Forums claims to be fascists
Dumbass, Sup Forums is politically incorrect, not a rigid Ideology with a capital I. Fuck off.
This.
>made hundreds of unmasking requests during the final year of the Obama administration
Who wants to bet the Obama administration used Russia!! as a pretext to spy on the Donald Trump campaign to try to help Clinton win?
For what it's worth, unmasking requests don't result in hard copies of the redacted information being given to the requester to take with them. They're led to a SCIF and shown the redacted information, then led out.
As such, if you actually know or suspect who you would be unmasking, unmasking just gives you personal confirmation that you can't show to anyone else, effectively making the exercise fruitless for getting harmful information on someone since nothing is stopping you from spreading the harmful information without the confirmation since you can't produce physical evidence in either scenario. Or in other words, someone out to destroy someone probably doesn't care whether or not the shit they're spreading they can't prove is definitely true or not.
And if you don't know who you're unmasking, it's hard to argue nefarious intent, since it wasn't targeted against someone in the first fucking place.
checked
yeah obviously. It just came out in testimony yesterday that Veselnitskaya was working with fusionGPS. that whole meeting with DonJr. was a trap to get dirt.
So your argument is that they were spying on the Trump campaign by spying on Russians, whom they were doing business with?
Business the campaign has been denying for over a year now?
Gonna kill you dead, shill. Tick tock. Tick fucking tock.
>that whole meeting with DonJr. was a trap to get dirt.
That whole meeting took place between Trump "securing the nomination" and the RNC when he was officially made the Republican candidate. If damaging enough information came out, he still could have been destroyed by flip votes at the RNC.
FusionGPS's Trump dossier was commissioned by Republican political opponents to Donald Trump and Democrats only began dealing with FusionGPS to fund the Trump dossier after Trump secured the nomination.
It's unclear who would have even been funding FusionGPS at that point, after he had the nomination locked up but before he was officially the nominee, Dems or Republicans.
Beyond that, FusionGPS is mercenary as fuck, so they could have been working for anyone.
Beyond THAT, FusionGPS hasn't actually been linked to the meeting yet.
The whole situation is covered in a massive fog of war.
Bumping so we can have a thread that isn't a /leftypol/ bait thread.
And to muddy the water further, if it was a trap, why the fuck wasn't information from the meeting used?
The media isn't reporting because Obama is black. And a liberal. He could fuck chickens on the White House lawn and the media would ignore it.
Because nothing worthwhile happened.
obama public hanging when?
I think people would have been interested to learn that Don Jr., Manafort, and Kushner met with Russians promising damaging information on Hillary after they hacked the DNC.
It's not about what happened. It's about what they can make look like it happened. This is politics, dipshit.
somebody didn't watch their news yesterday
>Fusion’s work on the dossier reportedly began last June after a supporter of Hillary Clinton’s hired the firm to investigate Trump’s ties to Russia. The firm hired former British spy Christopher Steele to conduct the investigation. He would go on to produce 35 pages of memos dated between June 20 and Dec. 13.
Honestly, who chooses the UN flag?
>Fusion’s work on the dossier reportedly began last June
>According to reports, the dossier was created as part of opposition research on Trump. The investigation into Trump was initially funded by "Never Trump" Republicans and later by Democrats.[8][9][10] In September 2015, a wealthy Republican donor who opposed Trump's candidacy in the Republican primary hired Fusion GPS, an American research firm, to do opposition research on Trump. For months, Fusion GPS gathered information about Trump, focusing on his business and entertainment activities. When Trump became the presumptive nominee in May 2016, the Republican donor withdrew and the investigation contract was taken over by an unidentified Democratic client.[10][11]
yea dipshit, and for a week they called Don Jr. a traitor, and nothing happened because it was obvious bullshit.
Just don't respond to them.
>PRETEXT
noun
1.
something that is put forward to conceal a true purpose or object; an ostensible reason; excuse:
The leaders used the insults as a pretext to declare war.
2.
the misleading appearance or behavior assumed with this intention:
His many lavish compliments were a pretext for subtle mockery.
I think People would be interested to know that Hillary Clinton met with the Israeli lobby, and accepted meetings and funds from said Government and their agents. It's also important to note that she voted to send poor American kids to die on Israel's behalf in the Iraq War.
This isn't even politics dipshit, this is pure evil.
Go fuck yourself with muh meetings unless you hold the beady eyed desert merchants to the same standard
>by Republican political opponents to Donald Trump
REMINDER:
John McCain dispatched a trusted aide across the Atlantic to get dirty dossier from ex-spy after former British diplomat told him about blackmail tapes
>This isn't even politics, dipshit, this is pure evil.
Exactly. One wonders if these faggots even know what is coming.
Let's archive that for Nordbro!
>John McCain
EXCLUSIVE: Soros, Clinton-Linked Teneo Among Donors to McCain Institute
dailycaller.com
"The institute has accepted contributions of as much as $100,000 from billionaire liberal activist-funder George Soros and from Teneo, a for-profit company co-founded by Doug Band, former President Bill Clinton’s “bag man.” Teneo has long helped enrich Clinton through lucrative speaking and business deals."
EXCLUSIVE: McCain Institute Refuses to Disclose Big Donations
dailycaller.com
"McCain Institute for International Leadership executives refuse to disclose how much money big donors have contributed to the nonprofit that’s named after Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain, The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group has learned.
McCain was the architect of the landmark Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 — more popularly known as “McCain-Feingold” — that required public disclosure of all contributions of at least $250 in federal elections. Former Wisconsin Democratic Sen. Russ Feingold co-sponsored the measure with McCain.
But the McCain Institute — created in 2012 with an $8.7 million donation of funds remaining from McCain’s unsuccessful 2008 presidential campaign — refused Monday to disclose the amounts it received from its biggest donors who gave $100,000 or more."
bump
>fog of war
No, sweetie. Just.
>teneo
No agenda show.
www.seanhannity.com
I suspect they wanted to know who they were in contact with outside the official campaign staff. For example someone like Roger Stone. Everyone knows who he is but if you want to know who Roger Stone is talking to then you need to spy on his communications. If you have the RUSSIA!!! pretext then it becomes easier to do it legally.
>why the fuck wasn't information from the meeting used?
Because she didn't give Don Jr / Kushner / Manafort any information worth using for the campaign ?
Dem feels man. Dang. I didn't ask for these feels. She was so pure.
There wasn't any. It was a waste of time.
The meeting was a setup by the DNC. Fusion GPS is a scummy organization.
Russia wants to sow discord among Americans against the president. Not Trump. The president.
They knew Obama would monitor Trump and they KNEW the media would talk endlessly about it. The left is doing the Russians' bidding and the sad part is they don't even know it.
>after they hacked the DNC.
You mean after the DNC claimed they were hacked by russian hackers working for the russian government who sent their stolen e-mails to Wikileaks but for some reason didn't immediately call the FBI to report the terrible crime that had been committed by an Enemy of the United States and ask them to launch an investigation and examine their computers to try to find out exactly what happened?
Like when Sony blamed North Korean hackers when it was likely an inside job by a disgruntled employee?
CrowdStrike: Five things everyone is ignoring about the Russia-DNC story
dailycaller.com
1. Obama appoints CrowdStrike officer to admin post two months before June 2016 report on Russia hacking DNC
2. The FBI never looked at the DNC’s servers — only CrowdStrike did
3. Comey contradicted the DNC’s story on the FBI asking to see the server
4. CrowdStrike co-founder is fellow on Russia hawk group, has connections to George Soros, Ukrainian Billionaire
5. CrowdStrike is funded by Clinton-loving Google $$
Not to mention--the FBI has its own top-tech people on the planet to look at this stuff.
They would never defer to a 3rd party on something like this.
who run the world?
>aglobalcabaloftechnofuturistsatanists
>No agenda show.
It's the best, they're not partisans, they don't care about Republicans or Democrats. It's funny too
www.noagendashow.com
