Was Hitler a good painter?

Was Hitler a good painter?

Other urls found in this thread:

hooktube.com/watch?v=JhQagItLReY
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Checked
His landscapes were

the fuck is going on here

I would say technically an excellent painter but a un extraordinary artist.

...

The Ben garrison is a nice touch

yes.

the window is open slightly

...

his perspective is bad

Something about the positions of his objects is off

Yes.

Leftist continually shit on him because he's not an extraordinary amazing painter, but he's still far above the majority of the population.

It's strange knowing Hitler found this painting as comfy as I do.

>yes
are you serious? Hitler was not only unimaginative, but also complete shit as an artist, he never really grasped perspective which shows in everything he did

It's almost like the kikes were up to something...

No Satan.
But works by schizophrenics are sometimes interesting nonetheless.

C O M F Y
O
M
F
Y

>tfw you are part of the thread where Beelzebub himself is trolling Sup Forums

maybe if he could have gone to art school he could have fixed that

His work is mostly schlock. No meaning or much of any emotions conveyed.

>really grasped perspective
yes he did you mongoloid fuck, it wasnt perfect but he clearly understood it.
lets see your perfect perspective paintings, oh wait youre not allowed to have artwork in your shit hovel of a country

hitler was not only a good painter (not perfect, but that's why he tried to go to art school), but also an exceptional human being in many other ways.

I think he was on the right track, and should've stuck with it. Like people are mentioning, his perspective is a bit off. That comes with time, and lots of practice.
Was a better painter than I am, that's for sure.

I remember he was addicted to meth or a similar chemical..thats why he had those twitches during his speeches..forgot the article I read years ago. I'm sure if you research it you can find it..they were trying out experimental drugs on their soldiers to stay awake and alert off of little sleep..makes sense..super soldiers

Can you imagine if you owned one of Uncle Al's paintings?

Yes, but he was not a good artist.

He was very good at painting accurate depictions of buildings, and designing buildings he wanted to create.

That is not the same as art

Just because you can paint doesn't mean you're good. Hitler is as boring as Bob Ross.

the bottom left window he fucked up the perspective

...

your jew art teacher tell you this? clearly buttholes on a canvas conveys oh so much more meaning and emoition.
get fuckt

You bet Hitler was a good painter, painting European blood all over Europe.

...

...

was he autistic, perhaps?

In desperate times, if your body is a limit, you find a way to stretch your body beyond its limits. US military staff also has drugs to use in certain situations.

but the perspective is fucked

(((Schlock)))

Good enough to get into school for art.

>perhaps
uncle adi was autistic as fuck, I reccomend you to read a book written by a teenage friend of him

This user is correct.
no he really didn't. it's off in several places, lacks depth and imagination. There is nothing in Hitlers paintings that really depicts the scenes with any large amount of artistry or character.

I do think that he possessed talent though, and more than half the population. He was a much better leader.

Which one?

The perspective is fine. The windows are a bit opened so it creates that illusion.

>hating on Egon Schiele

Do you even know who Egon Schiele was?

The Jew art instructors gave him good advice, they told him he'd make a better architect which was true, of course instead of designing pretty buildings he decided to conquer Europe instead.

Checked and keked

august something was the name of the autor
google young hitler friend he didn't have many

lel

...

>lacks depth and imagination
opinion

>There is nothing in Hitlers paintings that really depicts the scenes with any large amount of artistry or character.
opinion

so in your opinion any artist that hasnt mastered perspective 100% in every painting they have made is shit artist? Hitler's perspective is not even bad off in a few places sure, but its hardly noticeable until you put every aspect of this particular piece under scrutiny

He loved animals, and read multiple books a day, so maybe mildly.

However he was very good at reading people, and spent many hours in conversation each night, so I doubt it.

He could certainly draw pretty good but nothing special. It was a bit unfair to block him from art school though, he could have developed into something special

He painted 2 dimensional, didn't portrait near items differently from far away objects. The lack of shadows and primary focus denote the inability to recognize distances.

He wasn't a good painter but he was at least good enough to be admitted to art school.

He did user
He did

The building looks quite good, although the perspective seems off? But the people...very strange. They are all like shadows, like something a child would paint, or like they aren't even really there. Very awkward.

He's like "50 bucks at an art festival, this will look good in the dining room" good.

praise him

...

>recognize
I think you mean portray, bongbreath

That top door is like 20 feet tall

Checked.

No you faggot, the window frames are readily apparent and flat as fuck. The second window is just straight up behind a staircase whose perspective is also fucked. Simultaneously being attached to the house and angling away from it at the same time.
Not to mention the door is like 9 feet tall, given average window height is about 3 feet.

Hitler wasn't awful at painting but he was terrible with perspective, which is why he was turned down. He could also only paint landscapes, and not anything human or animal. He had no versatility in what he could do, and ultimately he was mediocre at what he could do.

hooktube.com/watch?v=JhQagItLReY

Do we know if he was directly involved in national socialist architecture?

If so post pics of buildings/plans please.

His paintings were fairly unremarkable, but his performance art is second to none.

If hitler was alive he would be painting the rarest pepes ever. Respect.

Also
>666
checked

...

...

The other guys were original. That's the distinction.

He was turned down because the evaluators thought he was much better suited for architecture, not because he had no talent or understanding of perspective.

>brazil
post checks out

Original means little when it's shit.

His paintings are generally good but they are not perfect. As many will say perspective is a bit off and in many cases secondary aspects, such as people when a work is focused on a building, will look lower quality

Its almost as if he desired an art school to help him improve.

[Hitler] went back to the academy to get an explanation and was told his drawings showed a lack of talent for artistic painting, notably a lack of appreciation of the human form.
He was told, however, that he had some ability for the field of architecture.

The bottom window is larger than the other. The second floor window is...on the second floor, so there needs to be a slight adjustment.

Schooling would've help immensely in some areas... creativity can't be learned.

He had enough raw talent though.

He could've done very well as an architect

Nice.

...

kek has spoken

Tbh I can see that criticism. Still think it's ridiculous to just reject him for that, but if they did try to get him into architecture, which he seemed more interest in anyway, I don't see why he didn't pursui that path and instead went full on resentment?

Would Hitler have liked anime?

>do nothing whole life
>want to be a painter like a lazy good for nothing
>submit this literal dog Doo to art colleges to apply
>turned down because perspective is literally autistic and theres things like a staircase covering half a window
>decide to convince everyone to gas jews because of this
/ourguy/

yes

Because Hitler was a strange man. His drawing was natural talent, but it was mostly sparked by his love of architecture. He could draw large buildings from memory.
He also went full twitterpated autist over a married woman, almost having a panic attack when she gave him (and everyone else she passed by the road) a flower.

He wanted to paint pictures of buildings but the Jews wouldn't let him, so instead he painted buildings with Jews.

youre dense

his perspective looks a little off, so it's clear that's he's a beginner, but I definitely know he could have become great if had followed this path

It's actually pretty good, in my opinion, but I'm not a painter. He's become such a meme at this point he's reputation has become childish and fictional, like he's Darth Vader or something.

The gets shows that Hitler is with us.

Thrilling argument.

A pedophile?

The topic of Hitler never came up in the entry level arr courses I was required to take. An assuming response like this tells me that you are very likely brainwashed.

Just take a step back and actually think about his work. It really doesn't convey much. Compare it to any renouned artists.

Don't forget that wonky door frame.

No it isn't, you fuck, Hitler was rejected as an artist precisely because his paintings had fucked up perspectives.

of courshe

...

You guys are fucking retarded. Modernism is way worse than Hitler's art.

>inb4 someone trains a neural network on hitler's art and makes a nazi computer painter

>was involved in pre-military groups because I was a patriotard
>become sick when I turn 17 and don't get better until recently
>spend time drawing pictures of buildings and wars while I'm stuck inside
>not sick anymore but still recovering
>not going to be able to pursue my military ambitions anymore
>rejected from art school
>fall in love with girls who show the slightest bit of affection
>later find out about Sup Forums
>begin to notice (((coincidences))) everywhere
>tfw becoming a literally Hitler without even realizing it

Is that really by Hitler?

How utterly strange...

Pretty comfy. I'd hang them in my living room