I've noticed people on the Right read. A lot

I've noticed people on the Right read. A lot.
You'd be lucky to find a leftist who has read anything beyond buzzfeed articles and picture books.
Anyone can read Stirner. Few can digest Evola.
It's not about feeling Tfw to intel. It's about discipline and the eagerness to challenge your own worldview.

Other urls found in this thread:

dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2095549/Right-wingers-intelligent-left-wingers-says-controversial-study--conservative-politics-lead-people-racist.html
quora.com/Was-National-Socialism-or-Nazism-really-socialist
huffingtonpost.com.mx/entry/only-six-percent-of-scien_n_229382
people-press.org/2009/07/09/section-4-scientists-politics-and-religion/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>discipline and the eagerness to challenge your own worldview.
I agree.

>Tfw to intel
>That feel when to intel
what did he mean by this

>Implying lefties don't love reading harry potter and game of thrones

Which are also anything but challenging.

I read books to escape the degeneracy of the modern day, I pretend I live in the Edwardian era in my own little bubble with my fiancée, when I walk I pretend none of the buildings around me exist unless they're from that time and there's hardly a car on the road just horse and buggys, and everyone's dressed in Edwardian style clothes. I imagine there's still a British empire, and I read only old books.

They're also degenerate and glorify incest and witchcraft

>few can digest evola
Yes, because most get diarrhea

oh boy let the circle jerk begin...

Excuse me, have you ever read a song of ice and fire? Fucking pages devoted to nothing but describing meals. Getting through one of those books without shooting yourself in the god damned head is one of the most challenging things you can do.

>Anyone can read Stirner. Few can digest Evola.

lmao, did you know Mussolini praised Stirner's work?

>I've noticed people on the Right read. A lot.
I avoid books like the plague. Completely uninteresting to me. I read Sup Forums like 8 hours a day though if that counts.

>Mussolini had a great admiration for Stirner. However, when Mussolini took up Stirner’s egoism, he rejected his anarchism: and it has remained for the New Left movements of our own day to revive Stirner’s ideas in their entirety.

yeah...

See that's exactly why I haven't read GRRM, he's a senile oldfag with nothing better to do than just write useless pish that doesn't go anywhere for ages, and people wonder why he can't make an ending, it's because the entire ASOIAF is a stream of consciousness gibberish.
and a good morning to you too Mr. Burger

Nice fanfiction Adolf:

>Right-wingers are less intelligent than left wingers, says study
>Children with low intelligence grow up to be prejudiced
>Right-wing views make the less intelligent feel 'safe'
>Analysis of more than 15,000 people

dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2095549/Right-wingers-intelligent-left-wingers-says-controversial-study--conservative-politics-lead-people-racist.html

BUILD

Harry Potter is fake, not written by JK Stupid, written by Mi6 spooks.

Fact > anecdotal evidence

>red states are smart

>>Blacks have lwer IQ
>IQ tests are racist
>Its cultural differences
>IQ is irreverent
>>Right wingers have lower IQ
>lol stupid right wingers!
>IQ is a real thing

>Nazis
>Right wing

A socialist is a socialist.
Marxists try their hardest to distance themselves from the Nazis due to the bad press. There's very little core differences between the two.

The Nazis sent anyone who "hurt" an animal to the concentration camp, I should be allowed to whip my nigger if I wanted to.

I was in Cancun a couples months ago, Juan, and it was a fucking shithole.

The biggest tourist location in Latin America, the one city that you spics should be able to clean up and make look presentable and developed, and you still feel never forget that you're in a third-world hellhole.

Not to mention
>leftists have high IQ
>race and gender are social constructs
Then again, hypocrisy is what the Left do best.

>Nazism is a left wing ideology.
Yeah, no it's not, however it's not at all as bad as they would have you believe.

you deserve a medal hahaha

Black people are conservative.

Have you seen Africa? liberals are always the force behind social and economic progress.

>>discipline and the eagerness to challenge your own worldview.
>I agree.

I concur. This is important, and should not be underestimated.

For daily news as well, it's useful to look at leftist and/or globalist sources. Helps you maintain keen awareness and critical thinking.

...

>A socialist is a socialist.

And the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is a democracy.

>Socialism but only for Germans/White people isn't Socialism

Fuck off you Bolshevik kike.

what are you guys reading?
I can recommend any of these books.

Black people are socially conservative, along with everyone on the planet except white liberals and Jews.

Economically they're liberal because of the gibs, and they parrot SJW rhetoric because it directly benefits them (more gibs)

Agreed OP. The main word in your post I highlight is 'digest.' A person can't blaze through Evola or any major philosophical work without thoroughly asking themselves very intrinsic questions. Hell first time I got through Revolt Against the Modern World I would spend 2 hours on 5 pages just to really grasp what I was reading. Digest this slowly boys. Chew it like a good steak.

I read a little princess, that was fun, I read through the looking glass I don't recommend that, I'm reading Anne that's fun, I'm doing call of the Wild next I think

Compare and contrast you primate. Did you learn nothing in history class? The one political group that managed to get the Nazi's full unbridaled wrath.

Marxism and socialism on their own simply mean an economy controlled by the government, Nazism didn't take direct control of the economy, rather it took control of the people and made it illegal not to be employed or looking for employment.

>tfw

gee, I wonder who conducted that study

>Being proud of reading books
This is what your society's has become.

wind in the door is cool, I also think thief of always is fun, its clive barkers book. what is Anne

Scientists.

But you're right, scientists lean towards left wing ideology because they're smarter than the general population.

They also dominate the arts and business companies.

I've read 9 books on politics, economics, and philosophy this year
By contrast, my sister and mother, both who always encouraged me to be an avid reader, have read probably almost as many books but they're all vapid fiction novels and gimmicky self help books

Nassim Taleb is an author that will open your mind. You'll add iq points with each book of his that you read.

Start with Fooled by Randomness and work your way up to Antifragile.

>tfw to intelligent to read

>scientists dominate arts and businesses
Mexican intellectuals

>Take the same name and platform of Left wing National Socialist movements in Czech and Austria
>Rise up and take power the exact same way all left wing movements do, through the workers and unions.
>Literally preaching equality and social justice for all (ethnic) Germans
>Nationalising large sections of Industry and shutting down large portions of the private sector
>Creating a welfare state and having large sections of the population dependant on government assistance

During world War 2, here in Australia we had our very own National Socialist as PM in John Curtin. He advocated for the White Australia policy and pushed for much of the same things Hitler did, stopping just short of exterminating the Jews (Likely because they weren't even here in substantial numbers to cause problems). He serves our left wing Labor party and is still praised today by the left wing.


Keep falling for the propaganda like the dipshit that you are though. You'll earn yourself a free helicopter ride soon enough, if the cartels don't get you first.

I meant left wingers.

You need some reading comprehension classes, boludo.

Anyway, how many scientists do you know? The ones that show on TV all lean left because TV leans left

Seriously Paco, focus on laying those bricks and leave complicated subjects to people who are actually smart.

Anne of green gables is Clive barker that horror guy? I don't like violent books

No Paco, you need to learn to write better.

To be fair, at least the center left have some concept of property rights, no mater how authoritarian or Libertarian.

>The Nazis hated commies
>That must mean the Nazis are Right Wing

>Sunni muslims hate Shia mulisms
>That must mean Sunni Muslims are Christians

>Not Capitalism and not Marxist Socialism
>Capitalism: People working for the owners of wealth with profits going to the owners of companies, driven by market demands and accentuated by conflict between labor and capitalists.
>Marxist Socialism: People working for the good of everyone with profits (in a manner of speaking) shared by everyone who is working, driven by market demands.
>National Socialism: People working for the good of the country with profits going to the owners of companies, driven by the needs of the state with all conflict between classes suppressed by a heavy-handed state.

quora.com/Was-National-Socialism-or-Nazism-really-socialist

Even when Otto Strasser was still around, the nazis were never really socialists.

Socialism was just popular back then so they adopted that name for their reactionary party.

Oh, look - another asshole who "notices" shit that only exists in his imagination.

There are 2 types of right wingers
Idiots that are right wing on an instinctual level (people that would hate blacks even if they were good intelligent people)
And there are smart right wingers that were probably lefty at some point but got smarter and could see though the lies

Stirner is a perfect Trojan horse: the Left will eat itself alive over it, trying to debate what is a spook and what is not. I'm gladthe fell for the spook trap.

Again, facts > "muh anecdotal experience!"

>Only Six Percent Of Scientists Are Republicans: Pew Poll
>huffingtonpost.com.mx/entry/only-six-percent-of-scien_n_229382

Scientists also tend towards atheism and are open minded because their works demands considering new possibilities and thinking out of the box in order to succeed.

Conservatives are only good at following orders.

Very few people read any sort of literature beyond their facebook feed and whatever websites they decide to browse.

I have been to many peoples houses who don't seem to own any books whatsoever regardless of if they fell to the left or right on the political spectrum.

Actually it's the fact that the Nazis hold ideas of traditionalism and don't remove property rights entirely that puts them on the center, if they had started kicking people out of their homes for owning them, or started doing away with tradition and religion, then they would be much further towards the left wing.

>anyone can read stirner
Confirmed for not having read stirner. You at least need a basic understanding of hegellian dialectics to be able to digest the ego and its own. Leftists definitely read more than conservatives in general, hence most intellectuals considering themselves to be liberal or progressive. Im sure most conservatives havent even read atlas shrugged

I agree.

That's why Sam Harris and Dawkins have become more wary of immigration.

But then again, instinctual level conservatives are way more common than the second type.

I found some interesting points in Stirner, but I agree with Mussolini: anarchy is not the answer.

>instinctual level conservatives are way more common than the second type.
i agree, they are probably like 95% or more

>You at least need a basic understanding of hegellian dialectics to be able to digest the ego and its own.
Why?

>if they had started kicking people out of their homes for owning them
That's exactly what they did though, if you weren't deemed ethnically German. You think the 20 gorgillion Jews had any property rights?

>Ethnicly German.
So when the Germans managed to take Belgium and gave them all citizenship if they registered with the government? What, they had to live in a gulag right? Oh, right they didn't. They at least had an option to work for the Reich. Not preferable by any measure to a number of alternatives, but it's still better than getting lined up on a wall for the cardinal sin of having a farm to your family name.

I have a hard time reading anything more than 2 paragraphs because my mind wanders off and I'll have completely forgotten what I had just read a minute ago.

Feels bad man, I'd like to read classic books and be able to finish it in a weekend.

>huffington
>facts

you faggots are obsessed with your idea of "owning the truth", you claim anything you say is a fact, and support it with a crappy tabloid
And the article quotes a study done by a "fact tank" owned by 21st century fox, weird

Pew research is legit, you're retarded, judgement in favor of the other guy.

People on the 'far right' (national socialists, fascists, libertarians, monarchists, traditionalists, etc.) are a whole different breed than generic conservatards though. Many on the far right were liberal in their teens.

Posts like yours prove how useless scientific studies in soft sciences often are. Retarded researchers or retarded readers misintrepreting results cause headaches.

In order to fix a problem you have to admit it first.

If conservatives want to defeat leftists once and for all, the first step would be to recognize that on average leftists are smarter than right wingers.

The next would be asking yourselves "so what can we do about that?" "how can we convince right wingers to get into sciences and the arts so we have more people defending our points of view?"

If you don't. Progressives will keep shaping the your culture and there will be nothing that you can do about it.

lol not in the USA. Most staunch conservatives I know are super dogmatic and think reading anything unrelated to the bible is a vice. They also believe in stupid logic like "I know God exists because it says so in the bible, which is the true word of God."

>one post by this ID

Stop being so shitty.

>lul, I smarter than you!

really lies my bricks

>Have you seen Africa?
Africa is a shithole solely because of niggers, not conservatives or liberals

Most scientists in my experience are
>sheltered from real life in their specific academic research bubble
>both physically and mentally weak
>uninterested in politics and therefore likely to have read no literature on politics
Who would have guessed that the Priests of Scientism are not authorities on political affairs.

The average reactionary right-winger on Sup Forums is more intelligent than your average liberal leftist. Therefore, Sup Forums is right.

Fucking Mexican intellectuals.

lol they dont even read GoT

every lefty I know that watches that show refuses to read the books, all my rational patriot friends have read them and are disgusted by the show.

Bolivia is a great country, I tell that to every Bolivian I see in hopes they go back

>Most scientists in my experience are
>sheltered from real life in their specific academic research bubble

You sound like one of those guys who claim the school of life is better than college.

An academic can tell you more about a lion and his behaviors than a subsaharian african hunter who's been dealing with them for more than 20 years.

Abstract thinking is always better than "muh personal experience"

Yep, I literally just came here to tell you you're retarded.

>flag

Kys non-country

The internet is definitely having an effect on people's concentration span. (I remember someone writing a learned article about that a few years back.)

Clickbait culture programs the brain for constant small rewards - read a joke, look at a lolcat, like a petition, reply to a tweet etc etc
Almost nothing that takes more than a few seconds.

I try to balance it out with reading but I still notice the change in myself, and I'm super-old and my brain was basically programmed before all this nonsense.

If you read any old books, speeches, poems etc - or even watch old TV - it's astonishing how much longer were mental paragraphs in the past. Just read a Thoreau essay or a Dickens novel or a Carlyle or Ruskin sentence.

Or read some speeches by US prresidents through the years. Watch the sentence length go down and the paragraph length go down - it's quite startling.

People now, who have ONLY ever had the internet, are really screwed :)

>The average reactionary right-winger on Sup Forums is more intelligent than your average liberal leftist.

Not really, I do find intellectual right wingers here who are similar to Richard Spencer and other ideologues of the dark enlightment (now known as the altright).

But on average, the typical Sup Forums right winger is instinctual and more often than not hate other races because the way they look instead of the way they think.

You also have to add the fact that Sup Forums seems to attract people with social anxiety and sometimes even autism, so your cognition is quite deficient.

I just dont buy that someone who just parrots what college professors tell them is smarter than your average Sup Forumstard who came to this point through research they did on their own while trying to understand the world around them

Not even halfway through the divine comedy and thank god for the annotations, how am I supposed to know about all those italian noblemen burning in hell.

>I've noticed people on the Right read. A lot.

lolno

Most regurgitate simplistic rhetoric from television and radio.

9% of scientists identify as conservative. people-press.org/2009/07/09/section-4-scientists-politics-and-religion/

The right is most entirely based upon feeling.

Well in this day and age, using weaponized feelings to obscure the corporate looting of the commons, anyways.

The song and dance marketing campaigns that the globalists use to distract from the policies they right for right-wing politicians actively promotes anti-intellectualism. It's one of the first things that has to go when the right is properly harnessed and reformed.

You yourself are guided mostly by feelings. Here you are pretentiously presenting your opinions as facts.

You will outgrow this when you have some proper role models.

The dominant cultural paradigm at the moment is very left-wing.

That means that the only people who escape it will tend to be the less intelligent (or at least, less academically inclined) who just don't go into the system, and the MUCH more intelligent, who can go into the system but see through it and resist it.

So basically if you look at the IQ bell curve, you are going to find more right-wing opinions at the edges, and more left-wing opinions in the middle.

Also, extremely high IQ people tend to have more extreme views in everything, especially politics.

I vaguely remember some survey along these lines and it roughly bore this out.

>The way they look.
Now your just being intentional confrontational AND retarded. If you've actually read the post by those who make open declarations of hate for the blacks, you would know their hate stems from the observed behavior of black people rather than the actual physical structure of their bodies and faces.

>You will outgrow this when you have some proper role models.
>you'll believe what I say after your brainwashing

so what youre saying is we need our own mama merkel to teach us to love black cock up our asses, then we'll be given a cookie and told we are the smartest boys?

Exactly right, Old George the feminist fairy is a great world builder and writes great characters but holy fuck A Dance of dragons literally had 10 pages dedicated to describing what daenarys had for her dinner.

I actually haven't read a book in years. Checkmate.

I'm not arguing that scientists are not masters in their own field. They obviously are. They just tend to be hugely specialized in their own niche, and are not too interested in things outside their field.

To understand politics, IQ isn't enough. If it was, all high IQ people would agree. Things like physical strength correlate with political beliefs probably more than IQ. Someone who is deeply interested in politics needs to be educated in a very broad manner, and a scientist is no more like to be that than your average person.

As a racerealist, Sup Forums appears to be definitely more racerealist than racist. Maybe you as a brown person take it more personally and you're unable to recognize that it's not pure hate.

People with social anxiety tend to be leftist, because they're fragile and weak. You don't want confrontations when you're fragile. Autists are, despite of the memes, mostly apolitical creatures.

its because the books at least make an attempt to be somewhat realistic, whereas the show is 'YASSSS QUEEEN SLAY'

Actually, disliking black people because of the way they look is extremely sensible and rational.

Your brain is a wonderful neural network which has been carefully programmed over centuries. Most of the best stuff it does is completely subconscious. Why would you throw all that away?

When you look at a black person (in person is better, not just a photo) you see all sorts of things instantly that SHOULD make you, at the very least, wary of him.

The most important one is, (assuming you're white), he is far genetically distant from you.

It's very sensible to be wary around people who are different from you.

Also a lot of negro body language is very threatening from a white standpoint.

There are many more aspects to this but tl;dw

better version

You've never seen a tryhard communist have you? They read their Marxist fanfic all the fucking time

t. mexican mind reader

I read Charles Hoy Fort
is that ok