Where do progressives think they are progressing to? Whats the end goal?

Where do progressives think they are progressing to? Whats the end goal?

What is supposed to be wrong with that picture?

Harrison Bergeron

To being sexless virgins

...

Vidya games>Sex

...

Free shit from taxing the rich out the ass, not knowing they aren't just going to leave the country or use legal loopholes.

Oh I see,the commie scum in the shirt
Delet this shit

liberals are like spiled brats. they just want more and more without even knowing what they want

Progress is the goal. Read Imperium by Francis Parker Yockey.

A world of equality, at any cost. Which is why they advocate race mixing and the destruction of the white race.

...

there is no end goal. Progressivism is nothing more than change for change's sake. That's why they're so obsessed with >current year

to making anime waifus real

Star Trek. Or Harry Potter, I don't know which fantasy they delude themselves with.

Having more friends more parties to go to different culinary tastes to acquire more life instead of sitting in a trailer complaining about minorities or gays

Harry Potter. Everyone who likes Star Trek is a anarcho-syndicalist.

>if you drink coffee you are responsible for some latin american doing manual labor
>if you wear clothes you are responsible for an asian in a sweatshop
>if you own a smartphone you are responsible for slave labor in africa
>if you watch porn you are responsible for women being paid to have sex
>if you eat shrimp or chocolate or smoke weed or buy makeup you are responsible for underpaid workers and not the companies that employ them

Protip: if liberals actually cared about that shit they'd stop consuming it.

I guarantee that whatever idiot drew this image has a smartphone and drinks coffee and eats food imported from other countries.

Degradation of standards.

Harry Shitter and Star Kek are both ridiculous and made by liberals.

Why didnt you join in the holy imperium of man yet,user?(40k)

...

What are conservatives conserving?

Harry potter is fine. Has some underlying satire

Nothing, which is why they've been losing the culture war the last 80 years

...

>What is their end goal?
To replace the 'old backwards society' with a new society, free of racism/sexism/misogyny/homophobia/etc...
They basically want to destroy western civilization, but they genuinely think that what they are doing is good.

...

No community in urban areas --> loyalty software malfunctions

And what do conservatives think they are doing? Going back to the 50s? Newslfash, that is never going to happen. Things change. Life goes on. Conservatism can't survive simply because it is based on things staying the same, which is untrue for everything in reality. Progressives are the future. Conservatives are the past. (And want to stay in the past)

y...you understand this is a negative SJW image right? Its pointing out that these spoiled women cry about oppression while reaping the benefits of this oppression instead of actually doing something active to solve it.

She is literally sitting in an armchair, to symbolize the girl being an armchair revolutionary. All talk, do nothing

...

>Where do progressives think they are progressing to? Whats the end goal?
No end goal. Infinite progressiveness (or regressiveness). As long as nothing is constant and everything is constantly changing fundamentally, that works for them.

You dumb nigga.

Being treated as a first class citizen for having the luck of being born white is simply immoral. You didnt earn your rights. Those are not proper grounds for having more rights than a nigress

Because the Jodoverse is way the fuck cooler.

Communism

...

Progressives core belief is that they want to rule over all and exert control.

We already have gay marriage
Everyone has a vote
welfarestate
social security net
abortions for all


The only thing Lefties haven't won on was
1st amendment
2nd amendment
taking private property away from owners.


^ thats literally what they want to strip next - their mission is a totalitarian system where you have zero fucking rights unless you agree with them totally.

...

I'm talking about the fans. I couldn't read more than a page or two of that trash. Rowling's writing style is fucking awful, even for YA fiction standards.

Progressives goal is to completely eradicate Western civilization and exterminate the living in embodiments of it in "white" people.

I am not sure why but the Jews do seem a likely candidate for this psuh to cultural suicide. It could be darker than that but why is hard to figure out. What is interesting to me is, what becomes the boogeyman if they succeed? Do they want universal extinction of all in an attempt to achieve some cult event?

It's odd because if we are gone the Asians (Chinese) will exterminate niggers and possibly everyone else. They are already making inroads into Africa and it won't be long until it becomes military based.

Conservatives are conserving traditional social institutions like marriage, borders, traditional social norms, etc.

But also conservatism refers to fiscal conservatism, where of course it is not historical norms that are being conserved, but MONEY.

You can see conservatives as the protectors of society, from a hostile threat ("""progressives""") that would gladly destroy us all in an impotent rage, out of a misguided desire for """progress""".

You just dont know how to analyze underlying deep satire thats all

but what happens when they reach their goal and they find out that some things naturally aren't equal?

yeah but do they power up invincible starfighters with their dicks

Conservatism doesnt have a place in 2017 anymore. We cant go backward

Nigga I'm posting Metabarons shit and you're telling me I don't know deep satire?

Thats edgy white people shit

...

Being treated as a first class citizen, taking taxypayers money, free education, free healthcare just for having the luck of not getting caught by border patrol when you broke the law and crossed into the US is simply immoral. You didnt earn your rights. Those are not proper ground for having more rights than a white male.

It isn't backwards. It's better.

How is it backwards? You think that we cannot undo the destruction progressivism has wrought on society or do you think that for some reason it is actually better in any way at all?

It isn't backwards to go back to a previous save file before you irreversibly fucked yourself and all you were working towards. As long as we have the knowledge, the will and the blood we can do it.

Actually, please keep drinking coffee... That's very good for our economy.

However, quit coke. Coke production has a lot of murders behind. Drugs, prostitution and porn are unethical.

Technology is growing and has grown at an alarming rate and what is done is done. No going back to the past. Sorry you have to accept it or die

...

Are you serious? Are you one of these technophiles who believes in the cult of technology? That it is some inescapable push towards itself and not shaped by what we need and want rather?

We control technology, if we confront the social issues of the day and remove disruptive and/or destructive technology or at least train ourselves to overcome it that does not have to.be the case. If you are driving a car and you accept that you will one day you are going to drive off of a cliff and you see a cliff one day you determined that not the cliff, not the car not anything else.

Technology is more than these silly obsessions with AI and robots etc. Technology we live with today is young and whether it lasts millennia is to be seen.

They want something where they don't have to work and don't have to fear anything. Basically they want "heaven on earth," which is why they're fucking retarded - that's impossible.

Recent world events would suggest that it certainly isn't. There will always be a conservative element in society my friend. Sorry that you are not intelligent enough to appreciate that.


The fuck does that have to do with anything? You realise there are conservative people in the tech industry, right? Peter Thiel being an example (although he's a fag). Palmer Luckey being another example. Brendan Eich being another. And not to mention the entire industry are of course defenders of free market economics, which is fundamentally a conservative idea.

We cant stop it tho. Its like a runaway train and theres no controlling it. Things esp technology will have a natural progression whether we like it or not. Reality has a progressive bias

Conservatism also refers to an approach to government, and particularly changes to government, which respects and preserves legitimacy and works within the existing structure.

As opposed to revolutionaries or radicals, who want to tear down the existing government and start something entirely new, and liberals, who (in this sense) want to bend and break the rules to get what they want.

The liberal/conservative dichotomy is particularly observed in approaches to changing the constitution. The liberal approach is to install a majority of supreme court justices, and have them simply pretend that the constitution says something else (i.e. "the 2nd amendment guarantees the right of the U.S. government to have a miliary that keeps and bears arms", "the 14th amendment guarantees gay marriage"). The conservative approach is to respect what the constitution actually says until you go through the formal process of amending it.

Metabarons isn't satire, it's just random batshit insanity.

...

There isn't really any end to it. They just keep inventing new problems to struggle with so that they can feel like they have a purpose. Each new step is more trivial and masturbatory than the last.

We can stop it, historically technology has been stopped for various reasons.

Technology has been lost. Computers may be lost some day in their current form.In a very real way they impractical from a reliability, energy consumption and resource use position. Power hammers and drivers have existed for nearly a century but we still have screwdriver and hammers. We still paint even though we have photography.

>the hamburgers helper

What about smart phones? I see what youre saying but they arent going away. Nor are powerful computers

Why are all those fat women disguised as lamps?

...

...

Smartphones are nothing new, it's just changing the interface of the computer to bigger level understanding.

Remember the internet before niggers? I remember.

That chick with the laptop is some kind of Slavic sex slave I think

Total Retardation

Why towards the objective of course.
That is, they're expecting cake at the end of it all.
And freedom.
Despite not knowing what they want to be free from.

...

Communism.
Well, most of them don't think it's what they're progressing towards but they'd be in for a surprise.

...

...

It is just another form of Utopianism. Unfortunately, with the one, they choose to adopt they will continue to fail to reach the Utopia.

...

Should say nigger level not bigger.

>Actually, please keep drinking coffee... That's very good for our economy.
This.
>muh exploitation
in the excess of actually not purchasing ANY goods is really insincere and/or retarded.

>niggers are poor and dumb, so they have low efficiency and can only supply us with cheap raw materials and agricultural goods
>let's embargo those cheap goods :D
simply ebin, I sometimes have to think really hard about some liberal agendas, because they could be pretty anti-nigger

There is no end goal.
>1) Find or manufacture a victim.
>2) Virtue signal by tearing down something or someone.
>3 )Repeat 1-2.

...

...

>We control technology, if we confront the social issues of the day and remove disruptive and/or destructive technology or at least train ourselves to overcome it that does not have to.be the case.
The problem with that idea is that anyone in the world can make new technology. Your government can ban it in your country, but that means other countries and criminals have the advantage of that tech, and the law-abiding people of your own country don't. So the countries that try to do this become backwards and uncompetitive.

Look at the example of Japan, which tried to close its borders and get rid of firearms in the early modern era. Eventually, a foreign power (USA) just sailed in with its latest wonder-weapon (explosive-shelled artillery) and slipped a leash around its neck (Commodore Perry's opening of Japan).

There's an emergent phenomenon of science and technology leading to more science and technology. The majority doesn't have to like it or want it, as long as someone, somewhere thinks they can gain an advantage by pushing things forward a little bit.

Nobody asked the world to vote on whether there should be nuclear weapons, or the ability to genetically engineer viruses.

Death.

Anon5 was right

What happened to being a good ole faction reactionary? It's like you can't into cyclical history.

...

They're in training for when Sharia law is implemented.

It satirizes the shit out of Freudian crap and gender essentialism, along with itself, by being batshit crazy. Like a dude who plugs his dick into a penis-shaped ship that he uses to attack a cult of crazy powerful gynosupremacist witches. Then there's the warrior woman who decides she'd rather kill herself than shack up with a walking dildo, leading to that batshit crazy arc about the perfect EVROPA poet-warrior who really screws everything up.

...

I don't mean that we become African level civilization or that we pick an arbitrary point to end technology.

People vote with money and right now we have bought into planned obsolescence and fucking failed to come to terms with it. How much are we really advancing? How much is technology really advancing? Is the value there?

You can buy brand new appliances which fail to last or remain serviceable as those made forty years ago. If you are in the tool business, you can buy things for a lifetime or you can by them per use. Technology has created per use rather than a cherished artisan mentality.

Japan adopted quickly to necessary contemporary technology when it became obvious. What they did not do though, is abandon the almost animistic level of manufacture that had been predominant in their culture.

Westerners used to.have that same level of investment in what we used or made but most no longer so because we are obsessed with cost. Cost, not value do not be confused.

There was a great environmental fag video on YouTube about ten years ago called the Story of Studd about how jewery basically causes the consumption of more goods to make an inferior product because of cost per unit and currency manipulation.

>It satirizes ... itself, by being batshit crazy.
That's not satire. That's just being batshit crazy. Self-satire is something you can do in a small part of a large work. You can't do a whole work of self-satire.

>It satirizes the shit out of Freudian crap and gender essentialism ... by being batshit crazy.
I'm not buying it. I think it's crazy for crazy's sake.

Their end goal is a nation where power is centralized under a totalitarian regime supported by oligarchs and the population is properly regulated by the bureaucracy where wise people will tell the unwashed masses how to properly live their lives to usher in Utopia!

The voters, however, keep getting in the way. Thus the full court press to get as many new alien voters as possible.

Different goals for different people. Some of what's considered progressive is simply a minority group acting as though their own racial self interests are morally superior. On an individual level, progressive politics creates far more opportunities for people to get jobs that are paid out of public funds.

Well unfortunately its going to get worse i think. Smart phones wont go anywhere and something else to replace it will be worse or just as bad imo. The techology is just too cheap and common now

>progressive politics creates far more opportunities for people to get jobs that are paid out of public funds
At the expense of more opportunities being created with privet funds. An important point that is often over looked.

...

One massive Brazil-style favela.

dem thighs