When EU becomes a superstate within a couple of decades, what do you think the geopolitical situation will be?

When EU becomes a superstate within a couple of decades, what do you think the geopolitical situation will be?

1. US becomes more liberal after the Trumpist age, and gets closer to Europe in order to fight the Russian and rising Asian menace

2. US remains Trumpist conservative and remains isolated, while EU is pitted against Russia which has remained politically the same

3. US remains Trumpist conservative and remains isolated, while EU gets closer to Russia which has gradually become more liberal after the death of Putin

In science we trust? Hahahahahaha
DA THIENCE IS THETTLED!

It will never happen it's end draws near

It's certainly better than in God we trust tho

>I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE!
just write in cock we trust, fucking faggot

Frexit and Wilders were the last chance to leave and they failed. The only ones opposing the superstate are old fucks who are dying within 10 years and then nothing will stop it.

I didn't know that the tribalistic pol conservatism ideological package comes with a 89IQ tier distrust of science. Neck yourselves please.

Yeah, you say that 'cause science says gender is on a spectrum. You fucking cocksucker.

>I distrust in science
science can only solve materialstic problem, at least where I live our problems are of spirtual nature

Remember that following the new sanctions USA has put on Russia the EU are considering sanctions against USA not Russia even though they are not trump's design.
The EU is a lot closer to Russia than most memesters believe because of economic and pragmatic reasons. Also there is a lot of profit to be had in Russia, great partners.
>T. Employee in a major multinational company, Russia is one of the more profitable operations. Sector is wholesale
In comparison China sucks

Science is a tool for seeking knowledge, that doesn't mean that politically charged liberal delusions were based on factual information even if they were presented in a seemingly academic context.


There is no such thing as spiritual, if thou dissected your problems psychologically you would find a solution.

>thou

Best typo

Tell this to yourself while substituting god by science.

God is dead

the super state never happens. its a pipe dream . if it becomes a single country will you have welfare or not? if you dont have it every one in countries with it loses it. if you do many with in in countries with welfare lose it because of the cost of providing it for every one who meets the requirements being to high and thus the requirements become more difficult to meet

also universal health care. something not every country can afford and even the ones with it have constant night terrors about the next debate in the never ending series of cut backs followed by public outrage

if you become 1 country every one will expect some level of consistency in policy. also all your little trade deals go up in smoke. these were made to increase cash flow by making different countries pay other countries in the EU. this barely allows you enough gdp growth to keep the lights on. everything bought will be sold at a higher price other wise everything would close down. that vanishes. the ecbs goal of 2% inflation for the sake of allowing EU nations to even mint more currency dies with the super state

so try not to day dream to much euro fag. you got a lot of africans and muslims at your door step

Yeah, we already saw "scientific materialism" create a superstate full of "reason" and no "tribalistic conservativism".

Kill yourself fucking commie.

It will never become a superstate
in fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the EU construction collapse in a near future

United military + current open borders = superstate. Sorry amerifat, but EU will become your rival and you will lose the little influence that you had left in EU.

>you got a lot of africans and muslims at your door step

This is extremely ironic considering that you have a massive nigger and spic problem that far overshadows any problems Europe has.

lmao
One day you will hopefully go past the point of quoting Niezsche, while substituting god.
I think you lack Niezsche's self awareness.

>But we have to understand that belief is not a narrowness. Belief is an understanding that there are truths outside nature, and outside the contingent universe that’s in front of us, that are absolute. The left-wing view that it’s all relative, or we make it up as we go along, is false.

if it becomes a superstate all types of wars will ensue.
And it will collapse in the matter of years due to the ethnic and economic tensions

>comparing 1940s knowledge to the current day

hello 89iq.

And the eu is already on the brink of collapse.
You think making it a country will make the situation any better?

Of course knowledge is always incomplete, it doesn't mean that science is not the most accurate tool we have, or that you are not a retard for believing in spiritual nonsense.

I'd suppose that this European entity that has prevented European war for fifty years; will immediately go looking for a war with someone to try out its army on.

If you aren't sufficentely EU nationalistic; off to a concentration camp you will go.

Sounds good to me. The glory of Europe will be restored, deus vult.

>that you are not a retard for believing inspiritual nonsense
No, no self-awareness found yet, it must be a machine.
Also:
>Describing social issues with science.
>Describing physical issues with religion.
What is more useless?

4. Europe falls to totalitarian rule as islamist cause multiple civil wars in every major city.

>When EU becomes a superstate

It'l collapse long before that

There's no reason why cargo cultist worship of "science" wouldn't work exactly the same way the worship of "science" worked in the Soviet Union - the party decides what's "scientific" and if some professor finds evidence that the party is wrong a camp holiday in Siberia cures the wrongthinker.

If you proclaim "trust" in science you're a monkey tier cargo cultist. The whole point of the scientific revolution was to test ideas empirically instead of just accepting them because some "trusted" person with high status says so.

But man is inherently religious and authoritarian in nature so all this attempt to replace religion with science has ever done is give us a bunch of liberals and socialists who want scientists to be turned into a class of priests preaching a religion that just needs to be "trusted" and "believed".