>right wingers don't want more immigrants and refugees in their country
>support wars in other countries
>wonder why refugees are trying to flee their bombed countries
>more refugees stoke greater autism in right-wingers
>support war against the "hajjis", "niggers", "terrorists" even more
Really gets the neurons going.
Other urls found in this thread:
gallup.com
dailykos.com
commondreams.org
dailykos
archive.is
commondreams
archive.is
8ch.pl
en.wikipedia.org
squawker.org
archive.is
twitter.com
>strawman: the post
>he's really going to deny that the pro-war faction in America is decisively right-wing Republicans
Who went to war against Iraq? Who's trying to go to war with Iran? Who bombed Syria?
Indeed, anyone with half a brain cell would flee into Europe from bombed Syria, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan.. you name it.
>Right wingers hate another group of people
>Right wringers go fight wars against said people
>Those people become refugees
>Right wingers still hate them and don't want them in their country
I really don't see the hypocrisy here
We just want to go back to the old days when you went to war and killed all the enemy civilians. You didn't have refugee problems back then because you just killed them when they came to your borders.
really, really....
one fucking word
ISRAEL
Make sure you wipe the Doritos stains off your keyboard when you're done.
Not an argument
>support wars in other countries
user thinks all right-wingers of today are war hawks of the sixties.
All? No. But the most vocal advocates of war belong to the right wing.
Seen the news for the past year? The left has been pushing for war in Syria, Ukraine, and against Russia.
>Right wingers hate brownies
>Right wingers support immigration ban because they don't like them
>Right wingers support wars that kill as many of them as possible
Where exactly is the conundrum?
>Stokes tension with Russia, a nuclear armed nation
>Wants to go to war in Syria because muh feels
Wtf I hate right wingers now
Please name them and remember I said, "them" not one. Also remember pundits and politicians do not always represent the people well. Most people who voted for Obama probably never thought he would bomb certain "dictators" during the Arab spring.
(((military-industrial-complex)))
he didn't know better
>Jewish neocons don't want more immigrants and refugees in their country Israel, but want more in the West
>support wars in other countries
>deeply understand why refugees are trying to flee their bombed countries, try to shuttle them from ME and Africa to Europe
>more refugees stoke greater autism in right-wingers, leading Jewish neocons to kvetch about muh antisemitism
>support war against the "hajjis", "niggers", "terrorists" even more, all to protect Israel
>(((the most vocal advocates of war)))
Steve Bannon, former NSA Michael Flynn, Trump himself, Dana Rohrabacher, McCain, Walid Phares, Sebastian Gorka, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, former ambassador John Bolton, etc.
The pro-war faction is leftist neocons that LARP as social conservatives to secure the white working class vote. If you weren't paying attention, the anti-war vote last election went to Trump and all of the momentum was largely coming from the right.
>recycling flag
Every poll taken shows Republicans support war more than Democrats and Independents. The decisive anti-war candidate war Sanders, not Trump, who wants to tear up the Iran deal while placing loonies like Flynn and Bannon into positions of power.
gallup.com
commondreams.org
Neocons.
Also known as Reformed Jewish Trotskyite Bolsheviks.
But they don't use that name.
Always archive or screenshot
>dailykos com/stories/2015/5/28/1388566/-62-percent-of-Republicans-still-say-Iraq-War-was-the-right-thing-to-do
archive.is
>commondreams org/views/2016/08/18/republicans-democrats-alike-still-level-threats-iran
archive.is
Will do, but why?
(((who control both sides in america)))
literally the republican party has adapted and kept the same outrageous foreign policy introduced under bush, and its infected the dems long ago as well via (((the obama administration)))
ike was right, all politicians in DC should burned at the stake along with their cronies
You really got me there. You know most right-wingers are isolationist. Let's be honest you need to go back to this site 8ch.pl
Read this. It may help knowing who is really behind these wars.
en.wikipedia.org
This.
>right wingers are the only ones who want war, that's why Obama liberated Syria, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, and Afghanistan
>foreign intervention was invented under Bush
Korea, Vietnam, Panama, Brazil, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, Yugoslavia, Somalia, Iran, Iraq, Cuba, China
Our entire post-WW2 history has been one of foreign interventions.
>right wingers are the only ones who want war, that's why Obama liberated Syria, Libya, Somalia, Yemen, and Afghanistan
>foreign intervention was invented under Bush
Korea, Vietnam, Panama, Brazil, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, Yugoslavia, Somalia, Iran, Iraq, Cuba, China
Our entire post-WW2 history has been one of foreign interventions.
>Ike
Don't get me started on that filthy, wanna-be WASP kike.
>You know most right-wingers are isolationist
Source? The majority of Republicans STILL believe the Iraq war was right. They support Trump's strikes against Syrian overwhelmingly and showed their partisanship by not supporting the same exact shit under Obama.
>Bush did fuck up the middle east, but Obama made it ten times worst.
Wtf lol, how?
They can go to other countries. And we have no obligation to take them in even if we bombed theirs.
Other ways besides cultural enrichment exist to help them, if you so want to.
>Eisenhower
>all that outdated shit
Did you completely ignore the 2016 election, where Hillary "draft our daughters to fight Assad" Clinton was defeated by the isolationist candidate, and Dems/Reps traded places on the Russian issue?
The right wing is more supportive of war generally, I'll give you that. But when wars of moral cuckoldry like Syria come about, it's the human right worshiping left that pushes them.
Guys like McCain are hardly known for representing the right wing.
It's a god damn game played on all sides.
Europe's fucking lost, once the legal system supports this shit its over.
Courts are supposed to protect people, now they protect everyone but the citizens
crap like this
happens every day now
You argument isn't consistent at all. If all Republicans were war hawks, they would support intervention in Syria, regardless of who was president. It's almost as though both sides are blind partisans who simply cheer for whatever their side is doing.
>Obama made it ten times worse
He did so by allowing the CIA to kick off the Arab spring that destabilized the region. He armed the Salafists under AQ control in Syria in hopes that they would overthrow Assad. He also invaded Libya, provided the munitions to invade Yemen, and ramped up the civil war in Somalia. But, hey, he got a Nobel Peace Prize, so I'm sure he did something right...
Don't argue with the nordbot.
He knows better.
Archive it nigger.
>the isolationist candidate
>inks deal to sell Saudi Arabia $110 billion in weapons to wage war against Yemen, while increasing US support for the Saudi air force
>drastically increases war effort against ISIS to the point of near indiscriminate bombing, killing more Syrians than the Russians have in the same time frame
>trying to provoke war against Iran by placing more sanctions on them and creating a team to review the deal in hopes of claiming Iran is not abiding by the agreement (they are)
Trump rose to power by presenting a horror show of enemies, from Mexico to Iran to China to radical Islamic terrorism (and sometimes Islam itself). Not even the European Union escapes Trump’s zero-sum squint: He casts it as a German vehicle to “beat the United States on trade,” not an effort to secure peace after two world wars.
The dude literally wanted to go back into Iraq by force and steal their oil. He wants to increase military spending. His top advisor said the US will be going to war with China in 5-10 years. His NSA chief wanted to pin the Benghazi attacks on Iran to create a casus belli against the country. Wtf kind of isolationist is this?
I don't want to bomb the Muslims either, but our entire country is a colony of Israel, so what can you do? Our entire Congress basically has to sign a pledge of loyalty to Israel, we have the most Kosher President ever, and evangelical Christians all love Israel. Our entire media apparatus is Jew owned. We have a liberal gentry full of oversocialized white women and Jews constantly thought-policing everyone. The entire economy is a house of cards running on the mostly Jewish FIRE sector, so we have to keep bringing in immigrants to become debt slaves and also decrease the white population as thanks for helping the Chosen out in WW2. We will probably sign a law literally banning someone from boycotting products from Israeli settlements, because free speech doesn't apply to Israel. A colony, after all, can't go against the Empire so easily. Sometimes I wonder if Sup Forums shouldn't read anti-colonialist literature and re-frame anti-colonial struggle as whites vs. Jews instead of blacks vs. whites.
Also, most of the "refugees" are just Africans who want gibs, and they need to get the fuck out.
Republicans support war under Republican administrations. The ONLY reason why they were against Obama's strikes against Syria was due to partisanship, not genuine anti-war sentiments.
>the CIA started the Arab spring
Give me a break, man. Anyone who is knowledgeable of that region knows it was a powder keg thanks to the tyrannical governments, weak economies, and corruption.
Obama was not the root cause of any of this shit, while Bush singlehandedly threw the region into a tailspin. The rise of ISIS and Salafi Jihadism? Directly goes back to the Iraq war. Obama made mistakes, his biggest admittedly being the war in Libya, but nothing as big as the shit that was the Iraq war.
>support wars in other countries
That's distinctly more democrat or neo-con.
>Talk shit about Republicans
>Post the person who literally mentored Hillary
I am activated.
Obama directly armed ISIS with nearly a billion dollars on arms in hopes of destabilizing Syria. That shit show is just as bad as Iraq. Without CIA funding, the (((moderate rebels))) would have been quashed 5 years ago.
>6 rebellions happening right after each other was just a coincidence, nobody was pulling the strings at all
You really don't know how the world works, do you?
>Republicans love war
Yes, Republicans love war when a Republican is in office and Democrats love war when a Democrat is in office. Meanwhile, the real power players are laughing all the way to the synagogue.
gadaffi's death was the worst thing to happen since 9-11 never forget