This book will be our savior on the 23rd of September

This book will be our savior on the 23rd of September.

Other urls found in this thread:

hooktube.com/watch?v=ov5kvWSz5LM
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

bump for interest

more cabal brainwashing bullshit.
hooktube.com/watch?v=ov5kvWSz5LM

never do the shills' work for them, faggot.

go fuck yourself Sean Goonan you self important retard

Zinga m8

This is literally the same shit Stefan Molyneux says every single day on his podcast (not saying I disagree with him). Only difference is he has about 15 million listeners whereas this book sold about 20 copies on Amazon. So I fail to see how this will be as revolutionary as you claim. Are you the author?

hey Sean

fuck you

..

hey man

...

I'm curious, does he say stuff like this?

"Life is completely meaningless and free will allows for people to act on the meaninglessness in different ways, all
funneling categorically into the duality: Destruction or Building. The path of building builds the collective conscious and
everything necessary to support it to enjoy life and discover Truth, while the path of destruction tears everything down. It is not
Wrong for people to decide consciously or unconsciously to ruin what others have built because at the core of why people build,
there is no absolute Reason to build in the first place. An absence of absolute Reason does not make destruction automatically
Right or building automatically futile.

In the duality something that is wrong is actually something that is destructive. Something that is right is something that builds
on top of our meaningless existence for a life worth living and strengthens people against destructiveness.

Fundamental individual destructive tendencies given our free will in a meaningless existence are a lack of self-control, cowardice,
a lack of wonder, and a lack of sense of humor. Without courage, self-control, wonder and/or humor the individual and society
disintegrates. A lack of those four things leads people to wrath, depression, madness, hedonism, and ignorance. These five major
ways that destructiveness occurs greatly diminish the quality of someone's life and eventually lead to the cessation of life for
the individual and humanity.

All of these reactions influence the collective conscious, which shapes the existence of the individual and humanity.

Individuals create the collective conscious and are created by the collective conscious.
Individuals influence the collective conscious and are influenced by the collective conscious.

Society is an entity that binds and directs individuals according to the perceived collective conscious. It is intertwined with the
individual and can create destructiveness in the individual.

Individuals create society and are created by society.
Individuals influence society and are influenced by society.

A fundamental way society creates destructiveness in the individual is the creation of powerlessness along with, or due to
encouraging the destructive behavior above. Society can destroy individuals by pushing wrath, depression, hedonism, madness, and
ignorance onto them, and in turn the collective society is destroyed itself. Everything is connected. An individual may have been
courageous and in control and possess humor and wonder if not for the outside force of society pushing the person to be
destructive. But remember, an individual may and should always strive to be on the path of building despite all of the wrongness
surrounding oneself if the individual chooses life.

Ways of Self and Societal Destruction:

1. Lack of Self-control
2. Lack of Courage
3. Lack of Wonder
4. Lack of Humor

These four things lead the individual to five destructive tendencies:

Wrath

Existing produces mental and physical suffering. Other people or society as a whole can exacerbate suffering produced by existing. The
source of this mental and physical suffering is powerlessness. An individual that feels powerless may reject the conditions that produce
the powerlessness and retaliate through wrath as an attempt to gain power. The attempt to gain power through wrath is either the attempt
to supersede the powerlessness by trying to obtain all the power one can get (which indirectly creates destructiveness in the individual
and society), or the direct destruction of anything that creates powerlessness.

Wrath is destruction and destruction is power.
Wrath is extreme power and extreme power is destruction.

He shills this commie book every week or so. I'm betting he is. The book is shit.

sage, report and ignore

Society is an application of the collective conscious for the organization of individuals.

Society has created beings that are different and more than just animals, but we still retain an underlying animalistic nature.

Society is full of individuals that interact with one another. Each of these individuals must have a degree of autonomy and
individual power in order to be on the path of building, but as one individual gains more power, others may lose it, and can fall
into destructiveness through wrath and especially despair. Society provides guidelines for social interactions and the allocation
of power.

Considering these two important components of human nature (Underlying Animal/ Underlying Power) in relation to society:

1. A strong society is based in balancing the pursuance of our biological nature completely and the rejection of our biological nature.
2. A strong society is based in balancing the desire to obtain all power and the desire to relinquish all power from ourselves.

These are the Biological-Artificial Spectrum and the Power Spectrum."

"Destructive Societal Imbalance: Too Much Power Seeking and Animalistic Behavior

A societal structure that fosters and allows for too much animalistic behavior or power-seeking behavior is destructive.
A society comprised of power-hungry and animalistic people is destructive.

cont.
Excessive animalistic behavior means selfishness, an excessive drive to pursue sex, a drive for unnecessary violence, an
antagonistic mentality, and a survival of the fittest mentality. Animalistic behavior is very similar to excessive power-seeking
behavior, but there is a distinction in that animalistic behavior is more of an unconscious base desire and bodily drive (like an
animal) rather than power-seeking which may involve a broader scope and higher thinking. The two are heavily intertwined though.

cont.
Animalistic nature is not limited to violence- it applies to sexuality. A society comprised of people that follow a completely
animalistic sexual nature is destructive. The consequences of following this nature are far-reaching. A hedonistic nature and an
animalistic sexual nature are intertwined, although are not the same thing.

Complete animalistic sexual behavior in men is characterized by the pursuance of having sex with many women with disregard for
choosing a single mate to create a family with.

Complete animalistic sexual behavior in women is characterized by the pursuance of a man or many men for only their high sexual
prowess with disregard for the creation of a strong family due to:
A. The desire for the woman to put off raising a family in this pursuit, which also contributes to a long-term negative
effect in the creation of a family in section C.
B. The unlikelihood that a man with high sexual prowess will settle down and raise a child with the particular woman given the fact
that he has many other options and may be animalistic himself.
C. The elimination of the possibility of raising a strong family with a man who has less sexual prowess than any man the woman has
had sex with before. The reason for this is that a woman will only remain submissive and desire to be with the man who is the top alpha
male in her sexual past. The alpha male creates in the woman feelings and pleasure that is unmatched by others, and is the only man
that can truly command respect from the woman in a relationship. A man who remains in a relationship with a woman in which he has no
possibility for becoming the top alpha male in her sexual history is a beta and therefore weaker and inferior to the actual alpha male
from the perspective of the woman and her feelings. If the woman disregards her sexual hierarchy and starts a family with a beta male,
the partnership is doomed to be weak and they will fail in remaining together and fail to create strong offspring. The woman may have
chosen the beta for his provider status because of her inability to hold down an alpha male. The beta is a provider of both monetary
and emotional support for the woman. The woman is the dominant person in the relationship with the beta male because she holds the
locus of the power in the relationship- her sexual feelings and needs that are not being met."

Reported for advertising. Do like my I'd says and neck yourself seen.

"Destructive Societal Imbalance: Not Enough Power Seeking or Animalistic Nature

A societal structure that aims to reject and suppress our animalistic nature or desire to seek power is highly destructive.
A society comprised of people that reject their animalistic nature or reject seeking power is highly destructive.

There is a widespread fallacy in thinking that it is beneficial to our species for our animalistic nature to be completely
overcome. This nature is thought of as something that does nothing but hinder and drag down our species into a violent primitive
past. Only the fool would ignore our animal nature because it is and should always be ingrained in our being. Our natural desire to
reproduce comes from this nature. Using biologically ingrained physical and mental masculine traits, men have built civilizations.
Strength has been cultivated over millions of years of evolution to be harnessed and used to build. Our base animal nature is the
driving force in the sustenance of our species. Our underlying animalistic nature should not be overcome. Our animalistic side
should be controlled and harnessed, not eliminated."

"The worst thing that comes with the rejection of animalistic behavior and power-seeking is sexual degeneration. In a strong society
there is a strong polarity between the sexes with men being dominant and masculine, and women being submissive and feminine. But of
course with free will, and a society that allows for complete freedom, anything is acceptable. But why should our polar animalistic
nature be retained? Proponents of unrestricted free will ask why is it desired for men to remain men and women to remain women when
these creations can be dismantled and replaced with something else? Why not continue with our society in which more and more men
become feminine and more women become masculine? Why not take it to its conclusion with a new humanity where all women are the
masculine beings and all men are the feminine, or a new humanity comprised of androgynous things?

Our base polar nature should be retained because it is a base guideline to work off of and use as a mental and social anchor, because
it is practical, and most importantly because it is necessary."

Before getting to the creation of a strong family, we first have to look deeper into the nature of sexuality.

Sexuality has to do with power, or the individual's exposure and reaction to external and internal power. The individual can either
be sexually dominant or submissive. Humanity's biology is one of sexual dimorphism in which men are the dominant sex and women the
submissive, but with free will anything is possible. Environmental factors play a role in a person's sexual development, but in the
end it is up to the individual to cultivate the right nature.

Homosexual men are averse to masculinity, most likely having had bad experiences with overly masculine men or overly harsh women
that subjected the man to fear and powerlessness. Men who are homosexual were likely to be exposed to extremely masculine men
(father) counterparted with an extremely submissive mother in which the child would turn to. This manifests later when the child is
exposed to masculine boys in which the child feels inferior and turns those feelings into sexual submissive feelings towards the
boys rather than trying to be masculine himself. The child then turns to approval from his girl peers, just the same as when he
turned to his mother who would provide comfort from the domineering overly masculine father. Men who are homosexual may also have
had a weak and feminine father in which the child learns and mimics, and never understand the importance of cultivating masculinity.
The homosexual man becomes adverse to the harshness of competing for women and the difficulty in cultivating masculinity. The
homosexual derives pleasure from being submissive to more dominant men, the path of least resistance in grappling with his
inferiority and difficulty. Homosexual men relinquish all self-control. This is why they are likely to be hedonistic and pursue
casual sex.

The "gayness" of the homosexual is a lack of understanding that a man must be courageous, have self-control, and that
true happiness does not come from being overly gay and happy all the time to protect from the harshness of existence, but comes from
accomplishment, self-actualization, overcoming, truly connecting with others and so on. Homosexuals artificially pretend that
everything is great and project this pathetic gaiety onto others. In the certain kind of flamboyant gay man these things can be seen
the easiest. These projections and the man's feelings of inferiority, especially regarding masculinity, reflect the man's inability
to grapple with the demands of existence and the cultivation of power.

26

Men who are "bears" are hyper-masculine and because of this expose themselves to masculinity's fragility and ability to be rejected
in favor of deviancy. Hyper-masculinity fosters a snapping of the mind, because it is an extreme state of being that is taxing on the
mind and is not objectively necessary. The hyper-masculine man will reach the state of extreme masculinity, realize that even in that
state of being there is still always weakness, and turn on this weakness in exploring the subjective free will.

Homosexual men tend to be perfectionists, which explains a lot of their nature. A perfectionist man finds faults in his character
easily and exacerbates these faults as objective and absolute truth. For example a homosexual man may have felt that he could not
compete with other men for women because of a sense of inferiority. Being a perfectionist, or absolute-minded person, the man's
inferiority manifests into a rejection of his masculine nature in which he feels incapable of pursuing. The man delves into what must
be absolutely true- he is inferior to other men and must be submissive to them, and this desire to be submissive grows because it is
the path of least resistance.

The man rejects the pursuit of women altogether and relishes in his pathetic state of submissiveness by
becoming friends with women rather than pursue them sexually- something deep down the man truly desires but suppresses. Also notice
that gay men/boys turn to women/girls who have the most mental issues and are mostly dominant-narcissistic types of women who think
they know it all yet underneath feel crippling doubts of self-worth. The reason for this attraction is because the women seek power in
the worship they get from these gay men, the gay men seek to be subservient to women who are perceived to be powerful, and they both
seek the mutual reassurance that their mental deficiencies are ok. They both want to be validated. The gay man wants validation of his
place of sexual-social inferiority to women, that he is not-worthy of pursuing a women sexually and therefore seeks a woman who
portrays that she is superior to men and has power over men. The woman wants validation in her self-pride and general confusion and
destructiveness in life by a person that is always loyal and subservient and trustworthy, and is still male, giving him more weight
than her female peers.

Women who are lesbians can be two things:

Dykes are adverse to masculine men because they were exposed to powerful men and developed a feeling of jealously for this power,
along with a strong aversion to masculine nature. These women are wrathful. They then try to become men because they feel that they
should and CAN be just like men. They want the power of masculinity and they absolutely do not want to be subjected to any masculine
power. Masculine women most likely had a weak feminine father or no father, or were brought up to be one of the guys.

The "soft" lesbian is adverse to masculine nature but does not want to become a man, and would rather be submissive to another women
then God forbid be submissive to a man and his penis, the symbol of his masculine

nature (His tool of sexual power).

The transgender person is a person that takes the pursuance of their deviant submissiveness or dominance to its logical conclusion. A
person may delve into bisexuality, then homosexuality, and there is nothing stopping them from pursuing trans-sexuality. In fact the
mind will follow this destructive path because it is the path of least resistance. People support transgender people because they
believe that because someone CAN become transgender, they SHOULD become transgender. It is destructive to be transgender and it is
destructive to encourage transgender for the sake of the creation and preservation of the self and society, especially regarding the
preservation of masculinity. People are not born transgender; they become it. The genetic makeup and/or parental predisposition and
early parental influence does have a large effect on the individual's probability of becoming transgender, but the notion that a
person is simply born that way is wrong. Included in the genetic makeup, a person could be born with certain characteristics that predispose
the person to pursuing a deviant path. For example a man can be born with low testosterone and feminine features so he is more likely
to pursue homosexuality or become transgender. A woman could be born very large and masculine so would be predisposed to being a dyke
or transgender. It is important to always follow the biological nature of masculinity for man and femininity for women no matter what
the inclinations of the genetic makeup are.

A reason why a person would pursue sexual deviancy may be because they desire the attention and feeling of being different or
special. With the breakdown of social anchors and lack of social curbing, the deviant person recognizes the possibility of being
deviant and pursues this deviancy without any repercussion, gaining all of the sympathy from clueless supporters and attention from
anyone else.

Environment

We are a part of nature, not separate from it.
We are a part of the environment, not separate from it.
We must harness and take care of the environment, not abuse and destroy it (ourselves).
Humanity shapes the environment and the environment shapes humanity through its physical aesthetic and in what it provides materially.
Humanity must make an effort to use the environment and create the environment with intelligence.
Humanity must make an effort to preserve the untouched environment in some places.
The destruction of the natural environment is destructive towards humanity.
The creation of an unpleasant physical aesthetic is detrimental to humanity.

Humanity is a part of nature, not separate from it. If we are nature, then we must work with nature and not battle it or abuse it. We
must not be overcome by the negative consequences of nature, which means we must survive against the elements, and thrive with what
we are given. The environment is the physical foundation for humanity and should be respected, but used, but not destroyed in its
use. Our environment must be not be degraded because sustainability and aesthetics are important.

We shape the environment and our environment shapes us. The environment contributes to the aesthetic of physical existence, which
influences our aesthetic perception, and mind. Some aesthetics are better than others. Human beings create the aesthetic of cities,
buildings, land, and existence. The aesthetic must be created with intelligence and planning. Its construction must get rid of
artificiality and distraction. The distraction is a distraction from the fact that we live in a universe in which we do not know
everything and are not in absolute control. Artificiality creates this distraction. The environment should not convey that humanity
has taken over Earth, but is rather a part of Earth.

The ideal creation of an environment and infrastructure is one in which our entire concrete/asphalt jungle we call civilization is
undone. How this environment will play out and function in the whole of society can be found in the sections on economics and
technology. Technology has completely and seemingly irreversibly changed the infrastructure, aesthetic, and existence of the environment
and community. It has completely and seemingly irreversibly annihilated a natural and wonder inspiring environment and life. The
industrialization of our world must be undone. Cities must be recreated to be small, functional, conducive to community, and intertwined
with nature, with structures made of "natural materials" that create an aesthetic that invokes naturalness. Our current environment
evokes constriction, isolation, a separation from nature, a separation from one another, excessive industriousness, an acceleration of
day-to-day life, confusion, artificiality, and powerlessness. What we physically create and see as our environment reflects our internal
selves as a society. The environment doesn't mean just outside either. What we see and use within our homes and workplaces must also be
an aesthetic free from excessive artificiality and should be "of nature", meaning we should strive to purchase things of nature that are
made in a "natural way" (tying this in with the economics section: made from self-actualizing craftsmen who use scaled down production
with natural raw materials).

A human-created disorderly and chaotic environment creates a disorderly, chaotic, and destructive mind. Examples of disorderly,
artificial, and distractive contributions are large advertisements and logos (especially from corporations), street signs, concrete,
dirtiness/trash, and infrastructural decay.

An aesthetic of too much order is also detrimental to the mind and society, and reflects a
poor and misguided attempt in complete control to compensate for existing in not complete control. The aesthetic and environment does
not have to be excessively planned or thought out to the extreme, this results in an aesthetic that is too artificial. Artificial order
or artificial disorder are both destructive, what we need is the order/disorder of nature, a connection with nature, and using nature in
a scaled down manner for our needs. The best aesthetic minimalizes the "dominion of humanity over nature" and infuses humanity with
nature.

It is also vital to preserve the pure untouched natural environment in many areas large and small because we need the completely
untouched environment for its beauty, inspiration, and creation of wonder. Its beauty comes from being outside of human influence.
The untamed environment serves as an example for what the universe without humanity would be like and the wonder that arises from
this is invaluable and endless. The untamed allows for the individual to explore, become one with the universe, enjoy life, and feel
wild. "Wildness is the preservation of the world" as said by Henry David Thoreau, and wild is what a real truth-seeker and builder
must strive for.

It's fucking shit. And so are the mods for banning Sean from constantly spamming this excrement.

Have you read the goddam fucking book?

you too mobilefag